Reviewing with River

Be a reader!

It's important to review as a reader, and as a fellow writer. We all know that reviewers are also writers. We also know that reviewers are expected to discuss literary devices, grammar, etc. However, it is also important to show the writer that you are also a reader. Let the writer know what aspects of their item worked for you (or didn't work), as a reader. Were you confused in any aspects of the plot, characters, setting, etc.? Give the writer your overall impression of their item.

Do you think this is good advice?

Do you review from a reader's point of view?

It's the best advice. If you read, you have a deeper understanding of how stories appeal (or not!) and how much pace, settling, plot, characterisation etc etc. matters. Reading in a wide range of genres is even more helpful as it gives you a better feel for the different conventions.

All my reviews are written from a readers point of view. Yes, I'll focus on how a writer structures a piece through different devices and conventions, but I'm responding on how it works for me as a reader.

Paddy

Invalid Photo #1053879
You can see more choreography
from my pen at my blog
www.verveview.com