![]() |
A reviewing forum for those interested in improving their reviewing skills. |
February 2019 Discussion Topic Reviewing Your Peers Update 13 Participants paddy1 bobturn Lilli ☕ 🎼 RRodgersWrites 🎶 QPdoll Mary Ann MCPhedran the Wordy Jay Whata WackyBrew charitykountz Quick-Quill Danger Mouse ♥HOOves♥ Dave Reviewing Your Peers. Remember that the time you spend reviewing is the price you pay for asking others to review your work. A completely negative review can do great damage to an author. You have an ethical responsibility to prepare a well balanced, helpful review of both strengths and weaknesses of the story. Do you agree with these two statements? Do you have anything to add? *These Monthly Discussion Topics are simply questions to spark a discussion.* There were mixed reactions to this topic. The problem was the use of the word ethical. I think Whata WackyBrew “Ethical = An ethical person refuses to go along because it violates honesty. ... Honesty is a moral characteristic, a virtue, and sometimes considered to equate with truthfulness yet there are differences. Honesty means you say what you sincerely believe to be true”. 1,000 GPs were sent to each participant. QPdoll Thanks to all who participated in this discussion. River |