*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/scottiegaz/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/11
Review Requests: OFF
890 Public Reviews Given
961 Total Reviews Given
Public Reviews
Previous ... 7 8 9 10 -11- 12 13 14 ... Next
251
251
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.0)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – Correctly labeled as an essay

*Bullet*Spacing. – double-spaced for easier on-screen reading

*Bullet*Punctuation.

After reading the latest account I began to think about my own schooling. comma after ‘account’

energy; colon instead of semicolon

rut- space after ‘rut’

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors that I found

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I found


Intermediate Structure – 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction.

Ironically, it was inside one of the most regulated institutions in the country and, still, there I was, between the cracks. This is a little awkwardly phrased, and requires a second reading to understand completely.

During high school I regularly failed my classes only to pass by acing the exams. Also awkward; if you passed the class, you didn’t fail it. Perhaps your received faily grades and passed the class only by…?

where they couldn’t reach awkward; who are “they”?

over 100 students languages I don’t even speak Awkward; on first read, the ‘students’ seems like an adjective

I just wanted to bring out the point that it's not so bad between the cracks which is a good thing since no government can prevent anyone from falling there. Run-on sentence



*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – Your paragraphs were well constructed. Each paragraph made and developed a point.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – For the most part, you transited neatly from point to point in your essay. Each step was linked to the next one; each was well-developed. One thing:

When I registered for my summer school classes after my senior year Awkward because it repeats information from the previous paragraph

Content - 8 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Theme Strength.

Indeed, it shouldn't. I’m not so sure I agree that “falling between the cracks” is a good thing, though you seem to have weathered it well. To me, your essay seemed to change themes. You seemed to start with a “I wasn’t homeschooled but I was between the cracks and no one could help” point to a “it’s nice down here in between the cracks”. Perhaps consider changing your introduction somewhat to make the point that “despite falling between the cracks, I made it okay”, which seems to be your thrust.

Either way, you made a good case in point, but you leave me wonder about those who fail through due to abuse, drugs, etc. Should they be allowed to fall through the cracks too? I’d like to see even a brief nod in some direction – leave ‘em alone or some need help – in your essay, as that is a major point (especially since you reference your friends who fell through for other, nonboredom issues).

*Bullet*Language. – Your language is clear and unconfusing. You are straightforward and clear.

*Bullet*Reaction. – I enjoyed reading this piece but, as I said, you left me wondering about the “others” who fell through. Overall, however, you did a good job of convincing me that life in the cracks wasn’t so bad.

Flow – 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – You have a few awkward sentences that disrupt the flow but overall you move smoothly within your sentences.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – There are a few rough transitions within each paragraph but overall your piece flowed smoothly.

*Bullet*Progression. – You did a good job in moving from one paragraph to the next. I enjoyed reading!


Overall: This was an interesting piece, and quite enjoyable to read. You make a point that I have rarely, if ever, seen, that life is okay between the cracks and we shouldn’t worry so much.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - I would firm up your introduction a bit more so your theme is clear from the start.

Suggestion #2 – Clarify a bit more – even with a nodding, one sentence referal – how you feel about those who suicidally “leap” through the cracks (drugs, abuse, etc).

Suggestion #1 – Watch out for awkward sentences; you don’t have many but they make it harder to get through the peice


Star Total: 20.5/25
Averaged: 4.1
Rounded: 4.0

Write on!
SG
252
252
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.0)
This is an interesting 55 word story. You convey a lot in that time period, which I can especially ID with as a "risk" player. However, I'm not sure her response fits in with the rest of the story.

On technical aspects: no spelling, dialogue, punctuation, or grammatical errors that I saw.

Great story!
SG

253
253
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.5)
<Gasp> I have to say I'm shocked at the results of this poll! However, it's a cute poll and fun to take. The only problem is that there were several that were favorites of mine, and I'm not sure whether you meant it was "a favorite" or "my most favorite"; if it's "most favorite" I'm afraid I answered wrong, but if it was just A fav, it's hard to pick just one.
254
254
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (3.0)
I suggest considering double-spacing; it makes it easier to read on-screen. However, you are indenting, which makes it a little easier.

You have a number of errors, most specifically awkward sentences. You tend to repeat yourself and your sentences wind around.

Every year during the summer when I was little we had lots we used to do, a lot of which we don’t do anymore This is a little awkward and slightly repetitive. You may want to consider clearing it up somewhat.

Mostly because doing those things to me is not as much fun as it used to be because lots of it I did with my grandma. This is a fragment (not a full-sentence), and a bit awkward in the wording. You repeat 'because'

My grandma was what you might call the type to love getting out and looking around either outside in her yard or watching her grandchildren grow up. This doesn't function well as a paragraph; consider merging it with the next one. You need a comma after 'around'; I'd like to see some more details, as well.

But one week a year or so we would set aside some time and go to the fair. Fragment

She was as bad about that as I am about being in a store and just looking. This is awkward and doesn't quite fit with the rest of the paragraph

my grandma would walk every inch of the craft display and walk everyone’s feet off. Repetition

I think in a lot of ways she had to be thinking about the ways the older generations had to live before there were cars. Awkward; repetition

every year when we went to the fair with the exhibits that were set up there was an old log cabin set up where there were handmade quilts set up in it Repetition. Also, the structure of the sentence itself is awkward. Perhaps more like Every year, we visited an old log cabin with handmade quilts set up inside.

Now me as young as I was I respected the old ways of life but I was not too fond of that cabin because I am terrified of old cabins or barns and never understood why. This sentence as a whole is awkward. The first part, Now me as young as I was I respected the old ways of life alone is awkward, and the second part does not really refer to the first, making the sentence as a whole disjointed.

God love poor grandma and her love for the old ways but the biggest thing that was a sure bet you could count on was that every year grandma would have a ball and her having a good time for the time we had left with her is what we made sure she had, and what warmed all our hearts the most. This is a very long, convoluted sentence. It is difficult to follow and would be best served by being broken up.

Overall, this was an interesting piece. It would be better served, however, by a little tightening. The entire piece seems to be about the fair, and even more specifically, the visit to the log cabin. Perhaps develop that a little more. Why did your grandma like them so much? How could you tell she liked them, since she seemed to love everything about the fair? What made that special? What made it special to you? Draw a little more on your experiance and how you overcame your fears of the cabin to go inside despite the terror you had.

This is a lovely tribute, and with a little finessing, could be even more heart-warming.

Keep writing!
SG
255
255
Review of Dreaming  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
What an interesting story. I’ll never dream the same way again! See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars
This piece was correctly labeled as a short story; indented to show paragraph changes; no spelling, grammar, or dialogue errors that I found. Only one punctuation error that I found: long, metal benches No comma needed.

Intermediate Structure – 5 of 5 stars
And as he lay on the cold tile, blood from his face channeling in squares through the grout, pain radiating out in alternately burning and numbing waves from his hyperextended tendons, his breath combusting within his lungs – as he lay there, he finally saw it. This is good. Ordinarily, I would call this sentence too long; the reader is apt to get lost in a three-line sentence. However, you kindly repeat the beginning (‘as he lay there’), which helps us stay on-track.

Otherwise, your sentences were clear and crisp. I found no run-on sentences, fragments, or other forms of awkwardness. Your paragraphs stayed on-target throughout, no random sentences to break them up. The piece progressed logically through the beating. You showed the bullies growing rage, James’ desire to dream (I wondered why he made absolutely no move to defend himself and didn’t even seem to be dodging the blows), and the frightening results. You truly are a master storyteller.

