About This Newsletter:
Action/Adventure. . .a story of our lives. For every new day is an adventure, if you choose to look at it that way, and every day is filled with actions - some more significant than others. It’s the interesting days that make the best stories.
Letter from the Editor:
Avoiding the Agent Scams
There are a lot of people out there preying on the aspirations and dreams of others.
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. You've just finished your first novel. You've heard how hard it is to break into publishing; you've read tons of market listings that say "no unsolicited submissions, please!" You decide that it might be worth your while to hire an agent, so you begin searching for one who is willing to represent new writers. Eager, indeed, for fresh new talent to promote.
Is your book really good enough for an agent? Will they, like so many publishers, reject your labor of love? Here's where you begin to make your first mistake – deep in the back of your mind, you crave acceptance. You want your manuscript to be loved unconditionally. You do not want to see it with the jaded eye of a bean counter, analyzing its sales potential in today's literary marketplace. You are ripe for the picking.
A successful, busy agent may well turn you down if he or she feels that your work isn't marketable, or if he or she doesn't have the time to market it properly. Another agent may love that same manuscript, may be hungry for new clients, and may have contacts in different markets. A different agent may see something in your work that says "This is the next bestseller! I have to have a piece of this!" That's a business reality. Of course the best agents can afford to be picky – imagine being Stephen King's agent! (I wish.) Now, imagine being Stephen King's first agent, back before he was earning scads of money. What you need is a visionary, not a scam artist.
If an agent calls you and tells you how promising your work is and how eager he is to represent you, of course you're inclined to listen. Of course that's exactly what you've been hoping to hear. But you need to really listen. Do the compliments come with strings attached?
Some agents will ask for a retainer fee, up-front marketing fees, reading fees, or other fees from the writers they purport to represent. Beware! A reputable agent makes money from selling your work. Reputable agents will charge a commission of 15% on the advance and royalties from all uses of rights. All agent fees and commission should be collected out of book sale proceeds as they come in from the publisher. Publishing receipts generally come through the agent to the author, so the agents usually take their cut out as it passes through their hands. Be sure to choose a literary agent wisely. Some people who pose serious agents will ask for money up front, reading fees, evaluation fess, and pay-to-publish contracts. A reputable agent will earn their money based off of commissions and not from charging money to their clients. (from http://www.stliteraryagency.com/1197/literary-agent-literary-agents.html) You may be expected to pay some or all of the reasonable costs of marketing your work. Ask about commissions. Most agents charge a 15 percent commission on anything they sell on your behalf, and some charge for incidentals like photocopies and postage. And since agents only earn a fee when they have generated income for you, they have a strong incentive to work on your behalf. (from http://www.ehow.com/how_107938_hire-literary-agent.html) Notice that "reasonable costs of marketing your work" include such things as phone calls, photocopies of your manuscript, and postage, not glossy brochures and nationwide ad campaigns. Still other agents, searching for a stigma-free way to obtain money upfront, came up with the notion of marketing fees. Marketing fees go by many other names--contract, submission, processing, circulation, preparation, expense, retainer--but basically the idea is the same: the writer is being asked in advance to defray the expenses of marketing his/her work to publishers. (from http://www.sfwa.org/beware/agents.html) So these agents now expect the author to assume all of the financial risk and still be willing to share 15% of their income. Sure, they still have some incentive to market the work – after all, they could get a 15% commission, if it sells. But there's no incentive to turn authors away because their work isn't really marketable, or to work hard on their behalf – they've already been paid. By the same clients they were supposed to be helping to earn money. You might just as well self-publish and cut out the middleman.
