![]() |
This is my blog which I intend to use for the new group that I am joining |
|
I November 2012, I decided that I would like to join a blogging community on WDC. It basically required that we write blog entries according to specific prompts. Here is the result Edit: the stuff from 2012 is still there, but i have a new use for this blog, namely my thoughts on old pulps. . . |
"Night Talk" is a very short story penned by an obscure fellow named Charles Fritch. William Atheling {James Blish} specualated that Fritch was a pen name for Ray Bradbury. It seems that he was wrong about this. Fritch was a real person, but Wikipedia has very little to say about him. Anyway, the story is what we might call a short-short and Atheling suggests that it was bought mainly to fill some space in the September 1952 isasue of Startling Stories. It's actually a sort of Christmas story about a time when Earth has become overcrowded and people have begun immigrating to Mars en masse to the point where there's no room in th hotels. An unnamed traveler meets an unnamed hotel owner. The owner is guilty because he recently turned away a preganant couple and they ended up giving birth in a barn. Can you guess where this is going? Atheling faulted the story for giving us almost no information about the two characters. I don't know. I think it kind of worked with all the characters being a little bit mysterious. Atheling also suggested that critics would be too kind to the story simply because it's short. He then declares that brevity is not an excuse for being bad. I can sort of see his point, but I can also see the other side. This story is an enjoyable read because it can be quietly aborbed in a few moments' time. Atheling's next target was the August 1952 issue of Astounding which he states contains a very good piece called "Cold Awakening" and a very bad piece called "The face of the Enemy".Reviews of both are forthcoming. |
| Welcome. I have a new blogging topic. I just recently discovered a wonderful old book called The Issue at Hand by William Atheling Jr. with an introduction by James Blish. Now, in the very introduction, we learn a little secret. You see, William Atheling Jr. doesn't exist and was just a pen name used by James Blish when he wrote a column criticizing magazine science fiction at the time. The book is a collection of those columns and Atheling was a truly no-holds-barred kind of critic. He showed mercy to no author--not even James Blish. Anyway, one thing about reading this book is that it makes you want to read the stories which Atheling so harshly criticized. And in this digital age, that is not too difficult.Most of the magazines are available somewhere on the Internet. So why not do just that? I am going to begin reading my way through the book pausing to seek out and read the stories in question. I will offer up my own two cents here. The first story Atheling attacked is a story called Night Talk by Charles Fritch first published in the September 1952 issue of Startling Stories. Tune in tomorrow for my review of that story. |
First, an announcement. I have just won a contest here at WDC.
Okay, now to the prompt. They are asking what one word I would like to strike from the language. Honestly, I can't think of one word in particular, although I can think of some phrases that I would like to get rid of. The big one that makes me laugh is "not unlike". It's redundant. In fact, all "not un-" anything is redundant. "Not unkind" means kind. "Not unfamiliar" means familiar, but "not unlike" seems to be particularly pernicious. Perhaps, it's because people feel the need to avoid the word, "like". Like is kind of a tricky word, because it means identical. Since very few things in this universe are identical using "like" too often can mark you as the sort of shallow person who doesn't notice subtle differences. Somehow people feel that by adding two syllables to the expression they are leaving the door open for there to be some differences between the things compared. They aren't. The definition of "not unlike" is actually exactly like the definition of "like". Maybe these people should consider saying "similar to". The definition of "similar to" is similar to the definition of "like", but the latter means identical while the former implies that the things compared are different in some way. Oh well. End of rant. Don't forget to check out the story. |