%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
 As the first blog entry got exhausted. My second book |
| Evolution of Love Part 2 |
| Vadim Zeland is one of the most mysterious figures in contemporary Russian philosophy. He deliberately shields his personal details from public view. He refuses to become a celebrity. When asked "Who are you, Vadim Zeland?", he typically responds with a single word: "Nobody." What little we know comes from brief autobiographical notes in his books. Zeland states that before the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, he worked as a quantum mechanics physicist. After the Soviet era ended, he transitioned into computer technology. Then, in the 2000s, he began writing books that would eventually become international bestsellers and spark a global movement. Zeland's nationality is Russian, or more precisely, he says, a quarter Estonian. He's over fifty years old. He lives in Russia. Beyond these sparse details, he maintains almost complete anonymity. He explains his reasoning: "Fame turns against you, if you give in to temptation and climb up on a pedestal for all to see. You can distribute a product of personal creativity; but release your personality for mass circulation—never." Zeland positions himself not as the creator of his philosophy but as a "retranslator" of ancient knowledge. "My biography cannot and should not be a matter of interest," he writes, "since I am not the creator of Transurfing, only a 'retranslator.' It is essential that we be nothing—an empty vessel, so that we do not impose our personal distortions onto this ancient Knowledge." But whatever Zeland's origins or motivations, what he created—or retranslated—has captivated millions of people worldwide. He calls it Reality Transurfing. The central premise is both simple and revolutionary: reality is not a single, fixed entity. Instead, infinite parallel realities—what Zeland calls "life tracks"—already exist simultaneously. Every possible version of your life is already playing out somewhere in what he terms the "Space of Variations." These parallel realities are not theoretical constructs or distant alternatives. According to Zeland, they exist here and now, layered on top of each other like radio frequencies. The question, then, is not how to create or manifest a desired reality. The question is how to tune into it—how to slide from the life track you currently occupy to the one where your goals already exist. Zeland's answer challenges both traditional goal-setting wisdom and New Age manifestation techniques. The key, he argues, is not desire, not visualization, not positive thinking, and certainly not struggle or force. The key is what Zeland calls "importance" and "excess potential." In Transurfing theory, importance is the weight or significance you assign to something. When you desperately want something, when you attach enormous meaning to a goal, when you convince yourself that your happiness depends on achieving it, you create excess potential—an energetic imbalance in the field of reality. This imbalance, Zeland argues, actually pushes your desired reality away from you. The universe automatically works to eliminate excess potential by creating obstacles and resistance. Think of it like this: if you're completely relaxed about something, if it feels like no big deal, there's no energetic imbalance to correct. The reality where you have that thing can flow naturally to you—or more accurately, you can slide naturally onto the life track where it already exists. This is why Zeland teaches what might be called the "no-big-deal" approach. Treat your goals with calm indifference. Yes, know what you want. Yes, move toward it. But release the desperate attachment. Stop assigning it paramount importance. The more relaxed and detached you become, the faster opportunities manifest. This isn't passivity or lack of ambition. It's a fundamental shift in how you relate to outcomes. Zeland describes it as the difference between outer intention (force, struggle, trying to make things happen) and inner intention (choosing a reality, coordinating heart and mind, allowing the life track to shift). In traditional goal pursuit, you identify what you want, work extremely hard, overcome obstacles, push through resistance, and eventually—maybe—achieve success through sheer willpower. This is outer intention. You're trying to force reality to bend to your will. In Transurfing, you identify what you want, reduce its importance, maintain a relaxed inner state, choose the reality where it already exists, and simply slide onto that life track. This is inner intention. You're not changing reality; you're selecting a different reality. Like tuning a radio, you're not creating the station—you're just shifting your frequency to match it. Zeland supports this metaphysical model with elements borrowed from quantum physics—particularly the many-worlds interpretation and observer effects. While mainstream physicists might dispute how literally these principles apply to everyday life, Zeland's training as a quantum physicist gives his work a technical vocabulary and conceptual framework that distinguishes it from purely