A coworker of mine, Greg Morris, got sucked in by Dorothy Deering. (See http://www.edinboro.edu/cwis/polisci/jimfisher/scams/horror.html) Now, I just bought two of Greg's books (available through Amazon.com) and he's a good writer. Though the books are self-published, I think they are on a par with many of the traditionally-published mystery novels I've read. I don't regret the money I spent buying them. Had he taken a little more time to market them (irony of ironies, he's a marketing manager), I have little doubt he'd have been successful. As it is, he's sold enough to more than cover his costs in publishing them through iUniverse.com. He's still writing, in his spare time, and looks on the whole Deering incident as a learning experience. For some authors, though, it would be a crushing blow, both emotionally and financially. A serious dream killer.
If you have been scammed, realize that the scam is a business scheme – it doesn't necessarily mean that their compliments on your writing were mere flattery and lies! mmiles nearly fell victim to an agent scam. She turned to her friends on Writing.com and asked what we thought of the deal. I did a little searching on Google, and what I found there set off all the warning bells. I hated to trample on Mik’s enthusiasm and excitement, but I couldn’t stand by and let her be suckered in. She wrote back: As soon as [the agent] said she wanted $3000 up front, I was a little wary, though still excited. I think I mentioned I started searching for her client list on Amazon and BN.com and found nada. That's why I came here, because I knew you would know.
What I guess disappoints me the most is that I knew better. I've done my research and I know about these scams. But at the time, when emotions are high and you think that FINALLY you may have a chance and a door is opening for you.... You said it though: They prey on aspirations and dreams.
Intellectually, you know. Emotionally... you want to believe. That's why vanity press operations like Poetry.com are so hurtful, too. They're so good at the flattery. When a talented poet receives their marketing lit, it sounds great. When that talented poet learns that the guy who submitted something his cat typed up got the same letters, it hurts. It doesn't suddenly mean that the talented poet is on a par with the cat, but that's how it feels. The truth is that these people prey on everyone's hopes and dreams; they don't discriminate. What a feather in their cap it is to sucker in someone who actually has some talent or ability! These folks would dearly love to get hold of a naive John Grisham to lend themselves an air of legitimacy. Persistence will pay off, in the end. Keep the faith.
Additional resources:
Choose Your Weapons
by wildbill ![View wildbill's Portfolio. [Offline / Private]](http://images.Writing.Com/imgs/writing.com/writers/costumicons/ps-icon-regular-10.gif) , Guest Columnist
Sooner or later, most writers in the Action/Adventure genre are going to write about weaponry--and in most cases, this translates into guns. (For Sci-Fi and Fantasy Action/Adventure writers who prefer light-sabers and magic wands, skip down to the reading list.) This column will not try to make you an expert on guns of various types. To do that would take far more space than is available here.
Some writers may argue: "What's the big deal? All I have to know is some realistic-sounding lingo and I'm good to go." Let me explain why that attitude often leads to disaster in an otherwise good story.
A writer's job is to spin a tale so well that the reader 'suspends disbelief' and exists for a magical moment in the imaginary world the writer has created. Any false note in the details which wakes the reader from this mental illusion will abruptly end the suspension of disbelief and his acceptance of your story.
Genre readers are generally 'fans' whose consistent reading habits make them more knowledgeable about details--and therefore more demanding of authenticity by the author. I'm told by a popular Romance-writer friend that fans of the Georgian Romance sub-genre are quick to write letters about any error in dress or furnishings. I didn't know there were that many Georgian era experts out there, but there are countless millions of gun owners in America. In addition, millions of non-gun owners live out Walter Mittyish lives vicariously through Action/Adventure films, TV, and written fiction. These Action/Adventure fans have developed a base of knowledge about guns through their reading and viewing habits. If you hope to attract them, then you must meet their expectations. Let me give you an example.
I once wrote a Western story that won an award as the best short story in a University publication in Texas. I was proud of myself-until I got some letters that the rifle I'd cited in the story had never been chambered for the popular .44-.40 caliber. Not only were the critics correct, but I'd deliberately chosen a manufacturer other than Winchester simply to go for something out of the ordinary. Mea Culpa. So the gun nuts are not only out there; they read and will catch you out.
But what about the original question posed? Does a little lingo go a long way for a writer who doesn't know much about guns, especially if you aren't too specific? No, and here's why.
