Hi there,
General Thoughts...
I'm a Muslim, and I agree, there is a problem. Sadly though, you've missed the point by a million miles. You almost make some intelligent points, but your completly biased article is wrecked further by some of the most laughable statements I have ever read about Islam.
I hate to tear anyone's work to shreads, so I apologise that my suggestions section is so long. But in this climate of fear that we now live, you're doing the world no service by using your talents in such a counter-productive way.
In reply to one of your public reviews:
There is no compulsion in religion
Quran: chapter 2, verse 256
Best Points...
Not every Muslim is bad, and there are many peaceful Muslims.
I'm glad you mentioned this at the start.
You use a lot of statistics and give your sources, well done...not many people do that, but it is essential to any proper article.
Suggestions For Improvements...
What your statistics have failed to even touch upon is the state-sponsored terrorism that occurs daily throughout the world.
Northen Ireland/IRA killings
More than 1,800 cases, half the total number of people killed during 30 years of the Troubles, remain unsolved.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/432735...
Israel
The intifada claimed more than 4,500 lives. Three out of four were Palestinian, and a good many of those were children.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1...
17 is the approximate number of times the 13-year-old Palestinian girl, Iman al-Hams, was shot by an Israeli army captain as she walked towards an army post in Gaza in October 2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1...
Check out other guardian articles. There's also the story of the rabbi arrested for trying to stop a Palestinian man from being used as a human shield by the Israeli army, the psychological toll on Palestinian children...etc etc...
Iraq
Civilians reported killed by military intervention in Iraq (minimum) = 22353
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/#position
Afghanistan
A Guardian report in February estimated these casualties at between 1,300 and 8,000 deaths. A Guardian investigation into the "indirect victims" now confirms the belief of many aid agencies that they exceeded the number who died of direct hits.
As many as 20,000 Afghans may have lost their lives as an indirect consequence of the US intervention. They too belong in any tally of the dead.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/analysis/story/0,,718635...
This is just a selection....statistics, although useful, can also paint a biased perspective.
“…up to 900 were decapitated…”
The incident you refer to is one in which a Jewish tribe who had made a pact with the Muslims of Madinah, then betrayed them and joined the enemy against them in war.
I think you may agree that it is then defined as treason:
Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=treason
A leader of the banished Jewish tribe then went secretly to the Bani Qurayzah, another Jewish tribe still in Madinah, and convinced its leader to break their agreement with the Muslims and join the Makkan alliance.
http://www.theislamproject.org/muhammad/muhammad_1...
Could they possibly have been influenced into the beheading method of murder?
You're reasoning here is flawed in my opinion. Who cares how they choose to kill these innocent people? Their actions are totally against the Prophet Muhammad's teachings and the Quran. The fact that you're using an isolated incident of how the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) dealt with treason to say that he influenced these cold blooded murders is completly illogical? If they had used guns, would that mean that they hadn't been influenced?
The Koran was finished and written mostly by Abu Bakr, Mohammed’s successor.
This is the most absurd thing I have ever read in relation to the Quran. You'll have to define "finished" for me please? What I think you mean to say is that it was compiled, i.e. all the chapters were collected together (people had memorised it, but it was feared the message would be lost) and written down. By no stretch of the english language does that mean that Abu Bakr (peace and blessings be on him) finished (The entire Quran had already been revealed to Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him) the Quran or written (He did not write it, they were not his words, he compiled the already existing revelation in the written form) it.
It was here that his luck changed. He converted the masses, became powerful, and it was here that his teachings (suras) were to change as well.
Suras means "chapters" and they refer to the chapters found in the Quran. These never changed, once revealed they were memorised exactly and then later written down. The Quran still exists today in its exact original form.
And it’s certainly time for us to get along and accept each other’s beliefs.
An ironic closing statement from someone who wishes that Islam itself was changed to suit their viewpoint.
I welcome any dialogue to improve tolerance between us.
Write on!
Regards,
Farhana
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
|
|