spiritual or mystical teachings. But Zeland himself emphasizes that you don't need to accept his theoretical model for Transurfing to work. The techniques stand on their own. You can practice them pragmatically, test them empirically, and judge them by results. The practical methods include: The Slide: Consciously choosing and visualizing yourself already existing in the desired reality. Not as future fantasy, but as present fact that exists on a parallel life track. Reducing Importance: Systematically identifying what you've assigned excess importance to—relationships, money, status, goals—and deliberately reducing the emotional weight. Not by giving up or not caring, but by cultivating calm confidence that everything is already fine. Coordination of Heart and Mind: Learning to distinguish between goals your mind thinks you should want (based on conditioning, social pressure, or logical reasoning) and goals your heart genuinely resonates with (based on authentic desire and natural affinity). Zeland argues that forcing yourself toward mind-goals while ignoring heart-goals keeps you stuck on an unsuitable life track. Freiling: A technique of energetic cleansing—releasing resentment, guilt, negative emotions, and energetic hooks that keep you attached to undesired life tracks. The Pendulum Concept: Zeland describes "pendulums" as energetic structures created by groups of people thinking similar thoughts—religions, political movements, fandoms, ideologies. These pendulums feed on human energy and try to draw people into their orbit. Learning to recognize and step away from destructive pendulums is crucial to maintaining the freedom to choose your life track. Zeland first posted his text on the Internet in the early 2000s. The response was immediate and overwhelming. Readers reported that it actually worked. They described experiences of reality shifting in inexplicable ways—synchronicities, sudden opportunities, obstacles dissolving, goals manifesting with unexpected ease. The idea of "Transurfing Reality" quickly gained popularity. Publishers decided to release Zeland's manuscript based on numerous reviews saying it really worked and the author's original take on the structure of reality. In 2005 and 2006, Reality Transurfing became the top non-fiction bestseller in the world. The books have now been translated into dozens of languages. The phrase most commonly found in reviews? "It works!" But Transurfing also attracted criticism. Skeptics dismissed it as pseudoscience wrapped in quantum terminology. Some accused Zeland of appropriating concepts from Buddhism, particularly Dzogchen teachings and the work of Buddhist teacher Tarthang Tulku, and repackaging them with a Western scientific veneer. Others worried that the philosophy could become a form of spiritual bypassing—encouraging people to reduce importance and stay detached rather than addressing real problems or taking concrete action. Zeland himself addresses some of these concerns. He acknowledges that Transurfing shares elements with various spiritual traditions but insists he's presenting something distinct—a practical method for managing reality, not a religion or belief system. He also warns against certain dangers. For instance, he cautions that the practice of lucid dreaming can be risky, though his warning has nothing to do with religious doctrine and everything to do with energetic mechanics he observed through his research. By 2016, the movement had grown large enough that an International Transurfing Institute was founded, offering the only English-language instructional program officially approved by Zeland. Certified instructors now teach Transurfing techniques worldwide. Online communities of "Transurfers" share experiences, discuss principles, and support each other in applying the methods. What makes Transurfing compelling to many practitioners is that it offers both a philosophical model and a practical toolkit. You don't need to become a mystic or adopt a new belief system. You can approach it pragmatically: here are the techniques, try them, see what happens. Zeland himself claims the only proof he offers of Transurfing's validity is this: "Regarding my own success, all I can say is that Transurfing works perfectly." Whether Reality Transurfing represents a genuine discovery about the nature of reality or simply a clever reframing of perennial wisdom wrapped in modern language, it has undeniably resonated with millions of people seeking greater control over their lives. The philosophy taps into several contemporary cultural currents: quantum physics mysticism, the law of attraction, mindfulness, manifestation techniques, and the broader self-help movement. But Transurfing also offers something different from typical manifestation teachings. The emphasis on reducing importance rather than increasing desire feels counterintuitive. The focus on sliding between existing realities rather than creating new ones represents a fundamentally different metaphysical assumption. And the integration of quantum concepts—however loosely applied—gives the system an intellectual framework that appeals to people uncomfortable with purely mystical explanations. Zeland's