I was recently browsing the public reviews looking for something to read. I came across a public review from someone who claims to be a very young teenager. Since I knew the author I decided to look into this person's estimation of a great writer. I know everybody makes errors sometimes, but this writer seldom does with grammar, yet, this person questioned many things as being incorrect grammatically. Many of the "suggestions" are incorrect, very incorrect. So, I have decided to publically rebut the false information given in the review. Since the review was public, I can paste it below.
[The bright sun and balmy breeze tempted Karen to turn around and run from
the sorrow awaiting her and her brothers]
"her and her brothers" sounds a bit funny to me. I'm not sure if my suggestion
is grammatically correct, but how about "she and her brothers"?
The object form of the pronoun is needed in this case, so "her" is grammatically correct. Now others will think that she is right and will use it
incorrectly as a result.
[The house seemed sad to her since her mother’s death]
The "to her" is not necessary.
Maybe she was the only one who thought the house seemed sad. If so, then "to her" is necessary.
[Without looking toward the woman she knew would be scowling, Karen answered as she mounted the first steps of the polished mahogany stairs curving upward.
“I drove as fast as humanly possible, Bettia. New York is a few miles away.”]
I had to read this a few times to see what you meant. It sounds as if the segment before the first comma is something Karen is saying, or answering, only you forgot to put the quotes. So I would suggest to change the first comma to a period. The period after "upward" should be a comma.
Maybe she is very young since she couldn't understand what was written. Why would you change the first comma to a period? Then you would have a sentence fragment. No, a comma should not be after "upward." The line is saying that she
answered as she climbed the stairs.
[If a “lady” could snort, Bettia did.]
"lady" does not need to be in quotes.
Again she gives incorrect grammatical information Yes, "lady" did have to be in quotes since the opposite was meant.
[Not going. . . to get better.]
The dialogue reminds me of when people in cartoons say "must... get... better" or something like that. Putting an "I'm" at the beginning of this would take
away that thought. I know the person saying this is weak, but I still think it would be a change for the better.
Really, this is beyond nit-picking. A "thirteen-year-old" thinks her idea would be better? Apparently she hasn't been around anyone who is having trouble breathing and who is trying to talk. I have, and what was written is very realistic.
When a new quote is said, it should start a new paragraph, except for when it's one quote broken into two so the author can describe an action in between
them.
This really puzzled me. If the same person is talking, unless the subject is completely changed drastically, the dialogue is still in the same
paragraph. You don't put the dialogue from more than one person in the same paragraph.
[You better off . . . better than Phillip”]
Put a period after "Phillip".
Ah, she did really find something. I'll be the first to admit I have trouble seeing periods and commas on the screen anymore.
[Their father gathered strength to shout at his second child before a spasm
of coughing shook his thin frame.]
As a suggestion - put the word "enough" before "strength".
I have no idea why "enough" would need to be before "strength." The man gathered strength, period. Adding the word enough would be padding the
sentence.
This piece should be rated 13+. The description of what the half-brother did to animals and to that boy had pretty graphic adjectives. I'm not sure if
I'm correct or not, but it would be good to raise the content rating just to be safe.
To make her happy? She may be correct, so I request you up the content rating.
Maybe I have over reacted, but someone, who sets herself up as superior and trashes someone's work publically, needs to be sure she is correct.
In my opinion this work was technically a five. The author had no real errors to detract from the work.
Hugs
Becky
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
|
|