Content - 9 of 10 stars
This was a great plot. You take the beating to the next level, and you give us clues (with James’ frequent desire to dream) as to the ending, so we are not totally taken by surprise. Your characters were slightly rounded – due to the length of the story, you didn’t give us much time to get to know them. However, you avoided cliches; you gave them each a touch of detail to make them realistic. For instance, I loved when Kevin said My Uncle Danny was in a coma for a couple days and when he woke up he An absolutely realistic digression, this shows us how nervous he was. James himself was also given the detail needed to make him more than a flat, all-powerful victim, when you note he was unable to bring himself to spit it out.. You show fantastic use of language. First, I love your imagery. Splotches of crimson shone brightly against the pale green of the locker room floor That is a perfect scene. I also love the imagery present in what Nathan and Kevin see. It perfectly portrays what is going on and also gives us an insight into each of their minds. For instance, Robbie’s vision Robbie…saw trouble shows us his lack of imagination and heightened sense of self-preservation. Finally, I love the way you use language, in and of itself. he knew without a doubt that he was finally dreaming And with this you give the title and the hope of dreaming – which you set us up to believe merely meant “hoping this wasn’t real” – a completely different definition. Very nice. You also change the language in this section, making it more dreamlike and surreal and further distinguishing the difference between, er, dreams and reality. My overall reaction to this piece was delight; you do such a vivid job of capturing each person. Because it was so short and we didn’t get to know the characters, I didn’t feel the degree of empathy I have felt with some of your others; however, I did of course feel sorry for James in his situation and was glad that he was able to strike back in some way. Again, this was another Stephen King/Dean Koontz-like piece. Bravo!

Flow - 4 of 5 stars
Your sentences are smooth and clear; they flow easily and we don’t break out of the reverie that you are creating. Your paragraphs fit well together and each sentence within them transits nicely. You also manage clean transitions from one paragraph to the next. There is only one thing that bothers me with the flow of this piece. It was at that precise moment that Robbie ceased to care about James’s towel At this moment, you switch into telling the story from Robbie’s PoV. That’s a little confusing, especially with Jamie still concious. Particularly with a line like this He took a step towards him, your narrational shift is even more confusing.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - N/A

Suggestion #2 – N/A

Suggestion #1 – I would try to find another way to write the few sentences where Robbie takes over the PoV. I know you switch later, while James is passed out, but that’s more understandable and less confusing, with the break.

Overall: This was another well-written piece. You have an excellent grasp of language and do a great job painting your pictures and bringing them to life. Bravo!

Star Total: 22.5/25
Averaged: 4.5/5
Rounded: 4.5

Write on!
SG

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
256
256
Review of A Winter's Day  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: ASR | (4.5)
This is another great piece. The primary action is at the beginning, but you move us fairly easily through the secondary action and still keep us riveted to the story. See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 5 of 5 stars
         This is correctly labeled as a short story and each sentence (except the first) is indented to help us with paragraph breaks. There are no spelling, grammatical, punctuation or dialogue errors that I saw.


Intermediate Structure – 4 of 5 stars
         Your sentences are well put-together. There are no fragments, run-ons, or awkward statements. Your paragraphs all mesh perfectly. Each sentence within builds off the one before, and moves the piece along. There are a couple of points of inconsistancy and confusion, however. The boys are sneaking behind the small band of armed men, but right before that you noted that The soldiers would come soon. They would have heard the explosion. They hadn’t been far away. This leaves me confused as to which soldiers were coming; I assumed they were sneaking around the “bad” guys but in reality they were not. You also repeat yourself at one point. One soldier had seen them. Mark had been intent on avoiding dry twigs and ice-hardened leaves, but Roy had seen the soldier. This seems a little awkward. Your story progresses logically; I like the way you don’t allow Roy to fully realize what is going on. I do have to wonder why the soldier who saw the boys didn’t gesture them away or something of that nature; he at least should know better.

Content – 7.5 of 10 stars
         You build tremendously off the boys finding the land mine, but I am left with a few questions, small details that don’t seem to make sense. For instance, I wonder why the boys are in that area. You tell us Mark had wanted to sneak, like secret agents, behind the small band of armed men clustered around the barrel for warmth. I need a little more info on why Roy, who is 11 and should know better, would give in to his younger brother (info on how old Mark is would help, as well). In terms of character development, you paint Roy as a concerned older brother; this, too, is one reason I have trouble with him bringing his baby bro to the battle front. It just seems minorly inconsistant. I like your language choice; you do a great job portraying this as told from a child’s point of view. You have some great imagery; I enjoyed just a steel-grey blanket from horizon to horizon, which well-fit the mood and the events occuring. I also like how the boot-shaped clump of dirt is never defined for certain as being a boot, though in all probability it is. It leaves us a little uncertain and keeps Roy from fully knowing the truth; we couldn’t know unless he did. This was an impressive story, well-told, and while part of me wanted Roy to figure out what happen and rail at him, I also hoped he wouldn’t realize it for just a little longer, so he wouldn’t have to come to terms with it. You did a great job of portaying him as basically in shock; surely he knows (else he wouldn’t have left) but he hasn’t admitted it. That’s a realistic portayal and quite impressive.

         One minor inconsistancy: Roy doesn’t think he’ll speak the soldier’s language, yet the soldier speaks his. This seems like something Roy was not expecting, and I would think there would be a reaction of surprise.

         I do have another word to say about your brief intro, however (the public one). I noted in your last story that your intro was bland though the story was fantastic; that is the case here, too. Your intros fail to convey the depth of talent shown in your stories; indeed, they don’t particularly draw me in. If I were scanning a page for something to read (instead of launching an attack on your port), I would most likely pass them by, equating a bland intro with bland writing (not always the case, but with so much on-line…). Glancing at your port, I see the rest of your intros are similar, disguising what I am already pretty sure is some fantastic writing.

         You have powerful opening sentences in your pieces – think of your intro as having the same importance as your opening sentence, possibly more because we can always make a recover on the second or third sentence if we have a patient reader, BUT we have to get them to open the port first. See if you can get your intro to convey the same power that your stories do; you will most likely receive more R&Rs for the effort.

Flow - 5 of 5 stars
         This piece flowed smoothly from sentence to sentence, paragraph to paragraph, throughout the story. The details about the hill (to them it had been Kilimanjaro) are a little startling after the explosion, but then I realized Roy was remembering while being flung backwards – again, believable. Great work.

Overall: Another great, realistic piece with plenty of detail and realism. I like the way you humanize the soldier and bring him to life. I love the way your paint Roy’s shock and keep him from fully realizing what has happened.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - N/A

Suggestion #2 – A few more details, particularly on why someone Roy’s age would bring his little brother to the front; Mark’s age (even vaugely painted; is he six? Is he nine?) would be helpful

Suggestion #1 – Strengthen your intro sentence; very important!


Star Total: 21.5/25
Averaged: 4.3
Rounded: 4.5

Write on!
SG
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
257
257
Review of All That Matters  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (3.0)
This is a very interesting story about an unlikely friendship. See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – This is correctly labeled as a short story

*Bullet*Spacing. – Double-spaced between paragraphs for easier on-screen reading

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue tag errors that I saw

*Bullet*Punctuation. As I grew older I found myself thinking of dear old Mabel. comma after ‘older’

a recipe for her apple pie, some apple seeds and a letter comma after ‘seeds’

Yours Lovingly comma after ‘Lovingly’

*Bullet*Spelling. once glorious hyphenate

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I saw


Intermediate Structure – 3 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. – You have a couple of sentences that are awkward and unweildy. Your two most common mistakes are to repeat yourselves and to use run-on sentences. I have tried to point these errors out to you.

She was a nice old lady with a lot of spunk, for her age. The last part is a little awkward; I would consider removing the comma and possibly even with a lot of spunk for someone her age

I cried for days but left it at that. This is awkward and abrupt. Her close friend of many years died, and so she cried, but the “left it at that” is just sort of an brusque conclusion to the crying.

Like mine was because of you. This is a fragment, consider merging with the sentence before it

You occasionally repeat yourself.
She was also unable to cook the apple pie so, I took on the task of cooking the pie

She would sit at the table watching and helping me. After a few tries and always under her watchful gaze, my pies were almost as good as Mabel’s famous apple pie.


You have a couple of run-on sentences.
Mabel's face would light up as I walked through the creaky old gate, the twinkle in her eyes would almost come back. perhaps join with an and

One day, a few months before my eleventh birthday, I came home from school, my mother sat me down and told me I couldn’t go around to Mabel's house anymore.

She told me Mabel had rheumatoid arthritis and was in a lot of pain, her condition worsened as she grew weaker and then her heart gave out.

