*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
BY ONLINE AUTHORS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/timtuink/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/8
Review Requests: OFF
581 Public Reviews Given
582 Total Reviews Given
Public Reviews
Previous ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -8- 9 ... Next
176
176
Review of War never changes  
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
Hi, just a quick review on this, where I changed a couple of small words, but mostly indicated the correct paragraph breaks that were needed. It is difficult sometimes for writers to know, more or less, when to break their work into separate sections and paragraphs. I almost didn't read this solely because it lacked the necessary divisions that make it far more interesting. Especially the ability to add the single line at the end, which gives the whole piece its meaning.

This doesn't mean, nor should you read it to mean, that my breaks are the only ones possible. But they're fairly good and demonstrate how these things are generally done. Paragraphs usually express a single thought, or group of related thoughts, then move on to the next paragraph. They can be broken according to emphasis, also, as with the last line.

There are other errors here, but the lack of paragraphs was the most obvious and detrimental. See what you think and whether you get a different feel for the work now. You might see something new, or a different way to structure the piece. I'm not sure whether mentioning the specific title of the movie is needed. Give some thought to whether it helps your story or not. I can see it both ways.

Let me know if this was helpful, and by the way, I felt this was a nice "chunk" of writing that definitely deserved the time it took to do this review. Note, too, that it was WWI and not WWII *FacePalm*
With some added work, this could be a good anti-war piece. No such thing as a bad anti-war piece, really. Let me know if you have any questions -- really.
Bob

Last night I was at a marching band contest when an old friend who had moved away last year, came to visit. It was quite the pleasant reunion, and I can’t deny it felt great to have the old group back together. Though the good times were ever so slightly spoiled by the thoughts provoked by one particular conversation.

I knew that most of my friends planned on entering some form of military (service) after they graduated, but I never considered it for myself. The subject of enlistment arose in conversation, and my friend Riley said that he was thinking about joining the Green Berets Devin (the friend who came to visit) said that he shouldn’t because they’re the first to get shipped out,

Riley replied with “yeah thats the point.” Whether this was him showing evidence of a death wish or a misguided view of the grandeur of war I don’t know, but either way it was unnerving. However, what came next was significantly worse.

Devin suggested that Riley should come into the Navy with him, (and) this was followed by “just think about it.” He would have continued but thankfully he was interrupted by a newcomer to the conversation.

After that the conversation jumped subjects, but in that fleeting moment after he said “just think about it,” I did. And for half a second I thought that “hey, I’m still not sure what I’m gonna do with my life, I’ll be with my two best friends, and maybe, just maybe this is what I should do with my life.” In that instance I saw an entire future of good times being out there with my friends, and working for a higher meaning. Then the other half of that second hit, and all that came crashing to the ground.

Something about this situation seemed eerily familiar, I was reminded of the film “All Quiet on the Western Front.” The movie tells the story of a group of friends who, after being filled with images of glory and grandeur by their elders, decide to enlist in the army immediately after graduating. They were so happy and excited to be young, surrounded by friends, and fighting for some higher purpose.

The story then follows them through the years of WWI as they all realize what war is truly like and how horrible the world can be. Slowly they all die off in horrible displays of the evils of mankind. In the end they’re all gone and forgotten, their deaths virtually meaningless.

This is not how I want to spend my life.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
177
177
Review of The Bay  
Rated: E | (4.5)
Hi, I liked your poem a lot. But you do know this is a haiku, right? Or is this just a wild coincidence? Haiku's have a 5-7-5 syllable count, and three lines accordingly. Five syllables in the first line, and so forth. So were you pulling my leg? That's the exact syllable count of your poem. And you don't need a title for a haiku. Look it up and see what you think.

That said, are all three line poems that just so happen to match the right syllable count -- haikus? No, not necessarily. But if it swims like a koi, looks like a koi, and has the same bright colors, well, you know the rest.

Here's your poem dressed up as a haiku: all lines centered

sad eyes search white waves
across the shimmering bay (across a shimmering bay)
my heart is sinking

Let me know if this is just a coincidence or whether you knew all along what you were doing *Smile* Regardless, the poem is great.
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
178
178
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
Ooh, this is a juicy one to review, but first I have to comment on how delightful are the blinking feline eyes of your portfolio case. Very cool. I think the darn thing blinked at me fifty times before I finally figured out what the holy heck was going on *Smile* You'll have to teach me how to do that one day, when I'm wealthy enough to afford the site's first-class tickets. *Smile*

That said, time to get to it. Okay, the writing is excellent overall. It's like this next-to-the-last draft sort of thing where some final, but important edits are found necessary and wanting. They're all easy fixes with some being stylistic in nature, and others just plain structural boo-boos.

