I read this piece from top to bottom, and then again. It's very scientific and to be honest I'm not that good at all that stuff. I liked your use of words such as 'endeavour', 'counterpart' and 'equilibrium'. All very good words, there were more but you get the picture.
As I'm not very scientific I couldn't decide if this was a real life science experiment theory or not. If it isn't you've done a good job of creating a real life likeness of one but the situation itself just seems so unlikely! Eons!? I don't have the patience for years, let alone eons.
The writing was good and the context and the information was great. I could suggest using referencing (you did a bit but not much) but all in all this was a good piece. I have a list of grammatical, spelling, vocabulary and other issues I spotted and also some suggestions below. As always these are my own opinion and it is completely up to you what you decide to take on board.
How to Build Your Own Star System
All capitalized?? Why?
In the 2nd sentence, you’ve double spaced in between also and the.
When you say “This document is also the result of the Hicks Star System Formation Theory. That theory is not the universally accepted Star System Formation Theory,” I could recommend the second sentence being changed to “Whilst this theory is not the universally…”. The word ‘that’ changes the feel and flow of the piece. Also Star System Formation Theory could be shortened to ‘SSFT (Star System Formation Theory)’ when written the first time, (Hicks SSFT (Star System Formation Theory)) which would allow you to shorten it through out the piece.
Where you say ‘continuity, consistency and cohesion’. I like the alliteration but all three words mean basically the same thing, with consistency and cohesion they mean the exact same thing. I could suggest using ‘but it is a theory of continuing cohesion.’ Which means it is continually consistent. Which seems to fit with what you are trying to say.
When this is in page format I could suggest making (Those interested in reading the Hicks Star System Formation Theory may request same at rhicks@theorycommons.com) a footnote. So that those interested in more can read it whilst others can continue reading uninterrupted.
Could I suggest ‘Whilst it is also not to promote the Hicks SSFT, if you decide to use this as a basis *for your research* you can have a head start on the others…’ as we don’t currently know what they are using this as a basis for.
As this is meant to be an educational document I could suggest removing the word ‘some’ from “clarification of details by some astronomical society before they begin their project” and changing it to ‘an’.
You seem to use the word system a lot in this piece. Which is understandable as it is a piece on creating a solar system. In some places could you substitute this word for ‘galaxy’, ‘arrangement’ and/or ‘structure’.
When you say ‘undisturbed by any other forces’, could the word forces be changed at all? Forces seems quiet inadequate when compared to the scientific definitions surrounding the phrase. May I say the same for ‘eons’? I am not a science related person so I unfortunately have no suggestions in this matter.
‘There may be a body, and even a slight chance of several bodies and the larger of any bodies shall likely become your Star.’ Is a very short paragraph, is it possible to incorporate it into either the one before or the one after?
When yu say duties in the paragraph after, it is rather vague. May I suggest ‘you are just about finished your physical part in this process.’
‘then the chances are greater that you will form a Star System very much like the Solar System.’ When you say solar system do you mean ‘our’ solar system. Also in this paragraph you say ‘if you want other phenomena in your star system’, I think you mean another? Or phenomena’s.
P.S You also forget to capitalize Jupiter in this paragraph and capitalize ‘star system’ once, but say it again without capitalization.
Luny-? As a star name??
In the paragraph after this you again forget to capitalize Jupiter.
Iteration – the process of doing something again and again to achieve the same result. Is this the word you meant?
You’ll be needing your very high tech equipment? Sounds less scientific. You could also you “You’ll need”
‘In the true manner of speaking’ is rather redundant, maybe consider using ‘in other words’.
The word Jupiter, even when using it as a measurement should be capitalized. If I was saying the building was 10 Janes high (Jane measures 163cm, the building is 16.23m) I would still capitalize the name.
‘It follows that the star will do things that the sun did, and it will do them to the same degree that the sun did’. You use the words ‘that the sun did’ twice in one sentence creating the feeling of deju vu.
‘At that ninety-seven MPU distance and beyond, the material’ you double spaced between the comma and the ‘the’.
‘a considerable amount of the material will reach and maintain orbital velocity.’ Double spaced between the ‘reach’ and ‘and’.
‘nothing ever remains the same for very long, at least, on the cosmic time scale.’ Double spaced between ‘long,’ and ‘at’.
‘Because your proto-star now has a planet, we'll will no longer call it a proto-star.’ You’ve repeated yourself here which is hard to notice when you’re writing. ‘We’ll will’. We’ll means, we will.
‘Luny will escape the collision by squirting out from between the two new bodies, possibly squeezed out’. I’m not sure about how this sounds compared to the rest of the piece. The words squirted and squeezed maybe could be substituted for something else?
‘Should you wish to develop a star of greater mass, then find a molecular cloud of the mass you want your star to be.’ Remove then ‘then’ as it is superfluous to the sentence.
‘These are the primary considerations when choosing your molecular cloud, density, mass, spin rate, so good luck with your endeavour.’ I could suggest ending the sentence with “cloud, density, mass and spin rate.” And moving the ‘good luck with your endeavour’ to later in a sentence of its own, removing the ‘so’.
You double spaced a lot, I'm not sure I got all of them and also you didn't capitalize Jupiter in most of the later paragraphs.
Good luck with this piece I look forward to seeing what you do with it. |
|