*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/mathguy/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/6
Review Requests: ON
1,657 Public Reviews Given
3,026 Total Reviews Given
Review Style
In depth, detailed, and supportive.
I'm good at...
Elements of craft that draw readers into your fictional world and your character's head.
Favorite Genres
SciFi, Mystery, Thriller, Horror
Least Favorite Genres
Fantasy
Favorite Item Types
Short stories
Least Favorite Item Types
nonfiction, poetry
I will not review...
I'm only interested in prose fiction. I will not review anything over 4000 words, nor will i review poetry. If you have a longer piece, please divide it into bite-sized chunks.
Public Reviews
Previous ... 2 3 4 5 -6- 7 8 9 10 11 ... Next
126
126
Review of Escape!  
Review by
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "Escape!
Author Goblin Slayer
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
You have a fully-developed fictional world, something that is hard to do. You've also revealed relevant details of the world through the words and deeds of our characters--no info-dumps here! Good work.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (17/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening does a good job of setting the stage and mood of the story. It also has a sense of foreboding, which presages the plot. My main complaint is that we don't learn the name of your point-of-view character in the opening, or--I think--anywhere else. Knowing her name will help draw readers into her head and hence into the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (7/10 points)
Mostly third-person limited, but there were a couple of blips. For example, she can't see her face, so this sentence is a POV violation: "Her face turned a sickly color pale white."

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(19/20 points)
While there are no info-dumps, here and there bits of the story are told rather than shown. For example, you tell us the colors of the gowns startled her rather than showing her being startled.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (15/200 points)
The plot is good, starting with mystery and apprehension. I could have stood a bit more tension building up to the rescue, but overall this was nicely done.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (18/20 points)
Again, I wish you had named the protagonist. We do get a good sense of her goals, and also you give us reason to cheer for her. Scarscap--what a great name, BTW!--has a lot of potential, as does the Lord, but I could have used a bit more character development for them. Why does the Orc sequester his bride and torture the other woman? We don't have a clue. IF this were a novel, that would be fine--we could trust the answer would come in later chapters. In a short story, though, I think we some stronger hints.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (2/10 points)
While the basic story elements are strong, there are several technical issues. For example, at the start of the story the exposition alternates between the fictional past--she was nervous--and the fictional present--He leads her into the home. Either one is fine, but you need to pick one and stick with it. There are also several comma splices. These occur when two sentences that should be separated with a period or semicolon are joined with a comma. One example is: "He walked up to a door, with key in hand, he unlocked the door." Finally, there are some typos, like "whose" for the contraction "who's." The last could very well be an errant "autocorrect" from Microsoft, but the tense errors are more significant.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 78/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
127
127
Review of The Wishing Tree  
Review by
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "The Wishing Tree
Author fyn
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is a love story. It tells of once lost, then found, and then surviving the death of one of the lovers. It's sweet and heartwarming, and lifted my spirits on a gloomy winter's day.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (12/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

The opening paragraph did a good job of launching the events of the story, but I have a couple of minor tweaks to suggest. First, I think you should name your characters in the opening--or at least name your point-of-view character. Their names aren't a mystery, and knowing them will help draw characters into the story.

Second, it's generally stronger to start with your point-of-view character sensing or acting rather than speaking. The former choices help put the reader into the POV character's head and hence draw them into the story. Starting with a speech begs the question of who is speaking and--more importantly--who is hearing. If you first establish the POV, then readers know how to regard the words and engage with better with the story. An bit of stand-along dialogue leads the reader to expect an omniscient narrator, standing outside the story and looking in. Instead, you want your reader inside Sarah's head, experiencing the fictional world from her point-of-view.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (5/10 points)
This is more or less a continuation of the above. I searched for when we were truly inside Sarah's head, but mostly felt as if the story was told by an omniscient narrator standing outside the story. Indeed, phrases like "her eyes widened" confirm the omniscient narrator since she can't see her eyes widen.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(20/20 points)
We learn almost all the events of the story through the dialogue between the characters. Good job with this!

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (18/20 points)
Nice job with the plot, too. Sarah has an immediate goal--going on a walk with her spouse. As the story evolves, we see why the goal matters, and infer that it's really about being close to her husband. TThe obstacle turns out to be his health. The ending is bittersweet, ssince he's passed, but their love for each other has not.

My only blip with the plot is that I don't quite see how she was able to pick out "their" quarters from dozens embedded in the tree.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
The two primary characters are fully drawn and speak with distinctive voices. That's less true with the offspring toward the end, but they are sufficient for the role they play.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (8/10 points)
I found a couple of minor typos--things like "apart" instead of "a part"--but the grammar was impeccable.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 83/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
128
128
Review by
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "Along the Autumn Trail
Author Ashes
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I liked the Rashomon-like idea of repeating the same scene from differeing points of view.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph(s). (10/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening paragraphs do a credible job of invoking Mari's point-of-view. You name her, have her doing something--pursing her lips--and sensing.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (5/10 points)
The success of the Rashomon technique is largely dependent on the readers' engagement with each different point-of-view character. They need to be inside the head of the character, experiencing the fictional events over and over again. That's difficult to do in a story this short, where each character gets at most a few paragraphs and, by the end, just a sentence. The ultimate effect is an omniscient narrator, which has largely been abandoned in modern fiction since it distances the readers from the events.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(10/20 points)
I loved the way you showed Mari's exuberance by having her "dance," wrap her hands about a tree, and spin. On the other hand, you told us it was cold instead of having the cold prickle her skin, so this is kind of a mixed bag.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (10/20 points)
Well, there's not much of one really. We just seen different viewpoints on the picture and the reactions of people in the story. What plot there is arises from the Rashomon element.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (10/20 points)
I wish this story were longer so we got to know the characters better!

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (5/10 points)
Some minor things...Numbers like ten and two should be written out. You denoted thoughts by italics, which is correct, but most editors will deprecate "thought tags."

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 50/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
129
129
Review by
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "A Picture is Worth Two Thousand Words
Author {user:#purescifi}
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I *really* liked the premise for this story. The contest is to write a story about the picture, so you created a story where the protagonist is given exactly the same challenge! That's creative!! I love it!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Your opening paragraphs name your point-of-view character and establish the premise for the story. That's all to the good. However, the introduction is all told as opposed to shown. We're told the editor showed her the picture, how he acquired it, and what he wants her to do with it, as opposed to learning about this through the actual words and deeds of the characters.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (5/10 points)
Mostly, this is first person. However, there are several places where you say, "Victoria said" or Victoria did something, where she refers to herself in the third person, by her name. I found this mix confusing.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(10/20 points)
This is kind of mixed, too. YOu show the encounter with the teens, including their murmured conversation and their body language. But other parts of the story are told via narration. Showing is almost always stronger than telling...

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
I absolutely loved the plot.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (10/20 points)
The characters felt a little flat to me. I got some of Victoria's determination and some of the reticence of the teens, but they didn't quite become three-dimensional. I think that's probably due to the use of exposition as opposed to showing. I understand your plot is a bit complex to fit in 2000 words, but I'm pretty sure you could do so without the narration and give more depth to your characters--or at least to Victoria.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (2/10 points)
In addition to the point of view issue noted above, there are several typos in the story. In addition, some the wording is confusing. For example, when you wrote
At thirty-two, Jasper and his friends are about half my age.

I took that to mean Jasper and his friends were 32 and so Victoria was 64. Of course, that's not the case since they are clearly identified as teens in subsequent paragraphs, but it's still a blip. Later, you say the "picture" appeared, when what you clearly meant was that the forest portrayed in the picture appeared. I was a little confused about the one-every-year versus once-every-century explanation. These are all minor things, easy to clean up, but still confusing.
                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 62/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
130
130
Review of The Return  
Review by
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "The Return
Author Espinado
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I liked the dizzying pace and surreal scenes. You did an awesome job of description in this story!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. The opening paragraphs launch the story by embedding the readers inside your fictional world and stimulating them to imagine, in partnership with you, the details. One of the most effective ways to do this is by putting the readers inside the head of your point-of-view character.

Eventually, readers are deeply in Eric's head, especially after he wakes in the hotel. However, this is a flashback from the opening paragraphs, which were a bit cryptic. Indeed, I'd suggest starting with him waking rather than having the little time-reversal at the beginning which runs the risk of confusing readers and pulling them out of the here-and-now of the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
First person, in Eric's head. No slips.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(15/20 points)
You mostly do a great job of showing, especially Eric's emotional state. Here and there, though, bits of telling show up, as when you tell us the "air is invigorating." There is a repetitive flavor to the descriptions, too, with seven instances of "there are" or "there is."

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (18/20 points)
Eric has two related goals: recover his memory and live long enough to do so. The goals obviously matter, so the stakes are high. The obstacles are many and varied, and increase in scope and danger. This means that the tension increases throughout, so the plot has a real dynamic and urgent feel.

However, although I'm an admirer of Zelazny, I'm unfamiliar with the Amber universe. Thus, the punch line was a pretty big let-down for me. Being unfamiliar, I missed the foreshadowing you wove into the story with names like Brand and Flora as well. In any case, the ending felt rather disappointing after the great build-up.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Eric is a great character.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10/10 points)
While I don't read for grammar or other issues, I almost always find things to complain about. Not so here--this copy looked clean to me.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 88/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
131
131
Review of Trespassers  
Review by
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "Trespassers
Author Myles Abroad
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
There is much to love about this story, with evocative descriptions and deep emotional connections. I think I liked this phrase best:
Now we were trespassers into each other's hearts.

It captured perfectly the relationship between these two lonely souls.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (18/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. You do an awesome job of putting the reader in Jane's head by using subjective descriptions of the cold and the dog. There's evidence of an experienced author exercising craft here. My only wish would be that you revealed Jane's name in the opening, since that's one way to solidify the readers' connections to her.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
First person, in Jane's head. Perfection.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
I think perhaps the 2000 word limit worked a bit against this story. You used them effectively to show the isolation and loneliness of both characters, and how they touched each other over time. But critical elements of Jane's story wind up being narrated--told--instead of revealed in the words and deeds of the characters. You weave this skillfully into the narrative, but there's an inevitable distancing from narrating their conversations instead of showing them.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
Absolutely awesome. You don't ever explicitly say what Jane's goals are, but you don't need to: it's implicit in her deeds, and in her connection to the old man. Her goals--to surmount loneliness and make a human connection--are so basic that readers understand the stakes are high for both her and Ned. The obstacles, of course, are the most difficult to overcome since they are all inside her.

