This is a poem reflecting on a life lived. It has an interesting structure, relying on a repeated rhyme throughout the odd (as opposed to even) lines. It's a matter of debate whether this is sufficient to make it a poem (I would say not but I never have been a great advocate of rhyme) so we must look elsewhere to be sure.
There is no structured meter, so we can't rely on that for justification in labelling it poetry. Just as in free verse, therefore, we must fall back on words and meaning for our proof. We are on firmer ground here. There are images created with the words, metaphors and similes scattered to build pictures of the life flashing past. So I think the answer is yes, there is enough colour and immediacy in the words to support the claim to poetry.
How effective is it? To be honest, I think it's a bit too confused to really open up a life. It works as a view of general life that could be lived by any or all of us. But it is undecided itself on that point, talking of "he" in the early lines, becoming rather indeterminate in the middle and then admitting to be about self in the last line. The matters mentioned are also held at arms length, being kept vaguely general and not specific. To come alive for the reader, you need to look for actual events, no matter how apparently unimportant, that produced the effect it had on you (let's be honest, too, and admit that it's about your life - it allows the reader to begin to root for you). It's hard to care about events described in general terms - much better to speak of actual occurrences in sharp detail to illustrate living through them.
As an example, consider the line "Newly found emotions Love, Lust, and others untold..." Yeah, we all know what growing up feels like, but now you need to make it much more personal. Give us something that happened to you that shows just how much you were affected by the experience. A first love, especially if unrequited, would be ideal here. Yes, I know it's held close to you and would hurt to tell, but that's what poetry (all writing, in fact) is about. It costs to get it right.
As far as meaning is concerned, the poem is typical of most people's efforts. It's better than many of mine were when I first started to attempt poetry, but it doesn't rise above the common run of the average person. If you want to write better poetry, you're going to have to give a little more. Honesty is what draws the crowds - they recognise and love it.
If I can add a few words about rhyme, the rhymes you've chosen are not bad - they are unobtrusive and, in the most part, have a reason for their choice and positioning. They do occasionally restrict your ability to keep the meaning going (resulting in lines that could be lost without effect on the poem) and I would suggest you give free verse a try. It's much more amenable to exactly what you want to say. One can always return to rhyme at a later stage.
Meter is something you need to think about too. Don't worry about syllable counts or where the beat is going; just read it aloud to see if it flows naturally and doesn't have any awkward pauses, lumps or difficulties. And if there are any, fix them! There's always another way to say the same thing but flow better.
I've been hard on you because you're worth it. With some improvement you could write stuff that is really arresting and relevant to millions of people. It's going to take some work, but doesn't everything worthwhile do the same? Keep writing and know that the old saying is true - practice makes perfect!
Image # 2202470 over display limit. -?-
Beholden
Nominated for Quills Best Reviewer, 2023
Image #2291664 over display limit. -?- Image #2291665 over display limit. -?- |