Hello Ruchir P,
I read and enjoyed your poem "Repentant Love." I like to first give my reading of a poem so you can see how I understood your words, then I will comment.
My reading of the poem:
The individual, ‘me’ or ‘I’, of this poem seems to be addressing the individual ‘you’. (For ease of reference, I am referring to me/I in the masculine, he, and you in the feminine, she.)The narrator takes on the task of instructing ‘you’ in the art of denying him love (lines 1-4). The narrator asks ‘you’ to abandon him (let me fall, and condemn me) as fate has determined should happen (lines 5-7). The narrator seems to have assigned the power of love not to ‘me’or ‘you’ but instead to fate (into the fates lap). The narrator asks ‘you’ to release him from the little love that remains in her heart (the thread of your love) (lines 8-9). The narrator feels he has wronged ‘you’ and must be cut off from her love as a punishment for his wrongdoing (lines 10-11). The narrator asks ‘you’ to take away the very essence of her (your spirit) from him (lines 12-13). The narrator is willing to become zombie-like, a hollow shell of himself, without her or her compassion (your tenderness) (lines14-16). The narrator is asking to be punished as he believes there is no hope of receiving you or your caresses.
I love the title-Love is Repentant-Love personified feels remorseful and feels the weight of its own misdeeds. It seems as if the narrator is suggesting that wrongdoing is an inherent part of love. How profoundly true, as we are all human, love must possess the flaws and imperfections that we express as part of our humanity. Excellent!
There seems to be a great chasm between the title and the stanza of the poem. The dramatic shift from the accepting nature of the title to the controlling, desperate tone of the stanza is shocking. I wondered if this was a suggestion that love is not what the narrator expected it should be. There seems to be a great contrast between the appearance of the title and the reality of the stanza. I think this could be viewed the opposite way as well, as the reality of the title and the appearance of the stanza-hmm. This seems to leave a nice space for the reader to bring his own viewpoint into the reading. Nice work!
In the stanza, the narrator’s words seem to ring hollow, untrue. As he proclaims that the fates control loves destiny, the tone of the poem is accusatory, suggesting it is ‘you’ who has caused his misery, and ‘you’ who has the power to relieve it. Eleven of the 19 line poem are centered around ‘me’ and only briefly reflect you (7 of 19 lines). The narrator is clearly absorbed in his own misery. There is no indication how ‘you’ feels toward the narrator. The reader is left to wonder about the reliability of the narrator. Is he seeing the truth or is he filtering the truth through his perceived guilt. Without knowing either how ‘you’ feels or what the brutal action was, the reader must take the narrator at his word. The reader gets caught in the narrators experience as he/she experiences the narrator's tunnel vision. Nice writing! This, it seems to me, is a powerful reflection of how easy it is to get caught in an emotion, be it love, guilt, or any other. Excellent reflection!
The narrator uses metaphors to highlight the attitudes and emotions of the poem. The hollowness of the stanza is reflected in the allusion to the ‘living dead’, the zombie. Nice! Unhooking the thread seems to be a mixed metaphor. It is difficult for this reader to determine if this is intentional. Is it a reflection of the disparity between the title and stanza, the contrast between truth and reality? I would have liked to see the narrator remain true to his convictions throughout the stanza, perhaps using an ‘untying’ of the thread as oppose to an ‘unhooking’.
The scant appearance of ‘you’ in this poem gives a powerful voice to the force of emotion. That coupled with the absence of her voice, seems to make ‘you’ nearly invisible or unimportant. The emotion is so strong it no longer matters what the source was. This expression fits perfectly with the theme of the poem. I would have liked to see more control over the ‘you’ as suggested by initial lines of the poem. If the ‘you’ references were completely separate from ‘me’ and ‘I’ and were contained in a very narrow space the impact might be even greater. I love that the poem returns to ‘me’ in the end. Perfect.
I had a bit of trouble with the last three lines, the final sentence, of the poem. At first glance, it seemed as if the narrator was using the adjective forlorn as a verb. It took me several readings to figure out that it was ‘me,’ who was forlorn. The phrasing is awkward and difficult to understand. I don’t think a person can be forlorn ‘from’ something. He must be forlorn because of something, your absence, the absence of your touch etc. I think I get the gist of the sentence, but I would feel more confident if it were rephrased.
I enjoyed reading your poem. It was profound and thought provoking. Keep writing!
Thanks for sharing a great read,
Tuesday
|
|