I have enclosed my recipe for apple pie, which we used quite often, some apple seeds for you to plant if you wish I would insert ‘and’ before ‘some’

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – For the most part, your paragraphs are well put-together and concise. However, there are a couple of paragraphs that could use some improvement.

My next-door neighbour, Mabel, started getting sick when I was quite young. This is your introductory sentence, and it does a good job of encouraging me to read the piece. However, the rest of the paragraph doesn’t fit with it; you go on to describe Mabel, rather than her sickness, something that might be suited for the second paragraph. Or, you might consider adding a sentence to the effect of Things changed a lot when she was sick (not standalone, too awkward), or merging that with the first; My next door neighbor, Mable, changed a great deal when she got sick. Then when you begin describing her, add a Before her illness, she… clause.

You contradict yourself. I would still go over to Mabel’s house to pick the apples as I grew older, but after a while Mabel was no longer able to take the long walk down to the trees. She was also unable to cook the apple pie so, I took on the task of cooking the pie and picking the apples. It is unclear whether you frist started picking and then LATER started baking, or if you did it all at once.

When I turned eighteen my mother handed me an envelope. She told me Mabel asked her to give it to me on my eighteenth birthday. You repeat yourself here. I would possibly try merging the two of these

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – The story progresses logically through Mabel’s incapacitation and death. I have to wonder how old Rose was when Mabel got sick (ie how long did she know her before her sickness). You base a great deal around birthdays: We even made a special one for my tenth birthday, a few months before my eleventh birthday, on my eighteenth birthday You do manage one imprecise “when I was fourteen”. The occurance of significant events around her birthday is unlikely and sort of odd. It’s also not really necessary; if you point out how old she was when Mabel got sick and then when Mabel died, we get a generalized idea of the progression of the illness.


Content - 5 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – You have a nice, sentimental plot – a girl helping her neighbor through the last days of her life and being a true friend – but it needs more to draw us in. Your telling, while logical and linear, is sort of like following a time-line. We see little feeling in the narrator’s heart, something different from the outward emotions she displays. For instance, in addition to crying, I’d like to see if she carried sorrow with her, though of Mabel often, etc. Did she sniff a little whenever she saw an apple blossom or a piece of pie? How did she feel? Make us feel the same way.
Your conclusion also leaves us a little wanting. Mabel’s letter, while very kind, was nothing she couldn’t have said while she was alive. Nor do I understand why she wanted to wait until Rose was 18. Such a request builds tension, but the actual letter – a very nice “thank you” note – leaves us a little flat. Even if you end with the character’s realization that she … what? Has learned? Will plant the apple trees in her yard and share the recipe with neighborhood children? Would rather be hanging out with an old lady than her college-bound buddies? What was her reaction to the letter?

*Bullet*Character definition. – Your characters are a little stilted. The narrator specifically shows little actual emotion, particularly for someone telling the story. We see the results of the emotion – tears, etc – but we don’t get much of the feelings within her heart. How did her life change? Why did she decide to stick with Mabel? Surely it’s not what most ten and eleven year old girls would do (they’re just starting to notice boys, who are usually preferential to eighty-year-old ladies).
Mabel, also, doesn’t get much detail. Short of her hair and eyes, we don’t get to see her much. Why not describe the way her hands lay, crab-like, on the table, or how she winced whenever she tried to hand Rose a spoon or pick up an apple from the ground? Help us to visualize her. Show us her grief – how she was depressed when diagnosed, maybe gave up hope, then found it again through Rose’s visit. In short, show us the things the letter said, and help Rose to grow/change/realize something. Make the characters more alive.

*Bullet*Language. – You use clear, concise, crisp language to convey the scene, but you leave out much in the form of imagery. You have a great number of possibilities – the apple trees, for one, which are quite beautiful in the spring. The making of the pies, either before or after – scents, conversation, feelings. What did Mabel’s kitchen look like? How long of a walk was it to the trees? Help us better visualize the scene and the story – and the characters – will come to life more.

*Bullet*Reaction. – This was a bittersweet tale. I like how you teach the “it’s good to stand by those in need” lesson, but I think you could better illustrate it with more details. Also, as I said, the conclusion leaves us in sort of a lurch, which doesn’t help us when we come away from the story; it could be strengthened somewhat.


Flow – 3.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – There are a number of errors in your sentences which break up the flow and keep the reader form truly becoming part of the tale (see the ‘Intermediate Structure’ section for more details).

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – For the most part, the sentences in your paragraphs work well together. You don’t jump from one subject to the next within a paragraph; you stay on-topic.

*Bullet*Progression. – Your progression through the story is a bit jerky. You jump from one era to the next, with little in the form of transition. Taking out the birthday references will help to make something of a difference in the leaping, and will actually smooth your story out somewhat.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - Watch out for awkward sentences, especially those with repetition and run-on sentences.

Suggestion #2 – Take out the sharply defined birthday notations, which break the story into fragments.

Suggestion #1 – Include more details. Help us to come to know the characters, so that we will relate to and empathize with them.

Overall: This is an interesting story with a great moral. I like the way Rose stuck by Mabel and helped her out in her time of need. You did a great job avoiding most spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, which is terrific.


Star Total: 16.0/25
Averaged: 3.2/5
Rounded: 3.0

Write on!
SG

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
258
258
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.0)
An interesting story. See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure - 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – This is correctly labeled as a short story

*Bullet*Spacing. – Double-spaced between paragraphs for easier on-screen reading

*Bullet*Dialogue. – You don’t have any dialogue, so no dialogue tag errors

*Bullet*Punctuation. stepmothers perfume Possesive; stepmothers

friends were in there too comma after ‘there’

I looked straight ahead; keeping my eyes fixed on my house comma instead of semicolon

In my mother’s arms I felt safe again. Consider placing a comma after ‘arms’

*Bullet*Spelling. They took of running took off

My Aunt lowercase ‘aunt’, since you are possessing her instead of it being her name; you do it again later

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I saw


Intermediate Structure – 3.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. – You have two sentences that seemed awkward, but overall, they are fairly well put-together.

my stepmother stepped This combo is a little awkward

Before I could stop my self I began sobbing. I would either consider rotating this sentence (I began sobbing before..) or adding a comma after ‘self’

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – You have several instances where you repeat yourself within a paragraph. This is awkward and jars the reader.

. I was by myself in a large backyard that was almost totally unfamiliar. Big grey clouds rolled across the sky, blocking out almost all of the sun. In the large backyard and under the enormous sky I felt small. Repetition. I would reconstruct the first ‘large backyard’

This paragraph has a number of repeated phrases. The sun went behind a cloud, taking away what light was left. I got up and ran toward the side gate. The steel gate was broken. It hung slightly askew. There was a small gap at the bottom. The gap was just big enough for me to squeeze through. The grass was damp on the other side. The sprinkler was on, on the other side of the front yard. The scent of the damp grass smothered my senses, making me feel disorientated. A couple thoughts: There was a small gap at the bottom, just big enough for me to squeeze through. No need for the ‘grass was damp’ sentence; the sprinkler should tell us why the grass is damp. I’m not sure if the steel and the side gate are the same or different; if they are the same, then ran toward the broken side gate, which hung slightly askew (or “hanging slightly askew”).

Repetition. I reached the lane way. The tall wooden fences of the lane way

Repetition. Before I reached the end my mother saw me through her bedroom window. I heard the front door slam and then saw my mother.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – The story progresses logically, from the safety of the tree to the unsafety of the stepmother’s presence and back to safety again with the mother.


Content - 8 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. I could hear muffled laughter. I am uncertain as to whether this is the stepmother laughing cruelly after slamming the door, or the children going about the buisness of the party.

*Bullet*Character definition. – You don’t do a lot of character definition in this piece – the mother and stepmother in particular are both fairly flat and even stereotypical. Even your narrator is vauge: no sex, no age, no name. At first this bothered me – I like details, they help me see – but as I finished and reread the piece, I realized that you have neglected character definition so much that you have made the child an “everyman”, and even put him/her in an “every situation” – wrenched from safety, they return home to their mother for that unconditional love and protection (not that I’m biased as a mother). Even so, there is one problem I have:

The smell revolted me; it was like grass that had been recently cut. This seems oximoronic to me. We have a child who loves to climb trees (hence, tends his/her isolation towards nature) but hates the smell of fresh cut grass. This seems opposite in character to me; perhaps a more opposite-tended scent, such as the smell of car exhaust? *Bigsmile* The nature-good scent is further tightened by her mother’s incense. It was a sweet, flowery scent. I see why you do it, with the later reference to damp grass, but it just seems out of character from what we already know about the narrator.