I hope you won't mind, but the best way to show what I'm talking about is to shamefully type right on top of your own work. Please follow the bouncing cursor *Smile*

“Aw, we live on Neptune!" Oberon shouted out in frustration. "Why do we need to learn about people who lived on another planet thousands of years ago?”

Notice how I moved the speaker closer to the first expressed thought. We want to know who's speaking and how they're saying it, as soon as possible in any given sentence of dialogue.

“Oberon!" Rhea Vesta snapped at the unruly ten year old. "You will not interrupt in my class.”

So these were two examples of what I consider to be a very important structure consideration.

Rhea collected her thoughts. Sometimes I wonder why I took this job as a History and "Stellar" Cartography teacher.
You meant stellar, right? Man is this guy picky or what?

“As I was saying…many of you have some percentage of human in your bloodlines. (small m, not capital)

After a short period of chemical and nuclear weapons "usage", there was nothing at all left of their home planet.” The word, usage, sounds weak here. Maybe a word like "destruction" would work better: After a period of destruction from chemical and nuclear weapons, there was...

Ooh, my favorite: the elusive ellipsis. They generated oxygen through electrolysis…” Although this sentence is technically correct, it doesn't use the ellipsis correctly in this instance. You intend the ellipsis to indicate an interruption by the bell. But it's confusing because the cut-off comes at the end of a complete sentence. It works much more effectively when the sentence being interrupted is more obviously cut-off in mid-stride. For example, look how easily this is remedied: They generated oxygen through electrolysis and…”

As you all know, our ancestors here on Neptune discovered and rescued the struggling human colony while mining on the Martian moon of Phobos. Your homework is to write a report about the archived story from one of those early colonists."

I don't understand what the above paragraph means. Their Neptunian ancestors were mining on Phobos when they discovered a struggling human colony? I have no idea who's doing what with whom here. Please clarify *Smile*

I like the scene changes. I forgot what they're called.

“Rhea!” Grace, Rhea’s neighbor, caught her breath as she ran to catch the teacher before she entered her house. “It’s your daughter, Miranda!

Rhea's neighbor, Grace, caught her breath as she ran to catch the teacher before she entered the house. "Rhea!" she called, "...it's your daughter, Miranda. (I think this reads smoother. It's so easy to confuse personal pronouns with the appropriate character, it doesn't hurt to word it as well as possible. Which isn't necessarily my version)

"She's" lost quite a bit of life essence, and no one can find her healing horse.

Rhea checked the small bump at her temple and realized that it was indeed shut off; she must have pressed it by accident. “Grace, where’s Miranda now?” Tears then dripped/ran down her face as well.

In the sentence above, the first comma was removed and a semi-colon added. Even though these changes weren't necessary, technically, they do help to break the monotony of all the sentences being structured in the same way. Just as sentence lengths are varied, so is punctuation usage, just to keep things"jumping". Notice that I removed the words "streaming" and "now" which were unnecessarily repeated and sounded boring *Smile*

Miranda fell down a long drop. Luke ran home to tell me, and I called the rescue unit...but they can’t fix her. (again, here's a correct usage of the ellipsis in mid-sentence. One of the many reasons I love the ellipsis is because its use is so wonderfully varied, but whose proper usage can be demanding)

Rhea felt dizzy after the words that Grace quickly blurted out sunk in.
Try this instead: Hearing the words that Grace quickly blurted out, Rhea felt dizzy as they sunk in. Or, As the words quickly blurted out by Grace sunk in, Rhea felt Dizzy. I tried to separate the verbs "blurted" and "sunk" which run too close together. Try to do a better job than I did *Smile*

When a contact list appeared in front of her face, she clicked on her Aunt Lucy’s name. The "relative" lived right outside of the forest. (the first part wasn't a complete sentence or thought)

Let me know if she is, and I’ll have Miranda "'transported" there at once." (do you mean as in "beaming" like in Star Trek? By pickup truck? By sled dogs? Sling shot, what? *Smile*

Another nice (and appropriately timed) scene change. Darn, I still can't remember what these breaks are called.

Rhea found herself crying again, this time "with" tears of joy (no comma) as she watched Miranda’s pretty blue eyes open.

If you change POV to Miranda, she needs her own paragraph:

Miranda smiled as she hugged the champagne colored horse. Only moments earlier, the seven-year-old's limp, barely breathing body had been placed on the life-giving horse. The girl was going to be fine.