I admit that I guessed at the ending fairly early in the story, but that's the author in me spotting craft at work in your story. Most readers won't see the subtle signs, but they will resonate nonetheless.

Initially, I was tempted to suggest a more linear timeline for the story, but I think your episodic approach works well. The transitions from the fictional past to the fictional present are generally clear and you shouldn't lose readers in the process.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Again, really great craft in evidence here.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (9/10 points)
I found one typo--"storey" for "story"--although this may be the UK spelling. I also found one sentence that I had to read twice to get the meaning: "A grey ponytailed gnarled old coot glared down at me." That piled too many adjectives together, and for clarity I'd consider a revision.


                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 95/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
132
132
Review by
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "Legend of the Sacred Tree
Author brom21
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I appreciated the numerous Biblical references and felt that they added depth to the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Some of the primary tasks of an opening are to orient the readers in space and time and to establish the point-of-view. Starting with disembodied dialogue vitiates these goals.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (8/10 points)
Third person limited. Eventually, the story settles into Niethos' point of view and stays there.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(17/20 points)
In many places, the prose is vivid and evocative. However, I found quite a bit of telling in this story, too. This ranged from "an unusually large fig tree" ("unusually large" doesn't give scale for those who have never seen a fig tree), to state of mind--"Niethos was sad." Consistently showing as opposed to telling requires relentless attention and is one of the hardest things to do. It's worth it, though, as the places where show the setting or the actions really shine.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (15/20 points)
Truthfully, I found the plot a little thin, or at least hard to believe. Initially, we see Niethos determined to eat from the tree, so much so that he defies his father, the king. The plot, then, is about the conflict between his goal and his father's wishes. It deepens when the angel appears and tells him "no" as well. This should increase the tension. But insteand when the angel says, "No, because your parents sinned," and Niethos immediately relents. I can understand him acquiescing--after all, he's being told by an angel--but for verisimilitude there should be at least some conflict in him before he abandons his goal. This lack of conflict at what should be the climax dissipates the energy in the story without really releasing it.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (15/20 points)
Niethos is the main character here, but I thought you could clarify his motivations a bit more.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (6/10 points)
There were several minor typos, and other places where the word choices didn't seem quite right. For example, I think you meant "thunderclap" instead of "thunder clasped" and "revere" instead of "reverence." There were a few other places as well--nothing major. I have a hard time proof-reading, too. Sometimes it helps to read your copy line-by-line, but backwards, starting at the end.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 76/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
133
133
Review by
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "A Darkness in the Trees
Author Graham Muad'dib
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I know I've seen this plot before. I don't care. I loved it in all those teen-horror movies, and I loved it here. It has it's own logic and grim morality, and you've executed it flawlessly. Kudos!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (17/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Among other tasks, the opening needs to orient the readers in time and space and establish the point of view. Eventually, you get there, but starting with disembodied voices speaking vitiates these goals.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (8/10 points)
This story uses an omniscient narrator, in which the author stands outside the fictional events, looking in. The author knows the internal thoughts of all the characters; in fact, the author knows everything.

This narrative style dominated 19th century literature and continued well into the 20th. However, it has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

This is especially effective for a horror story. I think this one would be even more effective if you used third person limited with Dana as the point-of-view character.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
You generally do a really effective job of showing the various characters' emotional states and reactions to their surroundings. But there are bits here and there that are told rather than shown. For example, in the opening you tell the reader the night was chill but the fire warmed the company rather than showing them being cold and feeling the warmth of the fire.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
I still love it.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Here, you revealed traits through the words and deeds of your characters. This was especially impressive craft, with subtle little gestures showing much. Good work!

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (9/10 points)
Almost perfect...but "prized" should have been "pried."

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 91/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
134
134
Review of An Autumn Walk  
Review by
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "An Autumn Walk
Author Elle Cyre
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
Speaking as an introvert who lacks self-confidence, I kind of liked Roger, or at least found him sympathetic. The poor guy has such low self-esteem, you have to feel for him!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Some of the tasks for an opening are to orient the reader in space and time, to establish the point of view, and to foreshadow the conflict of the story. You manage to do all these things eventually, but it takes until the end of the seventh paragraph.

Some suggestions. Start where Roger turns his coat collar up and thrusts his hands in his pockets. Maybe have him shiver from the cold. Name him in the first sentence, since that helps to draw readers into his head and hence into the story. Give context to him musing about whether he should get a dog by connecting it to Claire walking a dog--which you do in paragraph eight. Finally, name Claire in the opening, too. Surely Roger knows her name, having obsessed over her.

You DO all these things, you just need to rearrange them so that the essential information is earlier.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (8/10 points)
We're in Roger's point-of-view throughout, but there are some places that feel like an omniscient narrator slips in to tell us stuff. For example, when you talked about his long coat and high-water pants (which make him even more geeky and thus sympathetic), it's as though someone is looking at him from afar and describing him. If, instead, he frowned at his "gaunt, extenuated" appearance and his pants, thinking they make him unattractive (because, of course, that's what he would think), then it would be in his head and hence in his point of view.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
See above...You're really effective showing Roger's character and Claire's ebullience. It's just the occasional lapse into telling that slips in now and again.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (17/20 points)
So you know I kind of like Roger, but you've got to admit he's pretty creepy, too, right? I mean, he's stalking her, and she has no idea that's what he's doing. Maybe I've read too many gruesome true-crime stories, but I was thinking all the way that "this isn't going to turn out well." Given the way the story ended, I don't think that was your intent. Thus, I'd say maybe you made Roger just a tad too creepy and could back off some. Alternatively, there's a meme called "save the cat" that's known to screenwriters. The idea is to have your character do some gratuitous act of kindness to establish that he's a good guy, i.e., "save the cat." That's as opposed to "kick the dog," which would show he was a bad guy...and Roger is close to that in his fear of Georgie the Corgi (awesome name, BTW).

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
The characters are finely drawn and credible, atlhough as I noted about Roger may be creepier than you intended. Still, you did a great job of revealing them through their words and deeds.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10 points)
I didn't find anything to flag in the way of grammar, spelling, or typos. It's not that I read for these things, but I almost always find them (In other people's work, that is. I can never find them in my own). Anyway, kudos for clean copy!

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 88/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! In case it wasn't clear, I really liked this story quite a lot! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
135
135
Review of Out of the Woods  
Review by
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "Out of the Woods
Author Deano
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
Well, I basically liked *everything* about this story. It's got crime, a wrongly-charged suspect, and a delicious twist at the end. It's almost like you wrote it just for me!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (20/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Your opening is masterful. It not only orients the reader in time and space and establishes the point of view, it's full of tension. We know the basic conflict of the story from the very outset.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
We're in "George's" first person point of view throughout, with no slips. I do wish you'd named him at the start, since that helps to draw readers into his head. However, by the end I wasn't sure that "George" wasn't an ad hoc alias he made up spur of the moment.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
We learn the action of the story through George's words, deeds, and thoughts. Excellent showing.

I do have one minor suggestion. In more than one place, you write George "heard" or "saw" or otherwise "sensed" something. One example is here:
I heard heavy rustling nearby. This was no squirrel or rabbit but something much bigger. I froze.
This is a subtle form of telling. It's almost always more intimate and immediate for the readers if you directly describe what he heard. Since this is a first person narrative, readers will infer he heard it. If you want to emphasize he heard it, you can have him react in some way, as you do here.

That little step of inference by the readers helps to draw them into George's head and reinforces point of view.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (15/20 points)
As I was reading, I loved the plot. On retrospect, writing this review, I think I see some flaws. For example, George worries about leaving a trail in the mud. He even says he's afraid of "recapture." But recapture by whom? From the ending, it can't be the people who shot him, and he was plainly unaware of the other crime. So, instead of misdirection, this is a flaw in the narrative. I also wonder how he'll find his way back to where he buried the booty, since he was clearly lost at the start. So, while I loved the twist, on retrospect there are some minor flaws.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (18/20 points)
George was a great character, and well-portrayed. The two police, however, were pretty stereotyped and unprofessional. I liked the "Frank Lloyd Wrong" moniker, which I thought clever, but you could have used that even if they had behaved in a more realistic fashion.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10/10 points)
This is clean copy. I found nothing to quibble over.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 93/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
136
136
Review of A Place Of Refuge  
Review by
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "A Place Of Refuge
Author Christopher Roy Denton
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
A story of resilience and a mother's love. There's really nothing to DISlike about this.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (20/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. This opening is almost a master class in how to craft an opening paragraph. It hits on all cylinders. You establish the point of view character, you orient the reader in time and space, you establish the main conflict of the story, and it's full of tension. Awesome writing here.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
Third person limited in Naomi's head. No slips.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(20/20 points)
The entire story, including the necessary background, is revealed through the characters words and deeds and through Naomi's thoughts. More skillful craft at work.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
A miniature three act play. I couldn't ask for a better example. In addition, Naomi's goals are clear, the stakes are high, and the obstacles nearly overwhelming. Her moral dilemma is also clear.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Both Naomi and India are great characters. The two men are credible villains.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10/10 points)
I was pretty deep into the story, so I may have missed something, but I don't think so.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 100/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! This is a really awesome piece of writing. Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
137
137
Review by
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC Contest.

