Hi! My name is Max Griffin π³οΈβπ , and I'm here to review your entry in the "Show, Don't Tell Contest"
Item Reviewed: "Invalid Item"
Author {user:####}
Reviewer: Max Griffin π³οΈβπ
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Our contest has multiple judges, and final rankings are always the result of a group process. Remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful , and that you will discard the rest with good cheer.
What I liked best
I absolutely loved this story. If i had to pick one thing, it would be the way that the opening connects with the ending, bringing us full circle. That's brilliant!
Effective showing of the information in the prompt.
(28 points out of 30)
This is a bit of a mixed bag. You do an excellent job of showing, but sometimes you start with a bit of narrative summation, which is telling. See the line-by-line remarks. This is good, but not quite perfect.
First Paragraph
(17 points out of 20)
The first paragraph accomplishes everything a first paragraph needs to do, but it's kind of in the wrong order. As a consequence, it takes a bit for the reader to really settle into Roscoe's head. See below for more detailed comments.
Creativity and Originality
(15 points out of 15)
This is perfection!
Effective showing--as opposed to telling--for the whole story
(12 points out of 15)
See the line-by-line comments below. I made several little nit-picky comments in places where reporting seemed to replace showing.
Plot and Pacing
(10 points out of 10)
Excellent job here, too.
Technical Proficiency (such as grammar, spelling, proof-reading, and following the contest rules)
(9 points out of 10)
One typo. Maybe one or two comma errors. No big deal.
Total Points
91 points out of 100
Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.
I think this was, hands-down, the best story in the contest this month, and one of the best stories ever. You have a real talent with character, plot, and dialogue. Oh, and metaphor. I love metaphor. You made one the basis of your plot, in an absolute act of brilliance.
But...this contest is about the best job of showing, as opposed to telling. This means that sometimes the best story doesn't win the contest, and that's the case here. It's not that you did a bad job, but another story did a dynamite job of showing, with not even the nit-picky little slips I noted here. It's a good story, too. Nearly as good as yours, in fact, although it's quite different.
In any case, thank you sharing your story. I *really* enjoyed reading it, and I hope you come back again!!
Line-by-line remarks
Your text is in BLUE.
My comments are in GREEN.
If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
Ker-thunk! Damn potholes, Roscoe's brows furrowed as he pushed his glasses back up the slope of his nose. He squinted, peering through the nearly opaque windshield awash in light from the setting sun. I canβt even see the damn things!βJust once, Iβd like to actually see people do what they promised. Stupid, lying politicians!βMy Comment: This opening does many things well. You name your POV characer. You orient the reader in space and time. You put the reader inside Roscoe's head with subjective things like him "squinting" at the "opaque" windshield, and by giving us his internal thoughts. The invisible potholes--and his associated epithet--even provide a metaphorical foreshadowing of the plot.
But...there are some tweaks. For one thing, you start with the sound before we know anything else, including who is hearing it and where they are. If you instead started with Roscoe furrowing his brows and peering through the windsheld, you'd put us in his head and orient us in space.
Note, if you "Roscoe's brows furrowed," that implies an omniscient narrator saw them furrow, so it's better to "Roscoe furrowed his brows," or, better yet, "Roscoe scowled."
Once we're in Roscoe's head and we know he's in his car, then you can have the wheel jerk and the crunch of the car bottoming out in a pothole with no confusion from the reader. As it stands, "ker-thunk" could be any heavy object--say, Aunt Beula--hitting the ground. Context is everything, and the sooner you provide, the better.
He could feel the heat in his cheeksMy Comment: Phrases like "he could feel" is a subtle form of telling.
In the first place, we're in Roscoe's head. So, in principle, everything that appears on the page is something Roscoes has felt, sensed, knows, or thinks. Telling us he feels it is just that: telling. It's unnecessary. Further, it's almost always more immediate and intimate for readers if you just directly describe what he felt: His cheeks flamed.
OK, Roscoe, calm down. Heβs just a kid, he chided himself.My Comment: The italics alone suffice to denote that this is an internal thought. Editors tend to deprecate "thought tags." Otherwise, good job here of showing his anger and his attempts to control it.
with a bit more drama than needed,My Comment: This feels like someone outside the story judging his manner, i.e., like an omniscient narrator.
watching the throw rug behind it coil like a spring.My Comment: "watching" is like "he could feel" above. It's telling us what he's doing and seeing.
The house was a disaster! Dirty clothes and mismatched shoes lay along the hallway interspersed with the mail that had been dropped through the door slot. My Comment: The first sentence is telling. You don't need it, because you've done a great job showing it's a disaster in the next sentence. If you want to emphasize that Roscoe thinks it's a disaster, have his "lips pull down" or have him scowl, showing his reaction to what he's just seen.
He listened intently and heard a muffled voiceMy Comment: "He listened" and "he heard" are like "he noticed" above. Also, "listened intently" uses an adverb to pep up a weak verb. I can't offhand think of a better verb, but I'd rather show him listening intently than use the adverb to show him doing so. For example, maybe he closes his eyes and holds his breath while he listens.
staring at his wife unkempt appearance. My Comment: "Staring..." is like "he noticed" above. I'll stop pointing these out, as I'm sure you get the idea. Just report that she's a mess. If you want to emphasize he's seen it, have him react--as you do, when he says it looks like she's done nothing all day.
Oh, there's a missing possessive--his wife's appearance.
βOh, mighty lord of the manor, forgive me for not rising and celebrating your return!β The scorn in her voice was palpable.My Comment: In some ways, reporting her tone of voice after she speaks is too late--the readers will have already "heard" her voice in their heads. If might be better if you first gave an indication of her state of mine by, say, rolling eyes, to cue the reader that what's coming is sarcasm. Then they'll hear the tone because you've prepared them for it.
Roscoe stepped back, eyes wide with surprise.My Comment: The wide eyes show his surprise, but he can't see his eyes, so this is a POV violation. The step back shows retreat. Is there some other way you could show surprise?
Evidently she tripped and he tried to catch herMy Comment: I hate commas, I really do. I never get them right. I think you need one after "evidently," and maybe after "tripped."
βOh, honey. What happened?β he said with concern.My Comment: I don't think he'd say that "with sarcasm." His words, indicate his concern, so you don't need to tell us. Moreover, it's again telling what his words already show.
Roscoeβs cheeks flushed,My Comment: He can feel his cheeks flush, so this is good showing of his chagrin.
My Comment: And this is where we see revealed the genius of the opening reference to potholes. I love it!
I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. Even though I'm scoring this for a contest, I'm also reviewing in part for my own edification. Thus, as is my usual policy, I have given a rating of "4" to all contest entries. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade."
Again, these are just one person's opinions. The contest has more than one judge, so you shouldn't assign inordinate weight to any one review. Regardless, remember that only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!
Thanks again for our contest. We hope you found it to be fun and a learning experience. Keep on writing!
Max Griffin π³οΈβπ
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out |