If you don't want to overuse the word, "as" then the above could be re-worded thusly:

Hugging the champagne-colored horse, Miranda smiled. (I also changed some of the subsequent wording in the paragraph. In case you hadn't noticed *Smile*

Rhea felt her heart ping with joy at (hearing) her little one’s words.

Okay, time for apologies. I feel like we were dancing and I stepped on your toes during the whole song. So forgive me if I overstepped myself. This piece was so easy to edit because it was so well put together to begin with. I mean that, really. As you know, all too well, I'm sure, this whole self-editing stuff is tuff. Nor was my intention to be the teacher and you the student. I don't like being presumptuous and if my critique comes across as such, then such was not my intent.

Tip-toeing through the tulips of your garden helps me as much as I hope it serves your own interests. Anyway, thanks for allowing me to trample on some of your flowers, and either make a fool of myself, be a helpful little elf, or both *Smile*

If you incorporate some or most of my suggestions and recommendations, I believe this piece can pretty much be put to bed. The ending is a tad soft, but fits the rest of the story well enough. After the dust settles and you're happy with the work, I think we could add a tiny touch to the end that would spruce it up a bit. Or not. Let me know *Smile*
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
179
179
Rated: E | (3.0)
Hi, MidnightAngel, I just got through reading your kids story about Globby and Friends. My first question is whether this will be illustrated or not. Books with pictures are treated differently from those that aren't. This reads and is structured as if we have seen paintings or drawing of the all the characters in question. I like the list of characters up top, as if players on the stage all taking a bow beforehand -- especially if they're like individual portraits of the characters.

I'm also interested in the target age for the audience. Which determines the overall length of the finished piece, yes? Not always, but usually. If you recall, in Disney's Bambi, for one, all the forest creatures knew each other, because they were already friends. One gets the impression that everybody knows everybody except for the Leprechaun, who seems new to the group. Depending on the ages of the reader, the Irish dialect may look and sound odd also. Unless someone reads it to them and is good with the "Lucky Charms" lingo *Smile*

Depending on how long this is intended to be, a lead-up, lead-in story can be a nice touch, also. That's where the "Once upon a time" came into play, and acted as a fun "intro" where many if not most of our main characters can make take their first bows, so to speak.

Again, if we don't see full page illustrations of the forest, the trees, sky, ground, flowers, bushes, and grass, then you need to describe these things, if only lightly. Let alone the characters themselves.

A good cast of characters also gives us the chance to "plant" plot "cues". These are little things for which no real explanation is given, but the role or purpose of which comes into play later in the story. For example, we've heard of the Dark Fairy and the Evil Troll. We need to quickly establish why the Fairy is dark and the Troll evil. If only slightly.

For instance, Globby may still wear a metal neckpiece that one of the villains used when he was held prisoner at one time. But we don't necessarily let on about this other than to show that Globby wears such a thing. One or more of the other characters are slightly damaged in one way or another -- yet another result of something one of our villains had done in the past.

Whatever the ending is, all the characters are made "whole" and restored to their healthy and original condition. That sort of thing. But done as you see fit, or course. Let me know if this made sense, and if you'd like some serious tips on the correct way to structure dialogue sequences. When you have several characters all vying for attention, it can be a tad difficult. I bet you already found that to be true *Smile*

Globby is my fave character so far, though I do favor villains. As well as the most vulnerable of the players. They're always fun to mess with *Smile*

Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
180
180
Review of HEART DEAD  
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Hi, Jasmine, although I'm not a fan of "Punished", I thought this poem was excellent. And I may be reading something into it that you did, or did not intend. But that's what makes poetry great. I felt you captured the anguish of a mother who sees her grown child as a stranger, almost. Who, in growing up and presumably leaving the proverbial nest, has "betrayed" the bond that once existed. I think this piece can be read as the histrionics of a mother in despair over her own "loss" as opposed to the child being an adult who likely has their own life now -- and who may, or may not -- come visiting as much as the mom would like. It's as if the mother is indeed in a grave now, wallowing in a self-made coffin which, at an earlier time, was a thriving relationship. One where the mother was needed, where the child depended on her for everything and now, for seemingly nothing.

Very cool, in terms of how I read it. And I'm usually pretty good with this stuff -- if I say so myself *Smile*

Let me know if this is how you meant the piece to be read, or if I put my own spin on it, for better or worse. Thanks.
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
181
181
Rated: E | (3.5)

Hi, Luis,

Please forgive my tinkering with your poem, but I wanted to see it this way, to see what it might look like in this format. I like it much better -- but that's me. I changed a word here and there, not because they're better than yours, but only to experiment. Do some experimenting on your own, like I did. See if you like what I did. Or not. It's just my opinion, but I've had a lot of experience with this sort of thing, so I hope you'll give it some thought.