deliberately mysterious persona adds to the intrigue. In an age of personal branding and self-promotion, his refusal to become a public figure is unusual. He genuinely seems to mean it when he says his biography is irrelevant. He wants Transurfing to stand on its own merits, tested by practitioners and judged by results, without the distraction of guru worship or personality cults. "The secret itself that is hidden only in as much as it lies on the surface is so great," Zeland writes, "that the personality of its bearer ceases to be relevant." Today, whether you view it as breakthrough metaphysical discovery or skillful repackaging of ancient wisdom, Reality Transurfing has carved out a significant place in contemporary consciousness. It reminds us that changing your relationship to reality—reducing importance, releasing attachment, coordinating heart and mind—might be more powerful than any amount of force or struggle. As Zeland puts it: "Reality ceases to exist as something external and independent, and becomes manageable if you follow certain rules." The man himself remains in the shadows, preferring to be "nobody." But his ideas about parallel realities, importance reduction, and sliding between life tracks continue to influence how millions of people think about possibility, manifestation, and the nature of reality itself. Whether it works? Zeland would say there's only one way to find out: try it and see. |
| At 24, Tom Hardy was dying. Not slowly—quickly, violently, with every line of cocaine and every bottle he emptied trying to silence the screaming in his head. In 2003, Tom Hardy wasn't the brooding action star who would become Bane or Mad Max. He wasn't the acclaimed actor collecting awards and respect. He was a young man from East London destroying himself as fast as humanly possible. "I was a shameful suburban statistic," he later said. "I was a criminal. I was a wreck." His addiction started early. Alcohol first, then cocaine, then crack cocaine. By his early twenties, Hardy wasn't just using—he was disappearing into substances, erasing himself one hit at a time. He'd landed small roles—a brief appearance in Black Hawk Down (2001), a part in Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)—but his career was secondary to his next fix. Success meant nothing when you're chasing oblivion. "I would have sold my mother for a rock of crack," Hardy admitted years later, unflinchingly honest about how far he'd fallen. The addiction consumed everything. Relationships disintegrated. Opportunities vanished. The person he'd been—whoever that was—got buried under the chaos of active addiction. Hardy has described that period as being "a very bad boy," but the reality was darker than mischief. It was self-destruction. It was a young man trying to kill the pain by killing himself slowly. He hit bottom hard. The specific details of his rock bottom moment, Hardy has kept mostly private—perhaps because shame still lives there, or perhaps because the exact circumstances matter less than the fact that he finally saw himself clearly: if he didn't stop, he would die. "I couldn't continue with the beatings," he said. "I was out of control." In 2003, at 25 years old, Tom Hardy entered rehab. There was no dramatic intervention from Hollywood producers. No concerned directors rescuing their star. Just a young addict who'd finally run out of road and stumbled into treatment because the alternative was death. Rehab wasn't glamorous. It was brutally, painfully honest. Hardy has spoken about the humility required in recovery—the stripping away of ego, the confrontation with truth, the daily work of rebuilding yourself from nothing. "You can't act your way out of it," he said. "You have to actually do the work." So he did the work. Twelve-step programs. Therapy. Meetings. The unglamorous, repetitive, essential labor of staying sober one day at a time. And something shifted. Hardy stopped running from himself. He stopped using substances to hide from pain and started learning to live with discomfort, with honesty, with reality. When he returned to acting after getting sober, he was different. Directors noticed immediately. There was a rawness to him now, an intensity that came from someone who'd genuinely looked into the abyss and climbed back out. In 2008, he took on Bronson—playing Britain's most violent prisoner, Charles Bronson, in a performance that was terrifying, vulnerable, and utterly fearless. Hardy gained significant weight and muscle, shaved his head, and inhabited the role with a ferocity that announced: a major talent had arrived. "That was me saying thank you for still being alive," Hardy later reflected. Then came Inception (2010), where he held his own alongside Leonardo DiCaprio. Then Warrior (2011), where he played a tortured fighter seeking redemption—a role that felt achingly personal. His performance was raw physical and emotional violence channeled into art. Critics couldn't look away. Audiences were transfixed. Here was an actor who didn't perform emotion—he lived it, bled it, gave everything to every role. Hardy's post-sobriety career became a testament to what happens when you stop running from