|
Okay, after many months of banging my head against the wall, I have worked through a major issue for me. Here goes.
As I write, certain details and events are interesting and make a framework for the book, but are not essential, and therefore counterproductive, for the reader to know. To put them in the book would take the mind of the reader off the story and its characters and place them in a world of facts.
Let me put this in other words. The storyline will be show and most of the show will be from the main character’s perspective. I tell what happens, but I do not tell the reader how these happenings make the character feel. Now, the character does not know why the Saxons are invading the land nor what their motives are. He doesn’t have the history book which I have before me.
Okay, I am going to jump around all over the place, but let’s take the hurricane which hit Galveston, Texas, in 1900. The Weather Bureau's central office in Washington, D.C. sent out warnings because a tropical storm was reported north of Key West, Florida, on September 6. However, in those days, there were no hurricane tracking centers, no planes hunting for the eye, no radar or satellite pictures, no TV, and none of the other things we have today. Word of a storm at sea is received, but no one knows where the storm is headed or if it is intensifying. On September 8, the 145 mph major hurricane hit a totally surprised population.
If my main character was a survivor in a novel concerning that situation, he/she would not have the information I can find on that hurricane today. Writing from his/her perspective, I would probably show the events in the main character’s life on that fateful day and how she/he responded as a result of these events. Perhaps the character was involved in getting people to some kind of shelter which surely was washed away. Maybe he ended up hanging on an uprooted tree which was riding the waves.
Now, in order to tell the events, I, as the author, can look to the actual charts and speculations to project what the main character would experience, but I really cannot tell the reader these facts because it would be like a big “tell” or narrative section with the voice of “God” telling it.
Getting back to my novel, “Where Jackals Hide”, my history of Britain books will tell me about the Roman occupation of England and about the Romans abandoning England in about 400 A.D. History even allows the possibility of King Arthur because of the mention of a Briton warrior with a similar name who won a battle against the Saxons in the Southwestern area of England. Of course, the historians would not have the knowledge my character would have of King Arthur because history can only report the facts it knows while my character, though made up, would have been there. Yeah, I can make up history to fill in the gaps, not for scholars, but for my storyline.
So, I can write my “fill in the gaps” historical fiction by writing down what historians do know and then fill in my fictitious history to give my characters a framework.
First, I can write down a composite history of the kingdom and the king. Then, I can write down the history of the Duke under which my character fought and gained his knighthood. I can write a composite history (real plus my “fill in the gaps fictitious history) of the Saxons and the particular army of Saxons who were going to go into battle against the Duke and my main character. I can tell of their encounters and write this entire framework to work out of.
I am building a world for my character to act within.
My knight encounters a maiden in distress, so I can give the history of her and her people. I can write why she was in the position in which my knight finds her.
I can write the history of the dragon and how this dragon came to occupy this particular valley.
The reader does not have to see all this history or even know it. But, it gives me a framework from which I can faithfully plot my main character’s moves and from which I can place him in dialogue and events.
I am reminded of my public speaking course. I needed to use certain knowledge and rules to make my speech, but they are the “pots and pans”, the supporting information.
“Just as a cook places his delights on fancy plates, so you should lay forth your speech”, instructed my teacher. Then, he added, “Never serve your speech in the pots and pans.”
In other words, I should not tell them how I determined to give my points. I should just give my points.
All that history is the pots and pans of the story. I write the story in the view of the main character who has no inkling of much of the history going on around him. I should give his “worm’s eye view” and not give the “voice from the air” “bird’s eye view”.
So, I intend, over the next few weeks, to write the “pots and pans” of my storyline here in this blog. Then, I will use these events to write my chapters and thus rewrite my first novel.
|