Welcome to Writing.com!!!
I have to say, this essay made for an interesting piece of fiction. See "Invalid Item" for more information on my reviewing techniques.
Basic Structure – 4.0 of 5 stars
Correct Item. – I suppose this is really an essay, despite the fact that you pretty much made most of it up. Your genres are appropriate.
Title & Description. – I'm not sure 'truth' works as a title, since this is about 75% fiction, but hey, it catches the spirit of the piece. Your brief description was just a repetition of the title; I'd consider jazzing it up to catch some more reader interest. Of course, I'm happy the way it is; it will keep more people from reading it.
Spacing. – You doublespace between paragraphs
Punctuation. –
In reality Mormonism is nothing like Christianity comma after 'reality'
Lucifer said “ I should be the savior comma after 'said', no space after "; you need a period at the end of this sentence
Spelling. –
you to can become one. 'too'; comma before and after 'too'
his many wife’s wives
and eve Eve
Intermediate Structure – 2.5 of 5 stars
Sentence construction. – You have several fragments, run-ons, and awkward pieces crammed full of information.
Saying they are like Christians (most converts are Christians) using phrases like “we believe in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost” and scripture This is a sentence fragment
If you are lucky enough to view the Mormon temple ritual you will be sworn to secrecy the penalty for telling is death. Run-on sentence; also, this doesn't seem to fit in the paragraph you are developing on the cult name of Mormons.
They say that on a certain day that god and his fellow gods and his sons (Lucifer and Jesus), yes they say that Jesus and Lucifer were brothers, formed a meeting Long, vague, highly-interrupted sentence. But don't worry, you forgot to mention (as most folks do) that we believe that EVERYONE on this Earth, in addition to Christ and Satan, are brothers and sisters.
Lucifer said “ I should be the savior and I shall rule them” but Jesus said “no give them freedom of choice” If you are going to put quotes, as though you were, say, quoting, then why don't you actually QUOTE the piece, rather than making it up? Hypothetically, that would make your piece stronger. There are plenty of copies of the scriptures floating around; they aren't locked up and secret.
If one ever comes to your door bring up some of these key facts and if you have any comments or if I got any of this wrong please email me at allbright06@yahoo.com Run-on sentence
Paragraph construction. – You skip around a great deal in your paragraphs. You cite points but don't develop them. Your third paragraph merges two points and should be split.
They have cultic rituals, beliefs and a demonic name. The only one you expand on in this paragraph is the demonic name
Progressiveness of Story. – You raised several points that I would like to see you develop. Why don't you go a bit more into why our phrases about believing in God the Father, etc. are false?
Content – 2 of 10 stars
Theme Strength. – Well, as I said, this piece is about 25% truth and 75% fiction. It's very sad, because you could have made some fairly decent points. If you are seeking to discredit a religion, you will gain more strength by being honest rather than creative. Now as soon as someone realizes you've made up one piece, the whole writing will be discredited. A couple of your incorrect points:
If you are lucky enough to view the Mormon temple ritual you will be sworn to secrecy the penalty for telling is death. First, this is a flat-out lie, as I have been to the temple many times, and I have never been told that if I tell, I will "die" (in any sense; whether God will strike me dead or the other Mormons will take care of it). Second, I have to agree with the previous public reviewer's sentiment – if you believe it, then why are you telling it, etc. I think she covered it pretty well, so I won't repeat it.
reaching the ultimate sinless life I'd love to see you develop this. Do Mormons, in your opinion, believe that they can become perfect on their own? Of course, you can't develop it, because Mormons need Christ to reach 'perfection', but that would make them 'Christian', defeating your earlier argument. I have a feeling you know this or you would have argued further…
and countless other things you can become a god/goddess Nope, I think that pretty much covers it. But even if I were an ignorant person reading this, I would be highly interested in having you develop this, rather than trickle off vaguely.
People who agreed with god were known as Caucasians or white people and were sent to earth to attain human bodies ROTFL! Wow, I am so glad you told me that. It's amazing that I have NEVER heard that white people were the only ones who obtained bodies! You are, incidentally, right on the fact that those who agreed with God obtained bodies.
And the neutral ones were known as African Americans (it was their explanation for African American people). Good thing that you've never read either the Bible (think Noah's son, Ham) or the Book of Mormon or you might realize that you are making things up off the top of your head.
God came down with one of his many wife’s and they were Adam and eve Amazing. All this time, with the Church teaching that God created Adam and Eve, and you seem to be the only one who knows that God became them. Another piece of fiction.
Language. – You used a lot of the passive voice and vague 'it' statements.
Reaction. – You completely discredited yourself by making up points. I read this whole thing with my eyebrows raised and my head shaking.
Flow – 2 of 5 stars
Sentence flow. – Your sentences were awkward and choppy
Paragraph flow. – Your paragraphs jumped around in topic
Progression. – You didn't build this piece up; it drifted off to nowhere, with an inconclusive conclusion.
Overall: Good points: you got two or three things correct, and obviously you are writing with a lot of passion.
Lest you think I am some fully deluded Mormon, I am a convert of eight years. Before joining, I read everything I could find – pro and anti – to try to discern the truth. Oddly enough, most of the 'anti' stuff was about as ficticious as this piece, whereas the 'pro' stuff made several good points about even the truthful things you have stated. And lest you think I was persuaded by good writing – I wasn't. It was a spiritual decision.
Irregardless, I tried to suspend judgement and rate you based on your writing. I confess to being a touch emotional over the fact you made things up (or got your information from sources who fictionalized pieces), rather than firsthand sources. This greatly weakened your credibility.
Star Total: 10.5/25
Averaged: 2.1
Rounded: 2.0
|
|