** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
Review 1 of 3 from your friend wakko71!
TITLE ETC:
The title, description, rating, and chosen genres all fit this piece perfectly.
CONTENT:
I really liked that each line was a complete statement in itself. The breakdown into different portions/stanza/sections really worked very well with your words to drive home different points and allow the reader to sit and reflect between intervals which, to me, gave me an added chance to relate to your words. The flow, however did seem a bit awkward to me. With prose, it's always hard to tell how it should or is meant to be read, but, the first time I read this, I found myself stumbling a few times. I think a quick read-through might help to identify the little "bumps". I think that some may have been caused by a feeling "jumping around" as I read --maybe try to find a way to better link each section together and/or rearrange them??
AFFECT:
I feel the passion behind your words and understand your feelings, however, the first time that I read this, I did feel a kind of detachment. It wasn't until the second reading that I truly found myself relating to your words... I think, though, that it is only due to the "matter-of-fact" way in which this is written; I felt more like I was reading a serious definition/observation than an emotional piece --which very well, judging by the description, may have been your intent.
EFFECT:
The imagery throughout this piece is mainly reader-driven which is great because it brings back memories for the reader, thereby making your words easier to relate to. 
GRAMMAR:
A few grammatical errors were noticed throughout the piece:
[a] emotionally
Due to the word follow "a" starting with a vowel, this should be an...
likeness[,] folks[,]
Since this is being said to folks, there should be a comma before and after folks.
Loneliness[,] I believe[,] is
I believe is added detail here, my dear, so a comma should surround it since it is not critical to the statement and could be removed without any "sense" being lost.
...rescue you from[.]
All other lines are complete thoughts, however, this one is fragmented since there is no mention of what the subject is being rescued from... While it is is implied, the inconsistency caught my attention. 
ET CETERA:
I enjoyed reading this piece, but I really think that it could be better. I think that an edit would truly make this item just blossom into a work of art. You've the idea and the thoughts, I think that's it's really just a matter thinking about the words and the grammar... 
RATING:
I'm giving this a 3.5 because I really feel like a bit more work would make this better... It just wants a few more minutes of attention to blossom into what it could be --and you have it in you, so I don't want to hear about offense over rating! I'm being honest and would really love to come back, read it again, and give this piece the rating that it could have with just a bit more work... I think that you could really make this stronger quite easily!
,
Stephanie Grace
CHECK OUT my friend and Adopt-A-Newbie Rogue♥Sherri  ! Thank you!
|
|