Reviewing with River

I am more a 'reader' type reviewer than a copy editor style. The most important positive I try to offer is how connected (lost) in what I read I was. What emotional effect it left me with, and what descriptive jewels of wording I enjoyed.

Negatives fall in two camps. New member posts get more passes and suggestions for things like Grammarly. For both new and longer members my negative list focuses on what distracts my reading flow (mechanics, lack of blank space, poor word choices).