*Bullet*Language. – I like this image beady, creepy little eyes, though you might want to consider describing exactly what was ‘creepy’ about them (they were always watching you, they seemed filled with malice even when she laughed, etc). I know you go on to describe her in further detail later (and you do a great job), but even a line or a mention would give us a better image of her eyes

Her face twisted in a way that made her look like a rat. I’m torn here; on the one hand, this is a great image; on the other, I wonder exactly how she looked like a rat. You convey a lot of sentiment but I can’t actually see the image; at the same time, I can feel the malice radiating off her. Perhaps more of a look like a rat, her nose scrunched up and her cheeks… I don’t know. I can’t visualize a rat and superimpose it very well, I’m afraid; I’ll leave that to you. I just wanted to give you an idea of how you might do it. *Smile*

the lane way I’ve never heard this expression before; I don’t know if it’s a cultural thing (if so, ignore) or an unintentional awkwardness, but I figured I’d err on the side of caution. *Smile*

You have done such a great job with inserting smell into the story and having it run as a common thread. I would like to see you tighten it a little more in your first reference to scent, here: The smell of eucalyptus floated through the air. Give it a good connotation, something to tell us that it is a positive sense. IE the SWEET smell, the CALMING smell, etc.

*Bullet*Reaction. – This was a very interesting story that is deeper than it appears after an initial reading. You do a great job with it, and your lack of detail, oddly enough, gives it strength. It makes me recall those times when my mother made me feel safe.

Flow – 3.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – Your sentences move smoothly, for the most part, although there are a few that could be combined to improve the flow. On occasion, you pause mid-sentence or stop altogether, which disrupts the rhythm of the piece.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – You have a great deal of repetition in your paragraphs, which breaks up the flow somewhat, making the reader stumble and come out of the image you are building. One other thing I noticed:

I heard the front door slam and then saw my mother. She was running toward me. The division of this breaks the flow; I would see my mother running toward me

*Bullet*Progression. – You progress logically on the journey from safety to danger to safety. You cover the moods quite well, and give a sense of the scenery as it merges with the narrator. There are no major breaks or leaps to confuse the reader.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - Take another look at your first and second smell and see if you can implement them more logically into the story.

Suggestion #2 – Look out for sentences that would be better served by merging, particularly in the case of repetition. This will also improve the flow of the piece.

Suggestion #1 – Watch out for repetition, within a sentence or a paragraph. This tends to trip up the reader and make them say “hey, didn’t I just read that?”

Overall: This was an interesting story/memory to read. I liked the associations with nature and the way that scent figures so prominently in the story; it’s one of the most neglected senses. You also do a great job of conveying the stepmother’s hatred with her facial expression/rat comparison. Best of all was your deliberate vaugery – great job!

Star Total: 19.0/25
Averaged: 3.8
Rounded: 4.0

Write on!
SG

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
259
259
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.5)
This was quite an interesting piece, and while I didn't actually write a poem *Blush*, I can easily see the point you are making. I like your notation to double check on avoiding state-of-being verbs. One thing I did not see - and that is probably because this is more to help those who "is" and "good" everything - is the notation that such words (particularly alternatives to "said") can be overused. I was taught - and have been told many times since - that to overuse those synonyms can be equally dangerous. Overall, you do a great job of providing alternatives to the writing reader, and giving a warning in regards to potential flat pieces they may be creating.

One note: this sentence The Tone Vocabulary lists help the writer was somewhat confusing, only because I first took 'lists' as a verb, not a noun. I had to reread it to straighten things out in my mind.

Otherwise, no technical errors, you did a fantastic job of staying on topic, and you are a walking thesaurus!

Thanks again!
SG
260
260
Review of Ghostly Encounter  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item.

*Bullet*Spacing. – I recommend double-spacing between each paragraph; it makes it easier on the reader and makes the breaks clearer.

He heard You forgot to indent this paragraph

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue tag errors

*Bullet*Punctuation. you were dead, would be terrible Comma splice

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors that I found.

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I found


Intermediate Structure – 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. He’d been reading about ghosts and some of the books said they do that. This is a little awkward and the end is unclear; I had to pull back and rethink it.

just cause you didn’t know either “because” or ‘cause

Maybe it was the phantom elm tree’s limbs rubbing together like greedy hands waiting to snatch the life out of him. With the state of frenzy you are working Jason into, and given that we are pretty much inside his mind at the moment, I would consider ending this in an exclamation point

I can see that,” he leaned closer to Jason’s ear I would go ahead and break this into two sentences.

He stepped away from the old man who filled his nose with the stink of the grave A little awkward

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. It began at his toes and moved slowly up his legs the way a shadow steals across the yard with the sinking sun. It made his heart feel like it was wiggling in his chest, the way a worm wiggles on a hook. These are both good images; however, they don’t work well back to back; overcrowded.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – Your story progresses logically. I like your conclusion, with the senile old man, but the ending is a little abrupt and feels a little rushed.


Content - 8 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – This is a great story. You do a terrific job of walking us through the ghost meeting, and keep the reader intrigued all the way through.

*Bullet*Character definition. – Jason was terrifically defined. About the only thing left tos ay was how old Jason was, though I got the impression of the eight-to-ten year range. Otherwise, you created a very vivid, three-dimensional character. The old man, though a lesser character, was also well-filled out. He plays his senility for all it’s worth!

*Bullet*Language. looking like strange and alien beings as they mumbled and plotted. Great image, though you may take it a bit too far when you say They leaned together and muttered.

You have some beautiful images, and once again, you do a terrific job when it comes to description! You create a very spooky mood (or should I say, paint a spooky picture?).

*Bullet*Reaction. – I had to laugh. This is a great story. You did a great job of creeping us out, then gave us a fantastically humerous ending.


Flow - 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – You have a couple of awkward sentences, but overall, the pieces fit together very smoothly. His gaze darted between the shadows, then he remembered his mother’s reassurance when he was much smaller and afraid of the dark. This is something of a run-on sentence and should be a little more broken up.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – Your paragraphs are well fitted together and you move logically through each sentence.

*Bullet*Progression. – The story progresses fairly smoothly for the most part. The ending comes as something of a sudden wrench; as I said, it feels a little rushed.


Overall: This is a great piece. Again, you do a fantastic job with imgarey and mood; you can create quite a scene!

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - I recommend double-spacing your paragraphs. You can check any of my pieces to see what I mean (you don’t have to R&R, I just thought that might be more visual). It makes it easier to read on-screen, and also easier to differentiate between the paragraphs.

Suggestion #2 - You have a couple of awkward sentences that need to be cleaned up, no majorly consistant mistakes. I think the error you made the most was the comma splices, they can be tough to catch. (see, I did that just for you!) *Bigsmile*

Suggestion #1 – I would go back to the ending and smooth it out a little; as I said, it feels slightly rushed.


Star Total: 20.5
Averaged: 4.1
Rounded: 4.0

Great job! Keep writing!

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
261
261
Review of Hold the Pickle  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: 18+ | (4.5)
This is a hysterical story.

Basic Structure - 4.5 of 5 stars
One punctuation error that I found, ***t." said Kyle comma not a period at the end of a dialogue; no other technical errors that I saw. I like the wordplay you have on your title, very humerous.

Intermediate Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars
Your sentences are smooth and, with exception of the one punctuation error, without error. Your paragraphs are all similarly themed; you don't have any transition errors or subject jumps within them. Nor do you have any problems moving between paragaphs. The story progresses logically.

Content - 9 of 10 stars
Your plot is hysterical and very interesting. I like how you move through the story of the pickle, and also the wonderful comparisons (to the roach, etc). Your characters are two well-defined teenagers who are true to type. They are a little stereotypical but I like the little details you've added, like the fact that Kyle is working to pay off the dent he caused. My overall reaction was to just laugh and laugh.

