*Magnify*
    November     ►
SMTWTFS
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Archive RSS
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/blog/bobinusa
Rated: 18+ · Book · Writing · #2186286
Musings on writing
Occasional entries
Previous ... -1- 2 3 4 5 ... Next
May 25, 2022 at 4:50pm
May 25, 2022 at 4:50pm
#1032852
Want to understand yourself? Discover the concise but comprehensive theory of mind arising from sensation, learning, memory, and knowledge.

It's taken me several years, a pair of development editors, and numerous copyedits, but Neural Almost Gate subtitle How Neurons Shape Thought is now available.

Amazon  
Other online book vendors  .

Burning Thoughts
February 28, 2022 at 12:34am
February 28, 2022 at 12:34am
#1027583

Methods

  1. Persuasion. Change minds of Influencers.

  2. Rationality. Convince Rule Makers of need for change.

  3. Resistance. Protests against Enforcement of the status quo.

Styles

  1. Effete. Assumes proper belief will automatically win an argument.

  2. Normal. Clearly stated positions and adequate responses to contrary beliefs will win.

  3. Over-The-Top. Cater to opposition\'s personal desires plus the normal style.

A Dream

I had a dream I had to convince the Rule Makers, The Powers that Be, to change the status quo.

Starting with an effete style of achieving method 2 doesn\'t establish a social bond with the Rule Makers. A cold pitch of facts is organized by interpretations of personal beliefs, trusted authorities, and desired end state. This works but rarely, as the status quo has an entrenched explanation of its impact and its shortcomings. The effete argument only presents the argument for change. It ignores the worldview supported by the rule, law, or taboo (resulting in say economic inequality). Thus the effete attempt in Method 2 is highly unlikely to be successful.

I tried again with a normal style of attempting method 2 to a small group of Rule Makers. I had time to be Over-The-Top, but didn\'t. Instead of preparing a meal over which the discussion would take place, I rested on the belief my position was logical and my arguments against the contrary arguments were strong. However, I overlooked the personal benefit of the status quo to those in charge.

The Over-The-Top approach to Method 2 relies on three types of persuasions to those in power.

  • An event that gets them in a complacent state of mine. Perhaps a retreat in a tourist locale, arranged for sating their desires. If possible, having the event violate a minor rule, establishing a rapport with the group.

  • A small, social dinner prepared by a professional staff. A gorgeous waiting room for before and after drinks (watered-down) and discussion. Place-setting swag to remind them of the fine occasion, embossed with a catchy phrase.

  • A short, cogent post-dinner speech. It must acknowledge the deleterious changes to those favored by the status quo. That should be done with wit, perhaps mentioning other remaining perks from other aspects of the status quo.

I awoke, tired from mental jujitsu.

December 3, 2021 at 9:34pm
December 3, 2021 at 9:34pm
#1022746
A few days ago, a foreign doctor with English as a second language gave an interview on COVID in his country. He sounded barely literate, making me wonder if he was right on the facts I could pick out of his answers.

Epiphany!

My prose could jar discriminating readers to dismiss my points as easily as the foreign doctor had confounded my confidence in his statements.


Burning Thoughts

PS Copyediting is important not solely to clarify prose, but to make my ideas understandable to readers.

PPS I have started using ProWritingAid
October 5, 2021 at 3:19pm
October 5, 2021 at 3:19pm
#1018754
I thought A Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet was sci fi, but discovered it's only sci fi if Gulliver's Travels is sci fi. Becky Chambers' novel has thinly disguised aliens standing in for LGBT characters. The multi-species crew gets along fine, although some encounters with officialdom are dangerous.

Still trying to finish the book, but it's slow going. The novel lacks real tension and building momentum.

I was ready to chuck it into the uncompleted book shelf, but then Chambers introduced a virus that affects thinking. The virus turns out to be a religious belief.

Some more pages call to be read.

Burning Thoughts
September 26, 2021 at 5:12pm
September 26, 2021 at 5:12pm
#1018089

PBI Anti-Vax Logic

Why do some people think that vaccination is unwise?

Answer 1. Don\'t chance a bad side effect from the vaccine. God is already protecting the righteous (self).

Answer 2. It\'s bad ethics to get the vaccine.

Other anti-Vax arguments remind me of the Trolley Problem in ethics. The trolley is barreling down the tracks, heading towards five people. If you do nothing, the five will be killed. However, there is a switch you could throw. It causes the trolley to change its path. That would save the five, but would kill another person who is standing on the other track.

Even professional philosophers disagree on the trolley problem\'s ethical solution. 70% would throw the switch, reckoning that one dying versus five is an ethical tradeoff, but 8% said they would not throw the switch and 22% couldn\'t answer yes or no. That is 30% opt for no action.

Although the situation is different, it has strong similarities. If one chooses the vaccine, There can be a high impact (although with low probability) of the decision killing oneself, while no choosing have a low chance of being the identified cause of a person dying from covid-19.

That nearly mimics the 2/3 of adults who have accepted the vaccine (act) and the 1/3 that hasn\'t (don\'t act).

Of course, that earthquakes, volcanoes, floods and fires are acts of God are not countenanced when the vaccine is discussed among anti-vaxxers.

