Reviewer's note: I'm offering this review as a participant in:
The comments below are just my opinion. Take only what you need and leave the rest, or leave it all. Ultimately, this is your piece and your voice.
My Personal Opinion:
This starts off on a great note - the opening bits of internal dialogue present conflict right away, sucking the reader in and making them wonder what happened.
The description throughout this piece is great - I can sense Annette's shifting combination of concern and irritation, and each setting was given enough description to cement it in my mind without bogging down the narration. The direct glimpses into her thoughts really helped add depth to the character and show that at her core, she's a caring mother trying to do what's best for a playful child.
The one thing I would have liked to know earlier on here was how old Thomas was. I got an impression from his hiding places of his size, but I think an age would have helped me better understand his level of comprehension in all of this.
I really like how you didn't say up front what new game Anette taught Thomas that trumped hide and seek. When I got to this point, the brief description clicked completely for me, and I laughed at the punchline. I've heard of parents who give children things like noisy toys, but teaching them innocent games to grate on each other's nerve's, that was a new twist.
This was a well told, playful story. I mentioned below that I felt the ending could be trimmed, but of course that's personal preference. To me, that was the biggest detractor in reading an otherwise fantastically written tale.
I have very few specific suggestions:
Now where did he go?
Annette scratched her head, trying to figure out where her son went.
He was just here a minute ago!
Thomas was something of a disappearing act.
To me, the second sentence here is redundant with the first, and I think you can move the needed information to the fourth. Suggestion:
Now where did he go?
Annette scratched her head, pondering the question.
He was just here a minute ago!
Her son Thomas was something of a disappearing act.
During a short trip to Target, he managed to disappear three times!
I don't think you need the exclamation mark here - to me it was distracting at this point.
The first was when she turned her attentions toward a great bathing suit in the clothing department.
This sentence is fine as it is, but with a little rearranging, I think it would have more pop, and I think you can remove 'in the clothing department' because that's implied.
The first was when a great bathing suit caught her eye.
climb under to rows of seats,
I think you meant 'two' instead of 'to'
The sandbox was just about the only thing in the backyard, and there weren't many places for him to hide... which is why she liked taking him out there to play.
I think you can remove the crossed out portion because you've repeated this thought in the next two sentences.
He debated Annette's offer.
Becuase we're seeing this consideration from Thomas' point of view, consider changing 'Anette' to 'Mom' or 'his mom'
"That's right," Annette confirmed with a satisfied smirk, as she moved to buckle Thomas into his car seat. "I spent all week looking for him and worrying. So now I'm returning the favor. Have fun chasing after him... and trying to get him to take his bath or brush his teeth when he won't let you near him!"
To me, this was too much additional explanation of what the overall plan was. I would have liked to see it just left with Earl finding out that the game was tag and slinking away in defeat. This felt to me like intrusion on the reader's imagination when you'd already laid out a heavy implication of what the results would be.
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
Let Your Muse Shine Through |