This was a great descriptive essay on thrashing farm traditions. I found it on the "Invalid Item" .
From a technical perspective:
You have this listed as 'nonfiction'. Listing it as an essay would get it more readers, I think. I would also recommend a third genre, as that will give it another point for people who are reading and also help encourage more readers (and thus more reviewers). Some good ones might be biography, community, historical, family, friendship, and regional.
Thrashing day, the highest point of the annual farm routine sticks in my memory comma after 'routine'
Within a few years their use comma after 'years'
my Uncle, Maury If you are using it as a name (Uncle Maury) there should be no comma. If you are NOT using uncle as part of the name, it should be lowercase.
it's one, I will never forget. No comma
In terms of content: This was a well written essay. I like your details but notice that you took yourself out of the majority of this memory. It lends a distant third person point of view that works well, but your interjection (mentioned at the end) comes off awkward. I think you could add to the charm with descriptions on where you stood, if you helped or just watched, how your muscles felt, etc. However, as it is, this is mostly a stand-back essay which works fine; it just depends on what you want, and your consistancy.
Maury was part of a cooperative that owned a thrashing machine. Who? This is confusing because we don't know who you are talking about.
The entire aforementioned paragraph (starting with Thrashing day, the highest point of the annual farm routine is awkward and jumpy. You start by talking about thrashing day, jump to the combine, and then move on to farming practices. All of this information may be necessary, but the layout you have is very jumpy and abrupt, and this breaks the flow of the piece. Also, the next paragraph is similarly based; you continue talking about combines, which should be with the sentences from the last paragraph. The second one isn't so jumpy but instead feels split.
Try instead using the first paragraph to talk briefly about how thrashing day is the highest point. Perhaps you could note what gives the "community spirit" in a line or two, and a mention of the cooperative might fit with that. Then start the next paragraph with This equipment resembled a brontosaur in size and shape and likewise, faced extinction. , though I wouldn't actually start with 'this equipment'; be more precise. This will help smooth out the transitions between paragraphs.
A combine completed the same work as the thrashing machine but with far fewer steps, much less time, and only one worker. This sentence assumes I know anything about combines and thrashing machines. I don't, and I assume the majority of your readers don't, either. However, if this were placed closer to the end, after we have seen the community spirit, we might feel more upset over the loss. Does that make sense? By then, we know that it takes x people to work the machine and it is an all-day event, but the spirit of cooperation is foistered, etc.
Some called it threshing, others thrashing. This sentence feels unnecessary.
It was not as efficient as a combine, We have already established this, so this sentence is unnecessary, unless you move the commentary on the combine to the end.
to help Maury's, Lois I think you forgot the word 'wife' here.
Years of practice at similar occasions and church dinners had made them experts on the mechanics of feeding a crowd. The men began to pitch the grain shocks onto the wagons. You have smoothly moved from the men to the women, but now you jerk us abruptly back to the men. A transitory phrase, such as 'in the meantime' or 'while the women geared up' before the second sentence would smooth this out a bit more.
Men forked the grain bundles onto the intake conveyer, they disappeared into the machine The setup of this sentence implies the men disappeared into the machine; I hope not!
straw and chaff emerged from the rear end of the beast. The machine blew it out of an adjustable spout onto the straw stack site. You repeat yourself here. Consider merging the two. the machine blew straw and chaff out of an adjustable spout from the rear onto the straw stack site. Or something to that effect; you can probably merge them smoother.
The younger staff learned the jobs from the seasoned veterans. The chaff got under my clothes This is also a jerky transition. I would just consider cutting the second sentence, since you haven't really put yourself in the piece very much. Your other option to would be
You used a great deal of the passive voice, specifically 'was, were' and other forms of 'to be'. I noticed this most prominently in the section regarding the food. The description of the layout was sumptuous but I felt that more active phrasing would really draw the reader in some more, and make the essay stronger.
Overall: I enjoyed this memory of times in the past, and thought your reflection enjoyable.
Write on!
SG
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only ** |
|