Item Reviewed: "A Backup to the Backup
Author Jeffhans
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
An anonymous email exchange leads to a life-changing opportunity. Who hasn't had that fantasy? I love the premise for this story!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (12/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Your opening establishes your point of view character, but otherwise it's pretty indefinite. Where is he having these conversations and exchanges, for example? Who is the "someone" in the first sentence? Ideally, the opening establishes the here-and-now of ongoing events in the story instead of abstractly telling us background.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
This is all your first person narrator telling us what happened. There are no slip-ups, although it's all narration--more on this below.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(8/20 points)
I love this plot. This would be an almost perfect story for an epistolary approach--in this case, where the story is shown through an exchange of emails. The original Dracula used this approach, as did Fried Green Tomatoes. In both cases, large swaths of the story are told through various sources such as news articles, letters, or, in the case of Dracula, transcripts of wax cylinder recordings. By putting the actual words the narrator exchanges with the 1ST2MARS correspondent, readers would see the here-and-now reality of their emails. you would be showing how their conversation evolved as opposed to telling us, and showing is almost always more immediate and intimate than telling. I think this would be a dynamite story if it were shown.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
I loved the plot. It's ingenious and original.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (15/20 points)
We really only meet one character, and he's pretty distant. We don't get much about him, or his situation, or his emotions. Showing the story, as opposed to telling it, would help to make him a living, breathing soul. (In fact, re-reading, I'm not even certain of the narrator's gender...)

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (8/10 points)
Other than a few minor comma errors, I found nothing to complain about.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 73/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
138
138
Review by
In affiliation with R.A.W.R.  
Rated: E | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I found your story on "Invalid Item. I enjoyed reading it and wanted to share some thoughts with you about it.

Item Reviewed: "The World of Regan
Author Rima...
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I love reading SciFi, and this is the kind of SciFi story I like best: it's about life on a new world, and filled with clever and original ideas about how humans strive to live on some of the strange planets out there. I especially liked how you wrote about one of the newly-discovered Super Earths, about Gliese 667C.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
I have to say, I'm not entirely sure what happened here.

First, there's the "Longship" Drekar, which is clearly in distress with a failing engine. It's about to crash-land on the "recently named" planet Regan. It's also a cargo ship.

Then we jump to people living on Regan. From the descriptions, it's clear they've been there for quite a while--long enough to build enormous, domed settlements in the twilight zone of the tide-locked planet; the settlements rotate like old LPs on a turntable in order to simulate a day-night cycle.

Then we jump to the Captain Zerman, who lives on Regan and commands a group of Force Men--another interesting idea. But if Regan was just "recently named," what's going on? I wonder if "longship" means that the Drekar is a sub-light craft, kind of like an emissary from a past age? But that doesn't quite make sense, since it works over "short" distances, and is a "cargo" ship rather than an explorer. But if it's from the current age, then why don't they radio the obviously extensive settlement on Regan for help?

In any case, much of the action in the latter part of the story centers on Zerman and his crew organizing to rescue the crew of the Drekar, despite the mysterious "monsters" who are rumored to live on the planet. The monster appears, seems to be benign despite its reputation, and the rescue proceeds.

So, as you can see, I'm puzzled about certain elements of the plot. In addition, the mystery of the monster isn't mentioned until midway in the story, although it appears to be one of the key elements of the plot.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
This story uses an omniscient narrator, in which the author stands outside the fictional events, looking in. The author knows the internal thoughts of all the characters; in fact, the author knows everything.

This narrative style dominated 19th century literature and continued well into the 20th. However, it has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, for each scene the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

A novel can--and usually does--have many point-of-view characters, but there should be only one for each scene. Usually, a short story has only one POV character, although this one could readily have two: one on the Drekar, and Captain Zerman, on the ground.

So, in addition to clarifying certain aspects of the plot, my other suggestion for this story involves point of view. I think changing to third person limited would greatly improve the immediacy and intimacy for readers.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
We get some sense of the setting, especially for those living on the planet. But most of it is narrated rather than revealed through the words and deeds of your characters and through the sensations and thoughts of your POV character. Editors and agents tend to dislike this kind of narrated background, since it draws the readers out of the here-and-now of ongoing events in the story. They even have a name for it: the info-dump. It's one of the hardest things to get around in SciFi and fantasy, since the worlds are strange and almost always have complex backgrounds. The trick is to reveal just enough for readers to understand the action that's happening right now, but to do so in a way that slips world-information in. Heinlein was a master at this--indeed, it's one of the distinguishing characteristics that made his fiction so arresting. The opening to "Methuselah's Children" is one of the best examples of this, and worth studying even though its over 50 years old.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Several characters appear, most especially Veva and Zermen. However, they feel a bit distance--probably because of the narrative style. We get a sense of what motivates Zermen from his words and especially his deeds, but less so for the characters on the Drekar.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
Be careful using vague adjectives like "small"--which appears six times in this story. Adjectives like this give no sense of scale and do little to add to the information in the narrative. More precise adjectives are generally better.

There are a couple of instances where "its" appears when it should be the contraction "it's." There are also a couple of places where the subject and verb disagree--"There’s no clouds," for example.

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

This has the makings of being a rip-roaring story in the tradition of the Golden Age of SciFi. a few tweaks to improve the clarity and showing rather than telling the information in the info-dumps would be worth the effort. Indeed, the story's concept and theme deserve these tweaks to make it more intimate and immediate for readers. Do keep writing--this story shows a lot of imagination and creativity. In fact, there are enough ideas in this one story for a dozen or more tales of life on Regen with its benevolent and mysterious monsters. Thank you for sharing!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*The Longship Drekar, a small space cargo ship that works over small distance, shuddered lengthwise as its only engine faltered for the tenth time. It coughed back to life, as always, but the comeback was not so promising. The red light on the dashboard was flashing in rhythm with the siren that blared throughout the ship.

Veva Terzo stared at her screen and then out the windscreen by her side. That little dot of a planet was zooming in pretty fast. *Cut*
*Exclaim*My Comment: Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

Your opening paragraphs have much to recommend them. You start in the middle of action. You orient the readers in time and place. You name your protagonist.

I do have a tweak to suggest. I'd invert the order of the first two paragraphs. The reason is to establish Veva as the point-of-view character. Indeed, if you could add some internal sensation--perhaps she tamps down a frisson of panic that tingles in her fingertips--you'd put the readers inside her head. Then, the second paragraph at least has a chance of something that she might be thinking--or at least would be part of her awareness. The goal here is put the reader in her head and hence inside the story, working with you to imagine your fictional world. Instead, we've got an omniscient narrator, standing outside the story, looking in, telling the reader things. This small tweak would do much to bring readers inside the story.
*Exclaim*


*Cut*He peeped through the little porthole. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: "little" is another of those vague adjectives I mentioned above. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Warm,” Brendon replied without a glace at him.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: should be "glance. " *Exclaim*

*Cut*Just fifty miles before we are in its g-field. If we can’t escape now we’ll…”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Technically, the gravitational field extends out to infinity, so they are already "in it." From the context, I infer that once they are too close, their engines will not be able to pull out. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He turned to his two companions and mumbled softly*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of those adverbs I mentioned. "Mumbled" is a perfectly good verb. He can't really "mumble" loudly, so in this case you could just omit the adverb altogether. *Exclaim*.

*Cut*There were probably more number of Force Men than there were citizens. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: There seems to be something wrong with this sentence. *Exclaim*

*Cut*The planet was divided into three parts. The Light Zone, the Dark Zone and the Twilight Zone.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: The story stops while the author intrudes to tell readers stuff. Moreover, the details here are not really essential to the story, except that they establish that humans have been on the planet for a long time. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay   on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
139
139
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Return of the Prince Introduction
Author Rei
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I liked the genuine affection the warriors showed for each other.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

On the plus side, you started in the middle of action, named your protagonists, and oriented the readers in space and time. The opening also grounded the action that follows.

However, the opening--along with the entire story--uses an omniscient narrator. I'll comment more on this in a moment, but here the omniscient narrator stands *outside* the story, looking in. This makes it challenging for the readers to imagine themselves inside the story and inside your fictional world. Thus, I think the use of either a first person or third person limited point of view would enhance launching the fictional dream.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
This chapter uses an omniscient narrator, in which the author stands outside the fictional events, looking in. The author knows the internal thoughts of all the characters; in fact, the author knows everything.

This narrative style dominated 19th century literature and continued well into the 20th. However, it has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, for each scene the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

A novel can--and usually does--have many point-of-view characters, but there should be only one for each scene.

I've flagged a couple of places in the line-by-line comments below to show you where the omniscient narrator hops from being inside one character's head to another. My main suggestion for this story is to pick one of the characters to provide the point of view, and then show the story from that perspective.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
Your request indicated this was fan fiction. Alas, I'm not familiar with the Legend of Zelda, so I didn't catch most--or any--of the references. I mention this mostly to point out my own weakness as a reviewer. It's not really a problem with the story, since the audience for fan fiction surely consists of other fans who will understand the entire context. It does, however, mean that as a reviewer I can't fully comment on referencing, or even relationships between the characters since I'm reading this de novo.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
A little sparse, but then see above: that's probably more of my own limitations.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Even within my limited perspective, the affection between the characters was clear and moving.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

Most of this story uses the "fictional past," where the narrator is relating events as though they happened in the past. However, there are a couple of instances where it slips to "fictional present," where events are happening in the present. Either is fine and each has its own advantages, but you need to be consistent and pick one or the other. In the line-by-line remarks, I've flagged a couple of places where this happens.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

As I noted above, I think this would be stronger if you used third person limited. Other than that, I think this is a fine story that will likely resonate with other Zelda fans. Keep writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*He watches as it takes its place in the adversary’s forehead,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: tense changes from fictional past to fictional present. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Vio noticed that he'd changed almost immediately. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: changes back to fictional past. Notice here, we are inside Vio's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*'He sounds like Zelda... But why?' Green thought. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Here, we are inside Green's head, hearing his thoughts. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
140
140
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thanks for asking me to read your chapter. I enjoyed reading and wanted to share some thoughts with.

Item Reviewed: "Yawara (Chapter 8)
Author Torin M. Rutledge
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
There's much to love here, but I think the POV character Mike is the most compelling thing in the chapter. He's clearly somewhat OCD, with his neat room and his obsession with exercise. He's got a troubled history, feels he's got a psychic connection with his dead brother, and that his grandmother has a "sixth sense." Then there's whole mystery of his brother's death and the conflict with the Massis. He's a nuanced character with troubled relationships. Between his girlfriend--who he's only spoken to twice--his parents, his dead brother, and the Massis, his life is chaos. Paired with OCD, that promises an explosion.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

On the positive side, your opening names your POV character, orients the readers in time and space, and begins to establish his compulsive character. In the line-by-line remarks below, I made some suggestions to tweak this, but overall it does a good job.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
There are lots of plot threads revealed here. Mike's overpowering need for order conflicts with almost everything else in his life. Obstacles abound, and the stakes escalate with the beating at the end of the chapter. Great job launching the plot!

