one question i have is how do you think reviewers should think about commenting on if something is just boring or not memorable or not something that really seems to do alot.
like if you read a poem that is flower-y descriptions of a beach or something, and it is technically good but it is similar to dozens of other flower-y poems about beaches (with boring lines like "the water crashing against the sand"), do you think that is something that should be negative criticism? or should you forget that and just focus on the poem itself?
The following section applies to this forum item as a whole,
not this individual post.
Any feedback sent through it will go to the forum's
owner, Writing.Com Support.
Log in to Leave Feedback
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/forums/message_id/3228921
Copyright 2000 - 2024 21 x 20 Media All rights reserved. This site is property of 21 x 20 Media
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.22 seconds at 7:16am on Apr 26, 2024 via server web1.
Log in to Leave Feedback
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
