|
Our bully President
I see that President Bush is going on the attack again, this time he is defending marriage. He is going to mobilize the wheels of government, take up Congress’ time with the issue, cost the networks millions of dollars while every talking head talks their head off about it, and ultimately fail.
Because I’m of a cynical nature I suspect this anti-gay marriage initiative by the President is designed to bolster support for his lagging popularity. It will work, his constituency loves nothing more than to bash gays. The Bible shows us God doesn’t like gay people so they’re an easy target. The other thing about gays is they won’t fight back, arm themselves, blow up churches, etc., so it’s also very safe to attack them, unlike those pesky freedom-loving Iraqis, who continue to bite the hand that beats them.
Although I’m not married, I sympathize with those who are, it is not an easy road to follow. Statistics seem to indicate that something like 50% of marriages die on the vine and people like me who’ve never had a successful one drive the percentage up. I’ve given up. To paraphrase Chief Joseph, “I will marry no more, forever.”
Marriage is a sacred state, most of the time it is performed with religious overtones, in churches, by preachers. Yet marriage has seeped into laws governing society as well, married people get preferential treatment, tax-breaks, Social Security perks, even hospital visitation rights. You can see why the gays would like it, marriage is a legal formation of family, and once the law recognizes your family then that family can stand to inherit, visit you in the hospital, share your insurance coverage and even adopt children more easily.
Civil rights have done a lot to shape marriage laws. By recognizing that black people were also humans and citizens, laws had to be changed to allow black and white people to get married, laws written by people with narrow definitions. I think that’s the key, we shouldn’t narrow our definitions. The path toward civil rights for everyone is broadening or getting rid entirely of definitions leading toward discrimination.
Because I see the gays as being discriminated against, not to the point Blacks, women, Chinese, Irish, Scandanavians and Indians were discriminated against, but still the objects of discrimination. Gays represent the next push toward intelligent civil rights evolution, the granting of citizen benefits to everyone, like Equal Opportunity laws have done in the workplace.
The attempt by our nincompoop President to deny gay people citizen benefits is delaying the inevitable. It is foot-dragging which will slow down the process, but I think ultimately gays will overcome, discrimination is discrimination, and the progress of our laws has been motivated by ending discrimination.
Perhaps it’s time to scrap marriage as a legal institution, not limit the definition to further discriminate against people for political ends. But the bottom line remains that marriage is not under attack, gays, polygamists and people who live together are. The President’s focus in defending marriage is typically wrong-headed, but what else should we expect from someone who hasn’t got one thing right yet? I hope the one or two points of approval rating he gets from the bigoted, hide-bound religious nutballs for bullying gay people will give him great satisfaction even if it does smack to me like the sheer desperation, the grasping at straws, so to speak, by someone who has a hard time making friends.
|