*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/books.php/item_id/865259-My-Sporadic-Journal/sort_by/entry_order DESC, entry_creation_time DESC/sort_by_last/entry_order DESC, entry_creation_time DESC/page/4
Rated: 13+ · Book · Other · #865259
A sporadic account of my reaction to life.
Over the years I have sporadically attempted to keep a journal. Each attempt has failed miserably. I think they expired because I established rules that were too ridgid for them. So, this attempt will bring with it very few rules.


** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **



There are many incredibly kind and thoughtful people in WDC. One of them is zwisis. Out of the blue she sent me this flower gift. It reminds me of the Bluebonnets of Texas. Thanks, Sarah. And, I must not forget the very talented katherine76 who created the flower...thank you.

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **



Well, it appears that my blog is going to the dogs. It aslo seems as if folks have gotten me pegged as a dog lover....they're right. Our very own Anyea has gifted me with this Valentine card. Now I ask you, "How sweet is that?" Thanks, Anyea *Heart*

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **




I have been fortunate to encounter many generous and kind people during my tenure in WDC. Debi Wharton is one of them. She gifted me with the following sig. It shows how sensitive and caring she is. It also shows that she read some my entries. She'll never know how much I appreciate the gift and the attention to my blog.

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **





Previous ... 3 -4- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... Next
May 8, 2012 at 3:13pm
May 8, 2012 at 3:13pm
#752539
Is there such a thing as a moral dilemma? Of course there is. We deal with it every day. If I put my mind to it I can give you numerous hypothetical examples. However, my mind does not want to work that hard today. Suffice it to say, moral dilemmas exist.

My most recent short story creation focuses on a moral dilemma. It is based on a true story. If you are at all interested you can find it listed as: "Invalid Item. Is it possible for a lie to be morally acceptable? I think there are situations where that may be true. For example, my mother-in-law was 96-yrs old and in very tenuous health. Her favorite son-in-law died and the entire family withheld that information from her. She would have been devastated. What would be the good in sharing that distressful information in a person's final moments. Would that lie be wrong?

As indicated in the above referenced story, I recently experienced a situation that presented me with a moral dilemma. I made my decision, but now I wonder about it. What is the right decision? Nevertheless, I must now live with it. I can do that.
May 2, 2012 at 6:39am
May 2, 2012 at 6:39am
#752137
OK, rarely do I get pissed to the point where I call people names. But, this is one of those times. There is a real jerk out there in WDC-land. Of the hundreds of thousands who wander in and out of this site, I'm sure it is not surprising to find one. I mean, I knew it before...I'm just confirming it now.

Like many of you, I check in to my site periodically. I usually check the summary stats to see how many visits my material has had and to see what is being read. I have a piece ("Invalid Item) that is apparently featured on some newsletter or other such site, because for the last week it has sported several visits daily. Yesterday it had sixteen visits. That's not a lot, but when a piece receives that kind of attention over a week or so, it tells you that a few folks out there are looking at it.

Occasionally, only occasionally, one of the viewers stops and gives a review and a rating. That is always appreciated. It isn't necessary at all. In fact the reviews and ratings are not as important to me as the fact that someone is reading my stuff and appears to enjoy it. That's my reward. Now, I noticed that someone, yesterday, had rated the piece. In fact they rated the piece but did not review it. More so, they rated it anonymously. And that is where I got pissed off. The jerk rated it as a 1-Star. In other words it's a piece of junk that is unworthy of the English language. Fortunately, up to this point the piece carried a 4.5-Star rating and could withstand this pompous idiot's thoughtless act.

Now, I don't think I have ever rated a piece with a 1-Star...never. I have never, ever seen anything so poorly written in WDC such that it deserved a 1-Star. I don't have a problem with anyone thinking my work is junk. Everyone is subject to their own tastes. I have definitely seen work in here that certainly is not my "cup of tea." When I stumble into something like that I usually back out of the site as tactfully as I can, keeping my opinions to myself. But, I have never, ever, never rated a work with a negative rating and not provided a review supporting my reasons. And, I have NEVER given a One-Star. I mean, one of the purposes of this site is to help us become better writers. The only way we can do that is if we give each other constructive criticism. I don't know your position, but what this jerk did isn't it. Especially, anonymously...now, how constructive is that?

My only saving thought is that that jerk of a person was mistaken. I mean, could it be that he was confused and thought One-Star was the best and a 5-Star was terrible? I would like to think that, because the only other alternative is that somewhere out in WDC-land we have a lazy, cowardly, sniveling jerk running up and down the halls making a complete ass of him/herself. Surely, that isn't the case. Hmmm...does this qualify as a rant?

April 23, 2012 at 10:41am
April 23, 2012 at 10:41am
#751528
         OK, I’ve been whining for about a year now about getting a hammock. Good grief, you’d think it was a new car or something. But, nope, it was just a hammock. It’s not that I’ve set my sights low or anything like that. I like fancy toys like the next guy. But, I’ve wanted a hammock for I guess forever. I can’t count how many times I’ve gazed at the shady spot in my back yard, which God created especially for a hammock. Every time a cool breeze caressed the trees and brushed the shrubs in our back yard I’ve recalled visions of a hammock strung in that perfect spot—of course the vision included my plump arse planted in the hammock gently rocking back and forth with my shades propped on my eyes and a cool drink with one of those long curvy straws sticking in it. Etched in my brain was that image; and for the last year it played and replayed in my mind when I glanced into my back yard.

         And so yesterday I did it. I bought the hammock. Today I moved it to my back yard and positioned it in that magic spot. Perfect—it was perfect. Of course I took it for a trial spin as soon as it was positioned correctly. All I can say is that I think I’m going to like this. However, there are a few concerns. It was a used hammock, after all. I have not purchased the super duper Mayan hammock that I’ve had my eye on. Nope this one is just a temporary one. My Mayan hammock is rated for 600 lbs--certainly enough for my ample self.

         I am a large guy. At six-foot three-inches tall, I have a lot of me to build on. Over the last sixty years I’ve carefully and strategically positions over 300 lbs of quality muscle and fat on my frame. In other words, I need a 600 lbs. load rated hammock. I don’t know what the temporary hammock I purchased is rated for. All I know is it creaks and pops every time I settle into it. So far so good. It has held. I’m gonna get my load rated Mayan hammock eventually. But, for now I’m gonna stress test this other hammock since I’ve got it already tested out. The only thing that bothers me is that my dog Max, refuses to lie under me or even next to me when I’m tucked onto the temporary hammock. Is his super dog-sense telling him something that I don’t know? Is this a warning? Oh, and I need someplace to set my drink. My root beer dribbles down my chin when I try to drink from my hammock. I need to invest in some straws.

         The awesome thing about having a new load tested hammock is that it gives you a new view on the things around you. I mean literally. As you lay there in your hammock, you look up. Have you ever thought about how much you miss by living most of your life vertical? Certainly it’s good to be able to stand on your two feet and navigate around. But, by doing so we tend to miss stuff. For example, as I was lying in my new load tested hammock, I naturally looked up…like into the sky. As I was looking there a message appeared in the heavens. Now, stay with me here. The message was actually written across the sky. It wasn’t the finger of God sending me some revelation; it was some skywriters delivering a message. It said, “Visit Myrtle Beach.com.”

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **

What are the chances I would have noticed that if I had never looked up from my load tested hammock? Of course I saw other stuff as I looked vertical. I saw the sun sparkle through the leaves of the Redbud tree that was shading me. And, I saw my feet propped up in my new load tested hammock.


** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **

         All in all, I think I did a good thing buying my new load tested hammock. I look forward to some serious lying in that hammock this summer. After all, I’ve got to get my money out of it. Maybe you should think about getting one too. Who knows you may even see a message scrawled across the heavens when you gaze at the clear summer sky. I did.

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **

April 16, 2012 at 8:20pm
April 16, 2012 at 8:20pm
#751119
         There are some topics that by their very natures are polarizing. We are currently cruising into a national election. Republicans and Democrats and everyone in between are consistently and often vehemently hawking their respective positions. As a result, whether or not it is intended, things get shoved into conservative and liberal camps, where very little gray area seems to exist.

         And, that’s the problem. There is an awfully lot of gray area in these polarizing topics. But, things are not always as black and white as the labels would have them be. Generally speaking, I am conservative to varying degrees on different topics. On the topic of abortion, I’m sort of conservative. On the topic of capital punishment I’m conservative. On the topic of immigration, I’m almost moderate—not quite, just almost. And on the topic of gun control, I’m very conservative. And, even among these positions I find I am always adjusting and realigning myself, depending on new input I receive and further reasoning.

         I don’t believe we need any more gun laws. I also don’t believe we should get rid of the ones we currently have. I do believe we should actively enforce the laws that are currently on the books. The Second Amendment is a simple statement. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has definitively held that "the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." In the state of Texas the home has been extended to include one’s vehicle. “Conceal Carry” laws are established by states and are a separate argument, which I don’t want to get into at this time.