                                                             
*FlagB*Hook
YOu could just end the chapter with Mike's shouted thread to kill all of them and you'd have an outstanding hook. Since the final sentence after that got cut off, I can't tell if you improved on that or not.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limited, in Mike's head.

There are some bubbles, though. There are several places where the story stops and the narrator intrudes to tell the readers stuff. I've tried to mark these in the line-by-line remarks below. The idea is to enmesh the readers in the here-and-now of your fictional world and keep them there. Narrated bits pull the readers out of the here-and-now, so you should avoid or at least minimize them.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
Clearly we are in Australia, but the exact era is not entirely clear. I don't recall cell phones, for example.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
Sufficient for staging. In the case of Mike's room you mentioned his compulsion for neatness, so *describing* the room would show that--especially if it contrasted with the rest of the house.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Mike's the star, and he's compelling. I'm unclear about his age, though. I'm guessing less than 20, maybe even less than 18.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Comma Splices.*Exclaim*
A comma splice occurs when you have two complete sentences joined by a comma where a period or semicolon should be used. I've marked one or more of these in the line-by-line comments below.

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

*Exclaim* "It's" vs "Its."*Exclaim* "It's" is the contraction for "it is." "Its" without an apostrophe is the possessive form of "it."

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

Most of this story uses close third person limited. We're in Mike's head and we learn his thoughts as he reacts to his environment and those around him. There are a few places where the narrative slips to either omniscient--"author intrusions" in my remarks below--or even to "info-dumps"--also see below. Mike is a compelling character. He's clearly grieving the loss of his brother, which makes him sympathetic, too. The closer the readers are to him, the more they will engage with your fictional world and the story.

I'd say this is about 90% there in terms third person limited and keeping the readers in Mike's head. As you read the line-by-line remarks below, it will probably look like I've found a lot places to whine about, but these are relatively minor in terms of the "fix" needed, and not as numerous as they might first appear.

It's true I've spent a lot of time on the line-by-line remarks, but that's because I think this is a compelling chapter with a great character, Mike. This is good enough to deserve careful attention to make it the excellent work that Mike and the story clearly merit. So please take my comments in the spirit they are offered: this is good work already, but some tweaks will make it better.

Thanks for sharing, and by all means do keep writing. It takes real talent to bring a character like Mike to life!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Mike had just returned home from an exhausting three-hour session at the gym, was just walking through the door when his mother, cigarette in hand, told him that he'd missed a couple of phone calls while he was out "wrecking himself".*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Several comments here. First, instead of starting in the past--"had just returned home"--start in the here-and-now by showing Mike walking through the door. Second, instead of telling us his session in the gym was exhausting, show it by describing, for example, aching muscles. Third, instead of telling us what his mother told him, put the actual words in her mouth--have her speak. *Exclaim*

*Cut*So Ashley had rang him this time? He'd spoken to her on the phone a total of two times since asking her out on Sunday, had been a little nervous at first, but they'd found plenty to talk about - physics, philosophy, astronomy. It had been four days since the party at Craig's.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Good use of close third person limited here--we're in his head, hearing his thoughts. You might have him let a smile bend his lips for a bit of subjectivity, but it works as-is. *Exclaim*

*Cut*'The second call was from your grandmother,' Gwen continued.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Does he think of his mother as "Gwen?" If no, it should just be "she continued." Also, you used double quotes above for dialogue and single quotes here. Double would be the US standard, but whichever you use, be consistent. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He heard his mother sigh, saw her light another smoke - and she thought his excessive training was unhealthy? - then he removed his sweat-soaked shirt and retreated to his bedroom.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Phrases like "he heard" and "he saw" are a subtle form of telling us what he sensed. Once you've established Mike as the POV character, arguably everything on the page is something he sensed, hence you don't need to tell the reader he did so. Further, it's almost always more intimate and immediate for your readers to describe directly what he saw and heard. To emphasize he heard/saw it, you can always have him react in some way. Here, for example, he might resist rolling his eyes while thinking "and she thought his training was unhealthy..." *Exclaim*

*Cut*His room was his sanctuary, the place where his few treasured possessions were kept and where he felt most at peace. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: telling. I like the descripton that follows, but it kind of needs tweaked so it feels more like it's Mike settling in to the room rather than the author intruding to describe it. *Exclaim*

*Cut*On the bedside table were two photos of his brother: one a black-and-white portrait he and Ben had gotten Gwen for mother's day long ago - she still had her copy of Mike's portrait in her own room - the other showed two young boys, Ben and Mike, standing together on Mike's first day of high school. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Later you say that he keeps his room neat. As a way of showing that--instead of telling it--you could have him move the picture a fraction of an inch back to its proper place. That also has him interacting with the picture, which helps to make this in his head instead of the narrator telling us stuff. Similarly, in the next sentence, he might run a loving finger over the rocking chair and/or the guitar. Be careful about revealing too much, though--restrict yourself to things he might actually think and do as he enters the room. His actions will show it's his refuge. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He mostly kept the guitar because of it's sentimental and monetary value.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: author intrudes to state a fact. Also, it should be "its." *Exclaim*

*Cut*After Mike changed his shirt, he chucked a Metallica CD - "Ride the Lightning" - into his CD-player and sat down to stretch. It was very important when exercising as vigorously as Mike did that he stretch both before and after training, and the way Mike trained, each stretching session could last forty minutes or more.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Where did he sit? I'm guessing the floor? Also, the sentence about the importance and duration of the stretching is the author intruding to state facts. *Exclaim*

*Cut*he did not remember losing his temper and bad-mouthing the Massis toward the end of the night, which was unfortunate,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: If he didn't remember it, then this is the author intruding to tell readers something--along with the fact that it was "unfortunate." *Exclaim*

*Cut*A little over half-an-hour later the album he was listening to (stretching to) finished and he ended his session, left the room, strode stiffly out to the lounge-room and dialed Ashley's number. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Avoid parenthetic comments. If you must, use an em-dash to set off the comment. Also, you need a comma after "finished," since this is a compound sentence. The second half is also a compound predicate, so I'd recommend a period after "finished" and starting a new sentence with "He ended..." Otherwise, the sentence feels like a run-on. *Exclaim*

*Cut*After that he called out to his mother, told her he was headed to his Grandma's and set off at a spirited run.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Tells us what he's saying. As above, put the actual words in his mouth. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Ruby Stone, Mike's Grandma on his father's side, *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Author intrudes to tell the reader stuff. Editors tend to hate this kind of thing and have a name for it: the "info-dump." Remember, you've got an entire novel to reveal this kind of information. You should figure out what readers need to know to understand the here-and-now of evolving events and devise ways to reveal that information--and only that information--through the words and deeds of your characters. That way, you keep the fictional dream running in the readers' minds. *Exclaim*

*Cut*There were beautiful red roses and violets brimming with vitality, well-watered bougainvillea and of course, the ancient gum-tree out the back - a relic that would outlive them all. He approached the front door and rang the bell twice.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Story restarts here. To internalize the description of the flowers, you might lead with him inhaling their heady scent. *Exclaim*

*Cut*His grandmother lived on her own.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Author states a fact. Can you find a way to internalize this tidbit? Perhaps above, for example, when he looks at the tidy flower beds, he could think that, despite being sick and living alone, she still kept the place up. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"It's Ashley,' he said, and went inside, seating himself at her dining-room table. Just like that, he felt safe to talk around his Grandma, though he certainly was not going to tell her of his hearing Ben's voice - it would only worry her - but he sensed that everything else was okay to speak of here.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another good use of deep third person limited. Note that the facts that appear here are nuanced in a way that they are clearly internal to Mikey's head as opposed to the narrator, standing outside events, telling us stuff. *Exclaim*

*Cut*They sipped from the tea and Mike told her firstly how much he missed Ben*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Again, you are narrating the dialogue rather than showing it. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He told her about the Massis, then, how their father had died trying to save Ben - and how his surviving sons blamed him and his family, wanted them gone from Lark Hill. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: ...more narrated dialogue... *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mike looked toward where she was pointing he saw*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Mike "looked and saw" is like "Mike heard" above... *Exclaim*

*Cut*an elegant vase combining greens and blues and yellows in intricately leaf-shaped patterns. It was only a small thing, perhaps forty centimetres long and ten wide. It looked expensive, though. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Good description, but what made it "look expensive?" *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mike carefully took the urn down from it's place on the aged shelf,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: its not it's. *Exclaim*

*Cut*left her house and went home, carrying the urn cautiously.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of those weak verb/adverb combinations I mentioned above. Here, perhaps he "cradles" the urn, which would imply caution. *Exclaim*

*Cut*For the people of Lark Hill the day dawned like any other Saturday in town*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Story stops while the author tells the reader stuff... *Exclaim*

*Cut*He awoke from a dreamless sleep to shouting*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: After some narration about how he spent his Saturday, the here-and-now of the story restarts here. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mike sighed, emerged from his room, saw his father seated on the lounge with his head in his hands.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Mike...saw...just describe his father directly. *Exclaim*

*Cut*'It's fine, Mikey,' his Dad replied, maybe he thought Mike would believe him?*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Comma splice; need a period or semicolon after "replied." *Exclaim*

*Cut*The animosity growing between his parents was tough for him to witness, *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: author intrusion *Exclaim*

*Cut*Jake had mentioned the other day *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: who is Jake? *Exclaim*

*Cut*But after a little consideration he decided to visit his best friend - whatever th*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Something missing here...it seems it got cut off. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay   on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
141
141
Review by
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Ken Reaches For The Heights
Author Christopher Roy Denton
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is another strong story. Ken is a character with clear goals and obstacles. The tension increases nicely. The opening is awesome. The plot reaches climax, resolves, and then wraps up without any extraneous words. Not much I can say to improve this.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limited, in Ken's head. There are maybe one or two places where I'd think about being a little more deeply in Ken's head--especially in the climactic scene on the ledge. But certainly there are no slips.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
Good job overall, although I almost always whine about wanting more. For example, sounds of the creaky fire escape, or the sensation of wind whipping his hair might add some sensory details to the climax. Be careful to use them to increase tension, though.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

I did find a couple of places where "Ken saw" or "Ken found." These are subtle forms of telling. See the line-by-line commments below.

