|
Yep! It's Hurricane Season in the Atlantic again. The 2009 hurricane names are out, and Cindy is not on the list -- drat! In my warped opinion, of course, I think it would be almost a compliment to be compared to an energetic, exciting, storm, but whether my name is on the list or not, is not of monumental significance in my life or should be, in my opinion, in anyone's.
Hurricanes were originally named by what saint's day they arrived in Puerto Rico. Later, Navy pilots named them after their wives and girlfriends. The National Weather service used female names and developed a system of using Greek alphabet letters, names for different cultures and areas of storms, and a system for retiring names. In 1979, after the height of the Women's Lib movement, protests about men's names being included on the list erupted, and more equality invaded the naming list by incorporating men's names.
Yes, we should treat everyone equally; that's common sense. But Heck! Does it really matter if men's names are included in a list of hurricanes? There's an old saying about picking your battles, and I don't think this seems like one.
In the world of political correctness, some proponents go overboard. Let's face it -- men and women are not equal in all respects. Yes, I know there are exceptions, but speaking in generalities, most men have more muscle as opposed to fat content in their bodies than women do due to their physical differences. Should women be fighting next to men, performing the same jobs during war times? Should professional sports teams all be co-ed? Men and women are physically different. Recently, studies have also shown male and female brains and thinking patterns are generally different. In addition, according to Dr. John Gray, men are from Mars and women are from Venus, theorizing a word of differences between the sexes. Why not celebrate uniqueness and concentrate on strengths and positives instead of harping on everyone must be equal in every arena? After all, we are not clones, nor should we wish to be.
For a while, literature and language faced the political correctness in absurd forms. Instead of using the simple word "he" to refer to the masses, some PC (political correctness) people changed all language to "he/she" and "him/her," miring language in awkward, wordy correctness. Some people even changed historical quotes to reflect this PC -- you can't change a quote; the words are someone else's words. The political correctness then spread and spilled over into many facets of our lives. As zeal over PC peaked, for instance, one British school, changed the nursery rhyme "Baa Baa Black Sheep" to "Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep" (the term "black sheep" has nothing to do with the color of one's skin anyway), farm animal pigs wearing police uniforms in a children's book were censored, and school boards plus communities banned numerous books based on their point of view with disregard to historical accuracy in a desire to create pseudo equality, all examples of a type of political correctness going overboard and determined many times by special interest groups or a society's cultural values. Women libbers even protested women's rights in the societal and political arena by burning their bras. Their protest was noted, and many women began going braless in all phases of their lives, but did these later women continue a protest to bring equality, or succumb to a fad? Did they remember the original reason or support it? (Droopy boobs and nipple flaunting are fine, of course, if that's what someone chooses.)
Yes, everyone should be treated equally, in areas that matter, with equal opportunities to receive the same pay for the same work, or example. However, I think political correctness, in many areas, has gone overboard. We can't change history, and we also need to realize we are not all equal. We are each unique and we should celebrate that individuality. Does it matter if hurricane naming is treating everyone equally? Not in my opinion. It's unimportant fluff.
|