This review is offered in the spirit of encouragement and assistance. I appreciate your sharing your work, and am simply sharing my opinion in return. I hope it can be of use.
Overall impression
This is a poem where the message seems stronger than the delivery.
What I liked most
I like the way the initial two stanzas pose the questions, the middle two stanzas answer, or at least address, the questions, and the last stanza essentially asks God's help in implementing the answers.
My general suggestions
The rhymes seem forced. I'd step back from the meter and make the individual statements stronger, then revise the rhymes to suit. For example, you have
Why answer the call of hate?
Why heed mere gibberish?
Why use the pen or tongue when
The answer, silence, is?
The idea is good, but there is both a clearly missed opportunity and a very forced rhyme. By switching the verbs in the first two questions, you would get the better alliteration of "heed/hate", and then by switching the order, you get a far easier potential rhyme in "hate" than you had in "gibberish":
Why answer mere gibberish?
Why heed the call of hate?
Now, with one stronger line (and the other no weaker), and a better rhyme, you could alter the second part to something like:
Why use the pen or tongue when
calm silence beats debate?
This rhymes well, and also adds a subtle repeated sound with "beats debate". If you don't like that last part, you have a wide variety of rhyming choices for "hate".
In the second stanza, I'd suggesting that the "cozy wind", while not bad, could be a bit stronger with "warming wind", which both adds alliteration and a direct, as opposed to indirect, contrast with "winter". Now, if you were writing about the season, I would cheer for a variation like "cozy wind" which adds a little variety, but since the point is the argument about discretion, the less direct comparison weakens the argument.
Finally, it tends to be seen as weaker to rhyme two words that share the same root, as in your "forearmed" and "unarmed". It might be better to choose "harmed", which could probably be worked into this last stanza.
Conclusion
This is a strong message, but a little more effort could make it read better and strengthen its argument.
** Image ID #1447415 Unavailable **
|