your demons and start channeling them. Bane in The Dark Knight Rises (2012). Max Rockatansky in Mad Max: Fury Road (2015). Both Kray twins in Legend (2015). Venom. Alfie Solomons in Peaky Blinders—a character so magnetic that fans demanded his return even after his character died. Each role carried the weight of someone who understood darkness intimately. But Hardy never pretended the battle was over. "The demon is always there," he's said. "That darkness doesn't vanish. You just learn to live with it instead of letting it drive." He remains vigilant about his sobriety—over twenty years now. He doesn't drink. He doesn't use. He attends meetings. He does the daily work that keeps him alive. And he's unflinchingly honest about it. In interviews, Hardy doesn't shy away from discussing his addiction. He doesn't sanitize it or turn it into a redemption arc with a neat bow on top. He talks about it like what it is: an ongoing relationship with a part of himself that will always be there. "I'm an addict," he says simply. "I'll always be an addict. I just don't use anymore." That honesty has made him a quiet inspiration to others struggling with addiction. He doesn't preach or lecture. He just lives his truth publicly: recovery is possible, but it's daily work, not a destination. Hardy has also spoken about therapy, about continuing to unpack trauma, about the importance of mental health alongside sobriety. "I wasn't a nice person," he's said about his using days. "I needed to be stopped." Today, Tom Hardy is a father, a husband, a successful actor, and a man who's rebuilt his life from the absolute wreckage of addiction. But he's also still in recovery. Still doing the work. Still showing up to meetings. Still grateful for every day he doesn't use. Because he knows how close he came to never making it out. The roles he chooses now often reflect someone grappling with darkness—broken men seeking redemption, violent men trying to change, complicated anti-heroes navigating moral gray zones. "Every character since I got sober," Hardy has said, "is me working something out." His story isn't the typical Hollywood redemption arc where someone hits bottom, gets clean, and everything becomes perfect. It's messier and more honest than that. It's a story about a man who nearly destroyed himself, who got help, who does the daily unglamorous work of staying sober, who channels his darkness into art, and who refuses to pretend he's "fixed." Tom Hardy didn't conquer his demons. He learned to coexist with them. He stopped letting addiction steer and started steering himself. At 24, he was dying in the streets of London, lost in addiction. At 47, he's one of the most respected actors working today, over two decades sober, still showing up to do the work. That's not just survival. That's transformation—one honest day at a time. |
| He was 60 years old with a 40-year career when he joined MASH in Season 4—replacing a beloved character who'd just been killed off. The cast was grieving. Fans were furious. Then Harry Morgan gave one of the greatest TV performances ever—and helped create the most-watched episode in television history. September 1975. Harry Morgan received a phone call that would define the final chapter of his career. MASH producers wanted him to join the show. But there was a problem: he'd be replacing McLean Stevenson, whose character Colonel Henry Blake had just been killed in one of the most shocking moments in television history. Fans were devastated and angry. Henry Blake had been the heart of MASH—bumbling, warm, deeply human. His death in a plane crash had left audiences in tears and outrage. Now they wanted Harry Morgan to replace him. "I was terrified," Morgan later admitted. "How do you follow that? The audience loved Henry. They were mourning him. And here I come, this old guy, trying to fill those shoes." But here's what most people didn't realize: Harry Morgan wasn't some unknown actor desperate for a break. He was already a legend. By 1975, Harry Morgan had been acting for over 40 years. He'd appeared in more than 100 films. He'd co-starred in High Noon with Gary Cooper. He'd been in Inherit the Wind, The Ox-Bow Incident, and dozens of other classic films. Most famously, he'd played Officer Bill Gannon on Dragnet for years—a role that made him a household name. Harry Morgan didn't need MASH. But MASH desperately needed him. When McLean Stevenson left the show (he thought he'd become a movie star; his post-MASH career flopped), the producers faced a crisis. Henry Blake's death had been shocking, but now they needed a new commanding officer who could anchor the show. They couldn't just copy Henry Blake. They needed someone completely different—someone who could bring authority, wisdom, and depth without trying to replicate what Stevenson had done. They created Colonel Sherman T. Potter: a career Army officer, a veteran of World War I, a man who'd seen too much war but still believed in decency and doing the right thing. And they cast the 60-year-old Harry Morgan—a man who could bring gravitas, humor, and humanity without trying to be anyone but himself. Harry's first episode aired in September 1975. Fan reaction