Separate from my changes, I really liked this, and as a pet owner (who owns who?) *Smile* your little tail reminded me of the many adoptions I've had (who adopted who?)

Let me know if this was helpful. Notice the only punctuation comes in the third line of each stanza.
Bob


Chapter One
The Pound
A place of Hope.

Chapter Two
The Black
Her chocolate eyes pierce my soul, begging for kindness.

Chapter Three
The Room
She comes inside the room with us, and shows how sweet she is.

Chapter Four
Begging and Leaving
She begs, we leave.

Chapter Five
Home
We take her, she takes our love.

My dog
My Callie.
My life


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
182
182
Review of Life and Death  
Rated: E | (3.0)
Hi, just a quick comment about how sometimes a person strikes gold and doesn't appear to realize it. The beginning here is quite good, storywise, and carries through to the middle. Because I think you didn't see the real magic of what you'd written, you let the rest of the story just drift away. So what's so good about this, in my opinion? I'm glad you asked *Smile*

The whole concept of Life and Death, as if a variation on Adam and Eve, is kind of a unique idea and full of great potential. I like the whole idea that Life is a lovable lie, while Death is hated. And the two are debating the subject as if involved in a lover's spat. They could even be lovers. The whole thing just drips with a mythological twist, angelic, devilish, and very "gothic" in nature. It's a winner if you want it to be.

My concern is that you didn't seem to take the work as seriously as I did *Smile* I hope that changes and that you decide to sculpt this into the fine piece it wants to be. If you do, let me know. I'd like to help more, using a hammer and chisel together *Smile*

Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
183
183
Rated: E | (3.5)
"Creeeeaaaaakkkkk," groaned the green, skinny door as it opened, it’s diamond doorknob glittering in the moonlight. A cool, silver light spilled out of the crack as the opening grew wider and the air filled with a rich smell of grass and freshly turned soil.

Another sound then came softly padding through the door. "Swish, swish, swish, swish, swish, swish, swish." It was the rustle of someone running through the tall grass outside. Each second, the footsteps grew louder than the ones before them, yet they still sounded muffled and faint.

They were the noises made by rabbit -- or something like a rabbit -- running! "Thud, thud, thud, thud, thud, thud, thud!"

A cool breeze entered the room as a shadow darkened the door. As it came ever nearer, into the light, the darkness began to shrink until, what had at first looked like a giant, was now no bigger than a small child.

The creature's nose was long and stuck out of his head like a ripe banana. His ears, too, were round and oversized, and his round face was covered in brown skin, the color of a walnut and just as rough. The intruder's name was Peeayah, and he was known as a Peanut Butter Troll.

Hi, my name is Bob and I've taken great liberty with your story. I hope you will forgive me for doing so. I also hope you will take a moment to study the changes I made. They are not perfect, nor do I suggest you use them exactly as I've laid out. But, the grammar, punctuation, and usage is now extremely accurate and correct.

I did this because I really like what you have happening here. The story has great potential, and with the correct structure, I feel it's a winner and that children would love it. Please study the alterations I've so mercilessly *Smile* inserted, because they are important and, I think, speak for themselves.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Assuming we're still on speaking terms *Facepalm*
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
184
184
Rated: 18+ | (1.5)
Hi, I wanted so much to review this, because it was quick, to the point, and started out in an interesting fashion. Unfortunately, the piece quickly loses all meaning, and ends in a totally ambiguous manner. Please don't take these comments as anything other than an attempt to be helpful. The paragraph just needs to be rewritten, almost completely, with the words changed until the meaning is crystal clear. As hard as I tried, I was unable to understand what it was you're wanting to say. Not to worry, this is very fixable; it just needs reworking, and if and when you do, please let me read it again. Thanks.
Bob
185
185
Rated: E | (3.5)
Hi, my suggested title for this is: "Panic is not an Option"

I liked the way this is structured and it works fairly well. I think it's written well, also, but not without some suggestions that I think would make the whole thing "sing" even more. See what you think.

First, single and double-digit numbers almost always work better when written out. This would be especially true in your piece. For example:

Ten...nine...eight...

This is then consistent and works great with the "one" at the end. I don't think you need the emphasis at the end. As in:

twisted until you are stuck fast... no, better to let it run its course.
One...
Solitude, Isolated, alone...one. (I added a period and reduced all the "ellipses" to three only (correct usage).

I also kept the consistent form of the number by itself on its own line, then the rest underneath.

