I picked this image up at the "
Invalid Item"

because it fit my reviewing style so well. As soon as I saw it, I exclaimed, "Ha! I poke at thee!" and knew those to be the words that needed to go on it.
I tend to be rather tedious when I review. I nitpick. I poke. But I like to believe I put a lot of thought into my nitpicks and pokes. Likely, you saw this reviewing signature in a review, either on the Public Review Page or at the end of a review I did for you. If you want to know more about my reviewing methods, you can check this out:
Every reviewing methodology sways, but it has been over a year since I felt like I swayed enough to revise the outline. Maybe I've finally found the method that works best for me. Took me long enough.
These days, I mainly do my reviews for "
WYRM"

, but I do try to catch people on the "
The Review Request Page"

when I can. I've found another board to watch, however -- one that takes requests from those who specifically desire in-depth reviews.
The problem with both of these request pages is that they don't allow GC and XGC rated items. I know there are some fantastic items out there with higher ratings and I know there are some higher-rated items out there that have the
potential to be fantastic. If you have a GC or XGC rated item, but can't seem to get an in-depth and honest review on it, email me. I'll do it, just because I know that there are very few places to request such a thing on this site.
I don't mind reviewing erotica and I'll certainly review it in detail if you like, but I'm probably going to ask you to work a lot harder on it than you may be willing to do. There's so much erotica and it is all so similar, I'm not satisfied to let you go without me saying, "What sets this one apart?" If you don't want it to be set apart, I do understand that, in that genre specifically. But that's not the kind of reviews I do.
Lastly, I make my reviews public by default, but I will make them private if you prefer. Just let me know.