Flow - 4.5 of 5 stars
Your sentences are smooth and flow easily. There are amost no errors to break the pace of the story. Your paragraphs are well-linked and well put-together. Overall, your story moves logically from one point to the next with nothing to make the reader pause or be confused.

Overall: This is a very funny story, with a realistic portrayal of the two teens. I could easily see this happening.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - N/A

Suggestion #2 - N/A

Suggestion #1 - About the only suggestion I have for improvement is to fix that slight technical problem.


Star Total: 22.5
Averaged: 4.5
Rounded: 4.5

Great job! Write on!
SG
(PS Good luck in the "Best of Three" contest!)

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
262
262
Review of Little Bear  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (5.0)
This is one of the best stories I have read on-line in a long, long time; possibly ever.

See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – Correctly titled as a short story

*Bullet*Spacing. – In my opinion, every piece on Writing.com should have double spacing between the paragraphs. Without them, the paragraphs disappear, and make the story nearly impossible to keep straight. Indenting is acceptable, but I will still make note of the double-spacing. (It is also easier on the eyes while reading on the computer)

“You are the sister of the Light.” You need to indent this paragraph

goodbye. The night grew You need to add a line drop here

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No errors with dialogue tags

*Bullet*Punctuation. “Who are you,” I demanded. question mark after ‘you’

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors that I saw

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I saw


Intermediate Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. But I knew this river well. It was the one place I knew I could be entirely alone with my thoughts. The repetition makes this a little awkward.

The level of the river was perfect for canoeing, the water cold, and the sun hot. The second part of your sentence doesn’t seem to merge well with the first; the temperature of the sun and water don’t seem to go with the river level.

Gliding down the river, feeling its power as part of my own, searching for food, fresh water sources, perhaps a new site at which to re-locate. This is a fragment. It works with the former sentence, but when you start with ‘gliding down the river’, I think you are talking about yourself in the present.

Tears arose from some deep place within myself and followed an already well-forged path Beautiful sentence

He pointed to the stars above. “These are the only constants in this world,” I bet he gets distressed when one of the stars burn out, LOL

Anger coursed through my veins like molten lead Another great image.

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – Little Bear calls the narrator Moon daughter but then explains it as So we are as sister and brother Wouldn’t that make her “Moon sister”? I would understand her as ‘moon daughter’ if his name was ‘moon son’

Otherwise, your paragraphs are well-linked and consistant.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. I had gathered wood earlier and soon had a cheery fire blazing. Just on a side note, that’s an invitation. *Bigsmile* Which Little Bear goes on to take. Your story moves logically throughout.


Content - 10 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – You have a good strong intro that snags my attention from the start, though I might suggest merging the two sentences. Your plot is fantastic. You capture the realistic emotions involved and also the imagery. You paint an idealic scene and then disrupt it with the narrator’s conflict – then smooth her conflict out to fit the smoothness of the scenery. I especially love the rapids – the perfect spot for inner turmoil. You do a fantastic job of merging the imagery and the inner conflict.

*Bullet*Character definition. – You do a fantastic job of walking through the turmoil and resolution.

*Bullet*Language.I couldn’t think of another thing I might need, except, maybe, my life back. This is a perfect line. You had me so enraptured with the idyllic beauty of the place that I almost forgot you were there to escape. You are creating the perfect mood here: relaxing but at the same time, you remind us of the problem.

“The Betrayal”. I like the caps here, very realistic

You do the most fantastic job with language I have seen in a very, very long while. Your images are realistic. You paint the most beautiful pictures and bring them to life.

*Bullet*Reaction. – I am highly impressed at your skill. I identify readily with the protagonist, even though I have never gone through this scene. I also like how you walk through the conflict – you don’t take the vengeful point of view, or the “just get over it” stance.


Flow – 4.75 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – Your sentences flow smoothly and cleanly. You have a few minor technical errors that break the flow but otherwise you do a fantastic job.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – Your paragraphs are well-put together. For the most part (the one exception listed below), you transit from point to point quite smoothly, with no disruptive jumps.

I had to get away, to find some peaceful place where I could think things through. Having always been a big proponent of safety, I was aware I shouldn’t canoe alone on a whitewater river. These two seem to have nothing in common. Perhaps a smoother transition between being alone and the river, even a little something about how the river calms you, would help.

*Bullet*Progression. – You progress logically through the story and through the conflict. Your resolution comes cleanly and rationally, and is the perfect ending.


Overall: The best part about this piece is the way you clearly yet unobtrusively link the conflict and emotion to the scenery. You do so and manage not to be either too subtle or too heavy-handed; instead, you find the perfect balance. Your portrayal of the narrator is realistic and her reactions and the steps she takes in healing are believable. Overall, this is a fantastic story. PLEASE let me know once you have cleaned up the technical errors and I will be more than happy to return this with a perfect ‘5’

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 -

Suggestion #2 -

Suggestion #1 – Just the (few) technical problems to be changed; otherwise, my only suggestion is for you to submit this or another one of your pieces; you are quite talented!

*PLEASE* Write On!!


Star Total: 23.75
Averaged: 4.75
Rounded: 5.0

*Note* when I tallied the scores, I realized you were right at 4.75. I usually round down here because I save 5s for the ‘perfects’ but this is so close I’m going to do what I very rarely do and give you a ‘5’. Rest assured that I give these out sparingly and so it was VERY well deserved!
SG

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
263
263
Review of Little Green Men  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.5)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – Correctly labled as fiction, though I might have called it a short story

*Bullet*Spacing. – Double-spaced between paragraphs for easier on-screen reading

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue tag errors that I noticed

*Bullet*Punctuation. – No punctuation errors that I saw

*Bullet*Spelling. standard issue standard-issue

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I saw

Intermediate Structure – 4.5of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. Why you up there anyway?” This doesn’t fit in with the rest of his cultured language; might want to add an ‘are’. The rest of your sentences are perfectly constructed

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – Your paragraphs are all thematically linked, no random or extraneous sentences.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – The story progresses quite logically, well, more or less.


Content - 9 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – Great plot, our alien investigation of Earth. No wonder they haven’t blown us up yet, if all they’ve met are scarecrows and soda machines. Do you think they preferred Coke or Pepsi? LOL You did a great job.

*Bullet*Character definition. – Your aline was well-defined and quite humerous. He could have done with a touch more detail, but since you were classifying this as a children’s story (didn’t notice that until the end) he stood up just fine.

*Bullet*Language.
“Pit-a-pat?” / “Check!” / “Shmek?” / “Check!” The best part is the standard English spoken between the two; of course, we can’t all be lucky enough to have Shmeks and honks. LOL

But don’t chugalug until I get my va-va-voom back here.” ROTFL! This is hysterical! You do a fantastic job!

Your language is exceedingly humorous the entire way through. Great work!


*Bullet*Reaction.
The only real difference between zzippians and humans were the eyes; zzippian eyes jutted out from the tops of their neon-green heads Yeah, those neon-green heads look JUST like ours! *Bigsmile*

To see if I too could do the macarena Why do you persist in making me laugh so my family stares at me like I’m insane? This is hysterical!!!

Flow - 5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – Horrible sentence flow; it disrupted the WHOLE story every time I stopped to laugh! How are you supposed to create a reverie and keep me tuned in when my head is falling on the floor? *Bigsmile* Just kidding, no problems with sentence flow or pace.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – Your paragraphs were all well-linked and transited neatly from one to the next.

*Bullet*Progression. – Your story progressed smoothly, with no logical hangups or abrupt shifts to confuse or disorient the reader.


Overall: Did I mention that, overall, this was laugh-out-loud funny? Not even sure how we both won with this as my competition!!!

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - No other suggestions

Suggestion #2 - Oh, how about a sequel? Or a prequel; I’d love to hear more about the coke machine encounter! (is that an encounter of the carbonated kind?)

Suggestion #1 - The only serious one I can think of is maybe a touch more depth on the main character, but again, as a children’s story, it’s perfect


Star Total: 23/25
Averaged: 4.6
Rounded: 4.5

Write on!!