These kind of works should be as absolutely "clean" as possible -- sterile almost. With a minimum of punctuation. As few distractions as possible. It's the words that are important, not the "look" of the piece. No author editorializing *Smile*

I think you'll like the look of this if you make the changes I recommend. Some awkword word usage here and there, but overall very nice indeed. I really liked it, and found the presentation interesting, different, and fresh. Best of all, I felt the meaning, and feeling, of futility and controlled panic, quite compelling. Sweet.

Let me know if this is helpful, and keep up the great work. By the way, if the numbers were spelled out as I suggest, this is easily a 4-star presentation. Just so you know that I liked it 4-stars worth, but gave you only 3 1/2 *Smile*
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
186
186
Review of One dark night  
Rated: E | (3.0)
Hi, I decided to comment on this because these things can be very clever, and you caught me with the twist at the end. These sort of tales are like jokes in a way, with a long lead-in, and a final payoff or punchline if you will.

As with all anecdotal stories which are intended to sneak up and surprise the reader, there is, however, some risk involved. Which means you either pull it off, or you don't -- or the "victim" groans that they were "cheated" in a way because the ending is not worth the wait in getting there. Its not strong enough or funny enough, given all the preliminary hoopla that led to the inevitable conclusion.

These are all just my opinions, of course, but I think they're valid and worth expressing. See what you think.

Since the ending is supposed to be funny -- and it is -- we don't want any humor elsewhere. It only dilutes and diminishes the power of the punch at the end. No "midnight mouse" for instance, and overall, we want these guys to be genuinely frightened -- something easily achieved by tightening up the dialogue and making it more serious.

My advice is offered, by the way, for the purpose of making a good piece of work even better. And not in trying to make something good out of what I believe is a poorly executed story. So let's keep that part straight. Some of the writing is rough, some word choices could be better, but that's not my point in reviewing this.

I'm concerned that these two guys come across as a couple of goof-offs, trying to scare one another more than being frightened themselves. It's not a make-it or break-it problem, but if written straight, in deadly serious earnest, I guarantee the great ending would hit like an iron hammer instead of a rubber mallet.

Similar pieces have used this theme in the past, but the story never gets old. Which is all the more reason for doing it really well. Sometimes a work like this can require 4-5 drafts before it "sings" just right.

I hope this is helpful and let me know if you adopt some changes accordingly.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
187
187
Review of Devourer  
Rated: E | (4.5)
Whoa, this one caught me by surprise. A pleasant one, despite the despairing nature of the theme. Very nice, well done, and powerful. I was distracted slightly by the present tense structure and if you permitted me to be very persnickety, I'd change it to first person past. But that's just me *Smile*

Standing before it, I subjected myself to the dispiritingly familiar scent of the polish my grandmother had favored. I opened the thing and stared long into its ordered cutter of memories. A moment later, my wedding band clattered into the mix.

Very subjective to be sure. But an added perspective that is always interesting to consider. Let me know if you make any changes accordingly, otherwise, allow me to stand and applaud. A wonderful, thoughtful work.
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
188
188
Review of I Wonder  
Rated: ASR | (3.0)
Hi, this was so good until the last line! And even that's not all that bad. The whole thing reads like satin on silk until we get to the end. Two separate problems for me (as if you're waiting with bated breath *Smile*

1) The rhythm deviates from the rest of the lines. About four syllables too many? Make it quick, just like the others.

2) "field of green" is so yesterday *Smile* and too oft used as a cliche. I feel free to come down on you with these comments because the rest of the poem (like 90%) is sooooooo gooooood.

Ten syllables throughout, except for the last line, which just kind of oozes into some kind of puddle of words. I like the sign of forever stuff -- cool. But you in a field of green has got to go. Where? I don't know; it's your poem. *Smile* Take me somewhere I've never been before and keep the syllable count consistent. Too good a piece of work to let it not be as great as it wants to be.

Let me know if this helps, and if you change it, I'd love to see it again. Nice job. With a decent final line, this easily jumps from 3 stars to 5. Seriously.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
189
189
Review of The Schism  
Rated: 13+ | (5.0)
I only wish that I was erudite enough to give this beautifully written piece the great review it so richly deserves. I'm not even sure I could delineate its meaning, either superficially or in depth, let alone do it justice. The phrasing and word choices are delectable, and roll off the consciousness like fine food in the palate of a gourmet. This is novel-quality writing at its best and illustrates how excellent prose should look and sound. Congratulations on one of the better works I've had the pleasure of coming across.

That said, what did I really think of this? I think the title is a bit weak, and not up to the quality of the piece itself. That's about it. I love the whole "being at war with oneself as well as others" stuff. It all works and makes me dizzy trying to analyze what doesn't need to be analyzed, but just is what it is.

