This review is by way of an apology for the short review I gave you for another story. I hope you find it useful.
Positives:
The characters of Brad and Ellie are full and well-rounded in your imagination. I get the feeling you really know these people, and while reading this story I began to know them a little too.
The idea of two people with different priorities trying to make a successful couple is a good one. This is a story worth telling.
I'm not certain what the theme of the story is, but I suspect it's about optimism and beginnings. I didn't quite identify with the optimism at the end, because I think the odds were stacked against success for Brad and Ellie, but I hoped.
Negatives:
You need to have a story question or conflict near the beginning, which the story proceeds to unravel and solve. This is the format for a short story. You may think I'm being rigid and unfair, but all, even experimental, very outre stories, follow this broad (and it is very broad) formula. If they didn't you would not want to read them.
The story is too wordy. For instance, in the third paragraph you use 122 words describing Brad buying a watch for Ellie, and placing it under the tree. All that explanation is not necessary and not interesting. If we cared about Brad and Ellie, at this stage of the story, we might be more inclined to read long passages like this, but actually you need to build the characters, and introduce a conflict (story question) to keep the reader hooked.
Suggestions:
Regarding wordiness: The problem is actually more one of telling rather than showing. Here's an example re-write from the fourth paragraph. Your words in pink, my suggested edit in blue:
On Christmas morning, he insisted she open her gift first. He anxiously awaited the moment when she opened the box. These two sentences can be contracted to one and describe the moment as it would appear to an observer, which is what a third person narrator is:
On Christmas morning, he watched her quick fingers fumble with the tape and bows around the box. You will probably notice I haven't stuck exactly to your meaning, but do you agree that the idea is implied effectively and more concisely?
I must reiterate, this is only an example, to give you a practical idea of what I'm talking about. I am not suggesting you use my edits verbatim. Use them as inspiration to set about solving the faults I'm high-lighting.
Here's another example: How disappointed he was when she failed to express the sort of elation he had expected. How could she not be pleased? This is telling not showing, and could be omitted or replaced with a shorter, action sentence.
When she finally opened it, and saw the watch, her face remained impassive. The next sentence, about her closing the box, and giving him his present is fine. Then look at the last sentence of this paragraph, it's back to telling.
Instinctively his face reddened and he felt a sense of rejection, for the watch and for him.
His face reddened and he tried to hide it by scrutinising the parcel in his lap, or something like that. Let the reader feel his sense of rejection through his behaviour. You should strive to show the thoughts and feelings by describing the characters actions and reactions, not their inner world; unless it's a first person monologue.
What I'm trying to demonstrate, is how to show rather than tell. It is a difficult technique but it marks the difference between a novice writer and one with professional skill; so you must master it, if you're serious about writing.
Technicalities:
Your sentence structure, grammar and spelling is accurate. I spotted only one word I could quibble with:
Whiter, glitterier, more exquisite - awkward word choice. The comparative is, more glittery.
I hope you find some of these observations helpful.
Best wishes
Mavis Moog |
|