Usually they stay into the same memory dust heap as all the other precautions taken without second thought. Examples such as many other vaccines, seat belts, not leaving loaded guns where children can pick them up, and locking the door would fail the \"don\'t take action\" posture of anti-vax.



September 16, 2021 at 5:44pm
September 16, 2021 at 5:44pm
#1017562
I read Artemis by Andy Weir for a relaxing, escapist adventure. Life in Moon colony, the domes, economy, and cultural attitudes successfully accomplished that.

In the latter half of the book, I took to skimming. Jazz, the lead and point of view character, was not bound by laws or regulations, but the caper details were too intricate. More attention was paid to its details than to characters. A hallmark of non-literary sci fi.

Andy Weir is a male writer of Jazz, a female lead. That was not successful from my perspective. It does bring up the interesting question: what makes a woman character seem like a woman? And a man a man? Unfortunately, all I have is the question, not the answer. Difficult enough without even considering the full gamut of LGBT and ‘others’.

Two important considerations are the reader’s arriving attitude and the author’s backstory to support the character's motivations and actions.

This question came up in two writer classes I was in, both taught by women. One insisted that any character can be any gender. The other insisted that social conventions mold genders are that cannot be ignored. Those two positions are not absolutely contradictory, but they do indicate the writer must take additional care when their lead character is not their own sex.

Why do you think?





Burning Thoughts
August 29, 2021 at 5:43pm
August 29, 2021 at 5:43pm
#1016326

Not everyone has the time, interest, or skill necessary to give a detailed, writerly review.

A reader's review gives useful feedback on a story, by indicating specific areas that are successful as well as unsuccessful. Changes or fixes are typically not suggested.

Indicating three or four particular sections are sufficient to communicate the reader's reaction to the writer.

Another name for the Reader's Review could be the ABC plus D Review.

A - Top Grade. This sentence or paragraph is clearly communicated and interests the reader.

B - Belief is difficult. The reader disbelieves this part of the story.

C - Confused. The reader doesn't understand this sentence or paragraph.

D - Don't care. This section does not interest the reader.



August 3, 2021 at 10:11pm
August 3, 2021 at 10:11pm
#1015099

My daughter stopped over and returned two books she had borrowed several years ago. I was surprised and glad to see them again.

A Gentleman in Moscow is wonderfully told by Amor Towles. The period after the Russian Revolution was brought alive, revealing a reality I had not understood.

Here by Richard McQuire is a graphic novel that shows the happenings in the area now occupied by the living room of house over many time periods. With few words and many pictures a literary style is developed.

July 27, 2021 at 9:41pm
July 27, 2021 at 9:41pm
#1014628
Science is not a search for truth. It is a pragmatic effort to explain the world in terms that we can manipulate.
         1 String theory is not science, but philosophy … until it can measure something
         2 Quantum theory is not truth but useful to manipulating nature.

Facts sometimes may not be accepted by logical demonstration, because resistance is based on maintaining one’s position in the dispute, not the truth or falsity of the facts.
         3 Spouse: I’m not listening to you. You are always trying to prove me wrong and undermine my ideas. Go away with your highfalutin arguments.
         4 Surely, some aspect of this must be part of the dynamics in political disputes.

Governmental budgets can be in deficit as long as the fraction is less than GDP or asset growth.
         5 Yearly government deficits have not brought economic collapse.
         6 Huge deficits since 2007, for one emergency after another, have not led to ruin.
         7 Gov’t infusions of cash have led to financial asset inflation, not to CPI inflation.

Burning Thoughts
July 24, 2021 at 11:23pm
July 24, 2021 at 11:23pm
#1014263
It's time to take measure.
D.L. Hughes' advice: stick to one story world with 10-15 short stories each of about the same length. Use same main character, have some continuing characters.

I picked an opening story of Tales of a Programmer’s Cubicle. I have a handful of stories in that world, although with differing background characters and widely varying lengths.

I gave it a month. I applied myself to the story as my primary effort. After 2 drafts (each 9,000 words) and 2 revisions, I was unhappy with the result. The story was weak and forced. The writing was slack, unfocused and too centered on that the lead character thought.

Of the other hand, I was encouraged by the exercise of writing 1,000 words each day. Also, I see how to strengthen the next revision which follows the current story structure, by cutting much POV commentary, strengthening a supporting character, and adding a deadline to tighten the action and clarify that the story has a firmer ending.

In the revision, I will keep the scene beats at hand to cut me on focus.

For the investment of a month, I’ve learned it’ll take me 6 to 8 wks to complete a longish short story (~6000-7000 words). To do 10-15 such stories will take more than a year and a half.

I am returning my focus to Mental Construction ebook. It’s written and is ready for revision. I can pick up on the programmer tales when I am not swamped with other writing activities.

A worthwhile endeavor which will continue to pay dividends. I wish I had enough energy and time to take on every task that occurs to me.




Burning Thoughts

47 Entries · *Magnify*
Page of 5 · 10 per page   < >
Previous ... -1- 2 3 4 5 ... Next

© Copyright 2022 Burning Thoughts (UN: bobinusa at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Burning Thoughts has granted Writing.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work.

Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/blog/bobinusa