*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/newsletters/action/archives/id/12123
Drama: August 30, 2023 Issue [#12123]




 This week: Reality vs. Fiction
  Edited by: Annette
                             More Newsletters By This Editor  

Table of Contents

1. About this Newsletter
2. A Word from our Sponsor
3. Letter from the Editor
4. Editor's Picks
5. A Word from Writing.Com
6. Ask & Answer
7. Removal instructions

About This Newsletter

"Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma – which is living with the results of other people's thinking." - Steve Jobs


Word from our sponsor



Letter from the editor

Reality vs. Fiction


In this newsletter, I will explain why reading books or watching movies, or consuming the stories of others is bad for your writing. This flies in the face of the common bit of advice to "read to write." Read on to find out what this is all about and stay around for the conclusions you should draw.

A lot of fiction relies on tropes, archetypes, stock characters, plot devices, plot twists, and more similar pieces of equipment to tell stories. For writers, these building blocks are a huge help in crafting stories that are easy to consume, keep the story going, and make sense in the end. However, reliance on these bits of advice is stunting writers' imagination and keeps writing poor and one-dimensional.

Real life is nuanced and full of events, stories, people, animals, and natural occurrences that defy story telling tropes. Examples of how much the hero's journey has tainted storytelling are disaster movies. Whenever a natural or man-made disaster unfolds, humans react the way they do. Whatever that may look like. When it's all said and done and Hollywood makes a movie, the original events get distilled and reworked to fit the hero's journey. A simple line at the beginning "inspired by" grants blanket permission to change, alter, diminish, invalidate reality as it happened. Real life people get erased from the story to make way for one actor as the sole focus point. These movies can be fun to watch as long as we kind of push aside that real people died or were harmed for this movie to exist in the first place.

Life is not made out of one focal person who experiences everything with a few henchmen or stock characters around. Life happens to every single person from their own limited point of view. While it is completely unreasonable to tell writers to go out and try to get into harrowing situations to make their writing better, the advice should be to read the news, watch well-made documentaries, scour science journals for discoveries, and just go take a walk in the park to observe people in their real lives.

Even the most introverted writer has some people to observe. Family, close friends, coworkers, neighbors, or even the cashier at the supermarket have the potential for a better dramatic story that can be told with a fully fleshed out character who defies all character tropes.

Get your head out of the books and into life to write better.


Do you still think you should get your inspiration from reading others' books or watching movies?




Editor's Picks

 "Meet me at the castle"  (18+)
Writer's Cramp
#2302454 by Odessa Molinari

 The Right Move?  (13+)
A baby on the way, the promise of a new job, and taking that big leap.
#2301760 by JustinRock

 Invalid Item 
This item number is not valid.
#2301563 by Not Available.

 A walk in the countryside   (13+)
A vignette. A field full of cows. What could go wrong?
#2301443 by Sumojo

 Invalid Item 
This item number is not valid.
#2301295 by Not Available.

Fate on a Monday Morning  (13+)
Monday, June 25, 2001.
#180255 by The StoryMistress

STATIC
Whose Side Are You On?  (13+)
Rebuilding a shattered family while seeking revenge.
#2300249 by Amethyst Angel🌸📝🪽

 Invalid Item 
This item number is not valid.
#2299977 by Not Available.

 Birthday. Birthdays.  (13+)
Whose birthday is it? (Cramp Winner)
#2299943 by THANKFUL SONALI Now What?

STATIC
Winning the Vows  (13+)
A different kind of wedding story (dialogue only).
#2299881 by Words Whirling 'Round

 
Submit an item for consideration in this newsletter!
https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form

Word from Writing.Com

Have an opinion on what you've read here today? Then send the Editor feedback! Find an item that you think would be perfect for showcasing here? Submit it for consideration in the newsletter!
         https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form

Don't forget to support our sponsor!

ASIN: 1945043032
Amazon's Price: Price N/A


Ask & Answer

Replies to my last Drama newsletter "Damsel In Distress that asked: Can you use a damsel without making her look weak?

oldgreywolf scribbles wrote: Biggest damsels we had in the Army were usually male in dis dress, Battle Dress Utility.
Some of us NCOs started out in pickle suits.
My female characters have the better characteristics of the better soldiers, male and female, whom I worked with, but without some of the more disgusting habits.
And they're all human where they come from.

My experience is limited to what I see in movies or TV shows. From those sources, it would appear that the term "ladies" is liberally applied to everyone in the room. (What is NCO?)

Gaby ~ Just tired wrote: I'm not sure why women were ever portrayed as damsels in distress. Women were never weak nor incapable. It could have been the men writing - no offense men! - who needed someone to save. I also don't see women as equals to men. They are much more superior, but they have a more sensitive and gentle side. I don't like heroes, in stories or otherwise, male or female. Each gender has something to offer that the other can't. Oh, I could go on and on here. Having a strong female character but a weak male is also off putting. Just my two cents! *Bigsmile*

I'm buying what you're selling. Weak characters are off putting.

Siobhan Falen wrote: Aw, thank you for including my stories. Also, going to politely argue that Princess Leia was an equal member of the party in that she did help rescue Han, they all needed rescuing at one point or another, fought, and she provided a lot of the direction and drive behind their actions. I loved her as a kid and as an adult, I recognize that she did so much for women in the sci-fi world. Plus, Carrie Fisher was one awesome lady.
But this whole article cracked me up because my most involved stories include women, that as my middle daughter just recently told me, are "rebels". When I asked her what that meant, she told me that they were sarcastic, liked to fight back and had a ton of attitude. She meant it as both an insult (you should have heard the teen 'tude) and as a compliment but I hear nothing but a compliment. I like characters, men and women, that stand up for their beliefs and fight vs. retreat. No sleeping for thousands of years waiting for their prince to wake them up with a kiss.

I like that you cracked up. It would be terrible if you thought the article was just ho-hum. I also have a middle child (son in my case) who discusses fiction with me. So fun.

*Bullet* *Bullet* *Bullet* Don't Be Shy! Write Into This Newsletter! *Bullet* *Bullet* *Bullet*

This form allows you to submit an item on Writing.Com and feedback, comments or questions to the Writing.Com Newsletter Editors. In some cases, due to the volume of submissions we receive, please understand that all feedback and submissions may not be responded to or listed in a newsletter. Thank you, in advance, for any feedback you can provide!
Writing.Com Item ID To Highlight (Optional):

Send a comment or question to the editor!
Limited to 2,500 characters.
Word from our sponsor
ASIN: 197380364X
Amazon's Price: $ 15.99

Removal Instructions

To stop receiving this newsletter, click here for your newsletter subscription list. Simply uncheck the box next to any newsletter(s) you wish to cancel and then click to "Submit Changes". You can edit your subscriptions at any time.


Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/newsletters/action/archives/id/12123