OVerall, this is a great story for the the contest. I found a couple of really minor things that might--or might not!--improve the flow, but it's well-written as is. Good luck!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Ken gazed up at the Ferris wheel and shuddered. Its multicolored flashing lights provided a cheerful contrast to the night sky, but in his mind's eye he saw rotor blades crashing through green foliage. Ever since that fateful crash landing in the jungle, he hadn't been the same. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Excellent opening paragraph. *Exclaim*

*Cut*This close, he could see her eyes were squeezed shut and her face twisted in fear. Avoiding looking down, he leaned over the handrail and reached out. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Phrases like "This close, he could see" are a subtle form of telling. "This close" is shorthand for telling us he's now close--as opposed to showing it. In addition, arguably, since we are in Ken's head, everything on the page is something he's seen or otherwise sensed. It's generally more intimate and immediate for readers if you just report directly what he sees, and they will infer he sensed it. That little step of inference helps to solidify point of view. If you want to emphasize he saw it, you can always have him react in some way. Since the situation is more tense, I'd also consider using shorter sentences, or even fragments. The second sentence above, for example, has two pieces of information. I'd consider something like: "Don't look down. He leaned over the handrail and reached out." "Don't look down" puts us inside his head, deciding to not look down, and is more urgent that "avoiding looking down," which disconnects the action and the actor. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He clambered over the handrail and put his feet on the same ledge she’d used to reach the drainpipe, keeping a tight grip on the handrail beside him. Now that he was closer, he placed a hand gently on her shoulder.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: "Handrail" used twice in close proximity. "Placed..gently" is a weak verb/adverb combination. Is there a stronger verb available? Maybe "nudged," for example. *Exclaim*

*Cut*As he became accustomed to the light, he saw that they were inside a lady’s bedroom, with pink walls, a lace throw over the bed, and the scent of floral perfume.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another instance of "He saw..." Also, for clarity, I'd say "the dim light." *Exclaim*

*Cut*He rapidly checked her airway and pulse. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another weak verb/adverb combination. *Exclaim*

*Cut*The lady sat up and scanned the room. “Sophie?”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Great name for the child. *Exclaim*


                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
142
142
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Gold Prospecting For Dummies
Author Christopher Roy Denton
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is a very punny story. I liked it a lot.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Excellent opening that performed all the essential tasks effortlessly.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
we knew from outset this would end in disaster, but you kept the tension stringing ever tighter.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limimted, IN Daphne's airhead.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
Sufficient for staging. Since it's a TV set, I'm not sure what more you could do.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
No problem understanding Daphne's, goals, the stakes, or the obstacles. Ditto for all the other characters.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

Really, this is a great story. It's amusing, one that we see play out over and over again on inane TV shows, and it's got credible characters. Nice job.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut* Now she'd reached the wrong side of forty, *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I think you meant, "Now THAT she'd..." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Welcome to Beijing Today,” said the show’s pig-faced presenter.

Miss Dian Deng Pao tilted toward the camera*Cut*
*Exclaim*My Comment: Is Dian Deng Pao the show's presenter? If so, I'd use her name in the prior sentence and then her descriptor and title in the following sentence. I think that would be clearer. *Exclaim*

*Cut*famous single,Party Till Everybody Pukes?”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Missing space. Snot sounds like Joe Walsh. *Exclaim*

*Cut*forEntertainment Mexico. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: missing space *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
143
143
Review of A "Worthy Goal"  
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: E | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thanks for asking me to read and critique your story. I enjoyed it and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "A "Worthy Goal"
Author Jeremiah_Johnson
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

I see that you are new to Writing.Com, so I'd also like to add my personal welcome to the site. This is a great place to learn and grow as an author, as well as to make new friends. There's something here for everyone, so it's worth the effort to explore the site. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to write to me. It looks like you're off to a great start, though!

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
David Sidaris is one of my favorite humorists. Some of his best pieces involve first-person narratives about amusing incidents from his childhood that, without fail, provide insights into modern-day living. This story reminded me of Sidaris, so thank you for that. If I had to choose the one part of the story I liked best, I think it's the "shortcut." It is, of course, the most amusing part of the story, and well-told. But it's also serves as a wonderful metaphor for the two brothers finding their path in life which, ultimately, is what this story is about.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

There are some basic bits of information that help to orient your readers. These include at least some of the usual suspects: who, what, when, where, why, and how. For example, we don't learn your brother's name until half-way through the story, and we never learn your name. In the second paragraph, we learn they are in the mountains, but I only know they are in the Appalachian mountains from reading your bio-block on WDC. The when, where, and why questions are more or less covered.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
On the hunt for a basketball hoop, two brothers take a shortcut.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
First person.

About 30% of all published fiction today uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited. First person is a natural for a reminiscence like this, but it turns out first person is harder to write than third person limited.

First person is hard despite the fact that we tell first person stories all the time. At the end of the day, often over dinner, our spouse or other family member will ask how our day went, and we will relate an amusing, interesting, or at least diverting incident. There's often an element of acting involved in the telling, whether it's an eye-roll or droll tone. When we write in first person, it's easy to imagine exactly this setting, with our readers sitting right next to us listening to our account.

There are at least two problems with this. First, the above scenario involves telling the story. The maxim for the written word is that showing is stronger than telling. Secondly, there are non-verbal cues that happen when you tell a story out loud to someone, and those non-verbal cues are absent from the written page unless you put them there.

The reason first person is hard to write is because written first person narratives are necessarily different from the spoken kind we use all the time in everyday life.

Let me give an example of what this might mean for your story. You might start with the two brothers doing something. You might even start with them already on their journey, possibly with nettles prickling the narrator's skin. He could complain to his brother about the shortcut. They could argue, the way brothers sometimes do, about whether the trip to get the basketball rim was worth it, how much better it would be than what they have now. You'd reveal the answers to the basic informational questions through the words and deeds of your characters. That's showing as opposed to telling, which is how you do it in this story.

The reason for showing is because it's both more intimate and immediate for your readers. They experience your fictional world holistically, through the senses, words, and deeds of your narrator. They imagine that they are inside the narrator, experiencing his world through him. This vastly increases the power of your story.

Showing will almost invariably take more words than telling, but it's worth the effort.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
You give little details like "pre-WalMart" that help establish the era. We know the setting is rural and mountainous, too, again from details you reveal. Good job.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
I'd love to hear these characters speak, to get to know them better.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
I saw one typo, otherwise this is perfect. I have to say that, while I don't read for grammar, I almost always find something to complain about. Not here! Good job!

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

My main comment for this story is that you find ways to show the essential elements rather than tell them. The cross-country journey should be shown, perhaps in little episodes. One with nettles, one at about the fourth hill, one with the bull--how did they get out that, by the way? Did panic jitter down your spine? Show how that felt! All of this was to get the hoop, which turned out to be not what they were expecting. But it turned out that this journey, which was part of their love of basketball, had life-long consequences. So the end of the journey in the story, like their lives, had unexpected consequences. My take-away for this story is that things don't always work out like the way you expect, but they always work out, one way or another. The point is the journey, not the destination. Maybe I'm reading too much of myself into your story, but that just points to the power of your metaphor. In a truly good story, readers will always bring their own perspective. Your's is a truly good story. Thank you for sharing.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             

*Cut*someone had leveled out a spot near my friennd David's house*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*



Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay   on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
144
144
Review of Apartment 15  
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thank you for asking me to read your story. I enjoyed it and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "Apartment 15
Author Christopher Robin
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
There is much to love here, but for me the best part is the twist at the end. I love stories with a Twilight Zone feel, and this one certainly delivered!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world. In your opening, you establish the point of view and name your point-of-view character. You also tell us some fundamental characteristics of your character.

I especially like your very first sentence which mirrors the opening sentence of "The Tell-Tale Heart." Poe was one of the first masters of the short story, and he would likely have loved this one.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
I don't want to give away the plot, but I will say that it's the strongest part of a strong story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
I think you can tell I liked your story, but I do have some comments and suggestions in this section.

This story uses a first person narrator. About thirty percent of published fiction today uses this narrative style. It's comes naturally, since we use this almost every day in our lives. At the end of the day, perhaps over dinner, a family member might ask, "How was your day?" In response, we tell an amusing or at least interesting event that happened. It's tempting for an author to have this intimate setting in mind while writing a first person narrative. Indeed, that temptation is one of the things that makes writing first person stories so challenging.

Here's the problem with that scenario: it's all about telling your story. When you do this with family and friends, there's almost always an element of acting as well--your tone of voice, the expression on your face, other body language helps to convey the events. But on the written page, it becomes telling. The most difficult lesson for fiction authors to learn and to consistently do is showing not telling.

"Showing" means being in the moment, in the here-and-now of evolving events. "Showing" means revealing the information in the story through the words and deeds of your characters and--in the case of your point-of-view character--through thoughts and sensations. "Showing" is more intimate and immediate for your readers. Showing draws them into your fictional world, and hence into your story. Modern readers don't want to read about your fictional world. They want to experience it holistically, the way they experience the real world.

Now back to your story. The action in the story starts when Josh get's the phone call from apartment fifteen. Everything prior to that point is background and it's all narrated, i.e., told instead of shown. Editors call this the info-dump, and it's an almost certain route to the "do-not-read" pile for submissions.

Please understand that as recently as the 70s, you could find *many* stories that include this kind of narrated background. I'm sure you can even find it in currently published stories by well-established authors. But well-established authors don't have to worry about being dumped onto the slush pile: they get read and accepted because they have a record of sales. Beginning authors, on the other hand, need to adhere to the more modern expectations of editors and readers.

