I enjoyed your article and I appreciate the amount of research it must have taken. You make some very interesting points and observations.
While I agree with most of what you say, I wanted to offer some additional information and some observations for you to consider on this subject. I hope you don't mind. Like you, I like to verify everything I read in the Bible with science and history, although I find that sometimes it is not possible.
Regarding the date of Jesus' birth, Zechariah was told of the birth of John in the second round of the eighth course of the momthly priestly duties. Upon completing his priestly duties in that allotted course, Zechariah returned home to his wife Elizabeth and then their son John was conceived. This would have been at least in late June or early July of the year 3 B.C. About six months later (namely, in our December) Jesus was conceived. Nine months after that Jesus’ birth would occur about October 1 in the year 2 B.C.
Daniel’s prophecy (Dan. 9:24-27), shows that the Messiah or Christ was to arrive at the end of 69 weeks of years, these weeks beginning in the Autumn of 455 B.C. and ending in the Autumn of A.D. 29. The prophecy spoke of the sacrifice the Messiah would offer “In the midst of the week,” (or half a week, 6 months). We know from the priest inauguration laws that men could not act in worship until they were 30 years old. Jesus was 30 when he was baptized in the Jordan. Therefore he would have been 33 and a half when he gave his life. Since it was actually in the spring of 33 CE that Jesus Christ was executed, then three and a half years (or, half of a seven-year week) would take us back to the beginning of the week in the autumn of A.D. 29 for Messiah’s baptism.
Regarding the “Star” itself, this causes much confusion among believers and scholars, not only about the date it appeared but, also about how it appeared and from whom. History, and the churches have always treated the account of the star as emanating from God, guiding the ”Wise men” to the place of the Messiah's birth.
Yet, the Biblical evidence strongly suggests otherwise. Consider the men who followed the star. They came from the east. They were not “Wise men” but astrologers, a practice forbidden by God's laws. Furthermore, they were the only ones who saw the star. They were led by it, not to the infant but to Herod, an enemy of God who tried to slay the child, and as a result, hundreds of children were slaughtered. Why would God have arranged that?
Furthermore, the star “Came to stop above the stable.” Have you ever heard of a star that could place itself in orbit above a building?
Could there be any other Biblical explanation for the phenomena? Consider this;
The Bible describes the enemy of God, the “Resistor” and “Slanderer” - Satan, as a “god” of “Crafty acts” in which he “Keeps transforming himself into an angel of light,” whose operation is “With every powerful work and lying signs and portents.” This manipulative spirit was able to make a serpent appear to speak, and was described by Jesus as “A manslayer when he began.” It is worth considering, is it not?
I thought you might appreciate these points.
Well written.
Moomin |
|