![]() |
A reviewing forum for those interested in improving their reviewing skills. |
Do you review Non-fiction? Almost exclusively. Poetry, biographies, letters, geez anything real. If no, why not? Do you have suggestions for reviewing Non-fiction? As a matter of fact, I sure do! I was actually considering a workshop type of deal in the newly created but not yet open WhataLand on reviewing non-fiction. Not that it is so very different, yet it IS really different. In non-fiction you travel to the writer's mind: why did they write this? Why did they choose this presentation or form? What motivated them? Is everything they say really true, or are they exaggerating a little or a lot? Were they in a particular mood or point in their life where this type of writing was a likely outcome? Do they show it in their writing? What about the history going on around them as they were writing? Yeah. I could talk about cats and non-fiction for weeks without much of a break methinks Anyways. Let me just say, that as a non-fiction wannabe writer, I love it when people ask questions in their reviews to me. I am a big girl, and I can decide what's too personal, and I can prevaricate or avoid with the best of them. However, I mostly just respond honestly, though if I don't feel like 'going there' at the time, that response to their review might be quite late in coming. Just, you know, in case anyone was wondering So if you want to know something about the author's motivations or thinking process, I say go ahead and ask them in your review-- worse they can do is not respond or be rude to you. In fact, I think this is how I've made most of my good friends here Oh gee look at the time. Must get back to reviewing fiction |