\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
    May     ►
SMTWTFS
    
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Archive RSS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/blog/cathartes02/day/5-19-2025
Rated: 18+ · Book · Opinion · #2336646

Items to fit into your overhead compartment


Carrion Luggage

Blog header image

Native to the Americas, the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) travels widely in search of sustenance. While usually foraging alone, it relies on other individuals of its species for companionship and mutual protection. Sometimes misunderstood, sometimes feared, sometimes shunned, it nevertheless performs an important role in the ecosystem.

This scavenger bird is a marvel of efficiency. Rather than expend energy flapping its wings, it instead locates uplifting columns of air, and spirals within them in order to glide to greater heights. This behavior has been mistaken for opportunism, interpreted as if it is circling doomed terrestrial animals destined to be its next meal. In truth, the vulture takes advantage of these thermals to gain the altitude needed glide longer distances, flying not out of necessity, but for the joy of it.

It also avoids the exertion necessary to capture live prey, preferring instead to feast upon that which is already dead. In this behavior, it resembles many humans.

It is not what most of us would consider to be a pretty bird. While its habits are often off-putting, or even disgusting, to members of more fastidious species, the turkey vulture helps to keep the environment from being clogged with detritus. Hence its Latin binomial, which translates to English as "golden purifier."

I rarely know where the winds will take me next, or what I might find there. The journey is the destination.
May 19, 2025 at 10:38am
May 19, 2025 at 10:38am
#1089623
Earlier this month, I did an entry on smarts: "We Are Very SmartOpen in new Window.. In it, I said, referring to Richard Feynman, "I wish I could find out who said something like 'If you really want to learn something, figure out how to explain it to a fourth-grader.' I thought it was Feynman, but I'm having trouble finding the quote. If indeed it exists."

Well, I didn't find the exact quote, nor was I expecting to because I wasn't sure about its wording. But after I did that entry, I found the following article, an older one from Medium, and it describes a similar idea.



The famous Nobel winning physicist Richard Feynman understood the difference between “knowing something” and “knowing the name of something” and it’s one of the most important reasons for his success.

Well, that, and being really very insanely smart.

Feynman stumbled upon a formula for learning that ensured he understood something better than everyone else.

"Be very smart?"

There are four steps to the Feynman Technique.

Actually, there are five. The zeroth one is: you have to want to learn. Without that, you'll just be staring out the window, chin in palm, sighing, after asking "when are we ever going to use this in real life?"

Step 1: Teach it to a child

Write out what you know about the subject as if you were teaching it to a child.


This, I think, is from where I got the mangled quote above.

A lot of people tend to use complicated vocabulary and jargon to mask when they don’t understand something.

Yes, a lot of people do that, especially in the business world, which is all about optimizing synergies for sustainable innovative solutions to resource allocation issues (for example). But other people use it because it expresses nuance in a way that simpler near-synonyms cannot. While I agree that there's almost never a reason to use "utilize" instead of utilizing "use," "complicated vocabulary and jargon" are compression algorithms. Instead of using lots of words like "it's made up of different little parts that connect to each other" we can say "it's complicated."

Still, I agree with the basic idea: run a decompression routine on the jargon. Not only does that show you've got a handle on the subject matter, but it makes it easier to communicate to outsiders (and children).

There are, of course, three other steps, as the article notes. I don't need to reiterate them here. Mostly, I just wanted to clarify the Feynman connection from the earlier entry.

One thing I've found from experience is that teaching something (it doesn't necessarily have to be to a child) is a way to firm up and increase one's own knowledge of the subject matter. It may be one motivation for my blogging.


© Copyright 2025 Robert Waltz (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Robert Waltz has granted Writing.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work.

Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/blog/cathartes02/day/5-19-2025