Welcome!
You have some very well-placed details, my favorite being the characteristic "smell of old books and flowers" Samuel carries with him. Overall, the passage is well-structured, and the imagery used to characterize Samuel Harrison flows well.
I do, however, have a few minor suggestions.
Often, you have words or phrases that, though they are not grammatically incorrect, may assist the flow of the passage better by either removing or altering them.
In the second sentence, the comma between "chatter" and "among" is unnecessary. It forces a pause in the sentence that halts the flow of the imagery. In addition, the "about" that comes after "discussed" in the next sentence is also not needed.
In the third sentence, you describe the "young service men and women" to be "serving cream teas to passengers," although you use "were serving." This is not wrong, however, the sentence may be improved by using "served" instead. This way, any "wordiness" can be eliminated.
In the fifth paragraph, Samuel is revealed to be "perfectly content with the comfort of his own solitude." Because you have already stated that he is "content" with solitude, to say he holds "comfort in his own solitude" is repetitive.
Also, Mr. Harrison is described to hold "few associates and even fewer friends, if any." The "if any" reads almost as an afterthought, and by moving it up in the sentence, perhaps after "fewer," the phrase will be emphasized more than if it falls after "friends."
This next suggestion is very much my personal opinion. I would add "potential" before the word "embarrassment" in the fifth paragraph. Technically, Samuel is not afraid of "embarrassment" itself, but more so the thought of his own embarrassment (which, consequently has not occurred yet, and so would be "potential".) This just helps accentuate his unwillingness to engage with others.
When you are listing actions, (ex. "Every time a fellow passenger glanced in his direction, or one of the perfect smile servers would enquire about the quality of his service, his heart would race and he would fear improbable events." ) try to keep the tenses or suffixes of your verbs the same. In this case, because you used "glanced," in the first part of the sentence, use "enquir[ed]" instead of "would enquire" for the server's actions. Once again, this just helps with the flow of the sentence. (I would also add "their" instead of "his" to the line that states-"or one of the perfect smile servers would enquire about the quality of his service,"- only to clarify that it is the server's who are servicing Samuel. By saying "his" it can seem like Samuel is doing the serving, (which of course is not the case.) Its just a matter of using vague pronouns which can apply to either of the two parties.
One more thing, there are a few circumstances where your contractions are missing apostrophes;
-paragraph three; it should be "didn't"
-paragraph five; it should be "wasn't"
Hopefully my review is beneficial. If you have any questions about my response, or if I interpreted something incorrectly, or even failed to explain a correction adequately, please notify me.
Thanks for sharing!
|