*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/blog/cathartes02/day/8-23-2019
Rated: 18+ · Book · Personal · #1196512
Not for the faint of art.
Complex Numbers

A complex number is expressed in the standard form a + bi, where a and b are real numbers and i is defined by i^2 = -1 (that is, i is the square root of -1). For example, 3 + 2i is a complex number.

The bi term is often referred to as an imaginary number (though this may be misleading, as it is no more "imaginary" than the symbolic abstractions we know as the "real" numbers). Thus, every complex number has a real part, a, and an imaginary part, bi.

Complex numbers are often represented on a graph known as the "complex plane," where the horizontal axis represents the infinity of real numbers, and the vertical axis represents the infinity of imaginary numbers. Thus, each complex number has a unique representation on the complex plane: some closer to real; others, more imaginary. If a = b, the number is equal parts real and imaginary.

Very simple transformations applied to numbers in the complex plane can lead to fractal structures of enormous intricacy and astonishing beauty.




Merit Badge in Quill Award
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning Best Blog in the 2021 edition of  [Link To Item #quills] !
Merit Badge in Quill Award
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning the 2019 Quill Award for Best Blog for  [Link To Item #1196512] . This award is proudly sponsored by the blogging consortium including  [Link To Item #30dbc] ,  [Link To Item #blogcity] ,  [Link To Item #bcof]  and  [Link To Item #1953629] . *^*Delight*^* For more information, see  [Link To Item #quills] . Merit Badge in Quill Award
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning the 2020 Quill Award for Best Blog for  [Link To Item #1196512] .  *^*Smile*^*  This award is sponsored by the blogging consortium including  [Link To Item #30dbc] ,  [Link To Item #blogcity] ,  [Link To Item #bcof]  and  [Link To Item #1953629] .  For more information, see  [Link To Item #quills] .
Merit Badge in Quill Award 2
[Click For More Info]

    2022 Quill Award - Best Blog -  [Link To Item #1196512] . Congratulations!!!    Merit Badge in Quill Award 2
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations! 2022 Quill Award Winner - Best in Genre: Opinion *^*Trophyg*^*  [Link To Item #1196512] Merit Badge in Quill Award 2
[Click For More Info]

   Congratulations!! 2023 Quill Award Winner - Best in Genre - Opinion  *^*Trophyg*^*  [Link To Item #1196512]
Merit Badge in 30DBC Winner
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning the Jan. 2019  [Link To Item #30dbc] !! Merit Badge in 30DBC Winner
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on taking First Place in the May 2019 edition of the  [Link To Item #30DBC] ! Thanks for entertaining us all month long! Merit Badge in 30DBC Winner
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning the September 2019 round of the  [Link To Item #30dbc] !!
Merit Badge in 30DBC Winner
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning the September 2020 round of the  [Link To Item #30dbc] !! Fine job! Merit Badge in 30DBC Winner
[Click For More Info]

Congrats on winning 1st Place in the January 2021  [Link To Item #30dbc] !! Well done! Merit Badge in 30DBC Winner
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning the May 2021  [Link To Item #30DBC] !! Well done! Merit Badge in 30DBC Winner
[Click For More Info]

Congrats on winning the November 2021  [Link To Item #30dbc] !! Great job!
Merit Badge in Blogging
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on winning an honorable mention for Best Blog at the 2018 Quill Awards for  [Link To Item #1196512] . *^*Smile*^* This award was sponsored by the blogging consortium including  [Link To Item #30dbc] ,  [Link To Item #blogcity] ,  [Link To Item #bcof]  and  [Link To Item #1953629] . For more details, see  [Link To Item #quills] . Merit Badge in Blogging
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on your Second Place win in the January 2020 Round of the  [Link To Item #30dbc] ! Blog On! *^*Quill*^* Merit Badge in Blogging
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on your second place win in the May 2020 Official Round of the  [Link To Item #30dbc] ! Blog on! Merit Badge in Blogging
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on your second place win in the July 2020  [Link To Item #30dbc] ! Merit Badge in Blogging
[Click For More Info]

Congratulations on your Second Place win in the Official November 2020 round of the  [Link To Item #30dbc] !
Merit Badge in Highly Recommended
[Click For More Info]

I highly recommend your blog. Merit Badge in Opinion
[Click For More Info]

