*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/gaiadin
Review Requests: OFF
6 Public Reviews Given
6 Total Reviews Given
Public Reviews
1
1
Review by Gaiadin
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Hi there,
Here's my disclaimer: I'm not an editor. I like to think that I know a fair amount about the mechanics of writing, but if you have questions about anything I mention, please feel free to look it up and correct me if I'm wrong.

Story:
This story was dark, clearly. I like that. You set the tone extremely well with the way you setup your sentences and the words you chose. Things like "... for a hit of blow and a couple bills," really pull the reader into the disconnected mindset of Luther Alvarez. You chose to hop the viewpoint between Natalie and Luther instead of using dialogue to give us an idea of her feelings, which I actually think you did really well. The glimpse into her head was pivotal in understanding the relationship between them. Your characters were well developed in the short amount of time we had to get to know them.
Overall, the story and writing were both very good. Well done.

Technical Difficulties:

drunk, and cheated on his wife
--no comma necessary. Commas preceding conjunctions like this are only necessary if what follows the conjunction is a complete sentence or the end of a list of 3 or more things.
EX. "He did the crime, and he got what he deserved." or "I need 2 ducks, 8 trash cans, and a baseball."

stripers -- strippers

no touching -- hyphenate this. It's a compound modifier, meaning that both of the words together modify the following word: no-touching rule.

piss stinking -- again: piss-stinking

women was -- woman
women since -- woman

since he’d told that great big lie; I do. -- The semicolon should be a colon.

toilets -- toilet's. Or: general area of the toilet

was less then what he would feel heart when he heard it
-- less than. And did you mean: he would feel IN HIS heart?

There Luther was; content and alone in the dark,
-- Use a comma instead of the semicolon here. Semicolons are typically used to link two related INDEPENDENT clauses, meaning that they could stand on their own.

after he climbed into bed with his wife, and fell asleep wearing his shoes.
-- Another unnecessary comma.

Or the first time Luther had cheated on.
-- cheated on HER.

And in one of those tear chocked declarations of repentance; Natalie had lost her resolve to leave him.
-- tear-choked. Also, the semicolon should be a comma here as well. "And in one of those tear-choked declarations of repentance" is not an independent clause. I had the same problem until recently; I also used semicolons incorrectly. =)

It was now Sunday and his day off.
-- For whatever reason, the use of "now" in this sentence, just coming out of "Luther slept right through the next day" makes me think that he came home drunk Friday night, passed out, slept through all of Saturday, and didn't wake up until 8p.m. on Sunday night. Is that what you're saying? 39 hours of straight sleep seems a bit extreme. And coming off of that much drinking, I would be surprised not to hear about his wetting the bed.

He looked around and didn’t think it strange that Natalie was nowhere in sight, the sun was on it’s way down and it was almost eight p.m.; she could be anywhere, even downstairs watching the television.
-- Few things here. That first comma is incorrect. It's separating two complete sentences so it should be a period or a semicolon. A semicolon would work here since this sentence directly explains the conclusions of the previous one: that it isn't surprising Natalie is nowhere in sight. "it's" should be "its." the apostrophe is only used as a contraction for "it is" whereas "its" (without the apostrophe) is exclusively used for possession. A comma is required with the conjunction "and" to separate the two independent clauses "the sun is on its way down" and "it was almost 8p.m.," and I would reverse the two. "It was almost 8p.m., and the sun was on its way down." has a nicer ring to it. Finally, this use of "even" implies something out of the ordinary: she could even be on the moon for all I know. Consider using a different word here, since watching television doesn't seem like an abnormal thing for her to be doing.

But as Luther got out of bed his eyes fell to a note taped to the bathroom mirror.
-- Comma after bed. Commas separate a dependent clause from the independent clause when the dependent clause comes first.
Opening dependent clause: "After he got out of bed, he checked his watch."
No opening dependent clause: "He checked his watch after he got out of bed."