         I want to discuss the right of the individual to bear arms, or to own a handgun. I do not see how there could be any doubt as to the constitutional right I have to own a handgun and use it in defense of my family and property. The state of Texas has said I need not be licensed to have my weapon in my house or vehicle. If I wish to carry it elsewhere, then I must be licensed to do so, which I am. However, I do not carry my handgun on my person; I do not see the need to do so. You might be surprised to find I don’t think Zimmerman had a need to carry a handgun. However, I do believe he had the right to do so, if he met all of the requirements of the State of Florida for carrying a firearm.

         However, for the “conceal carry” equation to work you first need a responsible person. That appears to be the lacking element in this case. Whether Zimmerman was responsible will be determined by the jury. In my book there is no doubt that he was a stupid person. There was no need for him to be in that situation. His responsibility as a “watch captain” was fulfilled as soon as he called 911. A responsible person would stop and wait for the police.

         We cannot legislate “stupid.” People are going to act irresponsibly. That’s our nature. All we can do is to establish our statutes in such a manner that responsibility is encouraged; it cannot be guaranteed. We cannot guarantee a Navy Seal will not go rogue, we cannot guarantee a police officer will not act irresponsibly; and we certainly cannot guarantee our normally sane neighbor will not go insane. Laws are established for responsible people. The irresponsible among us care nothing for the law and will ignore them to satisfy their own agenda.

         Ban and remove guns from the population and the only ones having guns will be the outlaws—the nuts. And, don’t for a minute think a ban on guns will make it more difficult for outlaws to get the guns. All guns are illegal in Scotland; and that did not prevent Thomas Hamilton from shooting sixteen children and one teacher at the Dunblane Primary School. No, the black market will thrive. Most guns used in crimes are black market guns anyway—that’s the status quo. And, outlawing guns will not prevent the crazies from attacking a school or a crowded shopping mall with a homemade bomb, or other weapon. Crazy folks will find a way to fulfill their desires; that’s why they’re crazy.

         So, I suppose the question is do we remove the constitutional right of the individual to own a gun because there are irresponsible and often crazy people living among us? Well, are we willing to take cell phones out of the texting hands of drivers speeding down our highways? Or for that matter, are we ready to go back to the horse and buggy as our method of transportation? After all, 32,788 people died in traffic accidents nation-wide in 2010. I’m not willing to do that. The irresponsible and crazy people will always be irresponsible and crazy; and I, who am responsible, would then be unarmed.

March 18, 2012 at 10:52am
March 18, 2012 at 10:52am
#749082
         Multiple news media outlets recently reported the interaction between GOP candidate Mitt Romney and a struggling college student, regarding the cost of an affordable 21st Century education. Mitt responded as follows:

         “It would be popular for me to stand up and say I’m going to give you government money to pay for your college, but I’m not going to promise that. Don’t just go to one that has the highest price. Go to one that has a little lower price where you can get a good education. And hopefully you’ll find that. And don’t expect the government to forgive the debt that you take on.”

         As a result of this comment, Mitt has been severely criticized by those of the political left as being uncaring and out of touch with the American middle class. I read a well written article by Rebecca Sarwate, in a popular Internet blogging site, that criticized Mitt for his comments. The writer seemed to imply that it was his position of privilege which caused this disconnect with Main Street America. Now, Mitt may certainly be privileged, and there obviously appears to be some disconnect between him and Main Street America. However, I don’t believe it is necessarily on this issue.

          To that college student I would reply:

         Yes, the cost of education is expensive. Yes, I realize the cost of tuition when I first went to school is a fraction of what it is today. Yes, I realize students need help to get the education they so desperately are seeking. But, no! I will not condemn Mr. Romney for his comments or his position.

         It isn’t easy to make it through school. But, no one said it was supposed to be easy. Anything—ANYTHING--of value costs a great price. The work and toil we exert to pay that price is testament to its value. And, somehow the prize is much more cherished when we have to pay for it. So no! I will not pay for your education. It’s not that I don’t want to or even that I can’t. It’s that it is much more valuable and precious when you earn it.

         When I began my college education, tuition for a state school was about $900 per semester. That’s a far cry from the $4,500 it takes today (look it up—the average cost per semester in the US is $4,500.) From just that perspective alone, one can certainly understand the angst of the writer of the blog and the lowly student confronting Mitt. But, remember, when I began my college education the average annual salary was about $6,000 per month. I know that to be a fact because that’s how much I brought home to my wife and infant.

         To further set the perspective, our first home came with a purchase price of $13,500—a far cry from the cost of my current home. The poverty level today is measured around $22,000—more than three times the amount of my early annual salary. The middle income today, of which is the target of Ms. Sarwate’s article, ranges from $22,000 to $90,000—much more than my simple $6,000 in 1970.

         Obviously a college education costs a lot more today than it did in 1970. However, income potential is also much greater today than in 1970. That is by no means to say we are currently not living through difficult economic times. We certainly are; I feel it just like the rest of America. However, we must also view these current times with some degree of perspective relative to times passed.

         My point is—it was not easy getting an education when I did it, and I have earned my Master’s degree. But, it was by no means given to me. I worked through two-year colleges, transfers, scholarships, and 2nd jobs to get mine—no loans. Sometimes that’s what you have to do. That's exactly what my grandson is doing today.

         I don’t mind my taxes going to help students today with some of the load. I’m just not willing to be happy with paying most of the burden; it's not my education. It IS my future, and I want my future to be guided by individuals who earned their place in life--who know what it means to make the sacrifices to gain the rewards. That’s all Mitt is saying. And, although he came from privilege, I didn’t. Nevertheless we can still arrive at the same conclusion.

(originally published as a comment to Ms. Sarwate's article)
March 7, 2012 at 11:20am
March 7, 2012 at 11:20am
#748509
         Each of us has to own up to having a little of an ego. Admit it; it makes you feel good to receive credit for some idea, action, or creation you are responsible for. I can be as humble as the next guy, but I’ve got to admit there are times when I feel slighted when someone else receives credit for something I did. I can’t help it; it’s the little boy in me tugging on my mom’s skirt saying, “Mommy, look what I did.”

         Over the years I’ve had plenty of opportunities to practice biting my tongue on such occasions. Being a consultant, I occasionally come up with a really good idea. Having worked in the field of municipal planning for over thirty years a few of those really good ideas have been implemented across north Texas. When I drive through a community and see aspects of the city plan built as I proposed it should be, I quietly smile and say to myself, “See, I told them that would work.”

         Occasionally, I will be at a meeting where leaders of the community will be touting some study or plan they use as the gospel to guide them in the development of their neighborhood, I wait for them to say, “By the way, Dan wrote this plan and is here with us today.” Well, usually I just wait without any recognition. In most instances the mayor or council receives the credit as well as the praise for the marvelous plan.

         On one such occasion I had a planning director of a community say, “I would have recognized you as the author, but since you were paid to do this, I figured it was just part of your job.” I suppose I should be ashamed that I received payment for work and efforts expended on their city. Perhaps I should have done it for free; that way I could have slept without shame at night. Unfortunately, I wouldn’t have had a bed to sleep in or a roof over my head.

         What difference does it make that I received payment for an honest service rendered? Should credit not be given where credit is due? Of course it should; however, I’m not holding my breath. I’ve done this long enough to know that consultants don’t count; they are faceless and forgotten once the plan is adopted. So be it. But, just every now and then it would be nice for someone to say, “Thank you; you did a great job.” It's not as if I'm asking for an Oscar or a Nobel Prize.

         Next week I will have the opportunity to attend a meeting where a progressive community will be presenting their efforts and methodology in developing an historic plan of their old town area. They have already cited in the promotion material the historic document they are using as a guide through the process. As I read the material I recognized that the document is one I prepared for them almost twenty years ago. No one at the city was there when the plan was prepared. This staff does not have a clue that I wrote the thing. Nevertheless, I will be sitting in the audience listening to how they implement the plan realizing that I did that thing.

         I’ll probably nudge the guy sitting next to me and whisper, “That’s my plan; I wrote it.” To which I will probably get the response, “Sure you did.”
March 6, 2012 at 9:13am
March 6, 2012 at 9:13am
#748424
         I knew on the first day of my first real job, at age sixteen, someday I would do that retirement thing. I had no idea what that meant, other than I would not be working out in the field I was then in, cutting broomcorn. Now, many of you don’t know what that is or what the significance is. Let me just confirm you do it with your hands, arms and backs; it’s unpleasant, and you don’t make lots of money.

         I knew that someday when I retired I wouldn’t be working in broomcorn. I suspected I wouldn’t be doing my next job either, which was working on a drilling rig as a roughneck. No, I realized those jobs were stepping stones to get me closer to the job I would be doing as a career. I had no earthly idea what that was, and today as I look back at my career I’m amused as to how I got here. The steps through vocations to get to where I am today could never have been planned or choreographed. I had to stumble through life to get here. That I stumbled with such success surprises me as much as I’m sure it would all of my teachers, advisors, councilors, friends, and relatives.

         I’ve always realized that someday I would have to retire—voluntarily or involuntarily. I just hoped that when the time came I could do it gracefully and without worry. During the journey through my work years, there was always the possibility tucked in some insecure part of my psyche that I would be one of those homeless guys camping out under some bridge somewhere. Now, although anything can happen, I don’t really believe that one is much of an option today—fortunately.

