%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| >> Static Item >> Other >> Writing.Com >> ID #1751073 |   |
| |||||||||||||
     The following reviewers have worked tirelessly at the art of reviewing. They have shown over time that they care not only about the content of a review but also how it appears on the public review page. They have, quite simply, taken pride in their reviews. They have accepted that reviewing is a creative endeavor in and or itself, and it is in this spirit that The Art of Criticism was created in the first place. If you see these recipients around WDC, take a minute to congratulate them and thank them for giving back to our community. For a description of how each reviewer was enshrined, please see the "General Procedures" in "The Art of Criticism"  . If you would like to be enshrined, all you have to do is work hard at your reviews, giving as much time to how your reviews look as what they say, and I promise I will notice and invite you into the project. Favorite Reviews: Review of "One: The Darkness, The Void"  Review of "The Captivation Of Eden Dredlore" Invalid Review Review of "The Legend of Kaysha " Review of "The Widow White (pt.1)" "I chose these not only because I think they show my ability to review several kinds of stories, but also because they were some of my favorites to read." ~AJ Lyle~ ~AJ Lyle~The Official Tome of Artistry Interview  ToA: So, when did you first start writing?~AJ Lyle~: My mom started me off reading fantasy when I was eleven. I began with The Lord of the Rings series and continued from there. I was home-schooled as a teenager, and I averaged about 300 pages a day by the time I was thirteen. I first started writing after my English teacher suggested I try something longer than an essay. My first novel was completed by the time I turned fifteen. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?~AJ Lyle~: I have three main reasons for reviewing. First, I love reading. Second, I love to help other authors. My last reason is a selfish one, I must admit. I use reviewing to learn more about writing. As I progress through a review, I take an in-depth look at what works and what doesn't, and I feel I learn much about my own writing from the process. Not only do I notice certain things that detract from the reading experience, but some of those little things that go together to make it a wonderful experience. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? ~AJ Lyle~: Well, between working, raising four children, and reviewing, I don't have a whole lot of time left. However, I make sure I take three separate days a week where I begin the day at 4 a.m. with a pot of coffee and whatever I am currently working on. Sometimes I use the time to research things I would like to incorporate, sometimes I do character sketches, and sometimes I just write. Regardless of what I choose to do, it is to further my own goals as an author. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? ~AJ Lyle~: This is a hard question to answer, really. I have so many ideas about reviewing. I guess my main philosophy is to be encouraging, helpful, respectful, and honest. I feel that an author cannot grow in their writing without all of the above. I try to keep in mind what I would like to see when I receive a review. My suggestions are always supported with a reason or example to show what I mean. I do this so that the author can see I am not just throwing stuff out there. When I make a suggestion, I stand behind it 100%. I believe that a review should reflect the personality of the reviewer, as well as allow for varying opinions. Objectivity is also a vital part of reviewing. Just because I don't like the way a author did something, doesn't mean it didn't work well within the story. I try to keep in mind that no two people think the same way. It is essential that the reviewer shows respect towards the author, regardless of ability, skill level, or personal preference. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. ~AJ Lyle~: When I first open a piece of writing, I grab a hot cup of java and a pen and paper. On my first read through, I jot down anything that stands out to me. Whether it be something I liked or didn't like, errors, sentences that I ended up having to re-read, points I didn't quite understand, or specific lines that I loved. I also try to jot down any emotions I feel as I read and the spot in which I first noticed them. Then, I open the review tool and get to work. The first thing I type in is my initial reaction to the piece. I also like to comment on narrative tone and mood at this point. On the second read, I highlight any areas where I feel there are errors in punctuation, sentence structure, spelling, etc. The technical aspects of a story really stand out to me, so I get them out of the way as soon as I can. The third read-through I use for watching character development, plot structure, inconsistencies in character personality, etc. I pay particular attention to my reactions, and I highlight areas that I believe were well done. I believe all of these things are essential to a good review. This is the point where I determine the rating by taking an average of the key elements: narrative tone and mood, character development, plot development, grammar and punctuation, and readability. The last thing I do is edit my own review. I like to take a break from it, about twenty minutes or so, and then read it through to see if it makes sense and stays true to what I believe is important in a review. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?~AJ Lyle~: I would eliminate the rating system altogether. I don't believe that a star rating has anything to do with the skill of the writer, but more to do with how the reviewer sees the work. A review is about helping, and when a reviewer sees a low star rating, they are instantly discouraged. This goes against what I believe the purpose of a review is.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Rematch!" Invalid Review Review of "Mage's Rising" Review of "Her Book" Review of "Paranoid - Maybe" "I chose these reviews for two reasons. Firstly, I feel as though I did offer some useful observations to the writer, and that's why I review in the first place. Secondly, I've since gotten to know some of the people behind the pen-names. Reviewing has been a great way of opening up a new dialogue with some fascinating and talented writers who have now become treasured friends." MumstheWord MumstheWordThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?MumstheWord: About eleven or so years ago, I spent my life commuting to and from work with no space for anything else. I was in a bit of a rut, and the world felt rather grey. I began writing the odd 'poem' on the train as a way of venting some of my frustration. Not long after that, I met my husband-to-be and the colour seeped back in my world. Although I often thought about writing, I didn't do anything about it until Feb 2010. As a stay-at-home mum to my two mini-beasts, I felt as though I'd found my perfect job, but along the way (it happens so slowly that it goes unnoticed for a while), I lost a sense of who 'Kaylee' was. I'd been having dreams about writing, and one evening I just started typing. Three months later I'd written my first novel, and I've not stopped writing since. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?MumstheWord: I love reviewing short stories and chapters. I find it quite humbling that writer's on W.D.C are so generous as to share their work so that avid readers like me can enjoy and learn from their efforts. I learn so much from reviewing. In one respect, I discover new ways of saying the same thing. I'm trying to work on improving my 'showing' rather than 'telling' and sometimes I'll stumble across a piece which gives me a 'lightbulb' moment. In another respect, if I read a story and it doesn't quite work for me, I love puzzling out why. Even if I don't understand the technical reasons, I usually find a way of communicating what was missing for me. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? MumstheWord: Honestly, I thought I had a system, but on reflection it's a very fluid thing. My evenings are when I tend to get a good chunk of time to either review or write. Currently, I'll either spend my evening reading and reviewing, or I'll spend my evening writing for myself. I'm not very successful at either if I try to interchange. Knowing my nature, this will change again in a few weeks, and I'll take a different approach. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? MumstheWord: My approach to reviewing is summed up in my "The Emotion Notion" . Primarily, when reviewing, I share my thoughts on how a piece of writing made me feel. What is really important to me (and I try to keep this in mind whenever I'm writing a review) is to imagine the writer is sitting in front of me. I will only write what I'd be prepared to say in person. I used to work in Training and Development, and the key to facilitating learning was to think about how a message would be received. I keep that in mind and let it influence how I present the message in the first place. In keeping with that thought, I try to keep my tone respectful and polite. I hope my reviews always come across as one person's thoughts and not a presentation of facts. I also think a review is far more than just an 'I liked your work' commentary. To me that is more of an opinion or judgement. A review, at the very least, would follow that opinion up with some explanatory comment and perhaps, where appropriate, a suggestion for improvement.ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. MumstheWord: I treat every new read as I would treat a book I bought in a shop. I read the entire work through and think about what I've read. Sometimes, if it's a complex work, I'll think on it for a while and re-read it a bit later. Then, I open up notepad and jot down my thoughts and questions. I'll transfer these across into my template and if there are any gaps in my template, I'll consider whether I have anything to add in these areas. If not, I'll delete those headings. I don't force comments into template-headings for the sake of it. More often than not, when I think I've got a review just about finished, I'll save it and come back to read it later. This gives me the space to review my review with some objectivity. If I've been really excited by a piece my reviews can sound rather opinionated, and so often I'll tweak the tone to be sure it comes across as well as possible. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?MumstheWord: I do struggle with the rating system, but I'm not alone with that. I'm also hoping to do more to help fledgling reviewers find their feet. I found reviewing quite daunting when I first joined, and it took me quite some time to work out what a decent review looked like. Watch this space...  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Dear Author" Review of "Imagine" Review of "Payne Angove" Review of "Day 1: Ruin" Review of "Totem Wolf" "I strive to be positive and encouraging in every review that I send, so I could have chosen any five. My simple reason for choosing these five is that I could clearly remember the reviews sent, by looking at the title of the item. I think this is a good cross section and if you look at those reviews, you will have a good idea of my approach and style, as well as my reviewing with and without my template. I included the Ink Blot Group that I am a part of and one review each from two of my personas, HOOVES and tHiNg. I did not choose any from COWser Soze, my other persona, simply because I have not been COWser lately. I basically focus on my personal reaction to the writing and telling the author what I connected to and I did that in all of these reviews." Hooves HoovesThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Hooves: I first started writing creatively in 2000 when I wrote for a fan fiction web site. A group of us were inspired by the characters in a popular movie. I was one of the first authors to join Writing.Com (then called Stories.Com) when invited by one of my co-fan fiction friends. This site gave us the opportunity to write together in interactive stories and continue to play with our fan fiction characters. At that time there were only interactive stories on this site. Storymaster and Storymistress expanded to portfolios where we could post our individual writings a short time later. I posted my writings, received positive feedback and was on my way. I left the site for a short time during the summer of 2001 and came back as 4Provinces, where I have been writing, reading and reviewing for more than nine and a half years. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Hooves: I love to read and always have. I enjoy encouraging others and seeing creativity that surprises me. I see it all the time here. I see things that are astonishing and enjoyable to me as a reader. I think the reviewing process forces me to focus on what I have read and figure out what it is that appealed to me. I think it helps in my thought organization when it comes to my own writing. Reviewing helps me to see that there is a universe beyond my own creativity. It is a challenge to explore it! I hope everyone will realize that I approach everything here with a sense of wonder and a sense of humor. Find a way to have fun and enjoy what you do here and you will keep at it! If you keep at the reading and writing, you are bound to improve. That is my best advice to anyone. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Hooves: I limit myself to three reviews a day when I am here most of the time. I have neglected my writing from 2004 until this year, but I seem to be on a pretty steady path at the moment with the three reviews a day. I have set goals at the beginning of the year and stuck to them so far. I set the goal of writing a paragraph a week in a story I created at the first of the year. As of now, I am up to week 14, and I have more than two typewritten pages on that in addition to writing and entering the site contest each month. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Hooves: I try to focus on my personal reaction to the substance of the item I have read. I am not focused too much on mechanics, although I will point out any glaring errors that I see. My reaction is unique to me, and it is what I have to share with the writer. It is based on my experience as a person and a writer. Otherwise, I do not hold myself out as an expert on anything other than my own responses. And the other thing is I approach everything with a sense of humor about my own abilities. This is important to keep in mind, that I am no expert. I may not get something, but I try and say it nicely when that happens because I view it as a failing on my part in the first instance. Maybe I am too old to get it sometimes. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Hooves: I read the work once, and then I pull out my reviewing template and ask myself what my reactions are, if I can point out any technical errors, and what my favorite part of the item is. I typically put my favorite part of the item in quotations and share it with the writer. I go through and read a second time to answer these questions again and make sure I haven't missed something. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Hooves: The only thing I would change is that I would teach writers to thank their readers when they receive a review. It is amazing to me how often this happens that you hear nothing back after you have sent a nice, helpful review. Professional writers always thank their readers, unless the review is personally offensive or worse. So, the change I would make is teach some of the writers here to write a thank you note. I seem to notice that some of these folks who do not thank are the same ones who whine about not being read. If you read others and send nice reviews, your work will be read whether you know anyone here or not.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Socrates on the Ethics of the Embryo" Review of "A Time at Sea, A Campfire Creative" Review of "What the Army taught me about God" Review of "Poe's Daughter" Review of "The Windlesham Inheritance" "The choosing of only five reviews is difficult. This is the hardest of all of your requests. I chose to pick these reviews based upon my diverse reading choices. An essay, an editorial and a non-fiction experience, leaving the other two short stories, which is my favorite to read and review." CountryGranny CountryGrannyThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?CountryGranny: My first writing remembrances are from sitting down when young to scratch a few words, any words, in a letter to my grandparents. It was heartwarming to find some of these letters, many years later, when dealing with estate matters. I believe that writers do not choose the vocation. We write because we are driven to place our thoughts, opinions, faith testimonials, experiences and opinions in words. To entertain, convince or educate others alone is a great satisfaction for me. Writing is hard work, and to pursue it as a financially sustaining career was never part of my life. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?CountryGranny: This is where the love of reading comes into play. I love to read, and I am an opinionated person. Nothing is better than to combine the two loves of reading and reviewing together. It also takes writing skill to offer the advice, suggestions and hints appropriately. The greatest benefit is that I might encourage a future award-winning author. Here on WdC, the greatest perk or benefit is the acknowledgement from the author. Not all members here are pursuing an avocation or writing career, yet many should do so. This is a fabulous site for all of us that seek a serious hobby, which our muses drive us to perform, the creativity that might be lacking, in my case, to write regardless of whether we are marketable. The many blogs/journals and contests that give inspiration are our distractions from the real world. To write for our own distraction and give members the occasion to find like minded individuals through the groups, forums and interactive stories. Writing.Com has become my lifeline to reality through distraction. