%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
 Tales from real life |
How high is up? Much like looking for your shadow on Groundhog Day, it's a matter of perspective. It depends on where you're standing, what you're looking at, how you measure, and where you measure from. As a child, I looked up at the peaks of the Rocky Mountains, 6,000 foot above our ranch in Montana, and said, "That's high!" As an adult, I can look up to the 14,400-foot peak of Mt. Rainier from the Seattle waterfront and say "Wow, that's really high!" Others might look up at the Matterhorn, Mt. Fuji, Mt. Kilimanjaro, Mauna Kea, or even Uluru with similar awe. And everyone believes that Mt. Everest is the highest peak of all at 29,032 feet, but is it really? Everest may be the highest point above sea level, but the surface of the sea is neither fixed nor level. It's subject to tidal forces and the whims of weather. And it wraps around a lumpy world that isn't a perfect sphere (science guys call it an oblate spheroid). Earth's rotation produces a centrifugal force that causes an outward bulge at the equator. When measured from the center of the earth, this bulge accounts for a nearly 14-mile difference in sea level between the poles and the equator. What? Sea level isn't level! How can that be? Well, take a look at a globe. Why doesn't all the water run down to Antarctica? The answer, of course, is gravity. Gravity pulls the oceans toward the center of the earth and that causes the water to spread out more or less evenly. But the equatorial bulge also means that there's about a 1% difference in gravity between the poles and the equator. For example, a bag of potatoes that weighs 100 pounds at the north pole weighs only 99 pounds at the equator. Centrifugal force and the gravitational gradient allow the oceans to conform to the earth's equatorial bulge instead of draining 'down' to the poles. So, how high is up? It really is a matter of perspective. Is a variable sea level our best reference point, or should we measure from the fixed point at the center of the earth? The accepted standard of sea level makes Everest the highest point at 29,032 feet. But Everest's peak is only 3965.8 miles from the earth's center. Ecuador's Mt. Chimborazo is only 20,500 feet above sea level, but it sits directly atop the earth's equatorial bulge. So, at 3967.1 miles, Chimborazo's peak is actually the highest as measured from the Earth’s center, a full 1.3 miles higher than Everest. Does our definition of high actually matter? Well, try looking at things from a different perspective. Look down instead of up. Pretend you're in a ship sailing over a reef. You wouldn't really care about how high the reef is above the seafloor. You'd be more concerned about hitting the coral head that sticks up the furthest toward the surface. Now pretend that you're an alien life form on a mission to observe the denizens of Earth. If you put your UFO into an extremely close orbit, then you're more likely to hit Chimborazo than Everest. So, from that perspective Mt. Chimborazo is the most dangerous (highest) peak that could rip a hole in your hull. And hitting it would really spoil your trip. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