         But, as I closed in on the age of sixty I seriously began dealing with the definition of what it means to be retired. Surely the video bytes of commercial scenes where granpa and grandson are sitting in some idyllic setting watching geese fly in the sunset is some of it. Certainly there is a portion of taking time to do the simple things with family. However, that is just a very small portion. There are lots of other hours in the day to occupy one’s time. Of course, a few moments must be set aside for mid-morning and afternoon cat-naps, which are highly underrated and an absolute must.

         The rest of the time is spent in leisure or at work—just like before retirement, except with the proportions significantly switched. The important thing is that both leisure and work be dedicated to things one enjoys. I heard for years that the most important thing to do in life is to find a job that you truly enjoy doing. Find a job that, when given the choice of doing anything else, that’s what you want to be doing. Get a job so that when you retire you do it anyway—you just call it a hobby. And, more importantly, you do it when you want to.

         That being the case, I think I just may be retired. I’m not ready to declare that at this moment; it’s just a suspicion I’ve been mulling over. I hardly ever work a forty hour week anymore—haven’t in years. In fact, I neither want to nor intend to. I piddle the day away studying stocks, trading a few, and keeping up with the business news. I also expend hours writing stuff—nothing special, just stuff. Fortunately I’ve made a little money on the stocks and with the writing. It’s enjoyable and it makes me happy. Nudged in the hours of the week are a couple of projects left over from my consulting days. Three or four clients are all I have going on at any one time and that is plenty for me.

         To me, retirement does not appear to be a specific date on the calendar. There is no last day at the office and no gold watch or party. I appear to be just slipping into it gradually. I suppose the day I claim my Social Security will be the official beginning of retirement. However, I know that isn’t so. On that day I’ll be doing the same thing I’m doing today—only Uncle Sam will be sending me a check…that is if there is anything left in his coffers.
March 3, 2012 at 5:23am
March 3, 2012 at 5:23am
#748205

(Editor’s note: Several years ago, in a moment of total imagination and freedom, I created the place I call Bloggovia. Perhaps it was due to total boredom with the regimented life of the workplace, perhaps it was a means of escape, or perhaps it was creative inspiration to just let my mind wander beyond the bounds of regiment and fact. Whatever the case Bloggovia was the result.

Needless to say, Bloggovia has been evolving. Little by little detail has been added. Its towns, mountains, and places have been named after folks who have wandered through my blog page and indicated they wish to be listed on the map. There are still places and features which need to be named. They are as many as the imagination will permit. If you, my dear wanderer, wish to be immortalized on the map of Bloggovia, you only need tell me by leaving a comment. I will find a place for your name or nickname.

In addition, the history, geography, details of Bloggovia still need to be documented. If you have information as to a detail, I ask that you share it with me so I can include it in the profile. There is much to discover about Bloggovia. Each town has its own history, each mountain its own story, and each river valley its particular legend. If you wish to help me document any of it, share it with us all. Each article of information reveals more of the image of the place—makes it more real, at least as real as the imagination will permit.)


You have to want to be in Bloggovia to get there. It is not a destination the disgruntled and nonbeliever can attain. Throughout history there are accounts of travels to parallel worlds and enchanted lands. Alice walked through the looking-glass into a fantasy land of strange and unprecedented occurrences. Narnia was accessed through a closet, which when opened by the unbelieving only musty old clothes were found. Peter Pan sprinkled a little fairy dust, courtesy of Tinkerbelle, and the believers flew to Never Never Land. Dorothy and Toto were whisked to Oz by a Kansas twister and returned only through belief and some ruby red slippers. And, more recently, on his way to Hogwarts, Harry Potter walked through a brick wall to gate 9-1/2 to catch the train to sorcerer school. Do you really think all these fantastic places are simply figments of a fertile imagination? Oh no, they are real places—real and unreasonable places only accessible to the believer.

Nine-hundred and five miles southeast of Pitcairn Island and seven-hundred and forty-five miles southwest of Easter Island lays an anomaly. Tucked into the dark blue waters of the south Pacific, well out of the sea lanes you will find the island of Bloggovia. For those who are geographers its center is located at 34:26:31.86 degrees longitude and 118:39:08.33 degrees latitude. The island is one-hundred and eighty miles in length running north and south and is seventy-three miles wide at its waist.

Those geographers among you are scratching your head in disbelief; because you know good and well there is no island in the south Pacific named Bloggovia. Sorry, but you are wrong. You are correct that you will not find it on any chart and Google-Earth does not show it. Generally, it has been ignored by the world, uncharted, unwanted, and unmolested.

The climate on the Isle of Bloggovia is the best of all worlds. The average temperatures range from its coldest experienced in July being sixty-three degrees Fahrenheit to its warmest experienced in February being seventy-five degrees Fahrenheit. The trade winds fan the island with gentle to stiff breezes all year long. There is no dry season in Bloggovia; almost everyday a little rain falls. Usually it occurs in the evening or early mornings and relents during the work hours of the day. The air is crisp and clean and smells of newly washed linens. The average annual precipitation is about 120 inches, which means it is green—very green.

Bloggovia is a totally electric island. You will find no gasoline engines on this paradise. Transportation consists of electric carts that are similar to golf carts. A monorail traverses the island and runs adjacent to the main costal highway, being Route One. The electricity to power the island comes from wind generation and solar batteries. Because of this things move a little slower. There is no need of speed limits on its highways; the vehicles just don’t go that fast. Accordingly, life’s pace seems to slow down a tad also.

In the world of information, where every inch of the country is combed and scoped by cameras suspended in space and then digitally recorded in computers, where 3D models of mountains and valleys are just a push of a button away, you’d think that an island that is 13,140 square miles in size could not go undetected—a reasonable assumption. But, held captive in our scientific mind is the ability to accept the unperceivable. The possibility that a land mass the size of Taiwan could co-exist in our world without our knowledge is unthinkable to a person of science and reason. And that’s precisely the problem. Reason is not infallible. You can’t believe everything you see and sometime you must believe what you don’t see or even those things that are beyond reason.

Welcome my friends, to Bloggovia.


[#] "Invalid Item
March 1, 2012 at 4:04pm
March 1, 2012 at 4:04pm
#748115
         It seems to me the US government may be guilty of selective application. You know, that’s where you apply great truths selectively in situations which most benefit a particular agenda. A dear friend pointed out a couple of comments made by the government, as follows: “The food stamp program, part of the Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the Park Service, also part of the Department of Agriculture, asks ‘Please Do Not Feed the Animals’ because the animals may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves.”

         Amazingly, there are scores of people who take great pride in the fact that we are feeding more and more people and increasing that number rapidly. And yet the Park Service warns us against the harmful effects of feeding the animals. Now before you begin your tirade proclaiming my intent to let the poor and defenseless starve, don’t. I am just as compassionate as my neighbor. Just think about this for a moment.

         Since we are animals too, should it not hold true that humans can develop the same type of dependency as other animals, when it becomes easier to receive a food handout than to work for it? Is it not within the realm of possibility that the human animal could possibly grow dependent and cease to take care of themselves? We cite Pavlov’s dogs to explain the human tendency to form habits. It just appears to me the Park Service has run a much grander experiment with feeding the animals. Should we not draw some conclusions from their experience?

         The last time I checked my biology handbook, humans are still part of the animal kingdom. We are just as impressionable as the animals roaming our wilderness areas. When food is scarce and difficult to come by, bears and other animals leave the protective canopy of the forest and venture into suburbia looking for food. They have discovered that we, the human animal, are easy picking. We toss our unwanted leftovers in receptacles which we conveniently store outside, that is if we don’t just throw our half-eaten hamburger and fries on the ground. Sometimes, out of curiosity and amusement humans hand-feed the hungry animals, ignoring the signs admonishing us to do otherwise. The animals, by the way, have learned it is much easier to receive this handout than to hunt for food in the forest. And perhaps they realize that we as humans have a disdain of being told what to do and will usually ignore any and all signs of admonition.

         Our welfare system is a necessary system. It must never be abandoned. We must have some sort of provision to assist those who are truly needy. Let’s face it; sometimes people just need help. However, we do a disservice to those we are helping when we promise unending support from the cradle to the grave. How can they be expected to stand on their own if they are not given the incentive or the opportunity to do so? It seems only reasonable to expect someone who is promised to be fed for month after month to wait until there are no more months before they attempt to stand on their own.

         And, we have a government that is bent on extending the feeding period to infinity, if left unchecked. Are we not enablers? In the guise of compassion, do we not deepen the dependency and helplessness of those in need—not to mention those who are intent on abusing the system? How is what our government does any different from what a drug dealer does to the junkies they supply? How will our actions under the guise of compassion and generosity ever break the habits of poverty, when we righteously ignore the signs which read, “Please, Do Not Feed the Animals!”

         Two-hundred-and-thirty-six years ago our government declared our independence. It was a novel idea that men should have the right and the opportunity to be whatever they could make of themselves. Truly we have discovered that equality is difficult to define. Even in the best systems we have discovered that some men were born more equal than others. However, we have been working under the framework of the guidelines established by our founding fathers to continually refine that right of equality. However, nowhere in our Declaration of Independence or the Constitution does it encourage the right of dependency of one individual on another. No Sir, it is independence which is the foundation of our government. Without casting judgment on any people, class, or ideology, the statement by the Park Service, “Please, Do Not Feed the Animals” may possibly be much more responsible than the ever expanding influence of the food stamp program.

