Thank you for entering "Invalid Item"
Positives:
The theme of this story is a good one. Fear is an illness and it's infectious.
There are some great moments. For example, He shrieked in agony as he felt his wrist snap backwards and his hip dislocate, this is chillingly vivid.
Negatives:
The language is archaic, and out of place in twenty-first century America. Eg, "Ah, yes, burial laws. You are correct, my dear fellow," Not even the Queen speaks in such tortuous 18th century style.
Suggestions:
The opening sentence: describing the snow fallling is not a great opening, being just one step away from, "It was a dark and stormy night."
The use of the word "freefall" is erroneous. Freefall is the plummeting before a parachute deploys. A snowflake, because it is its own parachute, does not fit the freefall image.
Second paragraph: if the reception is important, why not start the story there? Open with a live scene, with dialogue. Giving the character's opinion, like this, – none of whom he particularly cared for – is not strong. It would be much better to show his dislike in his mannerisms or conversation while talking with them.
As they had droned on about their prestigious bloodlines this general description of behaviour would be fine in a synopsis, but in a story you need to be specific. Give some examples of the conversation, as part of a carefully constructed scene. When a narrator starts telling the reader what to think about characters the game is up. Remember; a writer invites the reader into his creation. He doesn't ask him to peer in through a dirty window.
Here, you have an interesting snippet of information, but it's presented poorly. Proud that he had created for himself a kind of modern-day Leichenhaus – hospitals for the dead, developed in the late 1700s, where corpses were watched for three days to ensure they were, in fact, dead
Here's a suggested alternative, Charles had modelled his contingency on the Leichenhauses of the late 18th century. Literally a corpse house, the leichenhaus was a mortuary specifically designed to allow dead bodies three days grace before burial. The Lichenhaus keepers, and Charles, were reassured that a body showing no signs of life in three days on a cold slab, were unlikely to spring to life after burial. My version makes more of a point of this fascinating piece of information, stitching it into the narrative, rather than chucking it in like a footnote.
Keep the style simple: for example, Judging by the smirking smile Andrew wore Judging by Andrew's smirk...
Technicalities:
He pressed PLAY on the stereo remote and sat motionless at his desk for a few moments, closing his eyes and listening as the sonorous notes of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No. 13 danced around him. There is never a good reason for capitalising whole words, but this is a very bad one. This sentence has lost its way. It can be corrected by changing "danced" to "dancing".
Scanning the myriad occupants. This is the second appearance for "myriad" in this story and neither of them are appropriate. It means uncountable or infinite. The books on a shelf and the stacks of books on the floor are not infinite. Hyperbole of this nature trivializes the narrative.
...aghast to think of the resulting consequences This is an example of tautology: "result" and "consequence" are very close in meaning. Use only one.
I hope you find some of these observations helpful.
Best wishes
Mavis Moog |
|