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
264
264
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.5)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure - 5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – Correctly labeled as an article

*Bullet*Spacing. – Doublespaced between paragraphs for easier on-screen reading

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue errors

*Bullet*Punctuation. – No punctuation errors

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors


Intermediate Structure – 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction.
Reading a review that's publicly displayed can be a way to discover interesting things to read. Repetition of reading

*Bullet*Paragraph construction.

Reading a review that's publicly displayed can be a way to discover interesting things to read. The review, however, shouldn't become a one-sided argument or include a complete copy of the story, poem, article, or essay being reviewed. Most people don't want a public review to be a hostile attack on a writer or his material. A public review should be informative, helpful, and topical. This paragraph feels like it jumps around a little bit. First you are talking to me as a reader, then as a reviewer. This feels like you are switching horses midstream. Your initial line (the first line of the article) is the one that draws me in, and this one makes it seem that you are addressing READERS of public reviews, not writers.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – The piece progresses logically from paragraph to paragraph. There are no major leaps or sudden change-of-subjects to throw the reader off.

Content – 9 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – The main drive of the article is on what a public review should contain. Initially, I found myself wanting to argue about the point of what a public review IS (on a side note, do you know any good articles that address that point?). However, the more I thought about it, the more I realized that you did, indeed, make your point – what you believe a public review should and shouldn’t contain. My disagreement stems from the fact that I think we are of two minds about the purpose of a PR. However, you did a fantastic job of arguing your point. The only thing I would advise is that you add a line or two about what YOU believe the purpose of the public review is, preferably in the introductory paragraph.This will only strengthen your piece, in my opinion, as well as keeping people from being confused while they are reading.

*Bullet*Character definition. – No characters, but you did a fantastic job of defining your purposes.

*Bullet*Language. – I like the way you use WritingML to emphasize the key points in your article. This catches my attention and makes me pay more attention to those points. You also did a great job of using clear, concise diction to make your point.

*Bullet*Reaction.

A review which starts with the positive points, the good things about the piece, always grabs a reader's attention. Ahh, but since the main recipitent of the review is the author, I prefer to try to conclude with the positive points to leave them feeling uplifted, rather than saving the negative for the end and leaving them possibly feeling dejected or downhearted.

Writing a public review with incorrect grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. needs to be avoided. So should writing a private review, LOL.

As said, overall, I disagree with your points; however, you did make a good argument. Perhaps a piece in conjunction with arguing the reasons FOR a public review, linked to at the bottom?

Flow - 5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – No disruptive sentences; your flow is smooth and clear.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – The sentences in each paragraph are well linked,and you make your point before moving on to the next one.

*Bullet*Progression. – You move smoothly from one paragraph to the next. No awkward transitions or unwieldy changes.


Overall:

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - I recommend considering a link to an article – by you or someone else – regarding the purposes of public reviews. The two would compliment each other nicely.

Suggestion #2 – I suggest expanding a little – a sentence or two – on your thoughts on the purpose(s) of public reviews, whether you link or not.

Suggestion #1 – I would strengthen your opening paragraph somewhat, especially your opening sentence.


Star Total: 23.0
Averaged: 4.6
Rounded: 4.5

Great job! Keep writing!

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
265
265
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (5.0)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure - 5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – This is correctly labeled as an article.

*Bullet*Spacing. – Doublespaced between paragraphs for easy onscreen reading

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue; no tags or problems

*Bullet*Punctuation. – No punctuation errors that I found

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors that I found

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I found



Intermediate Structure – 4.75 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. – Your sentences are well put-together, with no runons or fragments that I detected. Each sentence is easily readable and makes sense.

One thing I noticed: Helping writers improve their craft is the mission of Writing.Com. Honest opinions are what help writers improve. I’m pretty sure you were using the repetition to emphasize your points, but perhaps it could be stated without the repetition. Although it’s sort of a “duh” point, the repetition makes it SOUND redundant, wheras a slight change of phrase – or even are what help writers do this – might make it go down easier (ie sound less like “talking down”).

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – Each paragraph is composed of sentences that are thematically linked. There are no improperly placed sentences

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – Your article was well-outlined and moved smoothly from one section to the next. There were no major logic jumps to disrupt the flow or confuse the reader; you stepped simply from one point to the next

Content – 9.5 of 10 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – Or, in this case, topic strength. You easily addressed the different aspects of reviewing

*Bullet*Character definition. – No characters, but I learn a lot about The StoryMaster from the article! *Bigsmile*

*Bullet*Language.

Reviews should make good use of WritingML. Something that you have obviously done throughout this piece! (I know this isn’t really language, but I don’t really have a WritingML section, LOL). I like the way you bullet your key characteristics; however, I wonder if the color isn’t something of a turnoff because (though you have picked great colors) it does make it harder to read on-screen. I know you are trying to emphasize each point as separate and distinct, but I think you achieved this with the seperation and bulleting. On the other hand, I loved how you bolded the key words in each point. This makes it easier to do a quick “remember” scan to help reviewers recall the key points.

Emoticons can highlight important points Can I make an emoticon suggestion? When I review, sometimes I’ll say something that I realize could be misconstrued; ie I just told someone that they managed to describe the results of a gory accident without all the blood and limbs flying. I <thumbs up> icon would be PERFECT to put at the end of such a statement, since I don’t want them to think I’m saying “Hey, go back and make it gory!”. Anyway, just my two cents, while I’m on the subject, LOL.

six (6) I’m not certain of the reason for the parenthetical six, but it strikes me as unnecessary; however, you may be acting on more information than I have, LOL.

*Bullet*Reaction.

While grammatical, typographical and other errors can be included within a review, don't forget to tell the author how the piece made you feel. This is one that I am almost on the other side of the fence with. I’ve gotten so many “this piece made me feel …. “ with little to back it up; I’ve gotten (or seen) great reviews on an in-progress piece that drive me nuts because the technical aspect was totally avoided. At the same time, I see your point (it’s something I’m struggling to incorporate in my review technique) about how the plot, characters, etc is almost more important; you don’t want to chop down the forest due to a few bad trees. Anyway, I’m ambiguous on this, and would like to have seen a little “but don’t neglect bad grammar!” plug to get folks to stop giving 4.5 and 5s to things riddled with errros. By the same token, I realize that’s not the main gist of this article, and that between you and The StoryMistress you have addressed that same topic. So I guess my reaction here is mixed, LOL.

Overall, my reaction was “nodding my head in agreement”. You make several great points, each of which is properly emphasized. Can you put the ENTIRE “well rounded” paragraph in bold? Just kidding.


Flow –5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – No sentence flow problem. Each sentence was smoothly put together and moved the reader quite easily through the story.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – The only flow problem I saw was the aforementioned repetition, which I recognize was most likely an intentional “for effect” plug. Honestly, on a quick read (pre-read?), I didn’t really catch it, only when I went back through in “super reviewer” mode. So I’m not downcounting you on flow for that one, since the paragraphs all flowed well.

As for the rest – each paragraph transited neatly to the next. The only exception was your bulleted key points, which were supposed to be abrupt transitions; no problem there.

*Bullet*Progression. – The article progressed over the key points you desired to be made known. I liked the bolding of each section, which nicely seperated each one yet kept the piece continuous. Each section grew logically from the one before it.


Overall: This was a great piece, with some fantastic insight into the six key points of reviewing. I like how you also managed to point out the necessity of not only a close read, but also one from a distance (ie focus on plot, characters, scenery, etc)

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - N/A

Suggestion #2 – N/A

Suggestion #1 - About the only suggestion I have for improvement is to remove the color from the sections; they stand alone just fine and it causes a little more eye strain (not to mention encouraging those folks who like to make every line a different color in a regular story, UGH).


Star Total: 24.25
Averaged: 4.85
Rounded: 5.0

Write on!

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
266
266
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.5)
I hope you can forgive me for not using my traditional reviewing form, but overall this piece is pretty clutter-free; no technical (grammatical, spelling, spacing, etc) errors, no spliced sentences or bad verbage choices; it's a polished, solid piece.

