%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
 |    Not for the faint of art. |
| https://aeon.co/essays/mindfulness-is-loaded-with-troubling-metaphysical-assumpt... The problem of mindfulness Mindfulness promotes itself as value-neutral but it is loaded with (troubling) assumptions about the self and the cosmos Hey, look, an article that critiques this mindless "mindfulness" bullshit. Three years ago, when I was studying for a Masters in Philosophy... Normally, that's my cue to Stop Reading There, but hey - can't pass up a chance for Confirmation Bias. We gathered in strangers’ houses to meditate at odd hours, and avidly discussed our meditative experiences. It was a strange time. Okay, I'll say it: meditation annoys me. Not other peoples' meditation - if it works for you, great - but my own attempts at it. There is no difference, to me, between meditation and going to sleep. A popular activity (though I’ve never tried it myself) even involves eating a raisin mindfully, where you carefully observe the sensory experience from start to finish, including changes in texture and the different tastes and smells. Yeah, whatever. Something about the mindfulness practice I’d cultivated, and the way it encouraged me to engage with my emotions, made me feel increasingly estranged from myself and my life. You mean... it's just more snake oil? Tell me more. Instead of engaging in deliberation about oneself, what the arts of mindfulness have in common is a certain mode of attending to present events – often described as a ‘nonjudgmental awareness of the present moment’. There is no such thing as the present moment. There is only the immediate past. By the time you become aware of something, even within your own body, that something is in the past. In his book Wherever You Go (1994), Jon Kabat-Zinn, a founding father of the contemporary mindfulness movement, claims that mindfulness ‘will not conflict with any beliefs … – religious or for that matter scientific – nor is it trying to sell you anything, especially not a belief system or ideology’. "I'm not trying to sell you anything. Buy this book!" As well as relieving stress, Kabat-Zinn and his followers claim that mindfulness practices can help with alleviating physical pain, treat mental illness, boost productivity and creativity, and help us understand our ‘true’ selves. And make your dick bigger, and help your hair grow back, and... Buddhist scholars have accused the contemporary mindfulness movement of everything from misrepresenting Buddhism to cultural appropriation. Don't fucking get me started on "cultural appropriation." But if someone from a certain culture accuses you of appropriating something from their culture, maybe listen? We're not talking about sushi or kimonos here; we're talking about something that messes with your mind. Kabat-Zinn has muddied the waters further by claiming that mindfulness demonstrates the truth of key Buddhist doctrines. There have been books purporting that certain aspects of quantum mechanics also demonstrate the truth of key Buddhist doctrines. Those books are, without exception, bovine excrement. So I'm not going to believe that there is a "truth" in the scientific sense to any religious teaching. Not without hard evidence, at least. Critics such as the author David Forbes and the management professor Ronald Purser argue that, as mindfulness has moved from therapy to the mainstream, commodification and marketing have produced watered-down, corrupted versions – available via apps such as Headspace and Calm, and taught as courses in schools, universities and offices. Meanwhile, Drunk Yoga is still a thing. (Yes, I know that's from a different culture and religion. My point stands.) Contrary to Kabat-Zinn’s loftier claims to universalism, mindfulness is in fact ‘metaphysically loaded’: it relies on its practitioners signing up to positions they might not readily accept. Yeah, like proclamations from philosophers of old. One technique in Buddhism, for example, involves examining thoughts, feelings and physical sensations, and noting that they are impermanent, both individually and collectively. I take the exact opposite stance to Buddhist thought in this: I note that everything in the Universe is impermanent, and thus, the only "reality" is one of impermanence. Anything you think is eternal? That's the illusion. This worldview is controversial, I know, but without it, you start thinking that reality is fantasy and fantasy is reality, and that way lies madness. The problem is the current tendency to present mindfulness as a wholesale remedy, a panacea for all manner of modern ills. Like I said: snake oil. The questions of consciousness, of self, are tricky ones. It's possible that none of us can comprehend our own consciousness because we're living it. And the desire for easy answers is a very human one; we want to answer these questions definitively and finally - without complication. We can't get what we want, and that's annoying. I do know one thing, though: if the matter of consciousness is ever resolved, it will be by science, not religion. Religion and spirituality provide guesswork, no matter how intricate their frames or how firm their foundations seem. Science doesn't provide final answers, either, but we can get asymptotically close. |
 Log in to Leave Feedback |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
