Okay...
This is full of contrasts.
The descriptions of the action are mostly clear and very well done, and the dialogue's not bad either, but...
There are continuity and timing errors, spelling and grammar issues, and the geography is a bit loose. Your tense drifts, or is just plain wrong in places, and you're way overusing a confusing mish-mash of first and last names, including the sudden appearance of 'Usher' halfway through, which I take to be a revised (or perhaps pre-revision) name for 'Nathan'?
It's fine to introduce each character's full name, and even to switch back and forth occasionally for the main character, but he should have a preferred way of thinking about the other characters, probably surnames for the male characters, given his military background, but likely first names for non-combatant women. And use a lot more "he" and "she" where the context is clear, using names or other descriptors only once per paragraph (if necessary!) or when you need to make it clear who you're referring to.
I don't get a clear picture of the valley, the forest, the road they've come in on, or how the cabin is situated. The scene-setting paragraph at the beginning doesn't help, because I don't know what to care about yet and the rest is like a jigsaw puzzle with half the pieces missing. How thick is the forest here? You mention thick underbrush, and pine trees on a slope would normally be pretty good cover most of the way, given that they're evergreen and overlapping due to growing from different elevations, yet you describe Cort as having to be careful about sticking to cover. And I don't think oaks and pines grow together all that commonly. Pines tend to deplete diversity around them, apparently. Maybe it does happen where you're from? Maybe it's pines on the tops and oaks lower down?
I don't get a clear sense of steady progress from where Cort and Macklin park the car and have their fight-of-unexplained-cause, over the ridge and down through the valley to the cabin. At first it seems they're more-or-less at the cabin straight away, then they have to make their way across and down and then suddenly they're there, without having approached in stages as the cover thins out. You mention each stage, for sure, but it doesn't develop in a clear and consistent progression. The fight at the car is also where you mangle your tenses the most. You do do a reasonable job of suggesting the passage of time with respect to daylight though, except that you don't establish time of day well at the beginning. You mention "the darkening of the sky" but then it's still gray, not dark, when they get to the bottom, so did they start before it started to darken?
When they get to the clearing around the cabin, it's not clear how much clear space there is around it. You say Cort heads for the West side of the cabin, but we have no established orientation to know what that means in context. Is he going around the side, from the perspective of where they arrive? The back? Straight up to the side they're facing? Where is the front door? NSEW? Or just use left and right. Even with well-established compass points, it's better to use left and right as well.
It takes Macklin an awfully long time to open the door. Once the knob starts turning, I wouldn't expect Cort to have time to get to the corner of the cabin before he opens it, let alone around the corner and across the porch in time to save the great galoot from getting shotgunned in the chest.
You say Cort won't touch his gun until he needs to, but then as soon as he gets to the cabin he draws it, before there's any sign of trouble. But then later he draws it again. The gun seems to pop in and out of Cort's hand by magic. Sometimes he draws it or puts it away, other times it just jumps from his hand to his holster or vice versa. The same goes for his jacket or coat. He takes it off before approaching the cabin, then uses its sleeve to wipe the window. And "The Girl." in the bed turning into Henderson is a bit ham-fisted too. "The girl?" turning into Henderson might have worked.
And finally, "instinctually" is the wrong word (and you overuse it). You can have an instinctual sense of something, or an instinctual urge or reaction, but direct actions are instinctive. But maybe substitute "well-honed" or "highly-trained" or "ingrained" or "expert" or "natural" or "second nature" etc. for some of those instincts.
Speaking of which, yours for action are very good. The technical stuff can be practiced (or proof-read) and improved, but having a good sense of the action and dialogue is something many people can never achieve. Technically, this has issues. Creatively, it's good work. Best of luck with it! |
|