February 23, 2012 at 9:54am
February 23, 2012 at 9:54am
#747669

         If you’ve wandered into this blog to gain inspiration to accomplish some life deed or if you’re seeking some profound bit of knowledge to spark some sort of life epiphany, relax; it ain’t gonna happen today—at least not here. Today I’m gonna compare me to my dog--our ages to be more exact. However, if you believe you can launch an epiphany from that, then stick around.

         For those of you who have never graced these virtual pages before, I’ve got an eight year old black Lab named Max—or he’s got me; we’re still figuring that one out. Anyway, through the years he and I have grown quite fond of each other. To say we are inseparable is only a gnat’s hair from being the gospel truth. Most days he is glued to my side. When I take a ride into town to do stuff you usually do in town, he goes with me. As I do my people thing in the places I go to, Max curls up in the back seat of my Titan pick-up truck and snoozes, which isn’t a bad thing since when I fold up the back seat he has a veritable dog run back there.

         Being close, we have the opportunity to do a little staring at each other. I have studied his chin recently as he slept on the floor beside me. I haven’t a clue what he has studied about me, but I am a little disconcerted as I consider he often joins me in the bathroom. I’ve noticed grey hairs are beginning to populate the side of his muzzle and beneath his chin. At first there were just a few solitary invaders which were over-powered by the mass of deep black hair that covers him—and our floor and furniture. He is so black he shines like polished coal. We have black hair everywhere. I’ve opened the refrigerator door to find a wayward black follicle perched on a shelf—yes, I know it’s disgusting. Please know I made the appropriate “yuk” sound when I discovered it. Nevertheless the invasion of grey hair on my dog, Max, is quite noticeable, especially now that it has invaded in more number and with a concerted effort.

         It’s obvious to me that Max is no longer a puppy. The energy and excitement of puppy-hood has long disappeared from his nature. Although he is playful at times, it’s more of a grown-up play. I suppose he doesn’t play as much anymore because I don’t play as much. I no longer run and jump and play with him, not because I’m a party-pooper; I don’t run and jump and play because I happen to be an old codger. I didn’t plan it that way, it just happened. The important thing is that Max really doesn’t seem to care that much. At eight years of age, he is quite content to curl up and sleep on my feet, which is a good thing because it gives him his rest and it keeps my feet warm. And, accompanying this change in activity apparently is the onslaught of grey hair.

         The invasion of grey hair on Max’s muzzle and chin testifies that age has established a beachhead on my dog. He is growing older. I don’t like to dwell on Max’s mortality. I’m not particularly fond of the idea he is aging much more rapidly than I am. It has been said that each year is like seven years to a dog, in terms of lifespan. Using that analysis, being eight years old would make Max the equivalent of 56 years. He’s sneaking up on me, who claims 63 years on this planet. That means on his next birthday he and I will almost be the same age (since I’ll sneak in one more birthday before that time.)

         This disparity in age caused me to do a little more research on the calculation of dog years. What I discovered is that the one to seven ratio may not be quite accurate. In fact, one dog expert contends that dogs age at a rate of 10.5 to one for the first two years of life and then at a rate of four to one thereafter. Considering that theory, Max would be a middle-aged 45 today. This mode of calculation would also put Max and me at the same age of 71 when he is 14.5 years—that’s over six years away. For right now, I'm still older than him. All I can say is that old dog and me have got a bunch of livin’ to do in the next six years. I only wish he was eligible for Social Security; I could use the extra check.

February 10, 2012 at 12:08pm
February 10, 2012 at 12:08pm
#746765
         There are a lot of good spots in our house. There’s the spot upstairs in my study under the big picture window. If you choose to camp out there you can sit in the easy chair and watch the world pass by from that elevated viewpoint. The Crepe Myrtle trees are big enough now that they frame the windows with scores of lovely purple flowers. And there is the space downstairs next to the piano. You can snuggle into one of the captain’s chairs by the window looking to the street. That’s the most likely space to steal time alone out of the hustle and bustle of the commotion in the house. Then there is the spot next to the fireplace in the family room. Although we seldom have the fire going, it still affords a comfortable environment being next to the massive inside tree and the windows looking out into the garden. Of course you can always settle in to the spot in the bedroom, where it is kept dark enough to sleep and light enough to read, which usually lends itself to doing a little bit of both on rainy days.

         With all these prime places to snuggle up and snooze away your idle moments it amazes me that my dog Max chooses none of them. Rather, he chooses the one underneath my feet at my desk—close enough that I can reach down and stroke his back and scratch him behind the ear. I suppose I should consider myself a lucky man, indeed, that that silly dog would rather be nowhere else except with me. Every time I prepare to leave the house I see him watching me with expectation, waiting for me to say, “OK, you can go.” And as I drive down the road with him propped up next to me watching the birds on the power lines and looking for cows in the passing fields, I know he is there because he wants to be with me. And in his own way he has done what many have never done—he makes me feel very special.

         He’s lying there beneath my feet as I write this—sound asleep, occasionally snoring, trusting and content with his world. He’s where he wants to be, and I’m glad and very grateful that he is there.
February 4, 2012 at 12:28pm
February 4, 2012 at 12:28pm
#746360
         I had breakfast with a beautiful young lady today. Her beauty is certainly physical but it extends much deeper to her inner-self, and surely to her very soul. The amazing thing about advancing age is that I am afforded the opportunity to watch a precious life evolve. I am mindful of the great journey my granddaughter has taken these first seventeen years of her life--from adolescent to a mature young woman; the transformation has been exciting and dramatic.

         For the last several years she and I have chosen to set aside the first Saturday of every month for breakfast with each other. Over that period we have sampled breakfast fares of numerous eateries located in our town and adjacent towns. The food has certainly been nourishing for the body, but more importantly the relationship we have shared has been satisfying to my spirit and hopefully her’s. She has shared her likes, dislikes, viewpoints, problems and dreams over these morning meals. I have attempted to provide a smidgen of grandfatherly wisdom whenever I could. Undoubtedly, I have received the better payment for these precious moments. I am therefore in her debt forever.

         We talked today about her quickly approaching graduation from high school and her plans afterwards. Gratefully, college is solidly in her future, as she seeks to find the institution of higher learning that will provide her the best opportunity for education at a price that satisfies the budget. It isn’t an easy task, but a necessary one. I have no doubt she will soon have that step taken.

         This caused us to discuss briefly the difference between her life in high school and her new life afterwards. Her high school years, although generally satisfying, have not been free of adolescent trauma. Her sense of right and wrong and her choice in making decisions led her to sever some long established friendships and forge new ones. Such is life in high school. But there is no doubt that today’s teenager is faced with pressures the older generations simply did not have. The peer pressure is tremendous, and young people are influenced by an onslaught of ideas and lifestyles conveyed by a communication system which was non-existent when I was in high school.

         I am proud of the choices she has made during these formative and confusing years. Certainly it is difficult to endure the changes from adolescence to young adult without the added peer pressure encouraged by media and friends. It forces young people to set boundaries and make difficult decisions as to who really is worthy to be one’s friend. Many teens fail at this decision; hopefully the damage is minimal until the lesson can be learned.

         As we talked, I shared my analogy of her current situation. Until this moment she has existed in a very controlled environment whose boundaries have been generally related to associations formed in high school. Her life and sphere of relationships have been largely influenced by her school activities. For these last twelve years she has rubbed shoulders with many of the same kids--each one maturing through the process of growing and learning to be an adult. Cliques have formed and social standards have been set, be they either good or not so good. Her world has been framed within the panes of the high school system, which was by law mandatory and beyond her control.

         In a couple of months she will graduate from high school and move beyond this system. She will move into a new society beyond the limits of the high school parameters. For many young people, this represents new freedom and new opportunities. Assuredly, for my granddaughter and for all of these young people, it can be a frightening experience often approached with excitement and bitter-sweet emotions. Until this moment she existed as a fish in a small pond, constantly bumping into the familiar things in that pond. Now, she will be released into the vast ocean—much deeper than the pond of her adolescence and filled with untold opportunities and strange things to bump into.

         What she does now is up to her. It is her decision. She can do as many have done and stay close to the pond, never venturing far from its familiar banks and bottom—always preferring to bump into the things she has bumped into for her first seventeen years of life. She can swim into to the ocean, but not far, keeping an eye on the distant banks of the pond while testing the waters of the ocean. Or she can jump into the ocean and swim—swim into its depths, claiming its vast waters and endless opportunities as her own—swimming far from the familiar banks of the little pond, being aware of the dangers of the deep but welcoming its currents and swells with the confidence of an accomplished swimmer. The decision is hers. What will she do? Regardless of her decision, I know she will be happy with the decision she makes, for it will be made with divine guidance.

         Personally, I suspect she will swim into the ocean, testing and claiming its depths as her own. Regardless of what she does, I am very proud of her and envy her greatly. Ah, if only I were seventeen again.

