Although it's well-written, I disagree with your contention that blank items need reviews. (I also resent the injunction to be honest, but that's another issue, probably a personal one indicative of some mental dysfunction of my own, although so far I fail to see what it might be, but don't even suggest seeking professional help because I am NOT going to go that route.)
I don't mean to get off on a negative track here because my overall impression of the piece was quite positive. More about that later, but first let's get the minor annoyance out of the way.
The universe is filled with nothingness. It's probably the most common thing there is. There are actually an infinity of blank items, each much like the other, differing only in whose port they may reside and what item number they may have been given. (Of course, the vast majority remain unnumbered and unassigned. I won't go into the science of it as that would be inappropriate in a review I intend to devote mostly to nitpicking.)
The point is that given such a plentitude of blank items, you can hardly say that any of them NEED a review, which I am sure even you would agree is the moral equivalent of saying they DESERVE a review. And they don't really, do they? In fact, anytime a blank item gets a review it should thank the reviewer profusely and just be glad it got noticed at all.
Now, with that out of the way, let's get down to your item number 1951881.
I am familiar with some of your other work, some of it quite remarkable, and I think this ranks with the best of it. It's concise, hearty, not too moist, but not too dry either. You handle satire like a chainsaw juggler, always keeping the motor roaring, but never actually cutting off your own hand. If this were a poem, I would be saying What a clever rhyme!
But it's not a poem, and that's probably one nit we could pick. Blank prose is so much less satisfying than blank verse. But hey, it's a stylistic choice you were willing to make and we have to respect the writer's choices most of the time, unless it's bad grammar, then I stand up like any good reviewer and say Tense disagreement! or Inconsistent adverbial foreplay! or whatever seems called for.
Whoa! I see I've already written more than enough to grab the GPs for this one. So long. Keep up the good work! You can always count on me to review whatever you create as long as the price is right.
Steve |
|