The idea for this column derived from reading a beginning chapter of a book in a critique group. From the opening paragraph, a scene on a firing range, the author set up certain expectations about the expertise needed to describe this scene. The protagonist, a "Firing Instructor" attempts to teach pistol shooting to a nineteen-year-old recruit for a position as an armed bank guard.
The scene didn't work on several levels, not least of which is the unreality of a nineteen-year-old bank guard or the inexpert use of 'lingo' in the descriptions: "He aimed his .38, pulled the trigger, and shut his eyes...the bullet flailed, zoomed past its intended mark..." Let's analyze this description. Most people shut their eyes in anticipation of the explosion, not after the shot. Bullets don't "flail" and are never described as "zooming" in my experience in the genre. Since many readers scan the first page to gauge the appeal of the book, my guess is that this author needs some help in writing about firearms and their use. Here are some practical suggestions.
DO YOUR HOMEWORK: As an aspiring professional, you wouldn't try to slip a manuscript past an editor without doing a spell or grammar check. If you don't know anything about guns in all their many permutations--revolvers, semi-auto pistols, machine guns, rifles, shotguns, black-powder muzzle loaders--then you need to do some research to get a basic understanding of what you are going to be writing about.
One good basic book, written with the writer in mind, is Armed and Dangerous: A Writer's Guide to Weapons by Michael Newton. He gives a quick review of guns from their invention to the modern day with chapters devoted to the Old West, military periods (Civil War, WWII, Viet Nam, etc.) and Cop & Robbers. Newton explains some common author errors: you can't use a silencer on a revolver, (but we knew that, didn't we?) as well as some good tips to use in whodunits. The book has a glossary, annotated pictures of various types of guns, and some useful ballistics and trajectory information. Another good reference is the Shooter's Bible, which details information on current guns and ammo.
INTERNET SEARCHES: I've found the Internet is a research tool without peer when it comes to quickly finding out about weaponry. If you want detailed information on current products, check out the Web sites for popular manufacturers such as Glock, Smith & Wesson, or Hechler & Koch. Some have videos which give you a sense of the sound and mechanics. Or spice up your writing by finding little gems like the H&K MP5K which fires from inside a specially designed briefcase with a trigger in the handle.
You often hear about "gun nuts." They are people who have a deep interest in weapons and they are willing, nay eager, to share their facts and opinions with a lay person. I recently placed a question on a political Web site about a .9mm pistol for people with small hands. Within a few minutes I was getting replies; after 367 opinions I begged them to stop.
Best of all, you can find specialized information on Web sites that cater to various subgroups such as black-powder muzzleloaders (276,000 hits on Google), guns of the Old West (1,400,000 hits on Google) or civil war arms. (http://www.history-sites.com/mb/cw/cwaemb/index.cgi?) These enthusiasts really know their stuff about the weapons they study. How about related items? I once wanted to know about uniforms of the Red Chinese Army and actually found a site devoted to them.
Many sites have message boards where you can ask for, and get, information surprisingly quickly when doing period pieces involving firearms used in the Old West, the Civil War, or modern wars like the Gulf War.
Sometimes it takes a little ingenuity or luck in linking to various sites. Once I wanted some info on a "Swedish K" sub-machine gun the CIA used in Viet Nam. A visit to the manufacturer brought up nothing but their current products. But surfing around, using various search words, I came up with a hobbyist's site about Swedish military history. It had pictures of uniforms from the 16th century along with maces and swords--lots of fascinating stuff, all in Swedish--but nothing about my Viet Nam weapon. Finally, about midnight, I gambled on an email to the Webmaster, explaining I was writing a novel, and had forgotten details about an idiosyncrasy of the weapon after forty years. The answer, along with some additional details, was back by 9:00 A.M. It was the type of information I couldn't have found in a library in years.
