| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| >> Static Item >> Poetry >> Philosophy >> ID #1787046 |
| |||||||||||||
|
What among these is most noble:
to die for love or to die for the world? Love is that feeling of attraction that has little to do with gravity. It has nothing except the countless interactions of a vast quantity of eternities and involves none but the two involved and the center around which they forever revolve. Love is a force of nature that is as old as Creation itself. It binds two worlds in a futile duel that extends over the ages, across time; and unless true, ends vile and cruel. Love is said to know nothing other. But I can't help but wonder, why bother? The world is all to which we are bound. To some it's the flag or the trees; some say the people; others, the wealth underground. I feel it to be none of those things we see. Yes, it would seem the world exists, that energy makes it futile to resist; but who is to claim we are nothing save the dream of the gods? Even they wake in shame at the fear of a dream forever shod. So would it not be best to save the dream for the simple truth that the vision may end with the world torn at the seams? So again I inquire as to which among these is most noble: to die for love or to die for the world?
© Copyright 2011 Keegan (UN: gankee-con at Writing.Com).
All rights reserved.
Keegan has granted Writing.Com, its affiliates and syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work. |