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? CountryGranny: There has never been an official time management schedule in my writing. I would say it is far easier with the children out on their own and enjoying my retirement. Since I love the art of political editorializing, the news of the day determines when I write for myself, or read and review. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? CountryGranny: My philosophy of reviewing is very simple, yet not as easy to achieve as one might think. Keep it simple has never worked for me. I am very wordy. I try to keep the same standards for everyone. This means if you are a young and inexperienced writer, your age is not taken into consideration with my star rating. Yet you will receive many  and  comments as I can find. I base the majority of my rating upon grammar, punctuation and spelling and leave the majority of creative comments to others. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. CountryGranny: My reviewing procedure varies dependant on the static type. Basically, because I use the public library, my time online is limited. Some days I find many items of interest to read and other days very few. The title and introduction are the most important criteria. Genre choices help, yet I love to read from a variety of genres. I deliberately narrow my choices to editorials, essays, non-fiction, fiction and short stories. I do have a few authors that I follow on novels. These selected reads are saved in the review tool section where I can make notes as I read. Generally, I wait a day, maybe more, before reading it through a second or third time. This is when I do a thorough grammar critique. Then of course, the review is previewed and spell checked before submission. It is important for me to read for enjoyment as well as for critiquing. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?CountryGranny: I know that many do not like the rating system, and there have been many times where I find it difficult. Yet, authors have the choice to opt for a review only. I do not send anonymous ratings or reviews. I am a firm believer that I should proudly sign my name to all ratings and reviews. All reviews can and should be respectful and feedback is why we are all here.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Horses don't like Gummi Worms" Invalid Review Review of "Stranger at the Diner" Review of "What's My Soul Made Of?" Review of "Healing Wounds" " My favorite reviews are always the last ones I did." Hunters Moon Hunters MoonThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Hunters Moon: Writing is not a vocation, a pastime perhaps, a passion for sure. I started in highschool (not a one-room one, either) but abandonded it for 40 years until it found me again when my wife became ill. It was a great way to expunge a lot of feelings. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Hunters Moon: I review because it gives back to the community that has helped me develop what limited talents I have. Besides, you never turn away from inspiration - and many reviews have sparked a thought that my muse later whispers "you could write about that too!" ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Hunters Moon: I write like crazy then review. It clears my mind so that when I return to my work, I can see the error of my ways. What's "time management?" ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Hunters Moon: The golden rule: "Review unto others as you'd wish they'd review unto you." ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Hunters Moon: Read as a reader, not a reviewer. Note what works (what moves me). Then, put on the eyeshades and go back and read for technical merit. Only then can a thorough review be completed. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Hunters Moon: Provide a summary relating the review to the rating. If you give 4 1/2 stars, what would you want to see that would have raised it to 5? There's no consistency between reviewers words and ratings.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Forbidden Power" Review of "Pluto’s Rock" Review of "Twin Flames (Prologue)" Review of "The Hood and the Head" Review of "Adriannah and Me: A Romance" "I've chosen the following reviews because I remember each of the stories so clearly, and I had a blast reviewing these items. I think they show my template to best effect, including its versatility. These reviews also helped me to cement some cherished friendships." Ali AliThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Ali: I was a dedicated reader long before I was a writer. I started writing when I was sixteen because I was so inspired by the works of my favorite authors. I wrote the first few chapters of a young adult novel, succumbed to writer's block, and then put down the pen for about a year. After that, I started dabbling in writing fan fiction and doing online, written roleplays. I was writing thousands of words a day, and I think that practice helped a lot when I finally started writing my own stories again. That took place a little less than a year ago when I became inspired to start writing essays about living with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome on a blog in order to share my experiences with other patients. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Ali: It helps my own writing. I have become adept at picking out the issues in other people's work, and it makes the flaws in my own writing stand out like neon glow-sticks. Since I started reviewing, the elements that make up a good story have become much clearer in my mind. I have a better idea of what works and what doesn't. Beyond that, I love to read. I also love to proofread and edit. I find the process of reviewing both edifying and enjoyable. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Ali: To be honest, I am still struggling to find that perfect balance. On the days that I review, it is rare that I work on my own stories. Over the past couple of months, I have pledged a bit too much of time to my favorite reviewing groups, and therefore haven't been writing as much as I would like. I've decided to take the next few months to review less and refocus back on my own writing. I'd like to start working on a novel. I've made a pledge to myself that I am going to write everyday, even if it is only for five minutes. If I could continue that practice, even once I have rejoined the reviewing fold, it would be ideal. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Ali: First and foremost, respect the author. Even if the piece you are reviewing is a total mess, it is always important to remember that your critiques have the potential to help build a writer up or to tear them down. I always try to be as respectful and considerate as possible in the manner I present my critiques. Second, I am always thorough. I choose to point out ALL of my suggestions, not just the ones that seem most important. I attempt to give the author as much feedback as possible. Lastly, I focus on balance. I try to give as much encouragement and compliments as I give critiques. Knowing what worked well is just as important to the author as knowing what didn't. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Ali: The first thing I do is read the story once all the way through and develop a gestalt of the piece. Next, I do a second read-through and pull out all of the mechanical errors I see, offering suggestions on how to fix them. I know many reviewers would say it is wrong to comment on mechanics before content, but personally, I need to get the grammatical issues out of the way and clear my mind before I can give honest feedback on content. Finally, I do a third read-through and comment on all of the aspects of the story: plot, character, style/voice, setting, and my favorite lines. I top of my review with a small section commenting on my overall opinion. Once I've completed the review I do a thorough edit to make sure I haven't made any grammatical or spelling errors. Then I let the review sit for a few minutes; I clear my mind, come back and re-read my review, and if all looks well, I hit 'submit'. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Ali: I know that many other reviewers share this opinion with me: I would like to see the WDC rating system abolished. I have discovered that if I give a completely honest rating, the author can lose sight of the content of my review if the rating is less than they believe they deserve. I want the author to focus on my suggestions, not the silly purple stars. We all know that the star system is seriously inflated anyway; overrating has become the norm. It has become unprofessional because authors are loath to hurt or disappoint their comrades. I think the reviewing system would be more useful if it was focused simply on reviews and not complicated by the rating kerfuffle.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "The Unending Tale of James Lake" Review of "The Grey" Review of "Sliver~Prologue" Review of "Magic Daddy - Tickle my Funny Bone Entry" Review of "Reaper" "These are some of my most recent reviews. I change my template frequently to incorporate improvements whenever I think of them, so these reviews represent the most recent (and hopefully most improved) version." Kilpik KilpikThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Kilpik: I first started writing stories at the age of nine, immediately following my completion of J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the RIngs. The timing was not a coincidence. I was completely enamored with Tolkien's talent, and I reasoned if I had been born too late to meet him, I would just BECOME the next Tolkien. Needless to say, my aspirations have declined a bit since, but I maintain my admiration of a great writer who first inspired me to tell a story. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Kilpik: One of the greatest pleasures of Writing.com, as I'm sure any member can attest to, is receiving an encouraging and helpful review. Another pleasure? Giving that encouraging and helpful review. I love knowing that I possibly made someone's day a little brighter or supported their talent just a bit more. To me, that is what this community is all about. Along the way, I realized that you can get even more from reviewing. Having the chance to objectively evaluate talented writers' work on a regular basis gives me a better understanding of what works and doesn't work in my own writing. I'd like to say that I'm a better writer now, thanks to reviewing, then I was before. And that's pretty nifty, if you ask me. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Kilpik: I was extremely fortunate to be a part of the Paper Doll Gang Newbie Project, so up until a few days ago, I actually had enforced deadlines for short story and poetry submissions. Now that I'm about to graduate into the "real world" of WDC, I plan on separating my reviewing days from my writing days. I have a few free hours each day, and I usually try to only commit to one type of activity per day. I find cramming my writing with my reviewing tends to diminish the quality of one or both of my endeavours. Better to give each activity the full time it deserves. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Kilpik: I've been contemplating this a lot recently since there seems to be as many different review philosophies as there are reviewers on Writing.com. I'm still crafting my own personal philosophy, but from day one I have had one main goal that I try to stick to. I want every review I write to leave the writer feeling good about themselves and their writing. I know this sounds painfully simple, but I know so many writers who complain about receiving discouraging or overly critical reviews. I, myself, have been a recipient of beautifully crafted reviews that managed to be complimentary and condescending at the same time. I feel like, as a reviewer, it is never our job to condescend to writers, no matter how much more we may or may not know about writing. We're all peers here, friends even. So I guess my philosophy is reviewing every writer as if they're a friend. Honesty is important - yes, but so is remembering that each review, each witty suggestion and red-marked correction, is a comment that could sting a fellow writer. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Kilpik: I first open up a word document to write my comments as I make my way through the story. I used to not do this, but I found it's hard to remember specific lines and reactions two thousand words later. After I finish reading, I scan through the story and begin sketching out my favorite elements. I like having three or four areas that are specific to that writer's story. Once I decide my favorite element categories, I put them into my review template and begin filling them out. Then I tackle the suggestions. Usually this section is taken from my notes that I jotted down during my first read. Finally, I read through my review, preview it to make sure all the ml and sentences are arranged correctly, and hit that "submit" button! ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Kilpik: A couple of months ago I wouldn't have had an answer to this question. Lately, however, I've been mulling over the dreaded rating debate. I'm beginning to believe that the ratings may not be the best thing for this community. I understand the reality, of course, that the entire rating system gives writers a chance to get a direct evaluation of their work, but in terms of an effective method of encouragement and support, I am not so sure. Needless to say, I am doubtful the rating system will ever be completely removed from WDC, and I happy enough that writers have the option to not allow ratings on their work.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Noblesse Oblige" Review of "The Route" Review of "The Swarovski Horse" Review of "The Christmas Fortune" Review of "Post Card Christmas" "These are my favorite reviews because I could not wait to pass on my comments to the writers. Their stories had rich character development and total entertainment value. I will not forget these stories for a very long time!" Lornda LorndaThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Lornda: I was ten when I first picked up a pen and started writing in a journal. Fast forward a few years, and I have collected many volumes filled with interesting facts about my life. Four years ago when I joined Writing.Com, I wanted to see if I had any talent to write the comical side of family life. I learned fast that there is a difference in telling a story and writing it down on paper. With great feedback, helpful information on writing, and community spirit, I've learned to become a better 'work in progress' writer. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Lornda: The number one reason is because I enjoy reading, and therefore, like to pass on my humble opinion to the writer. The benefits from reviewing is a learning tool in itself. It helps sharpen my grammar skills, to look for the positive in any story, and most of all, if I can encourage anyone to continue to improve their writing and they listen, it makes my day! ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Lornda: I try hard to concentrate on reviewing the first half of the day. My writing is inspired in spurts, but I always try to tweak an item or write in my journal. As far as time management, it's all over the place. If I plan on writing a story and set aside the time--it just doesn't work out. I find that by the end of the day, the writing bug usually hits me, and I have to make sure there is paper and pens all over the house. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Lornda: What can I offer the writer in a kind and honest way? No matter what I review, I find something to help them improve. If a piece needs a total re-write, then I offer a couple of suggestions with a few overall comments. If they react in a positive way, I know how serious they are in receiving honest feedback. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Lornda: On average, I read an item twice. The first time I read it, I take note of the bumps along the way. The second time around, I zone in on why the bumps have occurred. When it comes to writing the review, I try to offer well-rounded thoughts on the story by splitting it up into three sections. I start with an 'Overall Impression' which allows me to give some input into the impact the story had on me from start to finish. The second part is the 'Suggestions'--I find I'm direct but try to be kind in the reason why I'm mentioning the problem I've run into. Third, I end it off with my 'Favorite Parts'. This allows me to zone in on all the positives that stood out to me, like a strong character I bonded to, some favorite lines, or the general entertaining impact it had on me. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Lornda: Educate reviewers that they should explain the reason they do not give a 5.0. I don't understand any review where I see a rating of 4.0 or 4.5, and then they offer no suggestions for improvement. Does this help a writer? Something obviously stopped the reviewer from selecting 5 stars--do the decent thing and pass your feelings along to the writer.