was... cautious. They missed Henry. They weren't sure about this new, older, more serious commanding officer. But something remarkable happened: Harry Morgan didn't try to make audiences love him immediately. He just played Potter honestly—gruff when necessary, kind when needed, always principled. And slowly, audiences fell in love with Colonel Potter. Alan Alda (Hawkeye) later said: "Harry brought something the show desperately needed. After Henry's death, we needed someone who felt like he could hold us together. Harry was that person—both on screen and off." Behind the scenes, Harry Morgan became the emotional anchor of the cast. At 60, he was older than most of his co-stars. He'd seen more, lived more, experienced more. When young actors struggled with the heavy material—episodes about death, trauma, the cost of war—Harry was there with quiet wisdom. "He never lectured," cast member Mike Farrell (B.J. Hunnicutt) recalled. "He'd just tell you a story from his own life, or make a joke to lighten the mood, or put a hand on your shoulder. He led by example." The show tackled increasingly serious material as it progressed. What had started as a comedy became something deeper—a show about the trauma of war, the cost of violence, the struggle to maintain humanity in inhumane circumstances. Harry Morgan understood that weight. He'd lived through World War II. He'd known veterans. He brought that understanding to every scene. "There were episodes that destroyed me," he later admitted. "You can't spend a day pretending you're in a war—even a pretend war—without feeling something real." By the early 1980s, MASH was the most popular show on television. It had evolved from a sitcom into something unprecedented—a show that made audiences laugh and cry, often in the same episode. And Colonel Potter had become one of the most beloved characters on television—not despite being different from Henry Blake, but because he was different. Then came 1983. After 11 seasons, MASH was ending. The final episode—"Goodbye, Farewell and Amen"—aired on February 28, 1983. One hundred and twenty-five million Americans watched. It remains the most-watched television episode in U.S. history. The episode was 2.5 hours long, dealing with the immediate aftermath of the Korean War's end. It was devastating, beautiful, and emotionally exhausting. Harry Morgan's final scene as Colonel Potter was simple: he rides away from the 4077th on his horse, Sophie, one last time. Before leaving, he salutes the camp. Harry later said that scene broke him. "I couldn't separate Harry from Potter anymore. We'd lived together for eight years. Saying goodbye to that camp felt like saying goodbye to part of my life." When filming wrapped, the cast held each other and wept. They'd been together for over a decade. They'd created something historic. And it was over. Harry Morgan, at 67, had just completed one of the greatest performances in television history. After MASH ended, Harry continued acting for another 20 years. He appeared in dozens of films and TV shows. But he always said MASH was special. "I did a lot of good work," he said in a late interview. "But MASH was different. It meant something. We weren't just entertaining people—we were making them think, making them feel." The show's anti-war message, delivered through comedy and drama, influenced an entire generation. It showed that television could be art. That sitcoms could tackle serious themes. That you could make audiences laugh and then break their hearts in the same episode. And Colonel Potter—the gruff, decent, horse-loving career officer who believed in doing the right thing even when everything else was wrong—became a moral center for the show. Harry Morgan brought that character to life with such honesty that millions of Americans saw him as a father figure, a mentor, a representation of the best kind of leadership. Harry Morgan died in 2011 at age 96. He'd lived a long, full life filled with remarkable work. But his obituaries all led with the same thing: Colonel Sherman T. Potter. The role he'd been terrified to take. The character he'd created at age 60. The performance that defined the final chapter of his career. At his memorial, Alan Alda said: "Harry gave MASH its soul. When Henry Blake died, we needed someone to hold us together. Harry didn't just hold us together—he made us better. The show, the cast, all of us. We were better because Harry was there." That's the real legacy: not just a great performance, but a man who made everyone around him better. Harry Morgan joined MASH at 60, replacing a beloved character, facing angry fans, terrified he'd fail. He gave one of the greatest performances in television history, helped create the most-watched episode ever, and became the moral heart of one of TV's most important shows. And he did it by just being Harry—decent, honest, funny, and deeply human. Colonel Potter saluted the 4077th one last time in 1983. But Harry Morgan's legacy salutes us still—reminding us that doing the right thing, leading with decency, and treating people with respect never goes out of style. Even in war. Especially in war. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
