Hello Jessica Marie,
My name is Lin and I am one of the reviewers for the
Your short story depicts an event in your life that you looked forward to and enjoyed. It is intelligent, well laid out, has a nice pace, and tells your tale in sequence. Your ending is just right. For the most part there are only technical corrections, and I'll get on with that in a moment.
You have done a good job, but the piece does need a few corrections. I'm going to start with the most controversial one.
Before I get started, however, I want you to know that your work is good. Don't despair because this commentary is so long. Your mistakes are mostly those of inexperience. My extensive review is to help you to be able to see some problems in the work and edit them yourself, toward a goal of making them less and less necessary. You will gain nothing if you get a nice rating, and a pat on the back, with no constructive comments. Editing is a writer's fact of life. The best and the brightest often need more than one set of editorial eyes to clean up their work. So, take heart. When you are done with the review, take a look at the suggested corrections that make sense to you, and see how the story looks when you have made the corrections. Keep in mind that a 4.5 stars is a very good rating.
The plural form of cannon does not have an "s" at the end. The plural is cannon. There is so much literature and poetry that contain this word in its proper form, that it would be a shame to lose it to the commonly used replacement with the word, "cannons". There are some resources online, such as Dictionary.com that will tell you that the plural of cannon can also be cannons. This is because dictionary.com lists the vernacular forms of speech alongside the literary forms. Merriam-Webster has also changed their language to read "plural usually cannon". However the literary plural for cannon does not have an 's'. People in the military will attest that using the word "cannons" does not make for a happy commanding officer. The point of this is, the plural form of cannon, with the s, is becoming more accepted as common language, but more, the plural use without the 's' is becoming archaic, antiquated. So technically, cannons can pass muster, but not in the military. Still, knowing about the true form of its plural, I would use cannon as the plural. We have several words that are incorrectly used that may one day replace their literary forms, but many deer are not deers, many fish are not fishes (which is a verb in American English, as in "He fishes every weekend, rain or shine." and a bushel full of crab (as a noun) is not a bushel full of crabs. We all learned a passel of these word forms in elementary school, and promptly went back to using those words in the acceptable dialect of our time and place.
In your first sentence, you should remove the word "actually". It has become very overused, especially by teens - which I see that you are one. Your work is intelligent enough to start training your eye to remove overused words, except where you do it deliberately, and it adds to the piece. Your final line took on double meaning because of the event you are writing about, so the words "a blast!" were very appropriate to the work and your own personal experience.
At the end of the first paragraph, you quote your dad's answer to your question. It would stand out more, and be of better form if you set apart his answer in quotes. ...and he said, "Sure. Without a doubt." In the last sentence, I think it would also be better form if, instead of "It" you started the sentence with, "The event". It is always nice to have a very clear sentence to wrap up your paragraph, and it "The event" is not redundant.
In the beginning of paragraph two, the reader does not know that the event is happening on a Saturday, and you give no real reference point to how much time you have waited. Adding to the sentence will help keep this from becoming a stopping point in the work. A simple, "That Saturday" or "The Saturday of the reunion came..." will do it. Also, because "reunion" is being mentioned so many times, you may want to replace that word in the same paragraph with Pennypacker Mills. The following sentence should be revised, and would include the change I just mentioned:
"Anyway, after we left and we arrived at the Reunion..." should be adjusted to read, "When we arrived at Pennypacker Mills..."
Do you see why I suggest this change? "Anyway" is also one of those overused words that add nothing to the piece. "after we left and we arrived" is a confusing and unnecessary part of the sentence that can be said more simply by saying "When we arrived", and "Pennypacker Mills" replaces one iteration of "reunion" in the paragraph, helping to ease the redundancy.
In your next to last paragraph, there is a small spacing error between "mid" and 'nineteenth", as "nineteenth" starts on a new line and "mid" ends in the middle of the prior line. This is because you hit the enter key instead of the space bar, and is easy to fix.
This is a good essay, and a good read. It can only be improved by technical revisions. Well done, Jessica.
I look forward to reading more of your writing in the Weekly Newbie Challenge.
Best wishes for all of your writing efforts.
-Lin
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only ** |
|