You have answered a number of questions and given me some feedback that, as I reviewer, I did not know; for instance, I did not know you could have a public anonymous review (of course, I've just never tried). It was also interesting to learn of the existance of reviewing influence, something I've never heard of before but makes logical sense. It's interesting to think of the ramifications of the reviewers feeding off one another and increasing the influence (though it makes my head spin just considering it).

Overall, this was a clear, informative piece that went on to link me to other informative articles. Thank you for the clarity of your explanation!

SG
267
267
Review of Monster  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure - 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – This item was correctly Ided as a short story, though I’m not certain it fits in the “horror/scary” category; more of a “drama”?

*Bullet*Spacing. – Double spaced between each paragraph for easy on-screen reading

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue errors that I saw

*Bullet*Punctuation.

it was probably a passing drifter, rather than anyone local no comma needed

*Bullet*Spelling.

I am thirty seven years old now. Twenty five years thirty-seven; twenty-five

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I saw



Intermediate Structure – 3.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. – A few awkward points, mostly repetition

Before there had been long blonde hair, blue eyes and healthy skin You need a comma after ‘Before’; otherwise, it sounds like “Before there had been long blonde hair, there was short spiky purple”; ie the long blond hair sounds like the ‘after’ instead of the ‘before’

I think they thought I was like the invisible man underneath, believing like me in a fantasy Two trip-ups here; repetition of think/thought and of ‘like’. I would elimatnate the first like – ‘they thought I was the invisible man underneath’.

. So I was okay, despite the agonising pain A bit awkward; maybe flipflop them . So despite the agonising pain, I was okay

as childish curiosity soon gets in the way You switch to present; I would change this to ‘got’ to stay consistant

The memories are almost too painful for me to recall; anger, humiliation, pain Repetition of painful

the poor boy never did get a good look at his attacker. The police are sure they will catch the attacker Repetition; you could probably fit the word ‘destroyer’ in there quite easily, however.


*Bullet*Paragraph construction.

he and a couple of his friends decided to forcibly remove them I’m not sure this could, by any stretch of the imagination, be called ‘childish curiousity’

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – A few small hitches…

The police are sure they will catch the attacker eventually though, whoever he is. Surely an eight or nine year old boy would at least have been able to notice if the attacker was man or woman, especially if they spoke or the child saw a hand or a brief glimpse (or, for that matter, she has a chest of any size)

All the same, I do wonder if it would have been better if I had left him dead.... This twist totally shocked me, though you built to it logically. Good ending; my only suggestion would be to tighten that sentence somewhat..Sometmes I wonder if ….

Content – 4.75 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – This is a very strong plot. You create a very believable speaker; at first I thought this was a miscast personal essay. I’m hoping, given the ending, that it wasn’t. Your conclusion was entirely unexpected, though logical and not overstated in any way; that is, you give adequate clues (even in the title and brief intro) for us to determine this won’t be a clean healing.

*Bullet*Character definition. – As I said, you did a fantastic job with your character. She is 100% realistic and credible, and you catch her pain quite well. Richie gave me a slight hitch; as I said, forceable removal is by no means “childish curiosity”, but even a simple line about him being the class/school bully would make that a bit more credible. Overall, fantastic job.

*Bullet*Language. – Great language. You provide good imagery, both of exterior and interior scars. Actually, on a quick review, you managed to skip the grotesque oogling of her face that horror folks seem to love (all the blood and gore, the left eye exploding from the socket, etc) and still give us a viable, realistic, horrific image. This is a testament of your superior writing skills/talent!

*Bullet*Reaction. – I spent 99% of the piece feeling sympathetic and hoping she would be able to move on, live a happy life, etc. That last sentence, of course, turned my horror FOR her to my horror OF her. Fantastic job!


Flow – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – There were a few awkward bits and some repetition, but overall, the piece was well put-together and flowed smoothly. (see the section on sentence construction for those errors)

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – Your paragraphs fit together well; I found no sentences that seemed to be misplaced or out of context.

*Bullet*Progression. – The piece progressed logically to the end. Even the final shock at the ending was logical, with plenty of clues to tip of the intuitive.


Overall: This was a very well put-together piece. You were realistic, honest, and emotional; you conveyed pain and, as I said, almost convinced me it was a mislabled essay. Your ending, though startling, was logically reached and reasonable with context clues. Your character was well portrayed and, as stated earlier, perfectly described.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - I would perhaps tighten the final sentence, as it is the last impression you leave your reader with

Suggestion #2 – I still wonder if the attacker, at least, would have been IDed as a woman, if nothing else.

Suggestion #1 – Watch out for repetition, it tends to jar the reader out of the reverie you are trying to create


Star Total: 16.75
Averaged: 4.125
Rounded: 4.0

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only ** Invalid Merit Badge #102615
268
268
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
This is a very well-written piece. There were just a few technical aspects, but the writing was very beautiful.

See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure - 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – This is labeled as a short story, but I think it would be more of an essay.

*Bullet*Spacing. – Double spaced between each paragraph; very interesting

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue so no errors! *Smile*

*Bullet*Punctuation. – You do have several punctuation errors

In our day of computers we call it multi-tasking, just how many things can we take care of all at one time? Semi-colon instead of a comma

be involved in, before No comma needed

get ‘wrapped up” in Inconsistant quotes; you start with single and end with double, here also. ‘if it was easy everyone could do it”

His crew on the other hand is depending ‘on the other hand’ is a clause and should be surrounded with commas

A brief two-to-five minute song, can liven a person’s mood No comma needed

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors found

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical erros



Intermediate Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. – Most of your sentences are very beautifully put together; only one rough one.

As I have come to a reflecting point mentally observing the many different roads I’ve traveled, and remembering such a variety of experiences, I realize the stories must be told or they will be lost forever. This is an awkward sentence; it could also do with some trimming.
Reflecting on the different roads I’ve traveled, and remembering my variety of experiences, I realize the stories must be told or they will be lost forever.
(knocked out a whole ten words, LOL)

As a bird perches in its branches, it may be only for a moment in its journey. The use of ‘its’ is confusing. The first refers to the tree, the second to the bird; and I thought the ‘it’ refered to the bird.

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – There are a couple of spots that you could maybe trim down for wordiness.

I do get ‘wrapped up” in projects and tasks, so many at one time that my oldest son has referred to me as being like a nuclear submarine captain. The captain does not operate the sub all by himself, but rather utilizes his tools at hand and the equipment, and depends on his crew for support to operate his boat and successfully complete a mission. His crew on the other hand is depending on him, the “holder of the hose” from whence cometh that guidance, security and calmness based on his knowledge gained from his life’s experiences of running his boat. They come to him because he is their positive energy. This is one of the paragraphs I would cut down if you are looking for word cutting. See what you can do to trim this down.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – The essay progresses logically from one point t the next.

Content – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – No plot, but theme is strong and well linked.

*Bullet*Character definition. – No characters

*Bullet*Language.on top of the work the WORLD?

*Bullet*Reaction. – Very inspirational; it left me feeling uplifted.


Flow - 5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – The sentences flow together very smoothly; tightly fit. No problem with flow.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – The paragraphs are put together tightly and coherently. No transition problems that I saw.

*Bullet*Progression. – The piece moves logically from one step to the next.


Overall: I didn’t have a lot to say because, quite frankly, there were next to no major errors. This was a very well-put together piece. If you want to cut down, there are a few superflous words that you should watch out for; you tend heavy towards the adjectives and could cut out a few pieces here and there.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 -

Suggestion #2 -

Suggestion #1 - Honestly, the only suggeston I have is to go through and take more careful notes with your punctuation.


Star Total: 18.0
Averaged: 4.5
Rounded: 4.5

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
269
269
Review of Dandelions  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: ASR | (4.5)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – Correctly labeled as a short story, but I’m not sure it works as comedy. It does initially, but then, once the kids disappear, it stops being funny and gets kind of funky/scary.

*Bullet*Spacing. – Double spaced between paragraphs; well done.

*Bullet*Dialogue. – Your dialouge is all well put-together, no errors

*Bullet*Punctuation. – No punctuation errors that I found

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors found

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors found



Intermediate Structure – 4.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction.

towards my trusty old maroon Oldsmobile Repetition of ‘old’

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – The paragraphs were well-put together, no errors, it was logically run.