January 5, 2012 at 5:44pm
January 5, 2012 at 5:44pm
#743426
         I have concluded that our attitude in life depends greatly on how we manage the little annoyances in our life. Let’s face it, each of us is just a hair’s width away from being either a Pollyanna or Grinch. One added little annoyance on any given morning can set the pace for the whole day. Actually, the occurrence of just one annoyance usually is well handled; it’s when the dang things pile up with a seemingly conspiratorial assault that shoves one over the brink into Grinchdom. I know that to be a fact because I have been duly shoved this morning.

         The first little annoyance today began when I opened my eyes, which was not an entirely voluntary act. In the recesses of my sleep I registered a pulsating irritant—a noise. Gradually the sound morphed from a remote sensation as I crept closer to consciousness to a piercing chirping, slapping the comforting slumber from my embrace. The first annoyance of my morning came in the form of our smoke alarms, which anyone who has one already knows where this is going. The things emit an obnoxious chirping sound which purpose is to notify one of the need to change the batteries. The up-side of this happening this time is the chirping at least waited until 6:00 am to sound. Usually they gleefully begin their sirens song at 2:00 am in the morning.

         However, added to the annoyance of the chirping smoke alarms was the fact that my black Lab apparently has very sensitive ears. Each chirp caused the 80 lbs. wimp to flinch and seek comfort and protection. I can sympathize with the black canine, but for the life of me I do not understand why his place of comfort should be between my legs. With eighty pounds of Lab clinging to your inner thigh it is almost impossible to walk gracefully or with much purpose. It does no good to admonish the animal to move out of the way. With each chirp of the smoke alarm there is a responding flinch in the black Lab and an abandonment of any pretense of listening to me. In his eyes it was a matter of survival, to heck with the training. “Stay” and “sit” commands held no meaning in this situation for my whining canine friend.

         And so, with the incessant chirping in the background and the black Lab firmly “velcroed” (yes, it is a word-meaning to stick firmly to an object) to my thigh I attempted to tend to the urgencies of the morning before I tackled the chore of changing out all seven of the batteries in the smoke alarm system. There is no delicate way to say I had to go to the bathroom. You know the drill. It was early in the morning and don’t deny it is also a part of your own regiment. In any case, as I tended to the chore at hand, I discovered, as I rested in a very awkward position, that there was an empty roll of toilet paper next to the throne—annoyance number three, which was compounded with the fact that the black Lab was still pasted to my thigh and the chirping smoke alarm still resounded in the background like a demonic Muzak.

         Needless to say, I worked through these minor annoyances so that by the time my bride of forty-four years graced the kitchen to begin her morning it was guaranteed that almost anything she said or did would bring a grumpy response from me. Which, for me, was not the best move of the day. For afterward, with a couple of inches shaved from my profile (which equals a couple of notches,) I finally began my day as a certifiably insane individual. I know I am insane because Albert Einstein told me so. It was he who said insanity is making the same mistake time after time expecting a different result. Which means that in spite of the little annoyances life tosses me, do not retaliate by snapping at your wife in the morning. Only an insane man would do that. So much for the little annoyances in our lives.
December 22, 2011 at 3:38pm
December 22, 2011 at 3:38pm
#742372
A fellow writer, Dennis Page, recently penned an excellent article stating how lucky he felt for finding ViewsHound. His words were eloquent, truthful, appropriate, and garnered agreement and praise from scores of viewers, as well they should. However, they also touched a nerve in me. I've long had a reluctance regarding the word 'luck.'

It is overused and misused often. Although considered as being a synonym for the word 'fortune,' there is a subtle shade of difference between the two words. The best way I can describe it is by the use of a few analogies.

Luck is randomly choosing a series of winning numbers for the lottery. Even more luck is having those numbers selected. While on the other hand, fortune is having the ability to reason and choose those numbers. Luck is finding a parking space up front near the restaurant entrance. Even more luck is having it remain open as you successfully negotiate your way to claim it. On the other hand, fortune is being able to drive your car to the restaurant. Luck is finding the last music box in the store for your wife for Christmas. Even more luck is having them wrap it for you at no charge. And, most importantly, fortune is having her as your wife and knowing she doesn't care what the wrapping looks like.

Fortune, like luck, is the presence of rewarding, gratifying, and often pleasant conditions or experiences. However, different than luck, fortune is often the product of our actions—not always, but sometimes. For example, I am fortunate to live in a nice home. And, although I believe I am fortunate to be an American, that was totally out of my control, being I was born American. However, the fact that I live in a nice home has much to do with the commitment and persistence I dedicated to education and vocation. I was fortunate to have the opportunity to study and work, but my current status is due to neither fortune or luck, but hard work. Coming from a dirt-poor background, I can assure you luck had little to play in this; however fortune was abundant.

This was driven home to me recently, actually several years ago, as I was sharing a private moment with my eight-year-old granddaughter.

Out of the blue she replied, "Granpa, you sure are lucky."

Somewhat surprised I asked, "Why do you say that Lauren?"

"Well, you and Granma live in this big house and have all this stuff."

Considering the source, I smiled and agreed, "Yes, darling, Granpa is surely lucky."

However, I realized luck had very little to do with it. Fortune abounded, but work and dedication was fortune's team-mate. Through decades I lived and toiled, experiencing the down times as well as the rewards. There were many times when we had to decide which bill to pay: the water or the electricity. I stood with my hat in my hand many times asking creditors for patience while I met my obligations. I stood at the graveside of loved ones wondering how in the world I could continue without them. Until eventually I found myself in the presence of an adorable little girl who proclaimed I was lucky to have what I had. I could not disagree; however, a part of me wanted to strongly protest that luck had little to do with it. I am what I am by doing it the old fashioned way; I earned it. I was supremely fortunate to have the opportunity and ability to work; however, luck had little to do with it.

So, with unbridled love and devotion, I can hold that precious little girl, who is today sixteen, and whisper, "Yes, Lauren. Granpa is very very lucky." However, I know the score. I know the difference between luck and fortune. I'm sure that in time she will also.
December 22, 2011 at 3:37pm
December 22, 2011 at 3:37pm
#742371
I understand a Brahma cow has free reign in the Hindu world. Brahmas are treated with respect and permitted to go and do as they wish. They are untouchable—sacred. It appears that the same sentiment is applied in our own country regarding the Social Security program. Running the risk of tampering with this sacred cow and bringing down the wrath of the multitude, I'd like to discuss it in relation to trading in the stock market.

I'm convinced people don't want to read articles about trading stocks. I've reached that conclusion because every article I've ever written about investing in stocks has taken a nose-dive. No one cares. So, I've decided to write this one to prove my point. Anyway, I've come to the end of another year of investing in the stock market. Now, I'm no Donald Trump, so my portfolio is rather limited. But I have a mixture of stocks and mutual funds, which are invested in a number of growth products.

A couple of years ago I was very fortunate in that my portfolio grew at a rate of 23% that year—not a bad annual growth rate. However, that was then; this is now. After twelve months of watching, studying, charting, selling, and buying I find that I am right where I began on the first day of 2011—no growth from my growth products. Although the market has created quite a commotion by taking historic falls and perplexing recoveries, it remains even in the last moments of this year. A roller-coaster is an apt comparison.

Bear with me now; this is where this discussion gets sort of tedious. If you look at a chart of the Dow Jones Industrial averages (DOW) from 1900 to the present (http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/historical/djia1900.html) you will understand better the relationship of the stock market and financial history of our nation. In the time period, exceeding 100 years, the definitive event was the Crash of 1929. Interestingly, the Crash did not occur on that date; it simply began then. Over a period of a few years it plummeted to its all-time low, which interestingly was not lower than the high recorded for 1900. However, it took forty-six years to recover to the place it held on Black Thursday, October 29, 1929.

Nevertheless, if you had had a hundred dollars to invest in the stock market in 1933, you would have seen your investment steadily increase in market value all the way till around 1962, where it would have been worth almost eighteen times its original value. There was a plateau in the market from 1962 till 1983 and then it once again began climbing rapidly. That one-hundred dollar investment in 1933, the very depth of the depression, would be worth $31,000 today. Had the investment been one-thousand dollars, of course the amount would be $310,000. And, of course, that's not including any investments added to the original one-thousand dollars.

The recent stock market drops following 9-11 and in 2008 after the housing crisis are certainly significant. However, in the scheme of things, when considering the historic trends of the stock market, they are little more that corrections in the market. They have not represented a full-fledged crash. They are rather a sideways movement with volatile falls and rises, similar to what was experienced between 1962 and 1983. Now, this is not to say times are not bad. They most certainly are. What it implies is, that as bad as times are, the market is still tracking true to its history. That means in the future we should expect a steady upward movement of the market for a number of years. The big question for us who are living in this particular moment in history is when will that upward movement begin?

Now all this brings me to the topic I really wanted to discuss. For fifty years the Social Security Administration has had my money to invest. The money in my SS account is principal deducted directly from my paycheck; the federal government has not added one penny to it. I can't see that they have done much better than I have done myself. Upon my retirement, the federal government will allocate funds back to me that I have put in over my working years. It is doubtful I will receive the total amount I put in. In fact, the federal government is betting that I will not. They intend for me to die before I receive the complete amount. They will still dole some out to my wife, but they are betting she won't last long either. And that is what we call social security.