I will share one brief interlude that this brought to mind, if only for a moment. In the masterpiece, "Animatrix" -- the animated companion piece to the "Matrix" film series, there is one scene in particular where a flag-wielding robot warrior, astride a robot horse, is shown galloping into battle with his human adversaries. Not a direct connection to the work in question here, but the glory and irony, the sheer odor of victory and defeat, are much the same as conveyed in that singular monster of an image.

I derived much of the same sensations from what can be found here. This website needs an icon which portrays a person standing and applauding. And I'll leave you with that image. Have a nice day *Smile*
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
190
190
Review of BUT I HAVE NOT  
Rated: E | (4.0)
Hi, Kristie, this is a terrific little piece of work that I thoroughly enjoyed. Congratulations on an original essay that I unforgivably turned into a poem (or a monologue). I put the part I changed down below and hope you'll take a look. And that you'll do the whole thing in a slightly different, but much improved way (in my very humble opinion). Sometimes a really good thing can be turned into a really great thing, and I think that's what we have here.

Your original form is largely horizontal. As you can obviously see, I changed that to a totally vertical form. The difference is that now it reads like, "boom, boom, boom, boom..." Instead of "this, then that, then that, then this..."

This is my only criticism, by the way. If you can't tell by now, I otherwise loved this from beginning to end. And the end was perfect. If, and it's a big if -- I get that -- you take my suggestion and go vertical with this, and do it as a kind of free verse monologue, please take note of the few but important word changes I felt were necessary in order to make it work in the revised format.

Please let me know also, if you change this accordingly, as I think the piece is very exciting and very publishable. But, I'd also have to submit -- only if changed from a horizontal essay to a vertical "monologue". See what you think and I hope this is not only helpful, but doable *Smile*
Bob


My name is Kristie Wilson.
I am the creator of the iPhone,
And I have killed 20 rattlesnakes with just my pinky finger.
I have jumped to the moon and back,
crash-landed an airplane with no fatalities,
And imagined up the imaginary number system.
I've been to Jesus' warehouse party,
Was a star in the movie "Up"
And been a flower girl for Princess Diana's wedding.
I have successfully performed brain surgery,
Am the unrecognized co-writer of Great Expectations,
And I'm the one who put the butter in peanut.
I was the founder of the Illuminati,


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
191
191
Review of The Microphone  
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
I almost ignored this and moved on, when I noticed the title again and it hit me. Of course, the relationship in question is between the person on stage and the standing microphone, which is its own person, its own personality that loves us, abuses us, and without whom a performance (metaphorically our life) can never exist.

My sudden re-evaluation turned this from a two-star rating to a solid four and one-half stars. Pretty darn good for age 13. Congratulations for a nice piece that is suitable for any age, and more than one interpretation. I instantly loved it once my understanding (and cognition) got up to speed. I even like the absence of punctuation, and I usually love punctuation.

I'm so glad I paused to smell the flowers thrown onto the stage. Some of which are now my own. Sweet.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
192
192
Review of Write Right  
Rated: E | (4.0)
Hi, Nadine, this is certainly the right place for your fun and informative article. I've reviewed numerous would-be writers thus far who would make perfect additions to your class. The difference, unfortunately, is that these older students seem to have lost somewhat, their willingness to ask about rules and such, and are much more interested in putting down random thoughts and ideas -- most of which are disjointed and only slightly related to the English language *Smile*

I really enjoyed one part in particular: "Remarkably, this teacher found, that through the freedom of written expression, the students wanted to create writing that communicated to themselves and their audience. (Who is the writing for?)"

There is, in my humble opinion, no more profound principle in writing, than the question: who am I writing this for? In many of my reviews, I ask this very question of these wannabe authors, poets, and essayists. As their reader, I ask them if they are writing just for fun, for self-amusement, or more for self-improvement, and the ability to say something meaningful, lasting, that adds to the world some of that color you mentioned *Smile*

In most cases, the writers remain moot on the issue and I either don't hear back, or the question goes unanswered. Which is precisely why, of course, that the query is so extremely important. Picasso is said to have spent his whole life trying to view the world again as does a child. I liked your literary piece because I pictured myself as one of your pupils who, as an adult now, wanted to maintain the child-like joy, wonder, and magic that comes from learning to write well.

So am I fin? Not yet! Thanks for giving me a reason to put an apple on your desk. *Smile* Or does that date me too much?
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
193
193
Review of A new path  
Rated: E | (4.5)
Hi, I'm new myself around here, though writing for me is an old game. I really liked your poem and felt it was worth commenting on. Extremely so.