All of this is a long preamble to my main suggestion for this story: develop an introductory scene of some kind that conveys the information in the opening through the words and deeds of the characters. You could include Josh's thoughts and sensations as well, but not those of other characters since Josh can only infer those from their words and deeds.

You know best how to do this, but here's one possible solution. First, you could establish he's a student working on his dissertation just by having him working on it. while monitoring the switchboard. He could take a call and answer it "Elysium Retirement Community, apartments for assisted living," or some other marketing spiel. That shows where he works. He could wonder--or be annoyed--that he got a call at 10PM about rentals. Perhaps the facility has a nurse who spends the night. He and the nurse could have a conversation. She might even "pray" for one of the people at the facility, or merely say "God bless her." That gives an opportunity for Josh to think something like, "how can an intelligent person like Zedekiah" need superstitions like religion. He could even be superior about how his scientific training frees him from needing religion. These are but a couple of ways to show the necessary information in the opening.

Note, too, that readers only need to know enough to understand what's happening in the here-and-now of the story. As the author, you need to know all the details, but don't necessarily need to spell them all out in the story. That's another tricky problelm: what to put in and what to leave out. But it's not as tricky as showing the information as opposed to telling it.

Notice that once Josh takes the call, almost all the action of the story is shown. The dialogue is believable and well done. Tension builds nicely to the reveal at the climax. It's the combination of the plot and effecting showing in the here-and-now of the story that makes this so effective. So, it's not like the above means I'm suggesting a huge revision to your story. On the contrary--I'm primarily suggesting a revision to the opening.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
THe setting is sufficient for staging--it's clear throughout where the characters are in relation to each other. I might prefer a touch more setting, but that's a matter of taste. As an example, maybe Josh's desk is cluttered with his laptop, dog-eared copies of his dissertation, and a pizza box. Or maybe the same things are there and you describe them in a way that shows Josh is obsessively neat. Either way adds some color to the setting and reveals a bit about Josh. A touch of description can add to mood, character, and plot. Don't overdo it though--too much description becomes what Elmore Leonard described as the "parts of a story readers skip."

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Josh is a credible and likable character. We know he's thoughtful, since he's troubled by the cognitive dissonance of his deepest beliefs and his lived experience as related in this story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
I don't read for grammar, but I almost always find things to whine about. Not here. You are clearly an experienced and literate author.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

The notion of a "guided dream" informs most of my work as an author and reviewer. After the introductory info-dump, the guided dream in this story is compelling. Tension cranks ever tighter as the call comes in and the wait for the paramedics ensues. Then, bang! We're at the climax. Some tweaking to the opening will make this a great story, not just a good one. Thanks for sharing, and do keep on writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut* Uses of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Determine the Three-Dimensional Structure of Large Non-Polymeric Molecules. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Since this is capitals, I infer it is the title of his dissertation? If so, the US standard would be to italicize it. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Not having been blessed with what is often euphemistically referred to as "private resources" (.i.e. rich parents), I needed a job to finance myself while I completed my thesis. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This tidbit about Josh's perseverance is an excellent way to make him sympathetic and put readers on his side. Most editors tend to deprecate parenthetic comments and prefer the m-dash instead. *Exclaim*

*Cut*All was pretty smooth sailing until the early hours of 14th May. It was just after midnight and a call came in; a call I will never forget as long as I live, no matter how hard I try.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is where the story actually starts. Everything prior to this is narrated background. *Exclaim*

*Cut*I answered.

"Hello, Mrs. Graham. Josh here. How are you tonight?"*Cut*
*Exclaim*My Comment: Assuming the "I answered" is a dialogue tag, this should be
I answered, "Hello, Mrs. Graham...
In any case, it is connected to his speech and should be on the same line as his words. *Exclaim*


*Cut*"My name is Rose Graham and I live in Apartment 15."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Hmmm...perhaps she should say, "I'm calling from apartment 15." Also, "apartment" should be lower case and "fifteen" should be written out. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"I don't feel very well."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: It might be useful to have some sensory information here on the tone and timbre of her voice. Is it thin and reedy, for example? *Exclaim*

*Cut*and I could focus on my thesis again.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: In the US a doctoral student writes a dissertation and a masters student writes a thesis. Degrees are somewhat different in the UK. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"No, it's Amanda Ryan. I'm a paramedic with MCS. Is that Josh?"*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I think she'd say, "is this Josh..." *Exclaim*

*Cut*I detected a strain in the paramedic's voice.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is a subtle form of telling. Since we're in Josh's head, arguably everything on the page is something he's sensed or knows. Usually, it's more intimate and immediate for the readers if you directly describe what he sensed. They will infer he "detected" it since he's providing the point-of-view. Indeed, that little step of inference strengthens the connection with Josh. If you want to emphasize he "detected" it, you can have him react in some way. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"What do you mean? The usual way; Mrs. Graham rang me on the hotline, the same one you're using now. She told me felt unwell so I called you guys in."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This would be a good place to give an emotional reaction from Josh. Is he annoyed, or is a trickle of fear jittering down his spine? *Exclaim*

*Cut*"DEAD???!!! You've got to be kidding me! How can she keel over and die that quickly?"*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Again, give us some internal suggestion of his emotional reaction. Also, rather than using all caps, you might him "shout" or "exclaim." *Exclaim*

*Cut*I tried to process this but it just floated there in front of me like a fog. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: missing comma after "this." *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Me neither. We've covered the body. That's as much as we can do. You need to inform the family. We'll file our report."*Cut**Exclaim* This doesn't quite ring true. Since there is evidence of a call from the apartment, they would think *someone* was in the apartment and made the call. Why did that person leave? Theft comes immediately to mind, so they'd probably call the police to investigate. You could have them just say, "The cops will have to investigate" and leave it at that. That leaves open who issues the death certificate, calls the medical examiner, transports the body, etc., none of which matters to the story which is essentially over.

One of the things Poe taught us about short stories was that they should end as soon after the climax as possible. From that perspective, this story goes on just a bit too long after this point. If you could cut it by half or more from this point forward, I think it would be more effective.
*Exclaim*


                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay   on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
145
145
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thanks for asking me to read your chapters. I enjoyed them and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "Darkside Outpost Three - chapters 1-5
Author Dragonbane
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I love science fiction and, in particular, the sub-genre known as "space opera." You've constructed a fully realized fictional universe, populated with interesting humans and given them intriguing aliens with whom they interact. You give us just enough of the underlying technology to understand what's going on in the story and resist the temptation to provide a detailed info-dump. The plot starts with a new commanding officer and the changed dynamics that implies, along with the mystery of his assignment. Thus, these chapters give a good launch to your novel and reveal just enough of your extensive and detailed world-building to pique the readers' interest. Nice job!

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice

I'm going to start with comments on point of view, because this is where I'm going to make my main suggestions.

In the line-by-line remarks below, you'll find several places where I remark that the point-of-view has "hopped" from Mat to Anna or back. This often happens when the author choose to use an omniscient narrator, a style that dominated fiction well into the mid-to-late twentieth century. However, this style has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, for each scene the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

A novel can--and usually does--have many point-of-view characters, but there should be only one for each scene. In many novels, you will find a fixed point-of-view in each chapter. This is especially useful in opening chapters, where readers are not only learning about your fictional universe, but are also meeting your characters for the first time. Putting the readers in that character's head and keeping them there for an entire chapter helps to solidify both the point of view, the fictional world, and the characterization.

Note that this is in striking contrast to a movie, where the camera provides the point of view for the audience. In addition, in a movie we have actors, mise en scene, the score, the sound effects, and so on to create the story. In a novel, all we have are words on page. But those words, done with skill and heart, can create an even more intimate and immediate experience readers since it all happens in their heads by stimulating their imaginations.

So, my biggest suggestion for these chapters is to decide on one character to provide the point of view for each chapter. I'm tempted to say that would be Mat for Chapter One and Anna for Chapter two, but it could be Mat for both or Anna for both. This will involve some re-working of events, since Mat (or Anna) can't experience what happens outside of his presence. But sticking with one point of view will greatly increase the immediacy and intimacy of the chapters, and therefore also increase the readers' emotional engagement.

Back to those line-by-line comments: I've used them to mark some--but not all--of the places where the POV hops from one character to another. If you choose to take my advice on point of view, those are the places to watch for.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

Your opening starts with Mat admiring himself in a mirror. That's good, in that it starts with him doing something. You also name him, describe him (since he's looking in the mirror, the description stays inside his head), and, through his uniform, we learn a bit of his history. You also orient the reader in space and time. THese are all positives.

However, having Mat admire himself in the mirror makes him seem like a bit of a narcissist, something that doesn't come through later. As an alternative, you might have him fuss over the details of his uniform to be sure they are perfect. That would give him an air of being OCD, giving inordinate attention to details. That would be consistent with his later actions.

Overall, though, I found your opening to be effective.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
As noted above, we have a couple of plot points already: the dynamic between Anna and Mat and the mystery of his assignment. You do a great job presenting both through the words and deeds of your characters and avoid the infamous info-dump. It's an interesting plot, set in an original and interesting universe.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
Good work here, too. You reveal just enough about the world, its technology, and its politics so we can understand what's happening in the here-and-now of ongoing events.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
I like both characters. Mat appears to be smart and effective. I like Anna even more. She's equally smart, a good officer who thinks things through, who wants the mission to succeed, and wants to excel for the sake of excellence as opposed to merely advancing her career. The interplay between the Sharimdara was just enough to sew seeds of distrust without being explicit.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Run-on sentences.*Exclaim*
I only marked a couple of these, but these chapters are filled with run-on sentences. This web page might be helpful in finding and fixing these:
http://writing.umn.edu/sws/quickhelp/grammar/runon...

*Exclaim* Commas.*Exclaim*
I thought I saw some comma errors. I'm terrible with commas, so I won't try to point them out. Instead, here's a great reference:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_c...
I've read it, and they're still a mystery to me. I hope it helps!

