Hello, inkwell
What I liked
I do like the structure, flow and near rhymes you use. I love mythological themes in general, so this is great. As I was reading through, some of the imagery did make me smile (though I suppose it should really make me shudder - probably says more about me than you! )
In the next section of this review, I'm going to rip your poem apart and be rather ruthless. Please, don't take that to heart. I do actually like this poem, but I want YOU to beccome a better poet. In order to achieve that, I'm going to be rather critical. Don't get upset.
What might need work
Firstly, there are a few small errors.
Its all an act, - It's, a contraction of "It is"
Thats when the Siren, - That's, a contraction of "That is"
So heed my warning.
When you hear.
The Sirens song,
should fill you with fear.
If you read this section, there's something missing in the middle, ie. gramatically speaking there should be a objective pronoun there, like "that" or "it", eg. "hear it" or "hear that", if you catch my drift. I'm not saying that you should phrase it like that, only that it reads odd as it is at the moment.
Also, note that with enjambement you shouldn't use a comma because you're placing a comma where you wouldn't normally have one in a prose sentence. Endstopping is a natural thing in poetry and doesn't need a comma to achieve stronger effect. What I mean is, "The Sirens song should fill you with fear" is a single clause, so NO comma in the middle.
Secondly, poets from Coleridge in his Biographia Literaria to Stephen King in his On Writing - a memoir of the craft have expressed the opinon that each word should have a real purpose, and ideally fulfil the role of an onion skin, ie. have multiple, sometimes ambiguous meanings.
When I read phrases like "Sirens of the sea", I'm firstly thinking, "Oh, there's a nice bit of alliteration," but then I'm secondly thinking, "What's the point of saying that?" I mean, sirens clearly have an association with the sea, so I don't feel that you're telling me anything I didn't already know when I read the word "siren" and so the three words "of the sea" are sadly redundant, ie. they have no real value to the poem.
Coleridge identified two checks on a word:
1) if it's removed or replaced, will the meaning of the line change?
2) if it's removed or replaced, will the line sound less beautiful?
"of the sea" passes the 2) because it provides nice alliteration and balance, where you have two unstressed syllables and a stressed followed by three unstressed syllable and a stressed. However, it really does fail on 1).
Reading through your poem, I'm afraid I get a couple more "so what" moments, ie. points in the poem where the fact you present is so self evident that I wonder why you'd write it. For example:
"they lie through their teeth." - you've just said "deceptive" so you're simply repeating the fact with more words, though sometimes that's necessary for balance.
"so they can win." - it's not really specified what they want to win with this line, so it's kinda abstract, and appears to be there for balance and rhyme rather than adding any extra meaning to the poem.
Thirdly, since you're using rhyme mainly in a ABCB pattern (with some exceptions), this really cries out for common metre, imho. I mean, there's nothing wrong with free verse, but if you're going to go as far as using mainly quatrains with ABCB, you may as well go the whole hog. Your choice, of course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_metre
If you used common metre (well, technically "ballad metre" like Coleridge used in The Ancient Mariner etc) the opening quatrain would be something like:
So beautiful yet treacherous
they lie as soon as breathe.
The evil that I speak of, sir,
will only kiss with teeth.
Fourthly, when I read something mythological like this, I'm thinking imediately of the Romantic Poets, and so really, really, really I want some deeper, hidden metaphor that the reader can tease out. I'd like to see some hints in here in passing that you're REALY talking, for example, about how badly some men treat women, or maybe the effect of drugs on people turning them into monsters. Anything, really, but just a theme, something beyond the obvious so that the reader sees "layers" in your poem. You see, what I get at the moment is an entirely "literal" feeling when I read this rather than a deeper "Oh, did she mean this or did she mean that" that I'd get from reading, say, one of Carol Ann Duffy's sonnets. Reading through it a third time, my feeling is that you could make this sound like it's about prostitution, either male or female, OR about drug dealers, selling you "sweet" drugs but then dragging you down. THINK about potential themes and then THINK again about word choices and how you can then hint at double meanings and depth to your verse.
And, finally…
Given the topic, you could really have been an awful lot more gruesome. This was like a PG version of the siren's story, with no gore or bits of intestines floating in the water etc. A bit more blood and guts, I'd suggest.
Since you enjoy writing poetry, consider joining: "Dew Drop Inn" so you can do NaPoWriMo with a supportive group next month!
Thank you for sharing!
Best wishes,
Bob
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
|