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story.

The rest of the day is uneventful. At this point, you shift from past tense to present, which is difficult to swallow. The rest of the story in present is distracting.

Content - 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – Very well put-together story, but the end is sort of weak and unexpected.

*Bullet*Character definition. – Your characters were well defined; I could see them clearly. I loved the sense of humor by your men, and Maggie was also quite clear.

*Bullet*Language. – GREAT language!!

borderline-desperate follows They were just dandelions, after all. This is what I inferred from this If they were taking the “it’s just dandelions” theme, then why sound borderline desperate?

I then muse aloud if the latter should actually be pronounced “walri.” She doesn’t find me funny. I do!!!

*Bullet*Reaction. – I spent the first part laughing, but the second half wasn’t comedic (maybe it’s because I’m a woman and a mom?). However, it was a well put-together story, and while I might have wished for a more solution-friendly (at least tell me what it WAS?!) ending, you did a fantastic job with it.


Flow - 5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – No errors or breaks; nothing to disrupt the flow.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – Your paragraphs are seamless, no disruptions.

*Bullet*Progression. – The piece progresses logically from beginning to end, from dandelion to women. Well done!


Overall: This is a fantastic piece, though not the laugh I was hoping for. It was enjoyable and quite intriguing to read, and it left me hanging in the “want a conclusion” category – but that’s not too bad. As I think about it, it has a Steven-Kingish quality, without the crudity and blatant monsters; the ending reminds me of his style (this is meant as a compliment, LOL). You did a terrific job.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 -

Suggestion #2 -

Suggestion #1 – About the only suggestion I can offer is that you change the genre from “comedy” to something more akin to “drama,” “tragedy,”, I’m not sure what else, but something that is more in keeping with the dark underside tone.


Star Total: 17.5
Averaged: 4.375
Rounded: 4.5

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
270
270
Review of Witch Trials  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
See "Invalid Item for more information on my reviewing techniques.

Basic Structure – 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Correct Item. – This is correctly listed as a short story, though I would consider moving from “horror” to “drama”

*Bullet*Spacing. – Doublespaced between paragraphs for easier on-screen reading.

*Bullet*Dialogue. – No dialogue errors that I found

*Bullet*Punctuation.

Our new Governor Phillips, set up a special Court No comma after ‘Phillips’

Those two, innocent and pure little girls, had a gift of pointing out Evil. No comma after ‘two’ or ‘girls’

*Bullet*Spelling. – No spelling errors that I found

*Bullet*Grammar. – No grammatical errors that I found



Intermediate Structure – 4 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence construction. – A few awkward sentences

The Governor Phillips ‘The’ is awkward, unweildy, and unnecessary.

Those two, innocent and pure little girls, had a gift of pointing out Evil. First, they had a gift FOR, not of; second, I’d be interesting in noting how old the ‘little girls’ are; I see one of them was 19, which means of or even PAST marriagable age at the time.

*Bullet*Paragraph construction. – Like sentences were grouped together in paragraphs, with no extraneous or distracting sentences that I found..

*Bullet*Progressiveness of Story. – The story progresses logically from one point to the next. There are no strange or random leaps.

Content – 3.5 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Plot Strength. – You have taken a well-known story and attempted a different take on it. The conclusion is somewhat inevitable, given the times (and the fact that practically everyone was arrested), and so one finds oneself merely waiting for the end.

*Bullet*Character definition. – There is not a lot of definition for the protagonist/speaker; we don’t get much from her except a sense of self-righteousness. I would almost like to hear why someone might suspect her (did someone want her land? Was she rude to Abigail at some point in the past?), and I would like to see some more definition in her. Was she married or single? Old or young? Rich or poor? Make a note that she attended services weekly, that in her daily prayers she prayed for those who were evil or affected, or something that gives us “tangible” evidence of her devotions. I realize you are trying to stay true to the history, but it makes your character somewhat flat. There are some things you could surely find out with a quick internet search, details about her life. I wouldn’t be surprised to find a biography of her or all the Salem Witch Trial victims floating around on-line or in a library.

*Bullet*Language. – You may want to work a bit more on identifying idioms and language useage of the time, to make things more authentic.

My God! My name! I do not believe that in a Puritan community a self-righteous woman would take the Lord’s name in vain.

*Bullet*Reaction. – It was interesting to read, but as the ending was somewhat predictable and I didn’t identify with your character as much as I could have, I didn’t really HAVE much of a reaction to her being accused.


Flow – 3 of 5 stars

*Bullet*Sentence flow. – Several of your sentences are awkward or disjointed, which breaks up the flow and the reading.

two little girls; These girls ‘those’ and ‘these’ sound awkward and trip up the reader, breaking the flow

The girls would give them names, and they would come charging up to the door of the accused. Your use of ‘they’ and ‘them’ is ambiguous and confusing, and could be refering to the girls quite easily (especially ‘they’). More clarification please.

Some of the townspeople had opposed to the trials, they even went so far as to sign petitions This is a runon sentence and should either be split in two, or changed somewhat. For instance, Some of the townspeople had opposed to the trials, even going so far as to sign petitions

They had for some reason believed that some of those convicted were innocent. Awkward.

*Bullet*Paragraph flow. – You contradict yourself at times.

the girls finally confessed who was to blame followed two sentences later by We knew who was to blame Repetition of the phrase ‘who was to blame’; this breaks the flow and disrupts the read

The Lieutenants of the Courts walked through town on a daily basis, searching. The girls would give them names, and they would come charging up to the door of the accused. First they were walking and searching, then they came charging to the door? Which was it?

They had for some reason believed that some of those convicted were innocent. Such was the trickery of the Devil. We did what had to be done. If the accused were not witches, and were in fact innocent, God would spare their souls. First you assert that believing some were innocent was the trickery of the Devil and obviously false; then you go on to say that some COULD be innocent; self-contradictory.

*Bullet*Progression. – The breaking up of the piece is interesting and unique, but I would like to see the quotes having more to do with the sections they break up. This would provide a smoother meshing and less disjointedness (is that a word?), making the story easier to read.


Overall: This was an interesting take on an old story. I like how you have tried to remain true to the facts, but you may want to be careful with that, or else do some more digging so you have more facts to provide more detail and thus more animation.

3 suggestions for improvement:

Suggestion #3 - Be aware of your tendency to misplace commas and keep an eye out for them.

Suggestion #2 – Watch out for your sentence and paragraph flow. You tend at times toward awkwardness, repetition, and contradictions, all of which pull the reader out of the story.

Suggestion #1 - Find out (or take author’s liberty with) more information about the protagonist, at least. Bring her to life so we identify with her; this will make the ending more horrifying to us. At present, her self-righteous attitude almost makes us think she got what she deserved.


Star Total: 14.5
Averaged: 3.625
Rounded: 3.5

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
271
271
Review of Snow Dance  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
And snow once white and beautiful
Is cold now and profane.

Love the contrast here.

As the wind begins to weep Great image!

I love the way this one is put together. Wonderful job!
SG
272
272
Review of Terracing  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.5)
Plant stones to frame the earth,
As earth will frame my bones

What a great double image! I love the contrast, the irony here.

273
273
Review of Unsteady  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
In time's distance
I like the oxymoron of this one. Usually time & distance are two different thing. I do wonder if perhaps you meant "times distant"? but this works well as is, also.

Turned from your purpose,
you turn back again

I love the repetition here, very well placed.

My eyes
grow mute

I love this clash, as well, especially when combined with the 'ballet of fingers' later. Here we are blind, deaf, and dumb. Beautiful.
274
274
Review of Kenning  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: E | (4.0)
the trees
all huddled in their corner,

I like this image.

Good work,
SG
275
275
Review of Leave-Taking  
Review by Scottiegazelle
Rated: ASR | (4.5)
I love the way this one fits together, also. One thing I noticed was the repetition here
the urge to call her back
my only urgent impulse


I like your verbage here:
a habit of humility
or, perhaps, the stain of fear;

Perhaps because I do a lot of eye-diverting.

I like this line(s) too
but she would not have it so,
and I would stay to please her.
326 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 14 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://www.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/scottiegaz/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/11