%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
 |
A honest look at the realities of giving thoughtful feedback in an automated review system |
|
Some context seems to be missing from this discussion. Reviews are assigned at random—I don’t get to select pieces that align with my personal taste or creative momentum. As a result, not every piece immediately sparks an effortless, flowing critique. That isn’t a judgment of the author; it’s simply the reality of a volume-based system. Some work requires more intentional effort to identify structure, strengths, and areas for growth. When that happens, I choose to engage more deeply rather than defaulting to surface-level or generic feedback. The goal is always the same: to provide something thoughtful, organized, and genuinely useful to the writer. If the expectation is that every review should come effortlessly regardless of circumstances, then we’re prioritizing convenience over quality. I’m more interested in the outcome—whether the feedback actually helps—than in policing the process behind it. Professional standards don’t disappear just because the system is automated. |
| This book is currently empty. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
Puzzle Hub
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