It was unlike Natalie to leave notes like that, she had always left her notices on the refrigerator, and so Luther felt some trepidation
-- This is a perfect place for a semicolon instead of that first comma. Then change the second comma to a period. You can still begin the following sentence with "And" as in "It was unlike Natalie to leave notes like that; she had always left her notices on the refrigerator. And so Luther felt some trepidation ..."

and so Luther felt some trepidation as he got out of the bed on wobbly morning legs and walked to the bathroom mirror.
-- I would reword this to exclude "as" since you begin the next sentence with it. "And so it was with some trepidation that Luther got out of the bed on wobbly morning legs and walked to the bathroom mirror."

As he crossed the bedroom his eyes happened upon the walk-in closet on the other side of the room, and he understood at once what would be written on the note.
-- Again, you're leading with a dependent clause so place a comma after bedroom. Change the comma after room to a period and drop the "and" to create a short sentence that will stick with the reader at the end of the paragraph.

He stood still for a moment, and after allowing what he knew in his heart to make it to his mind Luther let out a deep sigh and tasted the vile sting of the booze on his breath.
-- Consider rewording "what he knew in his heart." When we hear this phrase we have certain expectations about what will follow since it has often been used in a different way. We think "he did what he knew in his heart was the right thing." Also, comma after mind.

Natalie was not here to bargain with and the simple ...
-- Comma after with.

But in the note there was no fight. No name calling, not demands or chastening, and no accusations ...
-- Comma after the leading dependent clause "But in the note," and change the other commas to periods to continue the short punchy sentences.

Luther put the phone with which he intended to call Brittany back into it cradle and looked back at the note.
-- "with which he intended to call Brittany" is acting as a parenthesis so it should be separated off by commas, dashes, or parentheses. Also, "it" should be "its"

As he passed the kitchen table Luther put his hand out and carelessly seized a chair and dragged it behind him, chair legs screeching along the tiles as he slowly walked to a room just passed the dining room.
-- Comma after table. Also, and this is mainly a question of style, I think that these sentences (this one and the one preceding it.) sound better with more commas and less "and"'s. For instance: "Luther put his hand out, carelessly seized a chair, and dragged it behind him ..." and "He reached up, took down a bottle of whiskey, and headed towards the dining room."

Summary:

You clearly have a decent vocabulary, and most of the mechanical errors in this piece were of the same variety. Study up on semicolon and comma use, and you'll be a much stronger writer. I hope this helps!

Sincerely,
-Scott
2
2
Review by Gaiadin
Rated: 13+ | (3.0)
Hi there. I enjoyed this piece, but there are many ways in which I believe you can improve it.

Firstly, I notice that you have a habit of beginning sentences with verbs in their ING form. This is generally a bad idea since it serves to weaken the sentence. Here are some examples from this chapter:

"Doing as any child would do when taking medicine,"
"Looking down to the end of the cathedral,"
"Swiping my long dark hair out of my eyes,"
"Inspecting the rest of me,"
"Frowning,"
"Radiating purity,"
"Closing my eyes,"
"Having never broken a bone before,"
"Opening my eyes,"

Most of these sentences would be stronger if you use the simple past-tense verb with a conjunction or separated them into multiple sentences:

"I did as any child would do when taking medicine. I ..."
"I looked down to the end of the cathedral, and ..."
"I swiped the dark hair out of my eyes, and ..."
etc...

Another way to strengthen your writing is to trust your reader. We aren't as dumb as you think! Things like:

"I had no sense of how fast I was falling due to the darkness," We suspect that the reason she couldn't gauge the distance was due to the darkness, so adding it explicitly makes it seem like you are trying too hard to tell us something that we should already know.

"similar to the style of medieval times." Something like this should be shown rather than told, and you do that in the description of the clothing so this becomes unnecessary.

"splatters of wet red blood" Unless the blood is NOT red, the color of the blood is suspected to be red so including it here isn't necessary.

