Hi Jedd Vandross
Some comments for your piece
This is a good piece of writing, I enjoyed reading this, and contemplating the various themes and questions that you explored. You give the reader a lot to think about in this piece. The value of life, the chain of command, and simple human morality are all explored in this piece of writing.
The writing itself is easy to read. You have spaced the story well, and the flow and pace of the piece make for an comfortable and enjoyable read.
In terms of Characterisation, I was interested by your depiction of 'The Butcher'. This type of character is present in most famous Vietnam films and his actions form the basis for much of the story. The main character himself is described fairly well, and you wrote in good detail about his feelings and anticipations. I would perhaps like to have seen a little more attention given to the rest of the squad, but while saying that I liked the way that you built up for the death of the young, newlywed soldier.
If I could give one constructive criticism it would be that you could perhaps have provided a little more atmosphere in the settings. Maybe by focusing more on things such as the sounds and smells in the jungle you could have brought this great tale to life even more. Also, it struck me that as the crew were making their way to their ultimate destination, at no point they seemed concerned about the possibilty of booby traps in the jungle. I realise that as a writer you can't include everything in a story - but I thought I'd point this out just to give you food for thought.
Comments/Suggestions
These comments are intended as constructive, and are to give you my opinions and ideas about which elements of the work appeal to me or otherwise.
'The red sun was just rising, spreading out in orange, pink and crimson across the sky.' - I like this sentence, you begin by setting the scene really well. I would maybe liked to have seen a few more lines like this in the piece in order to have built up more of an atmoshere leading up to the climax of the work.
'I was assigned to serve for a notorious jungle fighter, Sergeant James “The Butcher” Rebman. Stories and legends were whispered throughout the ranks of the army, some good, and some bad.' - You introduce Rebman well, and I like the way that his reputation preceeds him. This adds a lot to the story, and the narrator's reaction to him really improves the characterisation in the work.
'Most of them were as frightened as me of the Sergeant, and none knew if he’d butcher one of his own men like he butchered the innocent Vietnamese here.' - I found this bit to carry a little amibguity. It is hard to tell whether the men are scared of the narrator as much as they are scared of Rebman, or if they are as scared as the narrator. Try changing to something like Most of them were as frightened of the Sergeant as I was
'I’d promised myself that I’d never kill a woman or child when I went into battle, but maybe war was different than a righteous crusade for good… Maybe it was just a brutal massacre for a loose, stupid reason.' - I like this part. The philsophy of war is interesting to read from the soldier's point of view. In my opinion all war is for 'loose and stupid' reasons. It is good to see that this particular soldier carries a lot of moral fibre, and that he is contemplating himself as part of the bigger picture. Again, good character work, and nice attention to detail.
'The things he did in a matter of seconds are simply too disgusting for me to describe, and I simply staggered into the village, shocked by what was happening.' - You repeat the word 'simply' in this sentence, perhaps you could opt for a different word in one of the instances. I'd recommend leaving the second instance as it is, it carries a good alliterative effect in tandem with the word 'staggered'.
“This was your first time in battle,” he said. “But now you will truly learn to kill. You are not a soldier unless you can look someone who doesn’t deserve to die in the eyes, and then end their life.” He pulled an old man to his feet and beckoned a soldier over. “Do it,” he said, in a cold ruthless tone. - Again, good war philosphy. Some would argue that a man is not a proper 'soldier' until he can kill without remorse. It is odd, nowadays soldiers are trained to hate their enemy, but then are criticized when massacres and various other war crimes are carried out. This is evident in the recent war in Iraq. In your story, this section really bolsters the moral arguments that you explore in the piece, and also highlights the tightrope that many soldiers are asked to walk on.
'I looked at the platoon at the men who’d done this before. They were soldiers, loyal to America. I’d come here for America, and if I had to kill a young woman to fight further for my country, maybe that would be the best thing to do. But the cruelty of this man, the Butcher, was hard to ignore. What was I to do?' - At the height of the tale the narrator finds himself in an uneviable predicament. The tension is really high at this point. Once more the thoughts of the narrator are well depicted at this point. You really give the impression that the por man is torn in two and doesn't really know what to do. Sort of a 'lesser of two evils' scenario.
The ending - you evil person! How could you just leave it hanging like that!! But seriously, great work with suspense and tension. You leave the reader to decide for themselves. I certainly know which choice I would have made - but it is easy for me to say that from the comfort of my chair. Great job.
Overall this is a very good war story. More than the actual story itself, the elements of war philosophy and the nature of man make for some very stimulating reading.
Thanks for the superb read.
Keep up the tremendous writing.
KevG |
|