I suspect you recognize this as being a conservative position. But I was wondering; why not let each citizen manage a portion of what they pay into the Social Security System? It is their money after all. I assure you, each of us has our own best interest at heart. Whereas the federal government cares little about our personal interest but rather is busy mismanaging the mega-bucks pouring into Social Security from all of us.

Now, I suspect there are many folks who contend that, although I may be capable of managing my own money, there are many people who can't. That's very true. For those folks, let professional money managers, much like mutual fund managers, manage the money. Large corporations do this with 401K funds every day. Or, a novel idea would be to let those folks with queasy stomachs simply opt out and leave well enough alone. Just do it like it's done today. But, at least give us the option. I can assure you there would be more money in the system to spread around. There certainly would not be less.

By all means the stock market is complicated. However, it is not that difficult once you do a little study—especially in this age of the Internet. With training and a little experience, even a novice can invest wisely and make more money than the Social Security Administration does. I've never understood why people revolt against managing their own stocks. If I could show you how you could make as much money as you do now and spend half the time doing it, would you not consider it? The amazing thing is most folks would not, because they simply don't believe it. There is a phobia against dealing with the stock market. There are old wives tales of bankruptcy and financial ruin resulting from trading in the stock market, which when done wisely is simply not the case. Besides, all this talk of stocks is boring and tedious.

What happens is people get the idea imbedded in their minds that only a stock broker is qualified or smart enough to understand the market and they therefore leave it alone, as if it were a forbidden fruit? I can assure you, as nice as that broker may be—even if he's your brother—they are not as concerned with your personal finance as you are. Brokers make money by selling and buying stocks; it's that simple. Whether you gain or lose makes no difference to them; their money comes from moving stocks in or out of your portfolio—or administrating the fund. They may feel badly that you lose money, but they still get paid. Trust me; I had a very good friend who brokered our Simple IRA fund for our company, who placed the funds in very safe, low returning funds. Thank you for not losing our money, but shame on you for not taking advantage of solid growth opportunities where the return was double or triple. We were forced to take management of our own accounts to right the situation.

Social Security is starter money. Everyone I know has to subsidize that fund with some other retirement fund or income. If I were to retire solely on my Social Security benefit, I would be below the poverty level. Had I had control over that fund, it would have easily been doubled. I expect some folks to vehemently argue against me regarding this. Any system that permits an individual to manage his own Social Security funds would certainly have to have regulations controlling wild investment schemes. Fine, put those controls in place. Controls to protect against mismanagement is easily applied. Even with limited control over fund management, the returns would be much better than what the Social Security Administration has proven they can do. Why not provide that option for those who choose to do so? It really is their money after all. That's a little detail the federal government seems to keep forgetting.
December 22, 2011 at 3:36pm
December 22, 2011 at 3:36pm
#742370
Monday 19 Dec 2011

I’m a little confused. As I watch the news on television I am assailed with the woeful plight of the economy in America. Now, I know these people are not lying to me. When they tell me folks are out of jobs and there are few to be found, I believe them. When they tell me folks are losing their homes and foreclosures are running rampant like a wildfire through our nation, I believe them. When the protestors cry that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer and jobs are nowhere to be found, I really want to believe them. Every day, pundits cite studies and figures proving we are in a recession and it’s getting worse. Surely the end of the economic world is precariously balanced on the edge of destruction.

So, why is it every teenager I see has an iPhone and drives a new car—or at least newer than mine. Why is it that the stores can’t keep up with sales of the latest Kindle Fire or iPad tablet? I know I can’t afford one. Who is buying that stuff? Who is spending that money? Surely it can’t be the downtrodden 99%.

My wife and I are semi-retired. I would be fully retired but just can’t afford it right now. But, being semi-retired, we splurge a little and eat out often. After spending forty-five years preparing meals for her family, I consider my wife has earned a vacation from the kitchen, unless of course she wants to be in there. As we visit our favorite restaurants I notice I am not dining alone. Heck, on most evenings we have to wait in line. The restaurants are full. Surely not all those folks are semi-retired old fogies like me. Someone is spending money on go-in-and-sit-down food.

This Christmas I made a visit to the mall to do a little shopping. Do you believe they had police officers directing traffic in and out of the malls? I had to park in the north-forty to get a parking space and then made a trek into the mall area, which was crowded with people. Do you suppose all those people were window shopping or do you think they were buying stuff, spending money? Well, by the evidence of the bags they were carrying, everyone bought something. That is everyone except me. I turned around at the door and came home to do my shopping on my computer, which by the way worked fine.

I see a few foreclosure signs in our neighborhood. That is so sad. I hate that someone has fallen on distressed times. However, I also see new folks moving into those houses. Someone is buying houses out there. Although, granted, there are parts of the Rust-Belt which have been devastated—places like Detroit. I suppose many of those folks have come down to where I live, looking for new opportunities.

And, lastly, the unemployment figure confuses me somewhat. Let’s see; according to the Bureau of Labor the unemployment rate nationally for November 2011 was around 8.6%. That means 91.4% of Americans had jobs. Certainly, some of those jobs were menial and low paying jobs; but they were jobs, nevertheless. Am I mistaken to understand that almost everyone has a job, at least 91.4% of the folks?

My quandary is this. I don’t doubt that some folks are experiencing exceedingly hard times. In fact, I suspect most folks have to be very prudent with their spending. And, I don’t doubt for a second that there are some folks out there who have lost their jobs and just can’t seem to find a new one. That certainly must be the case. However, when we compare this to the Great Depression, where there were soup lines stretched down the streets, where folks literally had no money for necessities, much less luxuries, and where life savings were wiped out by bank runs, our current condition just does not sync.

Somehow we are living in a different kind of poverty and distress—one where each member of the family has a car, communicates by iPhones, and has wireless Internet access. Most kids have a flat-screen TV in their room hooked up to a GameBoy. This modern depressed society waits in line for movies, concerts, and wears the latest clothing fad. But, rather than wait in a soup-line, they wait in Line at McDonald’s for a super-sized meal. Somehow the distressed multitude of our time are still able to spend money like it grows on trees. How do we do that? Do you think it is because we have developed a society which is used to spending someone else’s money—a society who thinks it is justified and entitled to go into debt just because everyone else is doing it? And, could it be because we have a corporate America who is more than willing to loan people money they don’t have for a small fee, knowing they will never collect on the loan? No wonder our government is in debt; it appears the people condone it.

I don’t know. I’m just confused with what I see and what I’m told. Am I the only one?
December 22, 2011 at 3:34pm
December 22, 2011 at 3:34pm
#742369
Sunday 18 Dec 2011

I read an article the other day addressing Internet compulsion/disorder … or something like that. That kernel of thought has planted itself in my mind and is germinating. I wonder if I am a casualty of such an affliction. Like any addict I disdainfully shake my head and say, “No that’s not me. I can stop anytime I want to.” However, I find myself behind this screen, banging on the keys, and putting out a new article to publish.

First response: I’m not wasting time; I’m being creative. I am a writer. Well, that’s not quite true. I am really a businessman—in fact, a pretty good one. Over the last thirty years I’ve formed a consulting firm and established a solid reputation with my clients. I have a wall covered with degrees and awards testifying to my commitment to my profession. And yet, I find myself putting off client deadlines as I edit and hone an article for ViewsHound which will earn me little, particularly in comparison with my fee as a professional consultant.

Second response: Writing and posting to the Internet fills a need to be creative. Ah, partial truth—see how we fool ourselves? As a child I wrote short stories. I have always enjoyed writing. With the advent of the Internet I have rekindled that passion, joining a few writer’s sites and sharing my written creations. Occasionally, someone outside my ring of influence offers encouraging accolades, praising some piece I’ve written, encouraging me, which is nice of them but not helpful in fighting my Internet compulsion. I have even become my own fan on occasion after reading something I thought was particularly well written. “Dang, that’s good!” I fawn dreaming of the Pulitzer Prize it will surely garner. I can’t understand why no one has contacted me to inform me of the Prize. Maybe they don’t have my address.

Third response: I really don’t spend that much time on the Internet. Well, I don’t know how to measure that. How much is too much? I suspect I spend more than I should because I feel guilty about it. Yeah, I know I should be cranking on that boring study for my client, racking up the billable hours. But, I still manage to pay the bills and meet the deadlines. However, I know I could have spent more time on my clients. I have long ago forsaken the 40-hour work week. I tell myself it’s because I’ve paid my dues. It’s now time to slow down—to do the things I enjoy like writing. True, but, how much of my slowing down is due to redirected interest in the Internet and how much is due to slowing for retirement?

Fourth response: It’s a good social thing—much like golf. It’s nothing like golf. Heck, I don’t even play golf, so how should I know. Social as the Internet may be, I don’t think it is the same. I do get to meet a lot of folks—well virtually at least. I’ve never been into the ‘chat’ thing, and the porn sites simply don’t interest me. I’m certainly not going to pay someone to talk dirty. What a waste of money. However, I do like meeting new talented and professional people. The writing sites have been ideal for that. Unfortunately, I’m a card carrying conservative and many of my writing friends are flaming liberals. Makes it interesting. Amazingly, I’ve actually made some very close friends through the writing sites; and managed to meet some of them face to face, which was a very rewarding experience, which both my wife and I enjoyed very much.

