Hello Pat
warriormom
Thank you for sharing your writing here on W.D.C. Today, I'm delighted to take a look at "
Choices (((under construction)))"
as one of my member-to-member reviews for March.
In this review, I share my feelings about what I read. My observations are made with the best of intentions, but please remember that they are just the thoughts of one enthusiastic reader. Feel free to disregard anything you find unhelpful.
Initial Thoughts
Wow! This is one strong, hard hitting scenario for a story. It has an emotional appeal on so many levels, which for me, makes it all the more compelling. Three POV in one short story is a lot to 'pull-off', and I think this story just about does it. Each character has such a unique POV that, as the reader, I accepted the frequent shift-changes more readily.
Thoughts and expectations from the title:
Short and Simple. I was curious as to what those choices were. If anything, I suspect the title underplays the content of the story a little, maybe something a bit more hard hitting would give the reader a better sense of what is to follow? Then again, your title did it's job just fine, so I'll leave it to you.
How do I feel about the main protagonist?
Well as there are three main POV, I'll touch on the impact each character had on me.
Mrs.Johnston - Her perspective feels a little clinical, but she appealed to me in spite of that. I can't say I liked her, but I understood her. She has the voice of reason. She lists all the reasons which justify her own opinion about where Cassie's best interests lie. She bases her decision on what she sees. Logic plays a huge part in her assessment of the situation, and I feel that the emotional implications seem a bit less important to her. It is hard to disagree with her, and even though she sees the love Cassie's foster parents have for her, the hard edge to Mrs.J's character leaves me feeling that although this might well be the right answer for Cassie, it is also a 'case solved' answer for Mrs.J. Is it best for Cassie, or is it best for her?
Miranda - Recognises the logic, but is driven more by emotion. Her own background plays a significant part in her thinking, and she recognises the long term implications of severing the emotional connection between mother and daughter. She is the voice of hope, she understands human nature, and she sees the risks, but she still has hope. There is a softer facet to her nature. Her history grants her a little empathy from the reader, though it does bring into question her motives. Is her solution best for Cassie, or is it a salve for what she is missing in her life?
Susan - A complex character that I personally had the most trouble accessing. I suspect that is because although Miranda understands addiction, I don't. I wondered if this was something that could be explored the tiniest bit more so that it is easier to empathise with her as a Mother with an addiction? If Susan really is desperate to have her daughter back, for me, that desperation didn't really come across as tangible feelings. Susan's motives are questionable too. Does Susan think Cassie will be better off with her, or does she just want her back for her own needs?
How do I feel about the pace and flow?
It's a highly engaging story, and I felt the level of tension maintained throughout no matter which POV I was experiencing. My only suggestion to improve the overall flow, would be to separate each POV with a tell-tale 'break'. I've seen some writer's use a carriage return, followed by *** and another carriage return. It just tips the reader off that something significant is altering in the story. In this case, the narrative.
Thoughts on any conflict:
The conflict is superb, and it resides in the undercurrents that run between these three women. Their different opinions on what is best for Cassie place the reader right in the heart of the conflict. The root of the story forces the reader to assess what is best for Cassie because these three women each have such different opinions and motives. I love that the conflict is not straightforward. There are strands of complexity running through this story and the reader has to ponder what they think, feel and believe.
Thoughts on the ending:
This is one of those stories where the 'right' outcome is almost impossible to determine without a crystal ball. To that end, although I was the tinest bit frustrated, I also understood the decision to leave the ending unresolved, and I think it shows remarkable insight and talent on the part fo the writer to do this. Whatever the outcome (in real life or in this story), IS this type of situation one that can EVER be fully resolved? Probably not, and I think the writer demonstrates a depth of understanding here that the reader can only appreciate with the ending as it is.
Thoughts on emotion and imagery:
For me, the emotional content is already established with the subject matter. It's impossible not to feel something for the situation these women are in. If I were to think about how this story could be expanded, it would be to shift the reader from engaged observer to engaged participant. At the moment we see and observe these women and their opinions. The next level would be feeling what their situation. I know you're awesome at this from your poetry, so forgive me if this is a bit like 'teaching your Grandmother to suck eggs', but as an example, you could take the following:
"Mrs. Johnston sat in the courtroom, waiting for the judge to return from lunch. He almost always took longer than everyone else. As she sat there, she wished she had chosen a cooler dress on this hot Alabama afternoon."
and show the reader how this feels:
"Mrs Johnston mopped the back of her neck with a crisp, white handkerchief. The temperature in the courtroom was oppressive, and not for the first time, she wished she'd chosen a thinner dress. Perhaps a drink would cool her down a little? She took a sip and swallowed the tepid water in disgust. Nothing could escape the suffocating heat on this hot Alabama afternoon. Drumming her fingers, she glanced at the clock on the wall and an irritated sigh broke the temporary silence...
Not great
, but I'm sure you'd come up with something far more engaging.
Outstanding questions or issues:
I did wonder whether the internal dialogue was necessary. Sometimes, if it doesn't sound 'just right', like something that would just spring into one's mind, then it can interrupt the flow a little for the reader. For example, in the following:
"It was obvious to her that parental rights need to be terminated. “Just get it over with, so Cassie could begin her new life. Put all this chaos behind her and forget about it. She’s just a baby; she’ll adjust fine to the Pattersons. They are good people, and they want a baby so badly.”
This could be expressed just as easily without feeling restricted by the need to make it a realistic yet 'unspoken' voice. For example:
It was obvious to her that all parental right needed to be terminated. She couldn't understand why Susan was here again today. Why wouldn't Susan just give-up and do the right thing? Cassie deserves a fighting chance with a family that loved her. She's just a baby; she'll adjust fine to the Pattersons...
Did I make any sense there? I hope it doesn't sound uppity! It's just a thought that popped in to my mind as I re read a few of the internal dialogue sequences.
Are there any technical issues I want to query?
Because of the number of female characters, and the three different POV there were a couple of places where I didn't easily recognise 'who' the subject of my attention should be. The use of three names in the next example, plus 'her' and 'she' meant I had to re-read it a couple of times to be clear who was referring to who:
"At that moment, Miranda, Susan’s social worker, came into the courtroom, running late, as usual. She had been Miranda’s supervisor for seven years, and she knew Miranda sometimes had a soft spot for the parents of the children in foster care. It was irritating to her..."
I did wonder whether this next line was a local turn-of-phrase or not. I would have used the word 'open' not 'opened', but I'll leave that one with you:
"Even the breeze from the large opened windows was warm."
My overall thoughts:
This is a fantastic story, and it undoubtedly has the potential for a far bigger story. There are so many questions posed in this one short story:
What happened in Miranda's past?
How did Susan get to be where she is today?
Who are the foster parents and what difference have they made to Cassie's life?
Where is Cassie's Dad?
Why is Mrs J. so dour?
How long has the case been running for?
and the most important one...
What happened to Cassie?
This could be an awesome story to revisit one day. Let me know if you ever do!
Once again, thank you so much for sharing your work.
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Go Noticed" .