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

The ideas behind the fictional dream provide the basis for my comments above on point of view. The changes needed to achieve third person limited point of view are relatively small, but will pay big dividends. These chapters have many strengths, and there is much to love here. Thanks for sharing, and do keep writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*“He’s nearly a week overdue I was beginning to think the pirates had got him,” Lieutenant Commander Anna Lopez said.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This seems to launch a new scene, in a new location, with new characters. *Exclaim*

b}*Cut*“His escort has picked him up then when are they due to arrive?” *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of many places where you've joined two sentences together with no intervening punctuation or conjunction. For example, this might be better as *Exclaim*

*Cut*she paused, hesitant to continue.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Since we learn what's in Anna's head--that she's reluctant to continue--this establishes her point-of-view. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat studied the station as the shuttle pilot handed over control to the docking computers. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Here we hop back into Mat's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*To look at there was nothing out of the ordinary about Outpost Three it was like all the other orbital station's earth had built a large grey cylinder with struts protruding out along its surface from which attached round tubes that circled the cylinder.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Run-on sentence. Also, no apostrophe in stations (plural). *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat woke to the persistent call of his commvid groaning*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: We seem to have jumped from Mat preparing to disembark to Mat waking up in his new quarters. At a minimum, you need a visual cue, for example extra vertical space or even three centered stars, to let the readers know about the shift. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“She must have glimpsed me pulling my pants on not the best start but can’t be helped,” Mat mused reflectively.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: He actually said this out loud, so she can hear him? Or did you mean that the thought it? If the latter, it should be in italics with no "thought tags" like "he mused." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Aye sir,” Anna replied and turned sharply as Mat turned of his commvid. “Well, that’s two things I know about him already he has a good body, and he is decisive more so than Greg Stevens anyhow.”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Since the vid is off, the point-of-view has necessarily hopped here into Anna's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat took the turbo lift he didn’t generally like turbo lifts they tended to make him queasy *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: and now we've hopped back to Mat's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Signal from the Sharimda ship audio only sir,” Anna said she wondered why audio only *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Hops to Anna's head since we know what she's wondering. *Exclaim*

*Cut*fell on death ears*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: deaf ears *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat studied the cruiser, as it made its final approach there was some minor damage to the hull nothing serious. Thankfully all of the delta-wing returned*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: hops back to Mat's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Anna started to object and thought better of it.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: "thought better of it" is in Anna's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut* “Here it comes I just knew the captain should have been here.” Anna thought,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: The editorial standard for quoting thoughts is generally to use italics only with no quotation marks and to not use "thought tags" like "she thought." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Yes, where is the captain; his absence borders on the insulting?” Sianna asked coldly*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of several places where you use an adverb to modify words like "said" or "asked" following a bit of dialogue. Here, what nonverbal cues might Sianna give that let Anna infer her speech was "cold?" Did her eyes flash, perhaps? Or maybe she "sneered" or "snarled." Or you could have Anna react with a chill running down her spine. All of these are more visceral that using an adverb to pep up a weak verb. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay   on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
146
146
Review of The Sacrifice  
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: E | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "The Sacrifice
Author AME
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
The theme of this story is powerful, all the more so due to the excellent characterizations. This is quite sad, so it would be wrong to say I "enjoyed" it, but I certainly am glad I read it and appreciate your sharing.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Effective characters have goals and face obstacles. The goals matter; those are the stakes. These are the basic building blocks of plot.

In this story, the protagonist is battling a debilitating disease, depression. Her loving companion, Ezra, is there for her, helping her during a long and painful healing process. Recovery is Rianne's goal, and we know from the opening paragraph that the stakes are life-and-death. The pervasive character of the disease is the obstacle. Ezra, too, has Rianne's recovery as his goal.

So, this story is powerful in part because the goals, obstacles, and stakes are so clear and so important.

But it's the heart-breaking twist to this story that ultimately gives power to the plot.

So characters combine with plot and theme to give an outstanding story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
First person, in Rianne's head. I found one little bump, otherwise this was perfect.

I did notice a few instances where you wrote Rianne "felt" or "heard" or otherwise "sensed" something. Most of the time you described the sensation directly, which is generally better. Saying she "felt" something is a subtle form of telling. When you describe it directly, readers readily infer she 'felt' it since you've done a good job putting us in her head. That little step of inference helps to draw them into your story. If you want to emphasize she "sensed" it, you can have her react--as you do in several places in the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
This was sufficient for staging--I could tell where the characters were in relation to each other. I understand that depression can deaden the senses, but add a few more might increase the intimacy of the story. If Rianne caught a whiff of Ezra's scent, for example, that might be a nice touch.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

This was a really good story and showed a mature grasp of character, tension, story-telling, and plot. It's an admirable mix of story and theme. Thank you for sharing, and do keep writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*It was past midnight. The city looked so peaceful, in contrast to the day scene, but my mind was anything but. My feet sought the edge of the roof, and stopped. My heart was pounding, my mind racing. One more step, just one, and all of this would be over. No more pain. No more misery. No more emptiness. No more opening my eyes in the morning and immediately starting to count down the hours till the day was over.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment:
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

There are many solid points about this opening. You certainly start in the middle of action. You orient the readers in time and space. You foreshadow both the action and the plot of the story. You establish point of view. These are all positives, and things authors often forget, so good job!

I do have a couple of minor tweaks, though. For example, I wish there were a way to name your point-of-view character in the opening paragraph. She does get named in the third paragraph, however, and it's certainly better to start with action than a disembodied voice speaking.

However, you *do* start with a statement of fact. If you did something as simple as put the sentence, "My feet sought the edge..." first, that would accomplish a couple of things. First, it would establish the voice of the first-person narrator. That makes the second sentence arguably (and intuitively) in her head rather than a faceless narrator, standing outside the story, stating a fact. It also adds immediate tension: she's teetering on the edge. Then we learn it's midnight. That's a great hook to draw the readers into your story.

Overall, though, this is an effective opening. You show the narrator's emotional state, her despair, and you do so using subjective language which helps to draw readers into her head and hence into the story. *Exclaim*


*Cut*Why am I like this? My brain screamed silently. Why do I feel this way? What am I supposed to do? How am I supposed to deal with all this? What is wrong with me?*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: It's correct to use italics when quoting internal thoughts. However, editors almost always deprecate "thought tags," like "my brain screamed silently." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Rianne,” A low voice behind me made my body tense up but I stayed rooted to the spot.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another picky comment. Readers will have already "heard" the voice in their heads, so it's usually better to lead with the tone and timbre, as in, "A low voice spoke from behind me," and then put in what the voice said. You are correct, however, to keep the reaction *after* the words, keeping a linear time flow. *Exclaim*

*Cut*my large, wild eyes*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: She can't see her eyes, so this is a small POV violation. *Exclaim*

*Cut*taking in his dishevelled appearance*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: nice foreshadowing--even here, he's showing signs of depression. Note the typo, though: only one "l" in disheveled. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Okay,” I replied softly before hanging up.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of those weak verb/adverb combinations I mentioned. Perhaps she "murmured" or "whispered," or even "muttered." *Exclaim*

b}*Cut*“Hey,” he greeted me softly, his hand stroking my hair tenderly. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: See above for "softly." "Tenderly" is a little speedbump that's not needed. He wouldn't stroke her hair "roughly," right? In that case, he'd "tousle" it. If you want a more precise verb, "caress" might do. *Exclaim*

*Cut*I stared blankly at him,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: another adverb..."gaped" might be better... *Exclaim*

*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Nice, evocative language here. Notice, you didn't say "I felt waves of peace," which would be telling. Instead, you described the sensation directly, which is more intimate and immediate for readers. *Exclaim*

*Cut*how he did in his own exams that was held on that same day.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: that were held... *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
147
147
Review of Samantha's Pet  
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Samantha's Pet
Author Christopher Roy Denton
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
OMG, I loved this story. Your description of Lilith perfectly matched Bebe Neuwirth's character in Frasier and Cheers. If "Bob" were named "Frasier" or "Niles," it would have been even funnier for me. (FWIW, In one episode, Frasier has an obsession with a pricey lawyer named Samantha.)

Besides my probably delusional connections to a TV sitcom, I loved this story for the foreshadowing, the descriptions, and the twist at the end. I do wonder how Bob felt about his fate, though?

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Your opening is perfection.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
Soda shot out my nose when I read the ending. I mean, I saw it coming, but it was a thing of beauty.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limited in Bob's dorky head.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
NYC, modern era. BTW, how did she find a place to PARK?

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
We learn about Bob's desire to please and his submissive nature through his thoughts about Samantha. Lilith is perfect, although I may have been influenced by visions of the character Lilith from Frasier.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
Perfect

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
Okay, I'm really glad you sent this to me, but surely you weren't looking for ways to improve it? It's perfect as it is.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*She didn't need a dog; she had Bob to roll over and fetch.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Haha...I bet this is foreshadowing, too. I was kidding here, but this turns out to be prescient. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Lilith." *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: If she has alabaster white skin and a biting, sarcastic wit, I've met her before on Frasier. *Exclaim*

*Cut*As they shook hands, hers felt strangely cold.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: see above. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Soon, the buildings grew smaller, and it became clear they were headed out of town.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: At least he's not hanging his head out the window with his hair fluttering the breeze and his tongue hanging out. Wait...maybe he SHOULD be? *Exclaim*

*Cut*As the gray city buildings segued into green fields and trees, Lilith turned to Bob with a predatory smirk. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: hmmm....predatory... *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Yes. Someone to feed you, ensure you get enough exercise, and punish you when you've been a naughty Bob."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Okay, now it's pretty clear where this is headed... *Exclaim*

*Cut*meanytime."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: missing space. OKay, so there is ONE thing to improve. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
148
148
Review by
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
** Image ID #2159387 Unavailable **

*Smile* Hi. My name is Max and, for my personal welcome to Writing.Com, I'm sending you some comments on your story. I found it on the Noticing Newbies   page, enjoyed reading it, and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "Grendel on the Moor
Author kmack
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
Please remember these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
Since you are new to Writing.Com, I'd like to add my personal welcome to the site. This is a great place to post your work, to learn and grow as an author, and to make new friends. You'll find a wide range of opportunities here. The site can be a little overpowering at first, so if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to drop me a note. If I don't know the answer, I'll try to find out.

Okay, then. Here we go with my comments!