OK, I have candidly exposed my virtual belly. I admit I spend lots of time on the Internet—lots of time on these writing sites. Am I an addict? Oh, I don’t know. Maybe I spend too much time in here. But, counting this one, I only have eight articles published so far. My most read piece only has 225 views. I’ve got six followers and they don’t ever say anything to me. Now, how social is that? But, yet I come back every morning to check my site. And, I bang out an article or two occasionally. I must admit my other writing site (www.writing.com) has over 270 pieces and 30,000 views. That’s likely the reason I’ve gotten addicted (if I am.); people actually view my stuff—amazing.

I would pursue this in more length but I’ve got to go do some real work. I can’t stay on this thing forever. However, I will most certainly be back.
December 22, 2011 at 3:32pm
December 22, 2011 at 3:32pm
#742368
Saturday 17 Dec 2011

It was not my intent to become a conservative. Like most folks, I hate being labeled. My last article in ViewsHound attests to that. However, I suppose I really am a conservative, which is particularly worrisome in a writing community since it seems the lion’s share of folks are liberal minded. Now, don’t argue with me about that; it just appears to be so.

Unfortunately, as soon as I don the conservative label, people look at me strangely. Well maybe not all folks, but a bunch of them do; at least those from around here do. I want you to know right now I’m not particularly proud to be a conservative; I’m not ashamed of it either. I am proud of who I am. I am confident in what I believe, which just happens to measure out to be of the conservative ilk. And, although I am probably not the greatest champion of the conservative standard, I can hold my own when going toe to toe with one of those nasty liberals.

It has taken me sixty-three years of wandering through the mire of politics to finally set my feet on solid political ground. To my amazement I wonder why there are so few up here with me? Could it be there is more than one way of looking at things? Could it be there is more than one way of doing the right thing? Could it be that there are liberal folks standing on solid ground of their own? Of course there are. That’s the thing that amazes me—the great contradiction: there is more than one right answer.

Does simply being committed to my solid ground, when it is different than yours, make me a bad person? Regardless of what ground on which you stand, I believe you could be my friend—unless of course your intent is to harm my family or me out of malice and spite. I have to think that leaves ample opportunity for making lots of friends who stand on all kinds of different ground. However, some folks will not have me as their friend simply because of the conservative ground on which I stand. Some judge me simply because I stand here. Now, I know we all do that to some degree unconsciously. That’s just the way we are made—subjects of our environment and upbringing. But, at times the sentiment against conservative thinking is so venomous it pollutes the possibility of having a new friend. I hate that.

So, what is it I believe that makes me such a bad person? Perhaps I am a little sensitive. But, what do you expect of a person when they are called stupid, close-minded, insensitive, and retarded—all this simply because I’m conservative? I’ll briefly mention a few of the things I believe which seems to encourage this response. Of course, that leaves me open to someone criticizing me from their different solid ground. I’ll take that chance.

Up here on my solid ground I believe individuals are the greatest resources we have. Decisions should be made by individuals with as little interference from the federal government as possible. I believe government should help and protect us, but not provide for our every need. I have other resources for that, and I am an adult capable of directing my own affairs. I believe regulations should be established on the local and state level as much as possible; federal regulation should have a very limited place in my family or finance. Sure, there is a need for some taxes, a strong military to protect our shores, a judicial system to enforce our laws, and a police system to deal with interstate conflicts.

My argument is not whether a poor family deserves assistance; it is who should provide that assistance. Assistance to the poor and needy is all of our responsibility; not the federal government’s. In addition, assistance is not a right; it is a privilege. If and when I need assistance, I want it to be given to me by those who chose to do so, not because they are made to. I give because I care. Of course the question is how do we motivate individuals on the local level to accept that responsibility? That is a difficult task to be sure.

However, it is being done in myriad ways by state governments, civic and service organizations, charitable organizations, religious institutions, and philanthropy by the richest among us—the 1%. To simply pass it on to others is to ignore our responsibility by letting the other guy do it, which in this case is the federal government. We all realize it takes a large bureaucracy for the federal government to do this. And, we can never escape the fact that the larger government gets the more opportunity there is for graft, corruption and inefficiency. In addition, it is documented that as taxes increase, there is a proportional decrease in charitable giving.

Now, do I for an instant believe this can be done totally by individuals and local governments? Of course not—but the involvement of the federal government should be kept at a minimum, which means welfare efforts should focus first from the local level.

An example is the case of federal response to natural disasters. In 1900 the City of Galveston was devastated by a hurricane which was on the scope of Katrina. The estimated deaths were between 6,000 and 12,000 persons. The city was totally destroyed. However, out of the debris the residents rose, dusted themselves off, buried their loved ones and began rebuilding. Over 2,000 buildings were raised to a safe level; some of them being raised as much as seventeen feet. Victims of the Galveston hurricane did not receive federal relief. There were no trailer homes hauled in for temporary housing. Most assuredly there was significant hardship for the victims; some never recovered. However, out of the debris a new city rose which was a testament to the spirit of the individuals. There was no national outcry as to why FEMA did not respond, and the President was not criticized for moving too slowly. There was a national concern as to why there was no warning. But, it was a much different approach than what was witnessed with Katrina (see Isaac’s Storm by Eric Larson.)

A more personal example is of my family home. In 1975 a tornado ripped through central Oklahoma and destroyed our home and the homes of our neighbors. We were fortunate to escape with our lives. As we walked through the rubble of the aftermath, the first to arrive was the fire department followed by the Red Cross and National Guard. FEMA was not to be seen and was not even expected. Neighbors, friends, and the National Guard helped dig through the rubble and secured entry into the area. However, over time, our home was replaced by efforts of my family and friends, without any assistance from the federal government. And that is as it should be.

Those who stand on the ground upon which I stand have often been accused of being insensitive, uncaring, and hateful. Is it insensitive to believe that each of us has a responsibility to be all that we can be, to be productive, and to not expect a free lunch but to be grateful when one is offered to us? To reform the Social Security system does not mean I hate old folks. On the contrary, at sixty-three years of age I am rather fond of that demographic. Similarly, to reform the welfare system does not mean I hate the poor. What I hate is mismanagement of funds and abuse of the program. Reformation of both Social Security and Welfare programs which address mismanagement and abuse would save billions of dollars. And while we are at it, reformation of defense funding can realize significant savings. I am convinced we can still have a strong military and cut the budget.

To acerbate my position even more, I confess I am also a Christian. Goodness, a conservative and a Christian—what a handicap that must be. I don’t see it as such, but some folks do. To identify as being a Christian tells the world I believe Jesus Christ is the son of God and is the avenue to eternal salvation. Why then should it be so scandalous for me to admit that I disagree with the belief of a Muslim, Hindu, Jew, or atheist? I mean, doesn’t the fact that they identify other than I do mean they believe I am in error? I have no problem with them believing that, because they are truthful and faithful to what they believe. I cannot condemn them for what they believe. Just don’t ask me to accept it. I cannot be true to my own faith and believe otherwise.

But, more importantly, whether it is my faith or my political stand, it does not mean I hate those who do not believe as I do. There is room enough in this world for me to accept the right of others to believe as they wish. Just don’t require that I believe as they do. I cannot believe in, accept, or even condone that which I believe is not correct. I cannot believe they are right and remain true to what I believe. That in no way means I hate them. On the contrary I believe they are a creation of God, as am I. As such they are a person of worth, worthy of my respect and affection—until they prove otherwise. This holds true with my faith as well as the place on which I stand politically. That is who I am.

I don’t believe in Keynesian economics. I believe in pouring resources into both large and small businesses and letting them grow and fuel the economy. I believe in taking the shackles off of business which consists of onerous regulations, which doesn’t mean we give businesses license to rape and pillage the land. No, just give them a little slack. Growing businesses create jobs. I know a little about that. I don’t believe in socializing health care. Make health care competitive. Competition has a way of equalizing the field. This doesn’t mean we forget the poor who can’t afford health care. Nope, make it profitable for health care providers to serve the poor in innovative and affordable ways. I’ve found the marketplace is remarkably flexible and innovative in ways the federal government can never be. Let the market do what it does best.

OK, I’ve shown my spots. You see me as I am. I’m not a hateful person. I’m really not a redneck; nor am I some sort of religious fanatic. I do stand on ground that is conservative. But I contend that I can stand here and still be your friend; if you will have me. Oh, I don’t mind if you consider me as being misguided. I may even think the same of you. However, that doesn’t mean I consider any less of you. On the contrary, I value a friend wherever they may be found—on whatever ground they stand.
December 22, 2011 at 3:31pm
December 22, 2011 at 3:31pm
#742366

Saturday 10 Dec 2011

It’s difficult to find the proper label for a person. Even though we realize we shouldn’t pigeon-hole folks into political categories, we do. Let me see if I have this straight. Most Democrats are liberals, most Republicans are conservatives, most liberals are Occupy folks, most conservatives are Tea Party folks, most liberals are tolerant, most conservatives are intolerant, most liberals are pacifist, most conservatives are war-mongers, most liberals are atheists, most conservatives are religious fanatics, most liberals are bleeding-hearts, most conservatives are cold-hearted, most liberals want to save the world, most conservatives want only to rape and pillage the world, most liberals are infallible, most conservatives are liars, the poor are mostly liberal, the rich are mostly conservative, and on and on it goes.