For diving into the prompts for Journalistic Intentions- thanks for joining the fun! Merit Badge in High Five
[Click For More Info]

For your inventive entries in  [Link To Item #2213121] ! Thanks for the great read! Merit Badge in Enlightening
[Click For More Info]

For winning 3rd Place in  [Link To Item #2213121] . Congratulations!
Merit Badge in Quarks Bar
[Click For More Info]

    For your awesome Klingon Bloodwine recipe from [Link to Book Entry #1016079] that deserves to be on the topmost shelf at Quark's.
Signature for Honorable Mentions in 2018 Quill AwardsA signature for exclusive use of winners at the 2019 Quill AwardsSignature for those who have won a Quill Award at the 2020 Quill Awards
For quill 2021 winnersQuill Winner Signature 20222023 Quill Winner

August 23, 2019 at 12:31am
August 23, 2019 at 12:31am
#964576
So, yeah, I took some time off to indulge vices (other vices than posting stuff here, anyway), but I'm back home now. And I have a difficult article to present today.

http://nautil.us/issue/47/consciousness/is-matter-conscious

Is Matter Conscious?
Why the central problem in neuroscience is mirrored in physics.


I'm of the considered opinion that most headline questions are answered "No."

What is physical matter in and of itself, behind the mathematical structure described by physics?

Math, too, has its limitations. Try as we might, for example, we can't precisely describe the shape of a cloud, or a tree, using math. Attempts to do so often result in something resembling a cloud or a tree, but not a particular cloud or tree.

Modern science has given us good reason to believe that our consciousness is rooted in the physics and chemistry of the brain, as opposed to anything immaterial or transcendental. In order to get a conscious system, all we need is physical matter. Put it together in the right way, as in the brain, and consciousness will appear.

Fair enough. But, again, try as we might, even if we could put everything together in the right place to recreate a human (or other animal), such an object would lack life. Life is still an elusive mystery in many ways, but we know it has to come from life, in an unbroken chain all the way back to the first life - whatever that was. Despite our certainty of our identities as individuals - as well as others' identities as individuals - there's a real, non-metaphysical, connection through time and space to all other life as we know it. That's why it will be so important to discover extraterrestrial life: is it connected in some way to ours, or was there a parallel to our own evolution?

My point is that "put it together in the right way" isn't as easy to do as it is to say.

If we were somehow granted knowledge of every physical detail and pattern in the universe, we would not expect these problems to persist. They would dissolve in the same way the problem of heritability dissolved upon the discovery of the physical details of DNA. But the hard problem of consciousness would seem to persist even given knowledge of every imaginable kind of physical detail.

This sort of thing always bugs me. Is it even possible to have knowledge of every physical detail and pattern in the universe? Magic 8-Ball says "No" - if only due to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. And also because to fully model the universe, you'd need something at least as complex as the universe, which you can't have, because of the definition of "universe." Even if some of the wildly speculative alternative-universe hypotheses are true, you'd then have to model those, and the problem persists.

We take it for granted, however, that physics can in principle tell us everything there is to know about the nature of physical matter.

For previously unknown values of "we," anyway. Because I, and a whole lot of people who are smarter and more knowledgeable than I am, don't accept this premise.

There is already a tradition for connecting problems in physics with the problem of consciousness, namely in the area of quantum theories of consciousness.

Which collides with my personal tradition of dismissing, out of hand, any article that discusses "quantum theories of consciousness."

The article continues by going way over my head with the philosophy. I kind of get the impression that the author is trying very, very hard not to use words like "god" or "deity," instead mincing around the theological implications. But I could be projecting my own bias; I don't know.

Mind you, I'm not saying the article is wrong, or right, or doesn't have decent points. It just seems to me to be another approach to the "god of the gaps" issue - that is, there are always gaps in our knowledge, no matter how much we learn about the physical universe, and at that point you might as well ascribe the unknowns to an entity of great knowledge and/or power. Science cannot disprove the idea; again, the gaps are always there, and you can't prove a negative. It just seems like a cop-out.

Then again, I've thought that maybe the entire universe could be, itself, conscious; I mean, look at a map of the universe   and compare it to a neural network of the human brain  .

But that doesn't mean the two have any similarities beyond the superficial.



© Copyright 2024 Robert Waltz (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Robert Waltz has granted Writing.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work.

Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/blog/cathartes02/day/8-23-2019