One thing worth doing is the removal of the divorce reference. Totally unnecessary. This piece is so good and so well written, that it can apply to any tragedy or any other painful experience where we pull ourselves together, especially with the help of another person. Except for a comma here or there, I'd be hard pressed to mess with this in any significant way. It's pretty damn good just as it is without any added tinkering.

Just my opinion, but this work is done, stick a fork in it, hang it on the wall, and move on to the next piece of business. I especially like the last line which explodes with renewed vigor and a real lust for life. Well done, yada, yada, move along, next one, please *Smile*

Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
194
194
Review of Dystopiapolis  
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
Okay, so just when you think you've read the last book on cockroaches, or seen the final film about them, here comes a fresh new take that makes you pause, step back, and smile; you've been had and don't mind a bit.

Hi, this intro is just my way of clapping my hands in applause. I really enjoyed your short story, which comes to us as one of those rare gems we really appreciate when they're found. With a final polish, punctuation and grammar check, this is a highly publishable piece of work. How you do that is your challenge, but it belongs somewhere where such things fit in with other bits and pieces of the best stuff around.

It's hard to get in a good twist nowadays, especially with a bug story, and especially with cockroaches; they've been done a lot. If I was forced, at gunpoint, to be super critical, my only complaint is that roaches have been done to death, and still you pulled something terrific out of the pile. Spiders, maybe? That could work. Nope, I think it has to be roaches. They're prehistoric and the idea of their being intelligent -- and loving -- just seems to be a fit. Damn! I hate it when I can't offer something better than what you already gave me *FacePalm*

That said, let me know if you'd like some hints on giving this that final polish I mentioned, otherwise I have nothing else to say. Bravo, kudos, and write on!
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
195
195
Rated: E | (4.0)
You're preaching to the choir and count me in as one of the congregation *Smile* My only quarrel is that as good as this is, and truthful -- and scary -- the only ones who will cheer are already members of a group for whom this kind of information is painfully familiar. No young person, let alone a Democrat or other disgruntled miscreant will read this and decide they've been on the wrong track all this time *FacePalm*

That said, this is written about as well as this kind of thing can be. The message is not one where we might spend time picking over a comma or a missing period. It is what it is. One either gets it, or they don't. And the piece isn't provocative enough, in terms of insult, injury, and accusation, to prompt a nonbeliever to want to know more. Nope, it's more of a "get out the vote" thing, which is never bad or a waste of time.

I hope you've written other political stuff; you're a good reporter, and feel free to do some name-calling and finger-pointing while you're at it.
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
196
196
Review of Life  
Rated: 18+ | (2.0)
Joe, you're not a quitter (the correct spelling) you're also a wannabe writer, too, correct? If so, we have our work cut out for us. First of all, I salute anyone who has the courage to take keyboard in finger and put their thoughts down where anybody and everybody can read them. It's sort of like being naked in a crowd, except everybody here is naked as well, so welcome to the local nudist colony *Smile*

Second of all, Joe, what in the world do you have going on here? And why is this rated 18+ (just curious). On the plus side, you have something you want to say, and you say it in style. The completely wrong style, perhaps, but with pzazz nonetheless.

This reads like one, long, nearly incomprehensible, single, run-on sentence. A nonstop stream-of-consciousness that leaves us exhausted before we're halfway through. I have to smile -- not at you -- but in the realization that for some people, all those books on grammar and punctuation are just so much kindling for a good fire. Don't be one of those people, Joe. Learn the basics, then separate your ideas into single, well stated thoughts that don't all just run together like a train wreck of opinions and observations.

Does that sound too harsh? Think of it more as "tough love" for would-be writers. We all have to pay our dues, and you're in arrears on yours, Joe -- big time. That said, I'd really like to know what's on your mind and what it is you'd like us to hear. For now, however, I haven't much of a clue at all. I hope you give this another shot -- or two. And bone up on a rule -- or two.

Let me know if this helps. Believe it or not, I'm here to help and not just quibble. So are you a quitter, or a writer? You tell me.
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
197
197
Review of Watching Over Us  
Rated: E | (3.0)
Hi, Paul, I liked your short story a lot. Naturally I have to nag you with ideas and recommendations, but overall it grabbed me. In spite of my nature to be very critical.

What you have here is a screenplay. Well, sort of. It's written as one, though the form would be considered wrong. But in general, imagine that a storyboard (a series of small illustrations that guide a director) were to accompany this. All you'd need would be a camera and some actors.

