Hi Rhyan,
Overall Impression: I like the concept of the story. What he have here is the story of a young man trapped inside himself. At first he thinks something is watching him, something that means him harm. The narrator describes himself as a bit of a sociopath. He doesn't care much about the world around him, only enough to try and blend in. He manipulates and lies to people so they can't see what he really is. Ultimately he discovered he's the one causing the harm. The narrator has at some point trapped his real self within him, and he must give up him own life to let his real self live. It's a great concept for a story but unfortunately, there are so many unclear passages in the narrative, it's difficult to comprehend the story without actively thinking about it and trying to figure out what you mean to say. There were a few areas where I had to use a bit of guess work to understand the story. It actually reminds me a bit of a published short story I read by Charles Yu. I stumbled across a book of his in the library titled
Third Class Superhero. The book is a collection of short stories, some good, some mediocre. One of the ones that stood out was a short story titled: "The Man Who Became Himself". In Yu's story, the title character is not one who has been living the life of a pretender, at least not in the same way. Rather, he becomes self aware, finding himself trapped inside another person. The story is about this man trying to escape from within another. It's definitely worth the read.
Grammar and Mechanics:
Paragraph 3: This way I was able.... A few [Some] of them were dangerous as they somewhat saw [had a sense of] what I was doing, but in the end I only got better because of that [that only made it easier for me to hide my true nature]. I wonder if there was someone [anyone] who really knew me. Not because I was a weird person, or a really complex person[,] just because the live [life] I lived was not mine. -
Somewhat saw seems like an awkward way of saying the narrator had friends who could sense what he is. The third sentence should use paired commas for this reason:
Not because I was a weird person, just because the life I lived was not mine. The third part of that sentence is a direct extension of the first part of the sentence, not simply a related clause. Also, there's a typo in the last sentence.
Paragraph 5: There was even a girl; she knew me perfectly well, except for the little fact that she didn’t [really] know ME [me]. That’s probably the point [when I understood] I couldn’t return anymore [go back]. It’s also the point I finally started realising [realised] something was off. The girl noticed too, and we broke up because we both felt bad because of it. - The preferred method of emphasize is to italicize, otherwise it comes across as if the word is being shouted. Although, based on the context of the sentence, I would go as far as saying it should be written like this:
There was a girl; she knew me perfectly well, except for the fact that she didn't really know me, the real me. Finally, where couldn't narrator couldn't return anymore? To his home? To his friends? The relationship with the girl? To being a child? Your readers are generally not going to think the same way you do so try to be as clear as possible. I think
couldn't go back works better than
couldn't return anymore, but it's still not very clear what's being said.
Paragraph 6: My sleeping problems got worse. When I did sleep [slept], I had alot [a lot] of dreams, dreams in which everything at first glance seemed normal [at first glance]. There was just something that was awfully WRONG [wrong] in those dreams, something that was watching me. - I suggest moving
at first glance to the end of the sentence to make it a more fluid read. Otherwise, commas will be needed around the phrase and it will come across as a much stiffer sentence. "A lot" is always two words. Feel free to petition the dictionaries if you want this to become a single word, but "alot" has never been considered a real word. Also, the preferred method of emphasize is to italicize, otherwise it comes across as if the word is being shouted.
Paragraph 7, sentences 2-8: I found myself.... I was eating breakfast, my dad was surfing the internet [Internet] and my sisters were watching something stupid on the television. I suddenly felt uncomfortable. Something, someone, was watching, and it was wrong. Remembering that I have more dreams [how vivid my dreams tend to be], I figured it probably was another one [I was probably still dreaming]. I do have a little bit of conciousness [retain some awareness] when I’m asleep, so it would be highly [was] possible that I was actually sleeping. I wanted to make sure though. I remembered a commonly known fact about dreaming: you can't read in a dream. The brain can’t make up a story fast enough, so even if you pick up a book and open it[,] it just won’t make sense. - What does the amount of dreams the narrator has have to do with anything? I think you mean the vividness of the dreams. The sentence should reflect how much the dreams seem like the waking world, not the frequency of the dreams. Also, a bit of consciousness implies the narrator is partially awake, when the implication is not that he's partially awake, rather that he has a certain level of awareness, that he either knows when he's in a dream, has some control over the dream, or both. I have to disagree with the commonly known fact that you can't read in a dream as I've been able to read in dreams before. So take that dream experts! Likely it's not that people can't read in dreams, rather that most people can't read in dreams, and those who can read in dreams read a few words or phrases but wouldn't be able to read anything in great detail. Also,
Internet is always written with an upper case
I.
Paragraph 8: A few weeks passed.... Suddenly I was aware of everything around me: the sun shining outside, warming the room to just a bit more than comfortable; the teacher[']s nervousness towards an unpredictable class; the boy next to me having a hard time waking up; the girls behind me laughing at a stupid joke of the boy behind them, probably about the sleeping boy; and… Something [something] else. - When referring to one teacher, it's
teacher's with an apostrophe s at the end.
Teachers means two or more teachers. Also, Don't cap the word
something as it's a continuation of the last sentence, not a new sentence.
Paragraph 9: I was lucky that day, as it [the feeling] passed before I got all paranoid [paranoia could take hold]. I still had an image to hold high in class; or more accurate[ly], I still cared for things like that. But it happened often now. It was not something I could get used to, as it grew worse every time it happened. I had no idea what was happening to me. I figured I should talk about it with someone, but as I tried it happened again… it did not want me to talk about it with someone. - It happened? What happened? The heightened awareness? Paranoia? If so, how would heightened awareness or paranoia keep him from talking? Be more specific. And if it's something other than heightened awareness or paranoia, that needs to be shown more clearly.
Paragraph 10, sentences 7-9: So I was.... In the end I’d just stay in my room unless I absolutely had to go somewhere, I didn’t even browse the internet [Internet] for a solution anymore. There was no point in that anyway. I am [as] sure there is no solution on the internet [Internet], as I am sure that if there was, the thing in me would just prevent me from finding it. -
Internet is always written with an uppercase
I.
Paragraph 15: Then I started hallucinating. That didn’t worry me. At that point nothing mattered to me anymore, except for finding out what was after me. Hallucinating would be the same as getting [probably get me] closer to [discovering] what was wrong. - Why would hallucinating be the same as getting closer to what was wrong? My guess is that you mean that the hallucinations will likely lead him to discovering what's wrong with him.
Paragraph 16: Today the hallucinations took over. I’m pretty sure I haven’t come out of my bed for a few [in] months, though with my time perception it might as well be a few hours. It does not matter anyway. I slept tonight, that was what did mattered. - Remove unnecessary words or phrases.
Paragraph 19, sentences 5-6: I finally realise.... My self wanted out, wanted to kick the pretender of [off] the throne and live for himself. A sudden fear rushes through me as I realised that was just what was about to happen. - Correct the typo and lose any unnecessary words.
Paragraph 19: Then, in my last moment, the last jigsaw falls into place. What was in the eyes of the real me except for pity was relieve [was not just pity, but relief]. - The phrasing needs work.
Final Thoughts: The story you present is about a young man trapped inside himself. It's a great concept but unfortunately the essence of the story is trapped inside poorly or unclearly phrased passages. Think of this as the first draft of your story. This is in desperate need of a second draft. The story here is potentially a really good one, but without the necessary corrections, it falls far short of what it could be. Reply to this email and let me know when you've done the necessary revisions. If you have any questions or disagree with any of my comments, I will happily discuss it further with you. Please make revisions though as this story has far more potential than what is currently in place.