There are a few places where you're using some words that don't serve a useful purpose or some redundant wording:

"The ceilings were arched as old cathedrals were that were built during the gothic period which were held up by large stone columns." That's a bit too many were's in close proximity. Try changing "as" to "like" and dropping the second "were"

"The men looked to each other, looks of confusion on their faces." This one is a bit redundant. Consider omitting "looks of"

"This caused me to cry out in surprise" So cry out in surprise then! What I mean is, instead of telling us what it caused her to do, just have her do it: "I cried out in surprise"

"I didn’t know what happened, but goose bumps traveled along my arms" Again, it's obvious from the context that she doesn't know what happened, you can omit that opening clause and just say "Goose bumps traveled along my arms"

"But the language barrier prevented me from asking these questions" You've made it clear that the reason she cannot communicate with these people is their language differences so this isn't necessary.

Be careful about overextending your sentences, trying to make them do too much:

"As I pondered what his problem was, my foot slipped from under me, and my arms flailed about me, trying to stop my fall" Sentences like this could probably be broken up into at least two separate ones.

And finally, a grammatical error:

"since I didn’t like being the surrounded and being the center of attention" Omit the "the" before surrounded. I would also consider changing "and" to "or"

I hope at least some of this helps! Please continue writing, and most importantly having fun while doing so!

-Scott
3
3
Review by Gaiadin
Rated: E | (4.0)
Hi there. I really enjoyed this piece. Your use of first-person present tense held me in the moment, and you did a great job of maintaining the momentum throughout. There are a few technical issues that I'd like to bring to your attention:

You end the third paragraph with "He faces me." and then go on to say "He is addressing me, but he is not looking at me." This is a bit ambiguous. You might want to explain what you mean by "not looking at me" or consider removing "He faces me."

Which reminds me of another point: Don't be afraid to use contractions. In certain instances it's okay to not use them (a character is specifically trying to sound formal, the character is stodgy or stiff or old-fashioned) but most of the time it's perfectly acceptable, indeed encouraged, to use them. They'll make your character more real and your reader will relate with him, which is especially important in first-person present tense.

"I spot a pair of flaps that probably serve as the entrance." I would lose "probably" here. It isn't doing useful work and it actually hurts the prose, since to everyone reading, and most likely your character as well, it isn't probably the entrance; it obviously is.

"The smart young man" Smart is an unnecessary and confusing adjective here. We haven't seen any reason to believe it. Perhaps if you add a short sentence about his appearance or change smart to smartly dressed, if indeed it was his appearance you were referring to.

"blown away" You've italicized blown. It's unnecessary. It only serves to cheapen the effect.

"My place on the bench is implied by a sloppy red 'X' painted on the bench." His place on the bench was already implied by the man indicating where he should sit. Perhaps the sloppy 'X' should "mark" his place on the bench instead. Also, "painted on the bench" is redundant. Try "painted on it" instead.

"All of a sudden panic grabs me." You could change this to simply "Panic grabs me." "All of a sudden" isn't doing useful work here.

It's tempting to string sentences together without punctuation to quicken the pace, but it's not a good idea. It calls attention to the mechanics and takes away from the story. Keep the sentences short and they will maintain the quickened pace you're going for, even with the separating periods.

Speaking of tempting, we all feel this need to mix up our taglines with verbs like squawked, chirped, whimpered, screeched, etc... When most of the time, a simple "said" will do. I recommend having Andrew yell instead of boom. It will draw less attention to the mechanic, which again will leave your reader focused on the story itself.

I like the use of the newspaper clipping at the end, but I'm disappointed you didn't mention Andrew's age. That's the perfect place to reveal things about your first-person character that he obviously wouldn't be thinking about in the course of the story.

Sorry about the wall of text here, but I hope that at least some of it is useful for you. Keep writing!
3 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 1 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/gaiadin