The Occupy “Someplace” movement is an appropriate setting for this discussion. It is no secret; I am not supportive of that movement as I see it now practiced. (Doesn’t that make me conservative?) Occupy had my support on the first day of the movement. (Doesn’t that make me liberal?) I listened to the voices, sympathized with their frustration, and identified with the emotion of the crowd. As the movement progressed, my support dissipated. In its incessant demand for fairness it has become accusatory, rude, and ruthless, (which some see as a conservative trait.) Occupy appears to vilify everyone and anyone who is ultra-successful in business. Every CEO of every corporation has been pronounced guilty of greed and avarice regardless of their background and past performance. Corporate America has become guilt by association—guilty because of who they are rather than what they have done. And, because I support corporate America, I suppose I am considered guilty as well. (Which would certainly make me conservative, I think?)

The nebulous 99% of America is portrayed as the victim of the evil, greedy, cold-hearted 1%. Perhaps the 99% really are helpless hapless victims; I don’t know. However, I ask you, “How did they get there?” Who perpetrated this great wrong on the innocent and naïve 99% (who would be liberal of course, wouldn’t they?) Is the bad-guy really evil corporate America (who is conservative.) Or did evil corporate America simply heed to the petitions and desires of a spoiled child?

The fact is corporate America responded to a spoiled child who had an obsession for stuff—more stuff. But wait a minute, that would make corporate America sensitive and caring (which is liberal; isn’t it?) In any case, spoiled America screamed, “I want more stuff and I want it NOW!”

Corporate America responded by giving freely to the spoiled child (or at least close to free.) I mean, this is business after all. Accordingly, corporate America charged a small fee for the ‘no-down payment’ and ‘delayed payment’ loans, which was necessary for the spoiled child to acquire all its stuff free (or at least near free.)

“You can have this stuff and don’t even need to make a payment on it for twelve whole months…really!” Corporate America urged.

Accordingly, the spoiled children lined up in unruly lines to claim their share of free stuff—or nearly free. Corporate America, in turn, justly realized a profit. As long as someone else was paying the interest and the spoiled child got its stuff, everything was fine. Both corporate American and the spoiled child were happy.

Eventually, corporate America devised a system where they could sell the spoiled child’s debt to each other and make a profit on it, which wasn’t illegal, just a little sneaky. After all, the spoiled child could care less as long as it was considered someone else’s money. They were getting their stuff, and that was all they cared about. (However, that would make them greedy, which is conservative, isn’t it?) More so, whenever someone attempted to restrict or account for corporate America’s actions, the spoiled child would throw a tantrum and halt any attempt to quench their flow of stuff, which they got free or close to free.

But, as is the great truth in life, nothing is free. One day someone suggested it was time to pay for all that free stuff. Certainly, that someone most assuredly must have been conservative, because that just wasn’t a very nice thing to suggest. Corporate America dug deep into its pocket and counted its money. To their horror they discovered they did not have enough money to pay for the spoiled child’s stuff, so they had to ask the spoiled child to pay for it.

“I thought this stuff was free!” protested the child.

“No,” responded corporate America patiently, “It’s not free; it’s almost free. But, now you’ve got to pay for it.”

“I don’t have the money!” cried the child, which certainly makes them liberal.

“Well, I guess we’ll just have to take the stuff,” reasoned cold-hearted corporate America.

To the spoiled child’s dismay, they watched corporate America take their stuff back, which is definitely something a greedy conservative would surely do. However, when the accounting was complete, corporate America discovered they still didn’t have enough money. Fortunately, they had a rich Uncle who gave them lots of funny-money, which he himself had borrowed or printed (as it suited his fancy.) As a result, corporate America could pay the bills (which by the way doesn’t make the Uncle either liberal or conservative—just stupid.)

And so, today we find the spoiled child standing defiantly in the streets outside corporate America’s office, as part of the Occupy crowd, protesting the fact their stuff has been taken and they don’t have a job. Corporate America would be happy to give each of them a job, if they had one. But, when they covered the spoiled child’s debts, they downsized and lost that ability. Of course, corporate America has money in the bank, and the spoiled child resents that. It appears corporate America continued to do business even through the difficult times—(isn’t that an awfully strange thing for business to do?) However, it’s a good thing they did, because 90% of the spoiled children work in their companies.

Sure, some of the folks at the top have a lot of money, and some of them have lots and lots of money. That’s how business works. However, that shouldn’t prevent the spoiled child from changing his ways and working his way out of the mess to become successful himself. (But, wouldn’t that make him conservative?) Or he could stand outside the offices of corporate America and chant, “Give me some of your stuff…that’s only fair!” That makes him liberal; doesn’t it? I don’t really know. I’m just trying to understand and keep all these dang labels straight.
December 22, 2011 at 3:29pm
December 22, 2011 at 3:29pm
#742365
Friday 02 Dec 2011

My best friend has a furry butt. I don’t know quite how it happened; but, it did. Over a period of time a bond has developed between an ole fat guy and a big black dog. Since the dawn of time, ever since there have been men and dogs, that bond has somehow formed. I don’t know if God ordained it or if it was just too strong a force for Him to control; all I know is He just lets it happen.

Again, I didn’t intend to get this attached to that furry butted dog; I don’t know how it happened. I’m sure this is nothing unique. Everyone who has ever loved a pet can identify with the emotions. Surely, it doesn’t warrant special treatment in an article. I mean, who would read it? I can honestly say, “I don’t know.” However, for some reason it satisfies a need in me. For some reason I’ve got to tell someone about it—perhaps if only to afford someone else with the opportunity to identify with what has happened to me. If you’re considering getting a pet, let this serve as a warning; your heart will be stolen. You will fall in love.

As time passes I witness my attachment to the dog deepen. When I’m away at a business meeting I actually find myself looking forward to returning home to that black wagging butt (he can’t possibly wag just his tail; the whole butt wags.) It warms my heart to think that no matter how his day went, when I walk through the door, he is up and greeting me; he’s happy I’m home. He depends on me; he trusts me. Yes, I believe he loves me.

However, the experts tell us dogs don’t love. Their apparent affection is simply a response to ancient bred traits of a pack animal. I’ve decided to let the experts think as they wish. I know better. What I see in that dog’s devotion to me and my family is as good a demonstration of love as I will ever find. Accordingly, I do the best I can to not let him down. I feed him, walk him, wash his furry butt and give him lots of petting and gentile words. It seems such a small price to pay for all the devotion I get in return.

Similarly, he seems to feel that I belong to him. Whenever I’m up and walking around, his eyes are on me; following me around as I move about. If I leave the room he moves to the room I’m in. Heck, if I go to the bathroom he lays outside the door and waits, after he has nudged it a couple of times with his nose. Lately, he insists on going with me in the truck. If I know I’ll not be out of the truck for more than thirty minutes, I take him and let him curl up in the floor while I’m out. I don’t know why he loves to go with me; he just does. He used to get sick when riding in the truck. Fortunately, he’s gotten over that; however, he still drools. I suppose that’s what towels are for.

Of course, I’ve become very attached to him. As I watch TV or work at my desk, I’ll occasionally reach down beside me and feel him laying there next to me. I’ll stroke his back as he sleeps there. His dark brown eyes open, and he often acknowledges my presence with a sigh. Every stroke tells him he is special; I think he knows it already. Every now and then he will lift his head and sniff of me—checking me out. He did that often when I came home from the hospital following open-heart surgery. It’s silly to think, but I do believe he worries about me.

Perhaps we spend too much time together. That’s easy to do since my office is in my house. As such he is always with me. As I work, he curls up next to me. Occasionally, I take a break from work, reach out, stroke his back or scratch beneath his chin, and talk to him. He yawns and sighs, adjusts himself and nuzzles my hand as he returns to sleep.

I’ve noticed he plays differently with me that he does with others. Within his growls and barks, I can hear laughter. The same kind of laughter that peeled from my kids when we roughhoused in the floor-the giggles and shrieks of pure joy. I can tell by the way he growls and tries to talk to me, by the way he cocks his head from side to side as I talk to him, by the way he holds his tail high and wags the thing vigorously. He makes me laugh. I am totally entertained and more than a little touched, just as I was by my children when they were little.

Good grief, Dan; get a hold of yourself! He’s a dog! You’re right. He’s just a dog. However, somewhere along the way he really did become my best friend-my dog, Max. Now, how’d that happen?

716 Entries · *Magnify*
Page of 36 · 20 per page   < >
Previous ... 3 -4- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... Next

© Copyright 2018 PlannerDan (UN: planner at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
PlannerDan has granted Writing.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work.

Log in to Leave Feedback
Username:
Password: <Show>
Not a Member?
Signup right now, for free!
All accounts include:
*Bullet* FREE Email @Writing.Com!
*Bullet* FREE Portfolio Services!
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/books.php/item_id/865259-My-Sporadic-Journal/sort_by/entry_order DESC, entry_creation_time DESC/sort_by_last/entry_order DESC, entry_creation_time DESC/page/4