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I check the "newbie" list daily, looking for things to read. I'm so glad I found your story. The Beowulf references drew me to this piece, and you kept them running throughout. I loved the premise, and felt more than a bit sorry for Grendon.

I liked your prose, too. It's fully of active verbs, vivid descriptions, and the characters each speak with distinctive voices. We learn about your fictional world largely through the words and deeds of your characters, so there is good showing--as opposed to telling--here, too.

You've also injected humor which more than once brought a smile to my face.

Finally, you made the monster human. You make him sympathetic by having him do a good deed in saving the "chicken" in the initial scene. In terms of tropes, this is sometimes called "saving the cat." Even though his confusion has led to deaths, he's still a tragic figure at the end.

Finally, the little twist at the end, with the finger hovering over the mobile phone, leaves the reader wondering what will happen next. That finger gives lie to Calpol's belief that "no one would believe" the farmer.

Overall, this was a satisfying read. Thank you for sharing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Some things you might think about.

Point of View.
This story uses an omniscient narrator, showing knowledge of the inner thoughts of both Calpol and Grendon. The opening scene feels like the narrator is standing outside the story, looking in. This would be perfect for a screenplay, where the camera is the eye of the audience. But in most stories, a *character* serves as the point-of-view for the audience. I think if you settled on a single point-of-view and stuck with it, you'd have a more immediate and intimate story.

The text wasn't consistent in referencing Grendon--sometimes he's a "he" and sometimes he's an "it." With a consistent point-of-view, you'd have to settle on one or the other.

There were a few typos in the story. I don't read for these, but I noted a couple in the line-by-line remarks below.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
I picked your story because I liked it and thought that your writing showed talent. This review is mostly just first impressions. If you'd like more in-depth comments, please don't hesitate to visit
Review Spot Glyph


Thank you for sharing your work, and please keep on writing!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Cut*Calpol shifted uneasily in his trenchcoat, running his finger inside the clammy collar. That was the problem with England.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is an excellent way to launch this scene. You name the point-of-view character. He's reacting to his environment, and you use subjective descriptions like "clammy," which help to put the readers inside his head. That helps engage the readers. Now, when you describe things, it will be as though Calpol is sensing them. Since you've put them "inside his head," that makes it more immediate and intimate for the readers. Good job! *Exclaim*

*Cut* It's been all we can do to keep it of the press.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: missing word. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Your not going to hit me with a forget ray*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Typo: should be "you're..." *Exclaim* or somethin', are you ?" asked the farmer.

*Cut*TheFarmer watched him go, then looked uncertainly at his cell phone, finger hovering over the 'send' button.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Awesome ending! *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {item:1847273.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
149
149
Review of The Bum  
Review by
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "The Bum
Author Karl
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is a really fine story. It's well plotted, with a fine air of mystery and good tension. The ending provides a twist that is both satisfying and adds to the mystery. Nice job!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

Your opening introduces the two characters, establishes the fundamentals of who they are and their relationship, and foreshadows the plot. Overall, it's excellent.

I have only a couple of tweaks to suggest. First, I think it would help to have a hint of the setting. We don't need more than a word or two to establish what kind of neighborhood we're in, but it would be helpful. Second, I think if you could find a way to reveal the name of your narrator in the opening paragraph, this would achieve a couple of goals. First, it would help to draw readers into his head and solidify the fictional dream. Second, in terms of the theme, having a named narrator and a nameless "bum" reinforces the differences between them.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
Good job increasing the tension!

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
First person, with one possible minor wobble. See the line-by-line remarks below.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
I could use a touch more, especially at the very beginning.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
The narrator remarks at one that there is not much difference between him and the bum. Certainly, that's true for anyone but I wonder if there is something in his history that led him to this insight?

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Comma Splices.*Exclaim*
A comma splice occurs when you have two complete sentences joined by a comma where a period or semicolon should be used. I've marked one or more of these in the line-by-line comments below.

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

THis is a really powerful little story. I enjoyed reading it and seeing the parts come together at the end. Thank you for sharing. I see this is the only story in your WDC portfolio, so I'd like to encourage you to write and post more stories. You have a real talent.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Even when you looked right at him and tried to see him, he was barely there, barely visible. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Nice interleaving of theme with description. *Exclaim*

*Cut*I saw him wandering the neighborhood daily. He would look at me out of the corner of his eyes, pretending not to look.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: A couple of minor points here. First, phrases like "I saw" are a subtle form of telling. We know we're in the narrator's head, so arguably everything on the page is something he's seen, heard, or otherwise sensed. It's almost always more intimate and immediate for readers to describe directly what he "saw." Since we're already in his head, readers will infer he "saw" it. Indeed, that little step of inference helps to solidify point of view and the fictional dream. If you want t emphasize he "saw" him, you can have him react in some way.

The second point is even more arcane. Your narrator can't know the bum was "pretending" not to look, he can only infer that. This is kind of borderline, since "pretending" is also a conclusion the narrator could have reached and is now reporting to the readers. It's potentially a tiny bobble in the first person narrative, however, since it also could be read as jumping into the bum's head. If you added, "like he was pretending..." it clarifies that it's a judgement at the expense of being less direct. I'm of mixed mind on which is better in this case, but I wanted to at least raise the issue. *Exclaim*


*Cut*There was an empty lot at the edge of the neighborhood where he carefully sorted the contents of his sack into different piles.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: "Carefully" is one of those adverbs I mentioned above, in this case telling instead of showing. Why does the narrator infer that he's being careful as opposed to random? What about the piles or how he constructs them lead to this inference? You actually answer these questions when you describe the piles later, so I think you eliminate the adverb altogether and have smoother prose. *Exclaim*

*Cut*It made me wonder how he had gotten to where he was in life, what mistakes had he made, what had caused him to be where he was?*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Comma splice *Exclaim*

*Cut*It quickly moved closer and intensified until it was right on top of the neighborhood. I changed direction and quickly headed back towards my apartment. My dog was scared by the storm and pulled on the leash.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: More adverbs--"quickly." Also beware repeating words and phrases, since runs the risk of making your prose seem monotone. *Exclaim*



                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
150
150
Review by
Rated: E | (4.0)
** Image ID #1992612 Unavailable **


Hi! My name is Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 , and I'm here to review your entry in the "Invalid Item

Item Reviewed: "Memories of Stephanie
Author Pernell Rogers
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I love stories with a twist, and this one delivered!

                                                             
*FlagB*Third Person Limited Point of View
(28 points out of 30)
You did a great job establishing Chris's point-of-view and sticking with it. There was just one little wobble toward the end where the author intruded with some background information, but otherwise this was perfect. Good job!

                                                             
*FlagB*First Paragraph
(18 points out of 20)
Your opening puts the readers in Chris's head, it starts in the middle of action, and it orients the readers in space and time. I suggested a couple of tweaks in the line-by-line remarks below to improve the orientation and to foreshadow the plot, but in any case this was a great opening paragraph.

                                                             
*FlagB*Creativity and Originality
(15 points out of 15)
Nice job here, too, using his guilt, intoxication, and grief to establish his horror at the ending.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective Showing (not telling)
(14 points out of 15)
Good work here too, again with the exception of the paragraph at the end.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot and Pacing
(8 points out of 10)
I loved the plot! But I think you could add to the tension if Chris "thinks" he sees his wife a couple of times earlier in the story. That way his emotional reaction can escalate from chiding himself for being silly to his delusional state at the ending, thereby increasing the tension.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical Proficiency (such as grammar, spelling, proof-reading, and following the contest rules)
(9 points out of 10)
I found one minor typo.

                                                             
*FlagB* Total Points
92 points out of 100



                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

This is a great story. It could have been on the Twilight Zone or the old Alfred Hitchcock TV series. Thanks for sharing!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Chris walked through the hatch and turned left while the rest of the human cattle turned right.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I get that the phrase "human cattle" instead of "passengers" reveals something about Chris's character. However, it's also not 100% clear where he's at in this sentence. Inserting "airplane's" in front of "hatch" would immediately establish his location and remove doubt. *Exclaim*

*Cut* this was going to be the last trip he would take with his wife.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: So, of course, I'm wondering, "where is his wife?" Since the only passenger you've mentioned is the woman in the next seat, I wondred if it might be her? It turns out that her location isn't supposed to be a mystery after all, since you tell us a few paragraphs later. Since it's essential to the plot, I'd consider doing so here, as part of orienting the reader. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He watched the little red straw spin around his plastic cup*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: In first class, this would almost certainly be glass, not plastic. *Exclaim*

*Cut*There it was. He saw them loading his wife's coffin *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I'd more or less figured this out, but I'm wondering why you waited until now to make it explicit? It's actually central to the plot, so I think it would be stronger to have him see this as he settles into his seat. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Good riddens.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: riddance I'm also not sure about doing a flashback here, since it interrupts the here-and-now of events in the story. It might be better if the memory is related to his seat-mate, for example, since that would keep you in the present. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He may try to strangle him in the terminal.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Too many pronouns here--who is going to strangle whom? *Exclaim*

.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This foreshadows the ending, of course. However, we're nearly 2/3 of the way through the story. I think it would be stronger if he thinks he sees his wife as he's boarding the plane and perhaps one other time, to establish his increasingly tenuous hold on reality. *Exclaim*

b}*Cut*The screen turned black before the movie started. To his horror, he saw his wife's reflection on the screen. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Repeating words and phrases runs the risk making your prose seem monotone. Here, "screen" repeats. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He was always aware of Stephanie's obsession with him from the beginning of their relationship.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: In this paragraph, the author intrudes to tell the reader stuff. The age difference and his infidelity don't even seem to me to be essential information for the readers to understand what's happening. In any case, narrated background of this type takes readers out of the here-and-now of the story and interrupts the natural flow of events. It would be easy enough to insert this into the flow, bit by bit, earlier in the story if you deem it essential. *Exclaim*

*Cut*It was Stephanie...*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: awesome ending! *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Even though I'm scoring this for a contest, I'm also reviewing in part for my own edification. Thus, as is my usual policy, I have given a rating of "4" to all contest entries. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for our contest. We hope you found it to be fun and a learning experience. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
463 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 19 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/mathguy/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/6