All screenplays and their like, are written in "first-person, present tense". Prose is typically "third-person, past tense". Why is this important? To begin, your story could be twice as powerful if written in another "voice" as it's called. By putting everything in the present tense, you deny the reader the ability to "visualize" -- on their own -- the action taking place. You, as the author, are in effect putting "training wheels" on the scenes, and guiding us along every step of the way. This is what you want in a screenplay, but not at all in a great story like yours.

I want to be an observer, a witness who, while we feel sympathy or empathize with the boy, his father and so forth, are not actual "participants" in the story. I don't want to be an "extra" in your movie, but rather an audience member.

I liked the dialogue and felt it suited the tone just right. I would still pick at this and that, but not here, and not now. When you learn and practice the fine points and nuances of third-person writing, a lot of present tense errors will correct themselves. And then you get to play with a whole bunch of new ones *Smile*

So, could this also be written in the first-person, but done so properly and exactingly, as first-person requires? Yes, but why? Especially when, in my humble opinion, it would be so much better otherwise.

Let me know if this helps. And if you do a rewrite in third-person, I'd love to read it. Write on!
Bob


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
198
198
Review of Dusk  
Rated: E | (2.5)
Hi, although I've written lots of novels and poems and essays, I'm a noobie here, so we're both walking the same trail, so to speak, in the forest of your poem *Smile*

Your poem is short enough that you might want to consider my suggestions. I like what you're trying to say, and the right mood is there, I'm just not sure what it is, the words actually mean. That sounds silly when it comes to poetry -- they're often supposed to be enigmatic. But we also need the right word choices, even when mystery lies at the core of the piece.

Almost all poems can be written as prose. Your poem, for instance, could, if you wanted to, be written as a very short story, not much longer than the poem itself. You wouldn't have the luxury of using just any words that fit your own mood, however, but you'd have to make it sound suitable for the average reader, meaning it would make total sense to most readers.

Even as a poem, I found your piece just a little too vague in meaning and word usage. Some of that is opinion on my part, some of it is just the plain truth. That said, I like the bird metaphor which tries to carry through to the end, but doesn't work because of words like "paves" and "ridden".

I'd like to read this as that short prose piece and see what "you" think the poem says.Then compare that to the poem itself and see if the two things gel. Each should complement the other. And say pretty much the same thing. As I said, this would be easy to do in your case because the length is perfect for this kind of critique.

Let me know if this helps and if you take me up on my suggestion. I'd like to see it again.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
199
199
Review of Dark night  
Rated: E | (3.5)
Hi, welcome, I'm a noob myself, you'll like it here, lots of nice folks and great writers. Okay so much for that. Now down to business *Smile*

I like the one, continuous stream of thought, no paragraphs, no breaks. Very cool, moves fast and frantic, conveys that sense of quiet desperation, until all hell breaks loose.

But lots and lots of small grammar and punctuation errors. Lots. Big deal? Not really because they're mostly all minor and easily fixed except for one biggy. A big no-no in any writing, is where two or more people are speaking, and the poor reader can't tell who's saying what without a program guide *Smile* Change those odd "a's" with the "hats" and dump them. There appears to be confusion concerning the use of quotes, also. That said, the fixes I suggest might be very helpful. Maybe not. You tell me.

You can't have it both ways. You can't retain this dramatic, single paragraph format, and at the same time, insert conversation and dialogue into it. Only two fixes are available to you.

1) The standard separate paragraph for each speaker that stands alone. Two peeps never speek in the same paragraph. Period. End of subject.

Or, 2) You keep the form and format as is, but only the girl speaks. The intruder remains silent, and does nothing, says nothing, that we don't see exclusively through the eyes and ears of the main character. It may even be more frightening if the intruder doesn't speak, but is more ominous, moot and mute but threatening, and the girl puts words into his mouth and idea into her own mind. This could be very cool. It could also have an extended ending if you wanted.

Let me know if this helps.
Bob
200
200
Review of Call of the Void  
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
Hi, this is nice work and I liked it very much. The timeless question of life and death so close they almost overlap one another. I've done exactly what you describe, and I think we would both be amazed (and shocked) as to how many others have "teased" themselves in similar fashion. I think the font should be at least twice as big. Some people have small computers *Smile* Since we don't know what Death is, you point out the bizarre nature of how we toy with something so profound. It draws us in, beckoning almost. But then we see that spot of green, so full of life, and the urge to rejoice in the light quickly dispels our dark fascination with the unthinkable and unknowable. Until another day. Very nice, congratulations, and welcome. Feel free to welcome me, also, as I'm a total noob who can't tell one icon from the next. I know a good little story when I read one, though.
Bob
212 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 9 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/timtuink/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/8