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Adriannah's "Russian Dance"" Review of "THE BROKEN MAN" Review of "The Maiden of the Dying Love" Review of "Night Anthem" Review of "Dark Music" "I chose these because they are reviews of some of my favorite poems I have read here." Miss Bee Miss BeeThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Miss Bee: My first memories of writing for passion rather than necessity date back to when I was the tender age of ten. That's not to say that I was raised by wolves up until this point and hadn't experienced the English language, but that was about the time that I started writing for enjoyment, not because it was a part of my daily curriculum. I remember sitting with my nana in her t.v. room at night; she would crochet and recite poetry by Banjo Patterson, who incidentally, is my favourite poet, primarily for sentimental reasons. It was then that I decided I would write a book of poetry. I entitled this Poetic Puddles. It was going to be a published work, of course, and once I had put together fifty-odd poems complete with illustrations, I discovered that ten-year-olds don't generally have their writing published just because they have a hankering to be famous! My endeavours did score me an article in the local paper and a free trip to Brisbane to meet the Governor General -- but that was as good as it got: my five minutes in the sun. Writing was a creative outlet for me during my teens, and it is still wriggling around beneath my skin. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Miss Bee: Reviewing is an activity that has its benefits. The main reason I like to review is because I like to think I might be able to help someone improve their work. I am no expert, but I know that advice has helped me to improve my work in the past and that's what the site is about: giving encouraging and constructive criticism. Also, reviewing has helped me to improve my own writing, without a doubt. A certain someone asked me a while ago if I wanted to improve my reviewing skills ... the cheeky fish ... but, he was right. By reviewing others' writing, an opportunity arose to learn different approaches and styles, and that is always a benefit. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Miss Bee: I don't consider myself to be someone who turns out a large quantity of reviews. I do enjoy reviewing but most of them are required by group memberships, etc. The reason I joined this site is because I love writing; the reviewing is secondary, but still an important element of the WDC community. But, when the muse calls me to my own writing, I generally answer. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Miss Bee: Constructive criticism. I guess I fall back on the old saying, "If you don't have anything nice to say ... " and so on. Basically, if I don't see anyting positive in a piece I prefer not to review because I don't want to shred any piece of writing. It wouldn't make me feel good, and I don't aim to crush a delicate ego and turn a person off something they might be passionate about. If a poem or story is fair but has some errors, I make suggestions gently and hope the feedback is received in the way it is intended. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Miss Bee: Generally, I review poetry, so I will use this form as my example. When I open a new work I always notice the format. I know this is secondary to the body of work, but appearance is important. If the writing and title merge together with no format and an unimaginative title, I assume that the content will be in the same vein. I always read the piece a few times; the first to get my initial impression, and after that, I like to make sure I haven't missed any deeper meaning. Finally, I check for grammar and spelling (when I could be checking my own!). After pasting my review template into the review tool I get started on my overall sense, where I comment on the emotion of the piece, my interpretation, if it isn't obvious, and any outstanding features that appealed to my senses. From here it is about the quality of the piece and conventions, grammatical mistakes, etc. I like to finish on a positive note, and remind the author that my suggestions are just that, and try and leave them feeling good about their efforts. Of course, I utilise the spell check and preview review tools. Where would we be without those? I still kick myself for a missed error at least once a week! ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Miss Bee: I would prefer to see the rating system abolished, or alternatively, only have rating when accompanied by a review. If someone wants to critique any other writer's work they should have to back it up with their thoughts.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "A Moment In Time" Review of "The Druidess Chronicles: Chapter One" Review of "Hansel & Gretel: How it Really Went Down" Review of "To Love a Human" Review of "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" "I picked these five reviews out of the list not because I think they are the best of the ones selected, but because they reflect on my growth as a reviewer. I also feel as though they show how reviews can be flexible." Riot RiotThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Riot: I started reading when I was very young, and I think that had a lot to do with my personal inspiration for writing. I could get lost in pretty much anything I read as a child, which I think helped feed my imagination. Picking up a pencil and jotting out ideas or 'stories' seemed quite natural to me. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Riot: Perhaps one of the biggest attractions to reviewing, for me, is getting lost in someone else's world and being able to have communication over it. Reading published work is a great thing, but how often can one really respond to the author directly and possibly hear back? I guess I like reviewing because of the incredible personal nature of it. I can also, quite possibly, help further their work positively. How cool is that? ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Riot: Writing has always been a humanistic experience for me. I find I'm only able to write well when I feel personal inspiration. So, for my own work, that time comes simply when the inspiration comes. Reviewing, too, comes with inspiration. If I read something that really strikes my fancy at the moment, I'm likely to review it afterward. Once in a while I find that magical piece of writing that inspires my own imagination. When that happens, I may pause from reviewing in the moment and come back later. Usually, I'm able to stifle my enthusiasm and on-the-spur writing until I'm done with the review, though. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Riot: I think that we're all capable of reviewing on different levels. It goes hand-in-hand with a lot of factors, though. For instance, someone may prefer to really say everything they have to say about another's piece of writing, so it can be difficult to review because it's time consuming and thorough. At the same time, you may come across something you simply can't dissect, so it's short. Perhaps you have all day to write a review, but maybe you have obligated your time to something else. Some may feel like giving gritty, detailed responses is a waste of time, but others may think simple reflections rob the writer of true criticism. I think what it really boils down to is what's best for you, the reviewer. I think the important part is balance. Reviewing shouldn't be a full time job, and it's certainly not something you're getting paid real cash for. If reviewing is wiping the smile off your face, you're going about it the hard way. Sure, there may be some groups that aren't for you if you're reviews aren't heavily detailed and expressive, but there are plenty of groups that welcome effort and courage with open arms -- even if it isn't what others perceive to be a 'top quality edit' review. The bottom line is: review how you feel is best. If you look at the barest bones of reviewing, it makes sense to review in the manner the writer of the review feels best. Just look at the options. Before reviewing, you first have to decide if you're even going to make it public. Then, if you're going to affiliate it with a group. Or hey, are you going to make it anonymous? Just typing out something and submitting it in the first place is a choice in itself. How could deciding what you want to talk about within your review be any less personal? The short answer is that it isn't. Providing you're not being right out vulgar, I'd say that reviewing should really be up to the person making the review. It's a pretty debated subject though, it really is. I personally enjoy having the freedom to make my reviewing options flexible to fit my needs at the moment. Sometimes I really want to say something right quick, but simply don't have the time to indulge in a line-by-line review. Other times, I enjoy sticking my finger into every sentence and pushing words around to make the writer consider the usage of words and the importance of order. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Riot: Before I do anything, I read the entire piece of work in front of me, if possible. (There are longer items I may go back and forth from as time permits.) If I decide to review it, I then open the review tool. I then start back at the top and read it again, looking for particular things that stand out to me. If it's littered with grammatical errors, I may take care of those first. If I feel there's a strong sense of something else -- like imagery, tone, or voice -- I may make notes about that along the way in the review tool. I look at basic things like dialog, character, and plot. Usually by the second read through I have a pretty good idea of where the author's going with what they've presented. If I don't, I may say that. The exception to this is poetry. I actually admire poetry in which I don't understand the philosophical nature of the writing right away. If you can make me think about what you've said, and I try to piece it together for personal meaning or think about it later, I'm impressed! By the third time through I'm looking for anything else I've missed that I feel is comment- worthy. Was there style? How do I feel about it? Is it what I personally consider average, or did it feel as though it were above and beyond? Did it stimulate me? If I'm heavily invested in the review, I use macros to sort my thoughts into smaller, digestible blurbs. When I'm done, I hit submit. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Riot: If wishes were fishes... - In short, nothing. What I'd really like to see is the approach on reviewing changed. If there was only one way we were supposed to review, I think the rules on reviewing would be much more cut-and-dried. As it stands, it's a community activity which is open, for the most part, to interpretation. This can, at times, lead to touchy debates, but in the end it's only one activity on a highly communicative site. I suppose, to indulge the proposed change of the rating system, I'd say that if the staff were reading over this comment for ideas that I'd suggest another option in the review tool. I think it'd be nice to see the reviewer have an option for 'opting-out' of rating an item altogether. Before you say 'wait silly-head, the author can...' I want to say that yes, the author of the item can set their work for review only, but the reviewer has no way of opting out of rating unless it's on that specific setting. Having an option where the reviewer can respond without labeling it on a 1-5 scale could be quite beneficial to both the reviewer and author of the piece. It would allow reviewers afraid to leave a certain rating the chance to still say what they feel, while allowing the author to gain ratings on the item by those that 'opt-in' to rating the item. This, of course, would all depend on the settings on both ends. At the end of the day, though, you gotta just do what you gotta just do. It's a big world out there, so don't sweat the small stuff you can't change. People come, people go. Don't limit yourself to the constraints of others and their expectations. Your reviews, your writing, your relationships on the site -- they'll all reflect that. The site is large and most of the people here harbor hearts of gold. Some will try and spoil the environment by gifting you polished red apples with seeds of poison, just like in Snow White. They won't be able to unless you let them. My advice is to throw those rotten cores in the trash, spray a bit of Febreeze behind you, and move on. The Seven Dwarves will laugh and dance, the birds will chirp once again, and you'll become a princess. Or something. Be you. Be genuine. Be true!  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Beautiful, Terrible Sea" Review of "The Bequest" Review of "End of Days" Review of " Poetic-ness " Review of "The Countdown" "I chose these five reviews because the poetry that was written touched my heart in different ways. Also, I thought that their poetry was well done and showed just how talented these poets are when it comes to their craft. I hope other members will read these items and review their work for themselves." ShelleyA ShelleyAThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?ShelleyA: I started writing poetry in high school and continued to do so through graduation from college (May 1977) when I put my pen down until mid 2000 when I started to write poetry again. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?ShelleyA: I enjoy reviewing predominantly poetry because it helps me with my general writing. I am able to see how they use the literary devices such as alliteration, assonance, consonance, metaphor, simile, personification, onomatopoea, allegory and more which helps me with my own writing. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? ShelleyA: I try to make a habit of reviewing at least three days a week. As a member of the WDC, I believe it is a responsibility to read other writer's work... Do this for others and maybe they will return the favor. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? ShelleyA: I find that encouragement to writers, whether they are new to it or not, is most important. Constructive criticism can be done politely and is much more helpful to all levels of writers because they know that you truly want them to grow in their genres of writing. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. ShelleyA: First off, I read through the poem several times before I start my review. Then these are some of the questions I ask about the work: (1) Is the title suitable to what is written? (2) Are the writing with feeling/conviction that can be felt by the reader/reviewer? (3) If the writer is writing in form, is it done correctly; is it perfect form? (4) What about imagery? Is it done well? Can the reader see what is described through the senses? (5) Concerning flow and rhythm, are the lines choppy or are they smooth with meter? Is enjambment used? (6) What type of rhyme is there? Near rhyme, perfect rhyme (dactylic, feminine or masculine); internal rhyme, etc.(7) Concerning tone, what is the attitude of the writer as they write about the subject of their poem? Is it serious, humorous, satirical, ironic, tongue in cheek, inspirational, happy, sad and so on? (8) How is the diction and word usage? Is it excellent, good, fair or poor? Is repetition used for emphasis of feeling? Are there spelling or punctuation errors? (9) Lastly, I give my overall impressions of the piece, ending with a few words of encourage to continue writing. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?ShelleyA: I guess the only thing that I would change is a requirement that any member should review at least one item of another writer for every piece that they post to their port.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Of Chance and Rain" Review of "Atomic Angels: Ch1: Motherless Child" Review of "The Pit" Review of "The Pit" Review of "My Dragon" "These reviews show a substantive overview in addition to details about how certain parts might be improved." LJPC LJPCThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?LJPC: I wanted to be a novelist when I was young, but got sidetracked by my love of film and other artistic endeavors. Now that I'm retired, have time on my hands, and have trouble getting good reading material, I decided to entertain myself by thinking up fun stories and writing them. It's turned out to be more challenging than I thought, but I've gotten to know such wonderful people that I don't regret it for a moment. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?LJPC: I began reviewing both to help people and to learn. When I stumble upon some writing that's brilliant, it lights a fire of inspiration under me and makes me want to write as good as that. It's all about pushing yourself and improving. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? LJPC: The more serious I become about getting my books published, the less time I spend reviewing. Writing and revising your own works must take precedence. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? LJPC: Be diplomatic and encouraging. The truth is, there's no 'right' way to do things. Like music, everyone has different tastes. What one person sees as a flaw, others may see as a strength. When critiquing, it's important to give your views and suggestions in a non-judgmental tone. It's only an opinion, after all. Review others as you would like to be reviewed: with compassion, patience, humor, an eye for detail, and a sincere wish to help the person become a better writer. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. LJPC: The hook is important. I prefer to see concrete descriptions of characters, settings, and actions, rather than esoteric ramblings on the meaning of life. Those are better shown, not told. No need to hit the reader over the head with the theme right away. Other things I look for include grammar, punctuation, varied sentence structure, moderate use of adverbs and passive sentences, realistic dialog, logical actions, no plot-holes, no cliches, a strong tone in keeping with the genre, original and interesting prose, strong characterizations, compassionate portrayals, vibrant character voice, descriptions using all the senses, balance of description/dialog/ action, and finally, an interesting story. I may not comment on all these things, but will point out things I believe need the most improvement. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?LJPC: I'm not in love with the numbered rating system. I don't believe a number should be assigned to a piece of art, and I think it can result in hurt feelings.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "The Science of Beauty" Review of "A Storm within the Mind" Review of "The Redemption of Heather" Review of "Insomnia" Review of "Taken " "I chose a variety of reviews. Some are reviews of stories; others are of poetry. Some reviews contain no suggestions for improvement, yet there is a lot of helpful feedback for the author pertaining to what was effective and why. At least one of the reviews had quite a few suggestions for improvement, but was very encouraging to the young writer." Pat Nelson PatThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Pat: I guess I'm a very late bloomer. I never even thought about turning my "way with words" toward anything as creative as a poem or a short story until my co-worker and friend, SWPoet  told me about Writing.com. I scoffed at the idea of myself as an author, but remembered that, after my mother passed away, we discovered some hidden writings of hers. She wrote poems that we never knew about. I saw my mother in a new light. With Brandy's encouragement, and a secret desire to follow in my mother's footsteps, I decided I would give it a try. I found that emotions and memories scrambled to come out once I decided to put pen to paper. I'm not saying they scrambled out as nicely as I would like for them to, but I'm still working on that.ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Pat: I discovered right away that reviewing was a great way for me to improve my writing skills. I still find that to be true all these reviews later. There is something to be learned from every review I give. It's like a self-study course on the elements of good writing. In fact, there is a direct correlation between the improvement of my reviewing skills and the quality of my writing. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Pat: It's really tough, as any active Writing.com member will attest to. I've rarely been able to write well "on demand," but I admire those who can do that. However, if I run across a prompt that hits me the right way, or an interesting idea pops into my head, I feel driven to make the time to write it. I get up a little earlier, and I stay up a little later. Somehow, when the creative juices are flowing, I find a way to put the flowing thoughts onto paper. Another way to get me off my keester is if I find that one of my pieces will be highlighted somewhere. I rush to my port and do some serious reviewing and editing of my piece. Whether it's a poem, short story, or article, I always look for ways to tweak it and make it better. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Pat: My reviewing skills have grown over the three years I've been at WDC. Even now, I constantly learn more about writing, thus more about reviewing. I add to my templates or take away things from my templates as I gain a better grasp of what is most helpful to authors. Reviewing should be about helping the author. The best way to help an author is to give specific feedback about the good parts of their piece, as well as the parts that need work. Vague comments leave the author wondering why the reviewer liked it or what needs to be done to make it a better piece. On the other hand, too much information can be overwhelming. If a piece is riddled with problems, you should try to focus on the most important areas. You don't have to analyze every piece to the bone, which leads to the possibility the author will be too discouraged to keep writing. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Pat: Absolutely, the first thing I do is to read it from start to finish. I'm not focusing on technique or specific attributes at this point. I'm just reading it to see the overall effect it has on me. I do take mental notes of anything that pops out at me as especially effective, or as in need of improvement. Next, I go ahead and select the appropriate group affiliation and pull up the template I'll be using, based on the item I'm reviewing. I insert the author's user name and the item ID number in my introduction, and tell the author why I have chosen this particular piece. Then the work begins. Let's say I'm reviewing a story. I read it the second time around, looking for Tense, POV, Tone, and Mood. Is the author consistent in his use of Tense and POV? Is the tone consistent, creating the mood the author intended to create? If a character is soft and gentle in one place, then cold and manipulative in another, is this intentional? Does the author want the reader to be surprised at the character's sudden change? Or, is it simply that the author didn't pay close enough attention to the choice of words, or the description of the movements to maintain the character's tone? I move on through each of the categories on my short story template--Plot/Conflict/Structure, Characterization, Dialog, and Imagery/Sensory Description. As I search for places that are effective or ineffective in these areas, I may have to re-read the story several times. Once I have addressed these elements, I give specific examples of what was effective as well as of those areas that need improvement. To me, the mark of a good review is in the specific examples given. It gives the author a concrete view of what he will want to do the next time he picks up his pen. When I feel that I have finished, I click on "Preview Review," and read over my review to get the overall feel of it. Have I been encouraging in my suggestions and comments? Have I given specific examples of what needs work, and offered some possible alternative wording? From an author's perspective, how does my review come across? Is my review template neat and easy to read? When I am satisfied that I have given an honest, encouraging, and respectful review, I'm ready to rate it. Right now, I'm using the Writing.com guide for rating. However, I've come across a rating system which uses a half-star or whole star rating for each category reviewed. The reviewer then adds up the total number of stars for the final rating. I have not adopted that yet, but I am looking at it carefully. Before submitting my review I click on Spell Check! Very important step! I inevitably find typos and spelling errors to correct before finally clicking on the "Submit" button. I want my review to look professional and sound friendly and helpful. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Pat: Like so many others, my only real issue about reviewing is the Rating System. It's not that I oppose it altogether, but rather that it is used so haphazardly by reviewers. In the first place, a rating does not contribute anything to the author's understanding of what he needs to work on. Even if it's a five-star rating, there's no feedback for why the rater considered it perfect. I strongly recommend to members to set all of their writing to "Rating Requires Review." Although this does not prevent haphazard rating, it does reduce it significantly. Another reason I recommend this is so that every reviewer is forced to decide for himself what rating my piece deserves. It's just way too easy to look at the average rating of the piece and go with that rating on your review. I like to review something with a fresh eye, not paying any attention to its current average rating. For all I know, the author may have made significant changes in the piece since the last rating. Besides, if someone reads what I wrote and has an opinion about it, I'd just as soon make him put forth a little effort in expressing that opinion in writing.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Crimson " Invalid Review Review of "Dark Celebration" Review of "A Special Place" Review of "Meltdown" "These seem as good as any." Max Griffin Max GriffinThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Max Griffin: Mathematics: 1974. Fiction: 2007. I'm going to assume that your question is about writing fiction, as opposed to the esoterica of mathematics research. I write because I have things to say and stories to tell. Most of my writing is still scholarly. There is surely beauty in the clarity and elegance of science writing. Science is about the intellect, about the crystalline precision of the patterns and logic we deduce existing in the physical world. Fiction is different. Fiction tells a story. It brings new worlds and new people to life. Fiction touches the heart as well as the brain. The best of fiction brings readers to new understandings by introducing readers to new people, places, and problems. Fiction doesn't have to find answers, but it does have to pose questions. Most of all, it has to engage the readers' imaginations. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Max Griffin: Reviewing makes me a better writer. It's always easier to read another author's work with a critical eye than it is to read one's own. Practicing this skill is important, and it makes one better at revising and critiquing one's own prose. I also owe a debt to the many talented authors and critics who have read my work and sent me reviews. I'm a better author for every review that I receive. The best way I can think of to pay that back is by paying it forward. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Max Griffin: Time to write is golden. Most authors have full-time jobs outside of fiction, and I'm no different. Writing time happens during lunch hours, days off, and weekends. Reviewing time comes out of the same precious snippets. Most weeks, my goal is to write at least 2000 words of new copy. In a good week I might triple that, depending on other demands on my time. It takes about four hours to produce a first draft of that length. Once I've achieved that goal, then I feel free to review. A typical review takes about an hour to produce, so four reviews is equivalent to a 2000 word chapter. I'll try to not exceed four reviews in a week unless I can also produce a second 2000 word chapter or story. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. But it's important that authors remember that writers write. If you're not producing copy, you're not a writer. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Max Griffin: I review the way I want people to review me. I also only read things I like. Your screenplay about zombies, written in non-rhyming choriambic foots, may be the best thing since Shakespeare, but I'll guarantee I won't read it. For more details, see "Review Template Annotated" ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Max Griffin: When I open a new work, I read the first sentence, and then the first paragraph. I can almost always tell from that whether or not to continue reading--see my comment above about only reading things I like. If I decide to continue reading, I'll read the item through, start to finish. I may annotate a few technical things as I go--comma splices, typos, etc.--but I'll try to experience the author's creation as intended. After reading all the way through once, then I'll go back and read it again, in great detail, including line-by-line comments. Finally, I draft a review that summarizes my general impressions on plot, setting, character, and other elements. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Max Griffin: Eliminate ratings.  Favorite Reviews: Invalid Review Review of "A Hero Of 911" Review of "Solo Wind " Review of "The Countdown" Review of "I'll Name Him Abel " "I like these five in particular because I believe I provided the authors with good feedback as well as using my reviewing experience well. I also like them because I remember the items reviewed and the positive response from the authors. However, my reviewing improves as I go on, so usually my favourite reviews are the most recent. I'm sure there will be many more favourites to come." Kasia KasiaThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Kasia: I remember distinctly that I first began dawdling with my pen at age eleven because I was inspired by what I read in books and poems and heard in music. Words have always been a strength of mine. (I finished my spelling course two levels and a year before my sister, who is three years older than me.) I wrote a whole novel at age twelve, then tossed it because I didn't like it! I began writing more seriously as a young teen, and set out on a road that I did not realize would never end. I believe strongly that writing is a strength God has blessed me with, and a talent I mean to use to the best of my abilities to bring Him glory. I am not published yet, but I'm planning, hoping, and praying I will be soon. I praise God because I know that no matter what I do or where I go, no matter where this path of pen and paper may lead, I know that Jesus walks with me and, as Philippians 4:13 says, I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Kasia: I review for several reasons. It's a great experience, looking at others' works and analysing their plots, themes and ideas. I see a wide range of writing styles and come across a lot of colourful characters. I love exchanging ideas with writers and encouraging them. But most of all, it is great practice for my own writing! Purely selfish. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Kasia: Often I lay aside an hour or so in the day to dedicate to whichever I choose: Writing.Com or writing. Sometimes I do both, but I find it's easiest and best to focus on one at a time. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Kasia: The first things I learned when reviewing are:  DON’T review for merit or gift points. This is so wrong, and will, believe it or not, be obvious in your review, no matter how hard you try to hide it. The reviewee will only become bitter at you and turn away what good advice you may offer, as well as destroying your reputation. Another lesson I learned (by observing others and thinking about how I felt when receiving reviews myself), DON’T ever think once that you are superior to the person you are reviewing. NEVER patronize them or treat them in an inferior manner. This ties in with one of the most important aspects of reviewing: respect –Be respectful. If you can respect nothing else, respect that this person is trying, using energy and time in an effort to become a better writer. They are trying to achieve something. If you can't even respect that, then don’t review them.Be honest. Read the item a few times and highlight what you think works and doesn't work. Don't fill your review with flattery. It's hollow and they know you don't mean it. But don't be overly blunt. If you think 'This sucks. What shall I say?', don't say 'This sucks.' Be diplomatic.Encourage. Everyone should know how to do this. If you don't know how to, here's a start: Tell them they're doing well, tell them that if they keep trying they'll get somewhere. (Because it’s true.)Choose your words carefully. Don't be repetitive or wasteful. (This can appear to be an attempt to get more characters into the review.) Also, try to think of new adjectives every time you do a review. Saying 'I enjoyed reading your item' every time is going to get really dry and meaningless. Try 'Your piece was a delightful read!' or 'A fantastic read! Thanks for sharing...' etc. Here’s one I’m still learning , that I think is important: Try not to review just because you have to. If you belong to a group that demands a certain number of reviews, don't feel like you have to. Instead, try to coincide with the group and review what you want to. It’s a lot more comfortable for everyone: you enjoy it and your enjoyment shows in the review, causing the reviewee to be happy, and the group is happy because their members are producing quality reviews.OVERALL, and what I believe is most important, always put yourself in the author's boots. Imagine the review appearing in your inbox. What would I like pointed out in the review? Do I need to hear this? Is it helpful? What did the reviewer like? What didn’t he/she like? And review to improve – your own writing as well as others'. I think when you put yourself in the recipient’s position, your reviews become better and better. Writing.Com’s reviewing motto: Be respectful, honest and encouraging. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Kasia: Well, first I read the item twice, (firstly for enjoyment and first impressions, then to get a better grasp of it, although usually I end up reading the piece a few more times). The first time I don't stop to think. I read it like a normal reader. But I take notes about what hit me during this time because, after all, readers are likely to read it only once and what strikes them in that time is what matters most. Then I start writing out my review. At each section in my template (i.e. 'Imagery & Emotion') I think of or look for parts in the item relating to that certain aspect that I like and what I think could be improved. I do my best not to be repetitive, although it’s sometimes difficult because different aspects of the story intertwine (i.e. 'Favourite Lines' and 'Narrative & Word Choice'). After filling out the review, I click ‘preview’, proofread, spellcheck and format. That is when I cut down on the wordiness (tut tut). I preview again, adjust until I am satisfied, then click ‘submit’. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Kasia: My instant reaction is to say ‘kick the rating’. Just about everyone doesn’t like the rating tool. But I think the purple stars are pretty . Seriously, I don’t mind the rating too much. It’s just something that needs to be used wisely. The problem isn’t in the rating stars themselves, the problem is in the users. As soon as everyone starts thinking carefully about which rating to choose, the problem will be fixed. But that won’t happen. One of the things I wish we could change on Writing.Com is the competition between groups, especially reviewing groups. Groups tend to pull writers in separate directions. It drives members to review, especially for merit, and a little of that is good, but too much is bad. The reviewer gets stressed, stops thinking about the reviews he/she is filling out and it becomes all about the quantity, not the quality, of reviews the group is producing. That goes back to the first rule: don’t review for merit or gift points. That’s something groups tend to encourage. But anyway, I suppose there’s nothing we can do about that, either. Overall, I’m pretty happy with Writing.Com, and I think SM and the staff do a great job of balancing and keeping everything in harmony.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Cry For Domoni" Review of "The Redemption of Heather" Invalid Review Review of "Moment of Impact" Review of "Pirates of the Chocolate Factory" "I chose each of these reviews because I enjoyed the stories as a whole. I think that they brought out some of my best examples of reviewing, since, on certain levels, I wanted to see the changes give the authors that little extra push to create the story into something even better than what it already was. I saw great potential in these stories and hope to one day see them in print for the whole world to enjoy as much as I have." Missy MissyThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Missy: I started writing when I was a senior in high school. My literature teacher had the whole class write a poem for a class project. I began to write more poems after that. I wasn't able to just write a poem, though. Most of the poems that I have written came from a deeply personal and emotional place. I started writing short stories around 2000 or 2001, and I left the poetry behind for the most part. I would be inspired on occasion, but I chose to focus more on my stories. The writers that I enjoyed reading during that time were Edgar Allan Poe and Stephen King, so it was no surprise that I feel comfortable writing in the horror genre. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Missy: Reviewing gives me a chance to read other works that I would not normally ever see. I've found some very good stories in the least likely places, and I've found some bad. I try to use these examples to improve my own writing. I believe that it has helped. I've found that the small mistakes that I've made in my stories seem to jump off the page. My eyes have gotten used to catching these little problems, so I've had fewer mistakes in my more recent writings. I love to read, and I have found that the more I review, the more mistakes I find in the books that I read. That makes my recreational reading a little difficult at times, but it doesn't ruin my complete enjoyment of it. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Missy: I don't try to balance them. Since it isn't a requirement that I review, I haven't had any problems getting my own writing done. I don't try to force myself to write every day. I lose all interest in the story when the first major wave of inspiration runs out. I can usually have one of my shorter stories done in just a few hours, and a longer story I will work on as I feel like it until it's finished. I have never been able to force myself to write. It has always come from inspiration. I write because I enjoy the thrill that it gives me as I watch the story unfold as I write. I never know where it will lead, or how it will end. I have no major plans of being published, so this method works great for me. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Missy: Reviewing is a never ending learning process. I'm constantly learning new things to look for in reviewing as well as writing. When I first started reviewing, it seemed like the hardest thing in the world to do. Most days it still feels that way. I'm still trying to find my style of reviewing, and I'm sure that I'll never get to the point that I'm completely satisfied with any review I give. Some have been better than others, but I have a long way to go until I am consistent with my reviews. I try not to rush a review unless it is absolutely necessary. If I feel that I need a break, I will take some time off from a review. I have spent several days off and on working on just one review. I want to give the author the most help that I can, so I try to take my time. When it comes to poetry, I have a hard time reviewing it. There are so many different types that I'm not familiar with, and because mine have always been personal, I feel that everyone else's is also, so I don't try to suggest anything unless I really feel that it could be useful. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Missy: When I open a new work, I scroll down the page, checking the length before opening up my review tool. This gives me an idea of which review template I'll be needing. I go ahead and put their name into the review and check on how long they have been a member of WDC, and if they are having an account anniversary. I also like to go ahead and add any links or tags that I need to. I begin reading through the story, looking for the errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and flow. I list these areas as I find them on the review template. I'm pretty good about remembering what I read, so depending on the story, I can either go ahead and finish the review in a matter of minutes without reading through it again, or I may need to skim through it to find some problem area that I made a mental note to check on. There have been very few that I have actually had to read through again. I always have to read through poetry several times before I can even start a review. Reviewing poetry is not an easy thing for me to do. It requires knowledge to review it, and I don't have that knowledge. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Missy: I would like to do away with the rating system. I believe this doesn't accurately reflect the work of the author. It's also difficult to which rating to use for each item. If I really enjoyed the piece, it gets hard to rate if I have found numerous simple mistakes. The same is true if I didn't find any mistakes, but the overall story, although good, didn't appeal to me as a reader.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "WdC Survivor!" "I chose this review because it was for the inaugural round of a contest that I participated in. I think the contest was a great, original concept and I wanted to help the organizer with future rounds by suggesting possible improvements on the first round, which can always be a challenge to run." Review of "First Date(s) - Again" "This review was for a good friend who asked for my feedback on his contest-entry essay, since I run a monthly essay contest through The Talent Pond. I included it because I think it's a perfect example of my review philosophy of being positive and constructive, but also finding some way to suggest improvement, even in an enjoyable piece of writing." Review of "Quiet Smile" "I think that this review highlights the fact that criticism doesn't always have to be negative. The star rating was lower than average, but I still feel that this review put a positive spin on it and found a way to be constructive, supportive, and positive." Review of "First Chapter of Rose Colored Glasses" "I selected this review because the suggestions for improvement cover a wide array of issues, from character development to dialogue to concept. I pride myself on my ability to speak to a broad number of writing topics, and I think this review is a good example of that." Review of "Politics redefined" "I selected this review because it wasn't a story or an essay, but rather a review of an argument. I think it's important for a reviewer to be comfortable asserting his or her opinion without being overbearing, and in this review, I think I was able to question some of the assertions that I felt were rather broad and generalized without being negative or argumentative." SoCalScribe SoCalScribeThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?SoCalScribe: I first started writing stories in the fourth grade. It was a class assignment and I had so much fun that I took it up as a hobby. I first started taking writing seriously as a career in junior high and high school, but wasn't sure what type of writer I wanted to be. I considered becoming a journalist, novelist, grant writer, technical writer, and screenwriter at various times in my life... and am still trying to find that niche for myself as a professional writer. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?SoCalScribe: I like to review because it combines two of my favorite passions: reading and helping writers improve their work. I've studied writing for years, both independently and in an academic setting, and I feel that I have experience and knowledge to share with other writers to help them improve. It's not entirely altruistic though; reviewing helps me with my own writing because, just like I learned how to write from reading voraciously, reviewing another writer's work and figuring out how to improve it makes me more aware of those issues in my own writing. When you point out a weak character motivation or unsatisfying conclusion often enough, you start to consciously think about how to avoid those problems in your own writing. And the flip side of that coin is when you see something done really well, it can often inspire you to improve your own work. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? SoCalScribe: I currently am a member of several groups that require and/or reward reviews. In order to manage the amount of time I spent reviewing and to make time for writing (especially since I have a tendency to get lost in a review), I do the reviews for those groups regularly. They generally account for around 100 reviews a month, which I have come to accept as a respectable goal that still gives me enough time to focus on my own writing. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? SoCalScribe: My philosophy of reviewing is to provide a balance of positive and negative. There are very few pieces of writing that are 100% flawless, or 100% hopeless. My reviews are designed to find that gray area... to positively reinforce a writer's confidence with what they do well, and to help them grow by pointing out areas where they could improve either their writing in general, or the piece in particular. I take care to avoid making suggestions that come from a personal place; it's not my job, as a reviewer, to tell the writer how I would have written it, or to allow my personal opinions and biases to translate into my opinion of the quality of the writing... but it is my job as a reviewer to tell them what worked or didn't work for me and why. At the end of the day, a reviewer is only offering his or her opinion of the piece, and if that can be done in a respectful, constructive way with as much objectivity as possible, that's all we can ask of a reviewer. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. SoCalScribe: I first read the new item through completely. It's important for my comments on structure and pacing that I'm not interrupted by stopping every couple paragraphs to jot down a note. Once I've finished a piece the first time, I read it through a second time, with an eye for technical issues. Now having read it twice (once for an overall impression and once in a more thorough way), I will formulate my comments on specific larger issues that stand out (i.e. character, story or logical problems, confusing parts, weak dialogue, etc.), and mention each of those in depth in the review. For me, these are the most important points to mention, and I usually spend the most amount of time with them. I have several review templates stored, but the one that I most often apply (here and when I read work elsewhere) is one where I simply point out what I think worked, what I think could be improved, and my overall impression or thoughts on the item. Once I've written up the review, I preview it and read through the previewed copy, making any changes or edits necessary to present as professional a review as possible. Only after I've gone through it to the point where I feel that I've articulated myself as effectively as possible and been as constructive as possible do I click the "submit" button. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?SoCalScribe: If I could change one thing about the reviewing here on WdC, it would be to find additional ways of promoting quality reviews. There are several mechanisms in place - like credited reviews for groups, review rewards, etc. which are excellent incentives to review MORE, but I don't often find activities and programs designed to encourage people to review BETTER. The guidelines and suggested review elements are posted everywhere, of course, and there are a great number of people who do try to impress the importance of quality reviews on other members... but it can be tough - and I've struggled with this at times too - to focus the time and energy on giving one quality review, when you could use that same amount time to do five less-thorough reviews and scoop up review credits, daily rewards, and group participation points... all of which are predicated upon the number of reviews you do, rather than the quality. I am gratified to see programs like Good Deeds Do Go Noticed, and the fact that many staff, mods and senior mods will comb the public review pages and credit quality reviews... and it is difficult to come up with a blanket policy to evaluate and reward "quality" ... but it would be great if there were additional initiatives to encourage quality over quantity.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Sheru's Packages Shop" Review of "Peer Pressure" Review of "A Minute of Failure" Review of "The Tea Garden" Review of "My Memories Of You" WhoMe???The Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?WhoMe???: I began writing in 3rd grade. It started with an essay I had to write. I had put it off until the day before it was due. I wrote it in bed by the light outside my window. The teacher liked it so well she had copies made for everyone in the class. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?WhoMe???: Reviewing forces me to analyze and think about what I just read, so I leave with a clearer picture. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? WhoMe???: I am a fly by the seat of my pants person with chaotic organization. I write when inspired to do so. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? WhoMe???: Hm, I tailor each review to the item and the mood of the moment. I let the item I'm reviewing speak to me. I believe in honesty and sincerity, though I wish to temper my reviews with politeness and encouragement where needed. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. WhoMe???: First I read the item. I don't necessarily look to see whose it is, of course. This depends on how I chose the item too. Once I read it, then I read it again, and sometimes a third time as well. I decide on the review style. Is this for a certain group, or simply for the author? I select the style I am going to review in, whether it is free-style or a formatted template. My reviews are based on the individual writing and style, accompanied by my mood of the moment, so it is hard to say what comes next. I skip around. I generally include a few facts, emotion, editing and overall opinion. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?WhoMe???: Nothing. I think it is fine the way it is designed. Some would say to take out the star system and review only. I would be fine with this, though I wouldn't campaign for it.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Day Dreaming Mind" Review of ""Crystal Tear"" Review of "Love" Review of "The Futurist" Review of "Unstoppable" "I selected these five reviews because they show my progress as a reviewer. Each one offered suggestions and critique in a respectful way, but you can definitely see how my reviews became more in-depth. I didn't even realize it happened until I went through this exercise!" Julie JulieThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Julie: I’ve always been an avid reader. When I was a child, I could get lost in a book for hours. Writing just seemed like the next logical step. By the time I got to high school, my writing was pretty good. I was fortunate enough to have an amazing English teacher my freshman year. She saw something in my writing and took me under her wing. She would give me writing projects to challenge me. She got me writing for our school newspaper. There were even several articles that she sent to our local paper. They ran a few of them. I often wonder if I’d still be writing today if she hadn’t given me the “push” I needed. I guess you could say I owe it all to her. If she hadn’t shown an interest in my writing and helped me along the way, I probably would have given up. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Julie: I enjoy reviewing because it’s my break from “real life”. I get to experience something through another writer’s eyes. It’s always interesting to see the different styles and types of writing. There are so many amazing, talented authors here. I learn new writing techniques, styles and forms. It inspires me to learn more about them…and try writing them! Plus, reviewing is writing. Any opportunity to write is an opportunity to improve writing skills, and that’s an excellent benefit! ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Julie: Writing, in any form, helps us grow and improve our craft. I feel that reviewing is a vital part of the growth process. I try to set aside at least a half hour every day to write something. If I have more time, that's great, but if I don't, I won't stress myself out over it. I'm very organized and try to plan out each day as best I can. That's what seems to work best for me. Plan, plan...and plan some more! ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Julie: I believe that there is never a reason to callously pick apart someone else’s work. We are all here for the same reason. We’re writers. As such, we should give other’s work the same respect we give our own. There is a huge difference between providing constructive criticism and being judgmental, rude and/or mean. I wish there were some better guidelines around reviewing or even some tutorials for those that are new to the site. I know there are some great courses on reviewing, but not everyone can afford those. All too often, I go out to the public reviewing page and see bad, and sometimes hurtful, reviews. It breaks my heart every time I see them. Those reviews do a disservice to the individual being reviewed and make the reviewer themselves look bad. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Julie: First, I read through the item several times. That way I’m able to ensure I don’t overlook anything. I open up a blank Word document and take notes along the way for typos, grammar issues, etc. If I find specific areas that either don’t make sense or don’t flow as easily as the rest of the piece, I’ll also note that. I always mention favorite part(s) and/or anything that may have struck an emotional chord with me. Those are things that I appreciate seeing in reviews I receive, so I like to include it in the reviews I give. Once I've finished the review, I read through it to check for errors, then I use the spell check. Before I click "submit review" I always ask myself how I'd feel if I received the review. I want to make sure I'm respectful, insightful and encouraging. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Julie: I struggle with the rating system. I don't think I'm alone either. How can you possibly encourage someone to continue writing if they have a good backbone for a story/poem, etc. but it's marred by misspellings, typos and bad punctuation? If you give them 3 stars or less with a good review that offers constructive criticism, how could they not be discouraged? I find it so difficult to come up with an appropriate rating that won't hurt the author's feelings but instead, will encourage them to keep writing and improving their skills.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "The Key" Review of "Minotaur" Review of "Circus Magic" Review of "Lillian" Review of "You Have got to be Jesting me" "The first review I chose was a story called "The Key." I love this one because it was my first listed on the Art of Criticism page. It was the review that caught Patrick's attention, the review that kicked off my community involvement here on WDC. The review itself is not my greatest, but I chose it for its symbolic meaning. The others I chose because the stories or authors stood out in some way. "The Minotaur" is one of the first reviews I did while in the Dynamic Reviewing class. "Circus Magic" I remember vividly as being one of the most beautiful stories I've ever read on WDC. "Lillian" I chose because the author is a dear friend and his stories are always a pleasure to dive into. "You Have Got To Be Jesting Me" was an all-around fun read and review!" Beka BekaThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Beka: To me, it feels like I was born writing, and I honestly can't recall what first pushed me to pick up the pen. Whatever it was, I'm glad for it. It's made for a life of creating characters and writing stories and poems. Storytelling is in my blood. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Beka: I like reviewing for many different reasons. One of the biggest for me is being able to spot the beginnings of an artist. Reviewing promising writers is a pleasure, and I go into the review with the hopes of inspiring the author to continue their work. Besides being able to help out a fellow writer, I review for purely selfish reasons... to improve my own writing. Seeing writing from another angle can help us to spot what works and what doesn't. Then, we can turn around and apply that to our own writing. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Beka: Time management. It's rough trying to juggle work and family while trying to follow a writing passion at the same time. Sadly, I don't get to review as often as I'd like. I'm lucky if I get three reviews done in a week... I just have to make sure those three reviews are fantastic. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Beka: Here on Writing.Com, reviewing plays as much of a role as writing does. This site is more than just a place to display your writing - it's an online community of writers. Authors are able to share a little bit of their soul through their writing, and reviewers have the chance to learn more about the author simply by reading. In essence, I believe reviewing increases the sense of community on the site. Reviews are like little gifts that you can freely spread around to your friends - little gifts of knowledge and encouragement. Each author on Writing.Com has the opportunity to help other authors by reviewing, and thereby helping them feel confident in themselves and their writing. I feel that if someone wants to be an active part of this site, they should make the effort to learn some of the basics on giving a good review. Of course, not everyone should be expected to give long, in-depth reviews. Even the shorter reviews have their place... as long as they are honest and helpful. A new member will quickly learn how reviewing is essential to the community, and should take it upon themselves to learn the basics. In particular, one should learn what isn't helpful in a review. When coming to Writing.Com, if a member expects to share their work and receive feedback on it, then there is a responsibility there to learn how to reciprocate. "My Reviewing Philosophy" ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Beka: Before I sit down to review, I grab my notebook and a pen. During my first read I scribble down anything that comes to mind, whether it be errors, thoughts, or parts I particularly liked. I try to capture my first impression right then so I don't forget later. After my first read and list of notes, I open up my Review Tool and read again, typing out the review as I go along. I go back through the notes, visiting the applicable headings in my review template, until I'm through with the second read. Often I will have more to discuss, so I've given myself a free heading which I've named "Things To Consider," where I can just sit and tell the author what's up without having to refer to notes. I spend about a minute fretting over the star rating. Then, after checking to be sure I made some sort of sense in my review (and checking to make sure it looks pretty!), I send it on through and hope that I've helped the author out in some way. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Beka: You should just auto-fill this question. Star rating! I wasn't joking about fretting over it. I hate feeling terrible for giving someone three stars. I can only hope they don't take it the wrong way... I know I die a little inside when I get a lower rating. No one should be hung up on the star rating like that, but it's tough not to be.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Suicidal Steam Pilots" Review of "I Will Not Die Today" Review of "The Tale of The Rat Catching Device" Review of "Your Clockwork Heart" Review of "Aurora's Humanity" "I think these reviews show a good cross-section of my reviewing style, and the way I relate to pieces at various stages on their road to achieving their full potential." CeruleanSon CeruleanSonThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?CeruleanSon: I have been writing ever since I was a child. I used to write fan-fiction about my favorite comics characters, of whom there were many. Also, I wrote skits and monologues to perform for (and with) my friends. I still enjoy reading my stories aloud, for my friends and for my son's class at school. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?CeruleanSon: First and foremost, there is the satisfaction of doing my best to help my writing colleagues to see things in their own work that they might not have seen before, or display something they have seen in a new light, or from a perspective unexpected by them. In addition, reading and analyzing the stories of others helps me to sharpen my ability to see the flaws in my own work, and to develop my stories in ways that I might never have otherwise seen. It all boils down to nurturing growth, both in others and in myself. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? CeruleanSon: That's a real balancing act. As others have said, Writing.com should come with a warning label: Highly addictive! When I first started with WdC, I immersed myself in other people's activities: contests like "Daily Flash Fiction" and "The Writer's Cramp", which I found quite stimulating to my imagination. Many of the stories in my port originated with these contests and others. Then, I became more involved with the WdC community, and I found myself putting more and more time into the various reviewing groups to which I belong, and creating my own contests, in which I review the work of others. I found myself writing less and less. I had to take a step back and look at my involvement with an eye toward time management. I've managed to achieve a greater balance, but it is a changeable thing, depending on the demands of the moment. I have numerous projects in the works at all times, and I try to make time to work on at least one of them every day. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? CeruleanSon: Mostly, I think a review should be friendly in tone, relaxed in style, encouraging, and most of all, helpful. A review that doesn't help a writer to see something about his or her story that he or she didn't see before, isn't very helpful, even if it is encouraging. The point, I think, is not only to encourage young writers to continue writing, but to help them to see the ways they might improve that writing, by pointing out not only mechanical errors like typos and grammar, but examining the storytelling and making observations about how the various elements, like narrative voice, characterization, setting, conflict, theme, etc., might be viewed by a reader, and suggesting ways that the story might be told differently. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. CeruleanSon: First off, I read the story through completely before I ever open up a review template. I think this is very important, because even making grammatical corrections before fully understanding the totality of the tale can lead the reviewer astray. I think that one must get the big picture before breaking it down into its elements. Once I gain an understanding of the story and what I believe to be its overall message, I open my review template (I have several, for various group affiliations, etc.) and return to the story's beginning. I try to start off with comments about my favorite things in the piece, and then move on to technical issues - typos, grammar and such, then on to storytelling commentary, and finally sum up my overall view of the piece and end with an encouraging statement about the story and its potential. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?CeruleanSon: I must say that I have trouble with the numerical rating system. I sometimes think that it's unfair to have anonymous people passing judgment on a tale without making any attempt to articulate their reasons for giving the verdict they give. Even with a detailed review, especially one with numerous suggestions for improvement, I often find it difficult to put a numerical value upon the piece. Perhaps a system where ratings can be given for various distinct writing skills would be better. I think if applying ratings at all were optional for the reviewer, that would be better, too, in my view.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Mising you" "I found this poem to be one that laid everything on the line. This person cared greatly for her lover, and she wasn't afraid to let them know. I think this is where I really started to put a lot of work into doing a review." Review of "Never Trust An Energetic Clown" "This one left me chuckling and was a pure joy to read." Review of "The Redheads In My Family Tree" "I think this story touched me because of it's subject matter. As a result, I think I enjoyed it more and enjoyed writing the review more due to that." Review of "Study of a Stranger (Working Title)" "I don't read vampire stories as a general rule, and I didn't know this was one when I started. But it was a good read and a pleasant review." Review of "Better Than Caviar" "This was an enjoyable read, a different sort of story for me to review. Writing this review was very easy." Sum1 Sum1The Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Sum1: Let's say that I took a "road less traveled" to get here. After getting on the web long ago, I found I could write decently well, but it was only erotic stories, written for friends, sometimes on request. But, I found poetry, loved writing it, and have never looked back. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Sum1: I love to help others in any way I can, and I'm hoping that my reviews help them improve their own writing. At the same time, I get to see other's writing styles and pick up tips and pointers by doing these reviews. And of course, I love to read. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Sum1: I work two jobs, sometimes 16 hours a day. I try to make time to do at least one review a day. But this schedule tires me out, and when that happens, my muse goes on vacation. Eventually, I'll sit down and relax, and when I do, I start to write. I also love to see prompts for contests and get inspiration from them. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Sum1: I think a good review should be detailed. A reviewer needs to point out the good they find in a story or poem, but also areas that need improvement. But it needs to be well written too, with no grammatical or spelling errors. Otherwise, my credibility as a writer/reviewer is gone as they read my review! I try to provide a short overall 'general feedback' on the item initially, then provide feedback on specific things in the story/poem. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Sum1: One, I look for an item that I can relate to. By that I mean, does it interest me, will it hold my attention? If I can't stay focused on the item, how can I possibly provide a good review? Once I start reading it, I will quickly scroll to the bottom and open the review tool. Now I can type in one window, and read in the other. I usually read through the item completely and notice small things. Then I will go back and read it again, this time copying areas that need some attention and pasting them in the Review Tool window. If the item is relatively short, I will just provide a short review. If it is longer, or needs a lot of editing TLC, I have a format I use for either stories or poems. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Sum1: You know, I think everyone is entitled to their opinion, and should be able to provide it. I'm not sure I'd change anything.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Of Chance and Rain" "Because this is very much an average review for me. Besides, I love John's work." Review of "The Soul who Walks " "Because it's a good example of a more critical review." Review of "Anything will do" "I'm very passionate about preventing teen suicide and I always review items that I feel the young adult might be depressed or in danger of injuring themselves. This is one of those reviews." Review of "Eden's Surrender - Part 2" "A good example of a 'critical but I loved it' review with group affiliation." Review of "Whim of Wind" "A poetry review for a piece that touched me so much, I had to award it." Brooke BrookeThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Brooke: "Writing is the only thing that, when I do it, I don't feel I should be doing something else." -Gloria Steinem This quote is the perfect explanation. Ever since I was young (before 10) I would always have a pencil/pen & paper with me wherever I went. I can remember sitting on my grandmother's couch watching television with her and her asking "Are you writing a family memoir?" Then again later in my 20's, people would always catch me walking around with a pen propped in my mouth thinking. It's just a constant. It would probably be just as easy to answer when will I stop writing, as when did I start. I think I was born with pen and paper in my hands. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Brooke: Reviewing is two-sided for me. I love the interaction of helping others. Getting a review response that says that my review genuinely helped them or taught them something is the best compliment. The other half is what I learn from reviewing. Most writers don't realize reviewing other's work is actually a writing exercise. It can teach you so much about your own work. It proves the old adage - you can't help others without helping yourself. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Brooke: This is a hard question because presently, I don't manage it very well at all. I tend to read and review while managing my group here but writing has taken a backseat. I do occassionally get challenged to write for a contest by a friend or just get inspired, but I don't write half as often as I should. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Brooke: My philosophy of reviewing would be that your review must be encouraging. I don't care how many errors you find or how much is wrong, you can still find something to be positive about and to encourage them to continue. It's much more important to build someone up then to tear them down. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Brooke: For poetry I read through it at least once, sometimes half a dozen times getting a feel for the words and the cadence. Then I usually will copy/paste anything that stands out - be it a verse or just a word so I can explain why I liked/disliked it. With other writing I tend to read and if something stands out, like a line that has to be reread to comprehend or has a noticeable error, I immediately copy/paste it in the review template and then keep reading. I do that throughout the whole piece. I don't make any notes other than just copying lines or passages until I'm through reading. Depending on the item or if someone has specifically asked me for feedback in certain areas, I may read it again. Then I return to the review and write my explanations of why I'm highlighting that line or passage then when that's complete, I write my overall thoughts on the piece. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Brooke: Honestly, I think overall it works. I don't care much for the star rating system. However, you can't control the fact that people will not rate every piece honestly. Plus, you have to remember everyone has different opinions and my idea of a 5 may be another person's 3. I tend to rate on a scale of what the piece meant to me as far as enjoyability, while others may be rating on a scale of publishabliity. I'm not a publisher so I only rate for me. If I found it enjoyable and can not offer any critique or find any errors - well, that's a 5 to me. It may not be perfect to everyone, but it is to me. Reviews are opinions, nothing less, nothing more.  Favorite Reviews: Review of ""Branding" Reviews: A Chat Room Lecture" Review of "Chapter 1 of The Sword of a Goddess" Review of "Champions of the Astral Planes" Review of "Dark Sight" Review of "Taking Back That Night" "I Liked these because they are intensive reviews, and show what was done right in the item. They reveal structure-wise what worked." Dreamin1 Dreamin1The Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Dreamin1: There was a writer position open for my high school newspaper. I knew nothing about it, but was curious, and also might have tried out for it, but I had low self-esteem. I wasn't sure I could write anything worth someone wanting to read it. Much later on, my heart was shattered over a lost love and eventually, in my grief, I escaped reality sporadically by writing some poetry. I never had training or knew anything about it, so I scribbled a few rhymes, shared it, and then did the unthinkable and ripped it up. That is one thing you should never do. I use to laugh at the women who purchased and read paperback books--romance at that. Out of curiosity, I happened to read one written in the fashion of historical romance and the paranormal. I tried a few others and wasn't that thrilled, but kept looking. Soon I was hooked on certain types of stories. And I thought, I bet I could do this. Why not try? What have I got to lose? So I wrote the beginning of a story, but it was more like a dramatic scene, and it was all I had. I had no idea how to go from one scene to the next or even what I'd write after that. It was enough to excite me. I liked how the characters came to life on the page, and although they came from my brain, they seemed real. I wrote a little more, but again I gave up and tore the pages up. For one, someone had poked fun at me and that discouraged me. I thought, maybe I am playing games with myself and am awful at it. Nearly twenty years passed by, and I picked up interest in a variety of books, instead of just academic ones. I've always been a virtual sponge, and I like reading different ideas or different scenarios. I'd remembered the first time I tried writing a story, and so I set out again to write one. This time I'd utilized some of the skills I had acquired. Not just a short story, but a novel. I grabbed every writing book I could find, and went from there. I wrote and where I didn't have answers, I left blank -- like names, for instance. I wrote in scenes. Sometimes skipping the in-between ones. I wrote the parts that I had a hard time with, because I was determined to move through it and feel good about it. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Dreamin1: I'm not totally unselfish. I read because I enjoy reading, and sometimes what I find is breathtakingly beautiful or so very sad that it brings tears to my eyes. Other times, I might laugh out loud. The other reason is because inadvertantly my eyes seem to glean the story or poem. I learn much from a review each time I do one. I believe that it helps me in my own writing because it reinforces what works and what doesn't work. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Dreamin1: I don't have a set time. I'm not very structured or if I am, it's all done automatically. I have spells where I just don't do reviews. Maybe my mind is temporarily too occupied with all those things I have to do in real life. I like to be able to concentrate and be as thorough as I possibly can when I'm doing a review, so that I cover each area that either needs editing or gives me a feeling. What I do find is that whatever I start doing, writing one sentence leads to another and then another and then another. I can't seem to stop for the longest time. So I might do three to four intensive reviews, then skip a day or two. Meanwhile, I write in campfires or In & Outs -- which by the way is a great way to play but also learn how to be more concise because you have to think fast. I might not write at all otherwise, or take a break then come back and concentrate on only that. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Dreamin1: Reviewing can be daunting when you are first learning how to do it. I know. I use to dread it. What I found out is that after doing it so much, I learned and it became easier and enjoyable. I tend to rate high if the content gets the idea across well, even though it has some errors which can easily be fixed. If the piece is able to give me a feeling or even cause my vision to fog up (tears), then I would rate it higher, yet it has to make sense too. The introduction is important, and all those little details make a difference. What I don't like is when I see reviewers who have been so callous and not been kind during a review. Our writings are like our babies and to get a point across doesn't mean you have to beat someone over the head with it. Yes, it is sometimes a hard pill to swallow when a reviewer tells you something doesn't make sense. My first reaction is..what are they talking about? Then I consider what they've said, and see if it holds true for me. If it doesn't, I move on and know it is simply their perspective and not necessarily everyone else's or even true, for that matter. Sometimes you just have to consider the source. You really do not know why someone says or does something. Maybe they had a bad day or maybe they misread something you wrote. Maybe one word was left out and that changed the whole meaning. Who knows? On the other hand, maybe the reviewer is on-target. You have to weigh this out on your own. That's when you kick back and rest some, and then come back to it and see how it reads. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Dreamin1: I start reading the item. If I stumble, I have the urge to write it down because if I wait, I know later I might not find some of the errors so easily. When you look at something with fresh eyes, you notice things easier than when you have to go over it again, and I like to make sure I'm not missing something. Sometimes I do and end up sending a second review to mention those too. Lately, I open up notepad and write a few words every time I see something that doesn't fit or stands out in some way. I keep going back and forth until I've gone through the whole thing. It might seem distracting, but I do this for the writer. I might end up going back through and just reading it through again and ignoring the errors as much as possible. Then I copy/paste the few words I wrote and move onto the review tool, which is previously set up to yes a form, which I not only fill in but also manually add my own subheadings and such. I have a popnote on mine that explains how I review and what I look for. I have additional popnotes explaining certain things about imagery and dialogue. After listing the good points, I then mention the things that havent' been covered in any of the other review aspects. Last of all, I thank the reader and remind them to let me know if and when they revise or have additional chapters. If I haven't rated it yet, I then consider the whole thing and select a rating. Often I rate high, even if there are some errors, when I see that the writer did quite well in expressing him or herself otherwise. The errors are probably easy to fix and with just a few touches it is a very enjoyable read. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Dreamin1: I'm really not sure I would change anything, unless it's curbing those reviewers who are being very unkind. You don't have to be hurtful because there are some things about a story or poem you don't like for some reason. Each reviewer has their own way of looking at things, just like an art-lover sees one thing in a painting, while another notices very different aspects of it. It doesn't mean that one way is better than the other, and so even a rating depends on the viewpoint of the reviewer. I've read some reviews and saw some ratings that I couldn't fathom why they gave such a thing, whether it be high or low. Some were rated excellent when it was fraught with errors and really made no sense at all, but for some reason they rated and reviewed it that way. I've thought of how maybe a bit of structure might be helpful, at least to those writers who are new to reviewing, or who maybe are timid, or who just need a little reminder. What I mean is a list of things a reviewer might look for to give them guidelines. Even a reviewing classroom could be quite helpful. It could be graded, yet anyone that takes it would pass since at least they are trying to understand. I might mention here that I have had software that found errors and even said what the error was using grammatical terms, which some writers might not grasp so well, and so it needs further explanation or examples. There are plenty of groups who provide the incentive to review, but quality over quantity should be the goal. The Good Deeds Go Noticed is an excellent idea and I like how someone is paying attention to the way a review is given and also whether or not it is just a cookie-cutter type review or a in-depth one. Even a short review can be helpful. I am no professional at this, but I think I do a fair job. I can't possibly know or remember all there is to know about writing. It is an ongoing learning process. I've kicked around an idea for helping new WDC members or those long-time members who would like to improve their reviews. I see a need. All I need is a little help with planning it and some assistants.  Favorite Reviews: Invalid Review Review of "Mistaken Identity" Review of "These Hands" Review of "The Sand Dollar" Review of "Depression Is A Dirty Word" HappyfingersThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Happyfingers: In college when I was working on a daily newspaper. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Happyfingers: The best benefit is appreciation. When a writer writes back s/he 'gets it', 'understands now'; it's that lightbulb moment. This is a response I received 3 days ago: "Happy Fingers, you have helped me more with your review than anyone. I love to write but I have never had training in writing. Freytag's Pyramid is great. I have never heard of it. Thanks for being so candid with me. I need it. I truly need the help and want it badly. I want to be a writer and a good writer. You told me exactly what I am doing wrong. Thanks so much." It is nice when a leader takes the time to write a personal note of appreciation. It's not the GPs or Merit Badges. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Happyfingers: It's cyclic. A month of in-depth reviewing refreshes me for writing. I put down the reviewing pen, and pick up the writer's pen. These cycles vary in time. Reviewing is particularly important after completing a writing course (Horizon Academy). I feel I can offer in-depth reviews with some feeling of competency. I have started a writing group which demands some writing every week and the face-to-face social interaction of discussion. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Happyfingers: Every item I review is different and needs a personalised response. Reviewing is fun, creative, and is writing on another level; it isn't constricted as much as writing a short story. Superlatives flow, fragmented sentence happen, response and emotions can cry out. I won't proofread unless it's so blaring it interfers with the mood and message. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Happyfingers: The first thing is to make sure it's a genre I like. Then I get into the head of the author by going to their bio, look through the portfolio, see how long they have been on WDC, their age, etc. Then I read the first paragraph. If it doesn't get me in, I move on to another story and start the process over again. I write notes as I read the story because this is the knee-jerk reaction. It's sponaneous like a reader. I read it a second or third time taking out the parts in which I want to emphasize. I proofread it, and copy and paste it into Word so it doesn't go into cyberspace after I hit the submit button. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Happyfingers: Not to harp too much on punctuation. I recently had a short story published and it was printed with two mistakes in which a reviewer from WDC had marked it down. A writer can get really blocked, worried about punctuation, and a reviewer who tears it apart without looking at the big picture.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Silent Witness" "I chose it because it was about bullying and this is a timely subject." Invalid Review "A short story filled with suspense and a twist. I love them!" Review of "The Interview" "I love comedy and twists. This story was filled with strong characters. I came away laughing." Review of "The Girl by the Window" "Another timely subject written with raw emotion and written well." Review of "The Hero and The Cramp" "I love original stories and this one fit the bill. The deadline was missed and this writer never obtained entry into the contest. I know it would have won! " InkerThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Inker: I began writing in the early 90's. It was the reason I bought my first computer so that I could do research and learn my craft. Needless to say, family and friends did not share my enthusiasm. It didn't stop me and I've been writing ever since. Writing is my saving grace and it is good for my soul. I get quite grouchy when I can't write my daily dose. My husband will testify to this. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Inker: I love to meet other writers and I love to read their work. I wish that every new writer had someone to give them courage to write what is in their heart. We all need mentoring. I want to give the encouragement, especially to new writers. Everyone of us needs to be acknowledged and be appreciated. I receive more than I give, when I do reviews. I read and learn something new from each writer. It is a journey I wouldn't miss for the world. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Inker: This is the most difficult for me. I am in two groups, WDC Power Reviewers and Showering Acts of Joy. I am also a student of Horizon Academy. I do monthly shifts to credit the reviewers at WDC. This is where I start to run out of time for myself. I am involved in a novel, love to do contests and prompts. I have to work my writing-time around my husband, children and grandchildren. All of them are an important part in my life, even though they are scattered from the Northeast to the Southwest. I get to travel that way. However, I am truly committed to my writing because this is where I shine and be the best I can be. Whether or not I ever get my book accepted to be published, I will still write. I do it for me. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Inker: I think reviewing is a win-win situation for both reviewer and writer alike. Each piece of work holds promise, even if it is only the first draft. It may have taken courage to write it. The spelling errors and sentence structure are secondary. As a reviewer, I want to be honest and open, but at the same time, offer them encouragement to write more. There's so much to learn in our writing. I find that rewriting can be either fun or a chore. This is what a writer must realize when he submits his review. He/she must know that the reviewer is not criticizing him or her. It is about the written piece becoming more professionally polished. After all, this is why we are here. No story is written in stone. What writer knows everything? My job as a reviewer is to spur them on and to offer constructive criticism. I feel it's my responsibility to keep them writing. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Inker: I like to visit a writer's port. If they have a bio, it gives me a little more information about the writer. I'm disappointed if it isn't there. Sometimes I remember to suggest to the writer to do this. Are they new or are they a "seasoned" writer? If they are new, I am more gentle with them. The worst thing I could do is scare them away. I use different outlines for different kinds of work. Each genre requires a somewhat different type of review. I have just gotten into reviewing poetry and I'm a newbie with this genre. I write the review according to my outline, but try to keep it fresh, not canned. I spell check and read it again, hoping that I have answered any questions that a writer may have. I hit the submit button only after all these points are satisfied. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Inker: The rating system is the part I hate. I don't feel that I'm that qualified to pass judgement. Unless a 5-star rating is given, I find that it is upsetting, to say the least. If writers would check only reviews with no ratings, I would be more comfortable. I feel that many writers, including myself just recently, are not even aware of this. The important thing is to give a constructive and helpful review.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Annie and the Calliope" Review of "The Warlord and the Imp" Review of "Chapter 1 -- Kabar's Creek" Review of "The Maiden of the Dying Love" Review of "Scintillant- Chapter One" "I chose these five because I thoroughly enoyed reading them. I found them all both entertaining and enlightening. All of these stories gave me more of an insight into how I could improve my own work. I feel priviledged to have been able to review them." A E Willcox A E WillcoxThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?A E Willcox: I first started writing only about 7 years, or so, ago, when my son went up to university. It seems a bit silly really, but I'd never previously considered writing my own stories, considering the fact that I have always had well-developed sense of adventure and I have always been a voracious reader. I honestly can't remember now what exactly triggered the sudden need to weave my flights of fancy into stories. Perhaps it was the realisation that I was getting older and there was no way in the world I would ever physically (or financially) be able to experience everything wonderful this world has to offer. Instead, I am now having lots of fun creating worlds and adventures from my imagination. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?A E Willcox: I like to review because I like to receive them. Good reviews which offer an analysis of the story or poem and say what is great and why and what doesn't work and why, are the only way a writer can improve their work. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? A E Willcox: I don't have any fixed times when I review or when I write. I prefer spontaneity over the rigidity of a predetermined schedule. I often find that doing reviews helps me to surmount blocks and sticky patches with my writing because my mind is tuned in to how others have successfully dealt with particular aspects of a story or what really isn't going to work. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? A E Willcox: To me, a review should be a detailed analysis of a writer's work. Ideally a review should be more than just praise or criticism. Ultra-short reviews are mostly extremely unhelpful. The reviewer should always let the writer know what works and why, and what needs improving and why and then, if they can, offer suggestions on how the writer can improve their work. I think that members should only review work they actually like and I also think that those authors who are not looking to improve their writing should say that they write for relaxation and don't want detailed reviews. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. A E Willcox: First of all, I read through the item, then I go and do something else. Then I go back, read it again, and make notes on how the work reads, whether the plot works, etc. and which areas I think need work. I also pick out those sentences, paragraphs, and passages which struck me as being really good. I then go back though the item again and look at the characterisation, dialogue, the world building and descriptions, etc. When I feel I have written everything that I want to about the piece, I then proofread my review and edit it. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?A E Willcox: I think that the star-rating system should only indicate the standard of the writing and should not be about a reviewer's personal likes and dislikes. I think that where it comes to stories, particularly, the 250 character review minimum is way too low because it is nearly impossible to write anything meaningful and helpful with such a low word-count. A 250 word minimum would be better.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "The Frog & The Swan" "This review shows how a great story/poem can still have many mistakes. I was able to give positive feedback while showing the author the many areas of improvement." Invalid Review "This review shows how a poem that has many issues, even with its fundament, can be reviewed with respect and positivity." Review of " Surrender" "This is a good review because it digs into the very form of the poem. The poem was absolutly beautiful but attention needed to be made to the content in reference to form. The author was very appreciative." Review of "Acrostic of Homeless" "I chose this review because it covers many areas such as tone, forced rhymes, title, structure, diction, etc." Review of "The Countdown" "I like reviewing pieces that are imperfect because it gives me the opportunity to provide suggestions to the author. However, this poem was great in nearly all areas. This review shows how you can still give a good critique when the poem/story is at or near perfection." Itchy WaterThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Itchy Water: During a deep depression in 2006, I had no one to talk to; no one could relate to me. That is when I discovered the healing effects of writing. I scribbled notebooks full of thoughts, emotions, incoherent jibber-jabber. I just wrote. After my depression, I stopped writing. Then in 2009, I became depressed again. I started writing again. But again, I stopped when I was feeling better. It wasn't until January 2011 that I realized I could write and not be depressed. Instead of ink and paper, I wrote on my new IPAD. I couldn't stop writing poems. Good poems, not incoherent poems like before. I remembered a website that I joined in 2009 called Writing.com, and I went back to it. I have never turned back. I found my joy in life — poetry, depressed or not. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Itchy Water: There are many reasons why I like to review. One is a sense of accomplishment. My reviews take time and effort. After I review, I feel like I have done something good. Another reason would have to be it helps me as a writer. I learn a great deal reviewing other poems. Sometimes, I even have to do a bit of research when reviewing. So I would say the knowledge that I gain is a great benefit from reviewing. Also, I have an editor's eye, which is a curse and a blessing. But with my editor's eye I can spot things that other reviewers may have missed. I am glad that I can relay that information to the author. You see, I review to help the author with their poem. I try to pinpoint areas that need attention. It makes me feel good that I did my best to show a fellow writer the viewpoint from a reader's perspective. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Itchy Water: Besides writing in my journal, I write when my muse speaks to me. When my muse speaks to me during the middle of a review, I save the review, and write for myself. I don't really balance my time with reviewing and my own writing. However, I don't write stories either. There would be a great need to set guidlines if I wrote stories. Since I only write poems, I don't feel that reviewing affects my writing all that much. I just have to make sure I am attuned to my muse and am willing to stop a review to write. A review can always wait, my muse cannot. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Itchy Water: I believe we should say "evaluate" or "critique" instead of "review." A review is a reader's summary of the piece. It doesn't help the author all that much to hear a summary of his or her story/poem. What is more helpful is an evaluation/critique of the story/poem. This can involve a review but it considers so much more. When I "review," I critique. That doesn't mean that I am always negative. I can critique a 5-star poem. Critiquing lets the author know what was done well and what was not done well. In my "reviews," I also like to give suggestions, if needed. If a rhyme didn't work, I will suggest a rhyme. This is to help give the author ideas. After all, I am writing this review to help the author. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Itchy Water: This is a hard question to answer, for every poem is different. I read the poem thoroughly. Then I look up any words I may not have known the meaning to. I read it again. Then I read it out loud. Then I read it again, looking at every line carefully. And maybe even again. By this time, I have the review tool out and am cutting and pasting things in the review tool. I make my comments in the review tool. I read the poem again to see if I missed anything. I rate the poem and send it off. This sounds a lot easier than it actually is. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Itchy Water: Aside from changing the use of the word "review" to "evaluate" or "critique," I would change the access that readers have to other writer's reviews. I would like to be able to read a poem/story and then be able to read what other people said in their reviews about the poem/story. I know that I could look it up in the public review section, however, the review is only accessable for a few days. After the review is posted, it will only be readable to others for a short window of time. I think reading other's reviews after I read a poem/story would help me as a writer and reviewer. I would really like to see this happen.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "From Friends to Enemies" Review of "Current Remedy" Review of "Spartan Auction {new round open}" Review of "Chapter 4, No Pain, No Glory, " Review of "The hidden truth" "I didn't choose the longest reviews or the most detailed reviews; instead, I tried to include a variety from the types of reviews I do. Two of these are from contests which I have judged. One was auction advice that I gave to a newbie. One was a requested review from "The 'Power' Review Shop," and the last was just one story from the many that I read." Maryann MaryannThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Maryann: I was one of those kids who knew how to read and write by the time I entered the first grade. I remember how I used to love to make my own construction paper greeting cards. My love of reading and writing continued throughout school, right up to college when it came to a complete stop. As supermom to my four kids, my goal was to make each one feel as pampered as an only child. In addition, I did well over my share of volunteer work. ... schools, sports, clinics ... I hardly had time to read a magazine! Ten years ago, my aunt introduced me to our writing site. I was instantly hooked! Now that my kids are grown, I have the time to enjoy reading and writing again. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Maryann: As the founder of "WDC Power Reviewers Group" I often tell my members that they can learn a lot from reviewing. When you think about it, writing a review is writing. In addition, the reviewer is constantly going over what works and what can be improved. This is great training for their own writing. I like to review because I know that I will give a review which will be appreciated by the author. My reviews are often very helpful. I point out things which can be improved, as well as things which I liked very much. I know how happy I feel when someone takes the time to read and review my work, so it makes me smile to know that I'm doing the same for someone else. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Maryann: Most of my WDC online time is spent making sure the "WDC Power Reviewers Group" is running smoothly. Part of the group's mission is for it's members to have fun, learn, and maybe make some friends along the way. I always make sure the group has an abundance of friendly and knowledgeable leaders. We encourage our members to spread happiness throughout the whole WDC community. Of course I enjoy writing stories and poems, but I feel that I'm always writing. I take care in how I answer a newbie's questions, or help a new member with their reviewing. There's always a forum to post on, or a group email to send out. I might not always be writing a 'story', but I'm always writing something. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Maryann: I believe that each author imagines an idea and enthusiastically creates it in item-form. They deserve to be encouraged and not ridiculed. I will offer my advice, ideas, and suggestions in a friendly, helpful ,and honest way. Most importantly, I will always find something nice about their work ... I hope to inspire them to write more, rather than cause them to feel badly about their style. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Maryann: Normally, I print out longer stories. This way, I can read in a comfortable chair, or take them with me wherever I go. It's also easier for me to jot notes right on the printouts. At first glance, I'll check out the small details, like the brief introduction, the content rating, and the selected genres. I'll also notice font, colors, centering and any images. Next, I'll read the story. As I read, I'll take note of spelling, grammar errors, or anything that might be improved, especially ideas which might improve the storyline itself. Finally, I'll type the review into my review tool. I'll write some first impressions and some upbeat and encouraging thoughts. Following that, I'll write about my favorite parts of the story. This is where I'll make them really feel good about their writing. After that area, I'll offer helpful hints and suggestions so they can polish it up. My goal is always to offer help tenderly, so that the author leaves the review with a smile. He should be excited about the fresh and new ways he might use to improve his story, and he should never be discouraged in any way. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Maryann: If I could press a magic button which would instantly make everyone an expert reviewer, I would. Unfortunately, not everyone is perfect, but most everyone who reviews really enjoys reviewing. On WDC, we have people of all ages, all experience levels, and people of all language backgrounds. I try to encourage all members to do their best at the reviewing they love, so that reviewing will always be a fun experience.  Favorite Reviews: Review of "Never Kiss The Undead" Review of "Dancin' On The Squall Line..." Review of "Flowers for a Priestess" Review of "When A Man Wants A Woman" Review of "The Feed Store" "I remember the positive reactions I got from these reviews, which made me feel helpful ... and that's the best part about reviewing." Evertrap EvertrapThe Official Tome of Artistry Interview ToA: So, when did you first start writing?Evertrap: I started writing fiction seven months ago, on March 6, 2011, the day I joined WDC. Before that, I wrote an occasional newspaper or magazine article and was comfortable in the non-fiction genre. For me, writing is not a vocation and probably never will be; it's an interesting hobby, of which I have many. ToA: Why do you like to review? What benefits do you think you get from it?Evertrap: I review to encourage others to aim for perfection, to improve my own writing, and for personal entertainment. Reviewing is like practice-writing: if I can find your mistakes, I'm more likely to spot my own. ToA: How are you able to balance your reviewing with your other writing? What methods of time management do you use to make sure you are also writing for yourself? Evertrap: Nothing I do is ever balanced, I tend to go in spurts. Sometimes I'll write for several days, then review for several more. At other times, I'll do both. And there are many days I can't get into either one. Since writing and reviewing is a hobby, inactivity doesn't bother me ... but I do miss it if away for awhile. ToA: What is your philosophy of reviewing? Evertrap: I try desperately to be helpful. If I find I can't be helpful in a nice way, I don't do the review. I review the way I'd like my stories reviewed. ToA: Specifically, what do you do as soon as you open up a new work? Take us through the steps from the time you first read a work until you hit the "submit review" button. Evertrap: To start a review, I scan the story to get an idea of what to expect, then copy and paste to Bean (Mac) and have the computer read it to me. This gives me the feel of the tale and locates word-choice mistakes that are easy to pass over when read. Whenever something sounds weird, I highlight that area. Then I physically read the story, highlighting other mistakes and places where the story impresses me. These lines are dropped onto a generic review-form, also in Bean, and I make short notes on this form about my first impressions. One more read, and I finish the review, read it through and submit. ToA: If you could change one thing about the reviewing here at WDC, what would it be?Evertrap: Two simple changes: (1) Rating with stars should be an option, not a requirement when submitting a review. (2) When replying to a review, GPs sent should be processed through the review crediting system, or a link provided to the reward window.
© Copyright 2011 PatrickB-new biz with MissBee (UN: pabernardy8 at Writing.Com).
All rights reserved.
PatrickB-new biz with MissBee has granted Writing.Com, its affiliates and syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work. |
 Log In To Leave Feedback |
Static Items
Books
Forums
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
