*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
BY ONLINE AUTHORS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/mrwiggly
Review Requests: OFF
9 Public Reviews Given
12 Total Reviews Given
Public Reviews
1
1
Review by MrWiggly
Rated: E | (4.0)
Disclaimer:
This essay is not meant to convince anyone of anything. It is what I think about a very complex subject. The most I hope to do is to give the reader a different perspective in which to think about God as they embark on their own search for truth.

Your disclaimer is unnecessary and detracts from the force of your article. If you believe what you say in the article, why wouldn't you want to lay out your arguments to others? Of course, it's what you think, unless you're not serious. What is a "different perspective" if it's not moving the reader from one point of view to another?

Well written. I haven't heard the name "Divine Intelligence" used as you use it, but it certainly fits if you want to keep the concept of God in the glare of scientific light. But, why keep the word, divine" at all?

If you want a simple, short story on what it's like to do science, try my story at
http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/1295...
2
2
Review by MrWiggly
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
This is a very thought-provoking, fact-filled, clear discussion of the stem-cell controversy. References are very useful and lend weight to your statements.

I think that instead of, "Burn victims may be saved from grafting their own skin," you meant, "Burn victims may be saved by grafting their own skin."

"Shortcoming" is a noun. Instead of, "As discussed, the President’s policy is rather shortcoming," I think you meant, "As discussed, the President’s policy has many shortcomings."

Do you really think that Bush believes a blastocyst has a soul? I doubt he actually knows what a blastocyst is, and he has no opinion about whether it has a soul. Isn't he just pandering to his fundamentalist Christian supporters?

Thanks for a good scientific article.
3
3
Review of The super alloy  
Review by MrWiggly
Rated: E | (4.0)
Very interesting story. Well written except for a couple of typos. For example, where you wrote, "Yesterday only we studied that the weight to strength ratio is important ," I think you meant, "Only yesterday we studied......"

You show how science can be fun and exciting. Well done.

You explain that the alloy was formed at 50,000 degrees. I think that no alloy could survive that temperature. It would vaporize into atoms. Maybe the heating pulse was applied with the material contained somehow?
3 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 1 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/mrwiggly