If you're going to write an action/adventure story, you owe it to the reader to utilize some basic research on weapons to prevent errors and discrepancies from creeping into your writing. As you learn, you'll improve your stories by injecting authentic details about weapons and incorporating them into your plots. Then you'll find your artful words will create that magic moment when the reader suspends disbelief and you transport him into your illusionary world. I’ll close with a word of advice from Raymond Chandler, a writer of action stories, on writing for light crime, action/fiction magazines (pulps): The demand was for constant action...when in doubt have a man come through the door with a gun in his hand.
Editor's Picks:
 | ID: 870956 Invalid Item  This item number is not valid. by Not Available. |
 | ID: 645541 Invalid Item  This item number is not valid. by Not Available. |
 | ID: 879484 Invalid Item  This item number is not valid. by Not Available. |
Ask & Answer:
Hi!
I enjoyed reading the A/A newsletter for 08/05/04. Thank you for including my nephew's work, "The Dark Hidden Tunnel" [13+]. I'm going to forward this n/l to him, and I'm sure he'll get a kick out of it! Any review or comment he gets will be happily received, I'm sure.
LOVE the tip of the week, re: Pay attention to the titles and brief descriptions you use in posting stories on Writing.com. A catchy title and a compelling description will pique a reader’s curiosity and draw him in...
I've often thought that myself when I read "descriptions" like: 'Just read it.' ...Not exactly inviting. LOL
*applause* on the newsletter!
Cordially,
Starr*
Thanks, Starr! I hope your nephew got lots of great feedback from the reviewers on Writing.com.
I can't emphasize the point too much – those brief descriptions can make all the difference between enticing people to read or raising a red flag that says "Enter at your own peril!" That goes for titles, as well. When I see misspellings, thoughtlessness, or painful insecurity in the first 100 characters or so, I do tend to shy away as both a reader and a reviewer.
Great to see you back Jessie. An outstanding newsletter as always.
Thanks, Bill! It’s great to be back. I do appreciate your keeping my chair warm while I was gone.
Welcome back, Jessiebelle - uh, I guess that's you this week since you're the only one I know as Katie's mom except for my granddaughter. But our little Katie bug doesn't play basketball, yet.
Thank you for sharing with us. You always give good information and good writings.
It was a test to see how many of our subscribers recognized my writing style. Yeah, that's it – a test. (You should've seen me whacking my head against the keyboard when I read that. "I forgot to sign the newsletter…again.") As for your granddaughter, I suspect it's only a matter of time before she's playing basketball (or softball) or…maybe she'll throw your athletically-inclined family for a loop and turn mad scientist in your kitchen with her first chemistry set! (Making note to self: "Make sure Viv's granddaughter gets a chemistry set.") In any case, I look forward to hearing what sparks your "Katie bug's" interests as she grows up!
wildbill ![View wildbill's Portfolio. [Offline / Private]](http://images.Writing.Com/imgs/writing.com/writers/costumicons/ps-icon-regular-10.gif) wrote:
Just curious about your picture of the Medusa head columns. Between the two heads you can see a couple of panes. One isn't clear but on the other you can clearly see the image of a man. I was wondering if those panes were empty or if they contained mirrors so any onlookers would see their own images as part of the medusa column. If so, that would be a clever trick by the artisan who created them.
That was an unintentional optical illusion! That image ("Invalid Item" ) is actually a combination of six different photos, laid out on a mossy green background in Paint Shop Pro 8.1 for use in a scrapbook. Here are some others: "Invalid Item" and "Invalid Item" .
mark writes ![View marks123's Portfolio. [Offline / Private]](http://images.Writing.Com/imgs/writing.com/writers/costumicons/ps-icon-regular-10.gif) writes:
thanks for the great tips
You're welcome!
Jessiebelle™ ![View jessiebelle's Portfolio. [Offline / Private]](http://images.Writing.Com/imgs/writing.com/writers/costumicons/ps-icon-regular-40.gif) 
(Signed, sealed, and delivered to your Inbox!)
|